Social Indicators Research - Journal - Bridge of Knowledge

Your account

login

Search

Social Indicators Research

ISSN:

0303-8300

eISSN:

1573-0921

Disciplines
(Field of Science):

  • ethnology and cultural anthropology (Humanities)
  • history (Humanities)
  • culture and religion studies (Humanities)
  • heritage protection and conservation of monuments (Engineering and Technology)
  • health sciences (Medical and Health Sciences )
  • family studies (Family studies)
  • economics and finance (Social studies)
  • security studies (Social studies)
  • management and quality studies (Social studies)
  • sociology (Social studies)
  • international relations (Social studies)

Ministry points: Help

Ministry points - current year
Year Points List
Year 2024 100 Ministry scored journals list 2024
Ministry points - previous years
Year Points List
2024 100 Ministry scored journals list 2024
2023 100 Ministry Scored Journals List
2022 100 Ministry Scored Journals List 2019-2022
2021 100 Ministry Scored Journals List 2019-2022
2020 100 Ministry Scored Journals List 2019-2022
2019 100 Ministry Scored Journals List 2019-2022
2018 40 A
2017 40 A
2016 35 A
2015 35 A
2014 40 A
2013 35 A
2012 30 A
2011 30 A
2010 27 A

Model:

Hybrid - transformation agreement

Points CiteScore:

Points CiteScore - current year
Year Points
Year 2023 6.3
Points CiteScore - previous years
Year Points
2023 6.3
2022 5.9
2021 4.7
2020 3.8
2019 3.5
2018 3
2017 3.1
2016 3.2
2015 2.8
2014 2.2
2013 2.5
2012 2.3
2011 2.1

Impact Factor:

Log in to see the Impact Factor.

Sherpa Romeo:

https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/16633

Papers published in journal

Filters

total: 1

  • Category
  • Year
  • Options

clear Chosen catalog filters disabled

Catalog Journals

Year 2020
  • Quantitative Storytelling in the Making of a Composite Indicator
    Publication

    - Social Indicators Research - Year 2020

    The reasons for and against composite indicators are briefly reviewed, as well as the available theories for their construction. After noting the strong normative dimension of these measures—which ultimately aim to ‘tell a story’, e.g. to promote the social discovery of a particular phenomenon, we inquire whether a less partisan use of a composite indicator can be proposed by allowing more latitude in the framing of its construction....

    Full text available to download

seen 684 times