A Survey on Identifying and Addressing Business Analysis Problems - Publication - MOST Wiedzy


A Survey on Identifying and Addressing Business Analysis Problems


Despite the growing body of knowledge on requirements engineering and business analysis, these areas of software project are still considered problematic. The paper focuses on problems reported by business analysts and on applicability of available business analysis techniques as solutions to such problems. A unified set of techniques was developed on the basis of 3 industrial standards associated with IIBA, REQB and IREB certification schemes. A group of 8 business analysts was surveyed to list problems they encounter in their work and to assess their frequency. Selected problems were further analyzed and most suitable techniques were proposed to address them. These proposals were validated through follow-up discussions with business analysts. The main results of research reported in this paper are: the comparative analysis of techniques included in IIBA, REQB and IREB standards and the list of problems reported by practitioners associated with techniques suggested as effective solutions.


  • 3


  • 3

    Web of Science

  • 4



artykuły w czasopismach recenzowanych i innych wydawnictwach ciągłych
Published in:
Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences no. 42, pages 315 - 337,
ISSN: 0867-6356
Publication year:
Bibliographic description:
Jarzębowicz A., Marciniak P.: A Survey on Identifying and Addressing Business Analysis Problems// Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences. -Vol. 42., nr. 4 (2017), s.315-337
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.1515/fcds-2017-0016
Bibliography: test
  1. Aoyama M., Nakatani T., Saito S., Suzuki M., Fujita K., Nakazaki H., Suzuki R., A model and architecture of REBOK (Requirements Engineering Body of Knowledge) and its evaluation, Proc. of 17th Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference, IEEE, 2010, 50-59. open in new tab
  2. Besrour S., Bin Ab Rahim L., Dominic P., Assessment and evaluation of requirements elicitation techniques using analysis determination requirements framework, In: Proc. of 2014 International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences, 2014, 1-6. open in new tab
  3. A. Jarzębowicz, P. Marciniak open in new tab
  4. Bobkowska A., Wyrzykowski K., A model for the activities of business analysts in public administration for the prevention of hidden requirements (in Polish: Model działania analityka biznesowego w administracji publicznej w celu przeciwdziałania ukrytym wymaganiom), Roczniki Kolegium Analiz Ekonomicznych/Szkoła Główna Handlowa, 42, 2016, 13-26.
  5. Charette R.N., Why software fails, IEEE Spectrum 42, 9, 2005, 42-49. open in new tab
  6. Cheng B., Atlee J., Research directions in requirements engineering, In: Proc. of Future of Software Engineering (FOSE 2007), IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC, 2007, 285-303. open in new tab
  7. Chrabski B., Zmitrowicz K., Requirements engineering in practice (in Polish: Inżynieria wymagań w praktyce), Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw, 2015.
  8. Davey B., Parker K., Requirements elicitation problems: a literature analysis, Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 12, 2015, 71-82. open in new tab
  9. Firesmith D., Common requirements problems, their negative consequences and the industry best practices to help solve them, Journal of Object Technology, 6, 1, 2007, 17-33. open in new tab
  10. IEEE, A Guide to Software Engineering Body of Knowledge 3.0, 2014. open in new tab
  11. IEEE Standard 830-1998, IEEE Recommended Practice for Software Requirements Specifications, 1998. open in new tab
  12. IEEE Standard 1233-1998, IEEE Guide for Developing System Requirements Specifications, 1998. open in new tab
  13. International Institute of Business Analysis, IIBA Annual Report 2015, available: http://www.iiba.org/About-IIBA/About-IIBA/iiba-annual-report-2015.aspx [Accessed 12, October, 2017]. open in new tab
  14. International Requirements Engineering Board, IREB CPRE Advanced Level Elicitation and Consolidation syllabus ver. 1.0, 2012. open in new tab
  15. International Requirements Engineering Board, IREB CPRE Advanced Level Requirements Modeling syllabus ver. 2.2, 2016. open in new tab
  16. International Requirements Engineering Board, IREB CPRE Foundation Level Syllabus ver. 2.2, 2015. open in new tab
  17. International Requirements Engineering Board, IREB CPRE Foundation Level syllabus ver. 2.2.2, 2017. open in new tab
  18. International Requirements Engineering Board, https://www.ireb.org/en/service/statistics [Accessed 12, October, 2017]. open in new tab
  19. International Requirements Engineering Board, IREB® and REQB® have decided to join forces, https://www.ireb.org/en/service/news-events/ (2017/01/18 news) [Accessed 12, October, 2017] open in new tab
  20. ISO/IEC/IEEE Standard 29148-2011, Systems and Software Engineering -Life Cycle Processes -Requirements Engineering, 2011. open in new tab
  21. Jiang L., Eberlein A., Far B., Mousavi M., A methodology for the selection of requirements engineering techniques, Software & Systems Modeling, 7, 3, 2008, 303- 328. open in new tab
  22. Karlsson L., Dahlstedt Å.G., Regnell B., och Dag J.N., Persson A., Requirements engineering challenges in market-driven software development -an interview study with practitioners, Information and Software Technology, 49, 6, 2007, 588-604. open in new tab
  23. Khan H., Asghar I., Ghayyur S., Raza M., An empirical study of software requirements verification and validation techniques along their mitigation strategies, Asian Journal of Computer and Information Systems, 3, 03, 2015.
  24. Kheirkhah E., Deraman A., Important factors in selecting requirements engineering techniques, In: Proc. of International Symposium on Information Technology (ITSim 2008), 2008, 1-5. open in new tab
  25. Liu L., Li T., Peng F., Why requirements engineering fails: A survey report from China, In: Proc. of 18th Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), 2010, 317-322. open in new tab
  26. Maalem S., Zarour N., Challenge of validation in requirements engineering, Journal of Innovation in Digital Ecosystems, 3, 1, 2016, 15-21. open in new tab
  27. Marciniak P., Jarzębowicz A., An industrial survey on business analysis problems and solutions, In: Madeyski L., Śmiałek M., Hnatkowska B., Huzar Z. (eds) Software Engineering: Challenges and Solutions, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 504. Springer International Publishing, 2016, 163-176. open in new tab
  28. Mendez Fernandez D., Wagner S., Kalinowski M., Schekelmann A., Tuzcu A., Conte T., Spinola R., Prikladnicki R., Naming the Pain in Requirements Engineering: Comparing Practices in Brazil and Germany, IEEE Software 32, 5, 2015, 16-23. open in new tab
  29. Project Management Institute, Business Analysis for Practitioners. A Practice Guide, 2015. open in new tab
  30. Requirements Engineering Qualifications Board, REQB CPRE Advanced Level Requirements Manager ver. 1.0, 2011. open in new tab
  31. Requirements Engineering Qualifications Board, REQB CPRE Advanced Level Requirements Manager ver. 2.0, 2015. open in new tab
  32. Requirements Engineering Qualifications Board, REQB CPRE Foundation Level Syllabus ver. 2.1, 2014. open in new tab
  33. Requirements Engineering Qualifications Board, http://reqb.org/index.php/about- reqb/facts-and-figures [Accessed 19, May, 2017]. open in new tab
  34. dos Santos Soares M., Cioquetta D., Analysis of techniques for documenting user requirements, In: Proc. of Computational Science and Its Applications (ICCSA 2012), 2012, 16-28.
  35. Sethia N.K., Pillai A.S., A study on the software requirements elicitation issues -its causes and effects, In: Proc. of World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies, 2013, 245-252.
  36. Solemon B., Sahibuddin S., Ghani A., Requirements engineering problems and practices in software companies: an industrial survey, In: Ślęzak D., Kim, T.H., Kiumi, A., Jiang, T., Verner, J., Abrahão, S. (eds.) Advances in Software Engineering, Communications in Computer and Information Science Vol. 59, Springer Heidelberg, 2009, 70-77. open in new tab
  37. The Standish Group International, Chaos Report 2014, 2014. open in new tab
  38. Vestola M., A comparison of nine basic techniques for requirements prioritization, Helsinki University of Technology, Report, 2010.
  39. Wellsandt S., Hribernik K., Thoben K., Qualitative comparison of requirements elicitation techniques that are used to collect feedback information about product use, In: Proc. of 24th CIRP Design Conference, 2014, 212-217. open in new tab
  40. Wiegers K., Beatty J., Software Requirements (3rd Edition), Microsoft Press, 2013. open in new tab
  41. Yousuf M., Asger M., Comparison of various requirements elicitation techniques, International Journal of Computer Applications, 116, 4, 2015. open in new tab
  42. Zhang Z., Effective requirements development -a comparison of requirements elicitation techniques. In: Software Quality Management XV: Software Quality in the Knowledge Society, British Computer Society, 2007, 225-240.
  43. Żeliński J., Business analysis: organizational modeling in practice (in Polish: Analiza biznesowa: praktyczne modelowanie organizacji), Helion, 2016.
  44. This paper is a revised and extended version of work originally presented at the 18th KKIO Software Engineering Conference, 15-17 September 2016, Wroclaw, Poland Received 31.05.2017, Accepted. 21.09.2017 open in new tab
Verified by:
Gdańsk University of Technology

seen 36 times

Recommended for you

Meta Tags