Search
Abstract
Bell's theorem is a conflict of mathematical predictions formulated within an infinite hierarchy of mathematical models. Inequalities formulated at level k ∈ Z are violated by probabilities at level k+1. We are inclined to think that k=0 corresponds to the classical world, while k=1 — to the quantum one. However, as the k=0 inequalities are violated by k=1 probabilities, the same relation holds between k=1 inequalities violated by k=2 probabilities, k=-1 inequalities violated by k=0 probabilities, and so forth. By accepting the logic of the Bell theorem, can we prove by induction that nothing exists?
Citations
-
0
CrossRef
-
0
Web of Science
-
1
Scopus
Cite as
Full text
download paper
downloaded 74 times
- Publication version
- Accepted or Published Version
- DOI:
- Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.12693/APhysPolA.143.S158
- License
-
open in new tab
Keywords
Details
- Category:
- Articles
- Type:
- artykuły w czasopismach
- Published in:
-
ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA A
no. 143,
pages S158 - S170,
ISSN: 0587-4246 - Language:
- English
- Publication year:
- 2023
- Bibliographic description:
- Czachor M.: Contra Bellum: Bell's Theorem as a Confusion of Languages// ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA A -Vol. 143,iss. 6 (2023), s.S158-S170
- DOI:
- Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.12693/aphyspola.143.s158
- Sources of funding:
-
- Free publication
- Verified by:
- Gdańsk University of Technology
seen 156 times