Keywords

Details

Category:

Articles

Type:

artykuły w czasopismach

Published in:

Sustainability no. 12, pages 1 - 16,
ISSN:

Language:

English

Publication year:

2020

Bibliographic description:

Słupek E., Makoś P.: Absorptive Desulfurization of Model Biogas Stream Using Choline Chloride-Based Deep Eutectic Solvents// Sustainability -Vol. 12,iss. 4 (2020), s.1-16

DOI:

Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.3390/su12041619

Bibliography: test

1. Guo, X.M.; Trably, E.; Latrille, E.; Carrre, H.; Steyer, J.P. Hydrogen production from agricultural waste by dark fermentation: A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 10660-10673. [CrossRef] open in new tab
2. Słupek, E.; Makoś, P.; Kucharska, K.; Gębicki, J. Mesophilic and thermophilic dark fermentation course analysis using sensor matrices and chromatographic techniques. Chem. Pap. 2019, in press. open in new tab
3. Bastidas-Oyanedel, J.R.; Bonk, F.; Thomsen, M.H.; Schmidt, J.E. Dark fermentation biorefinery in the present and future (bio)chemical industry. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2015, 14, 473-498. [CrossRef] open in new tab
4. Persson, M.; Jonsson, O.; Wellinger, A. Biogas Upgrading To Vehicle Fuel Standards and Grid;
5. ISBN IEA Bioenergy Task 37; IEA Bioenergy: London, UK, 2007. open in new tab
6. Andrés, C.; Guardia, A.D.; Couvert, A.; Wolbert, D.; Le, S.; Soutrel, I.; Nunes, G. Odor concentration (OC) prediction based on odor activity values (OAVs) during composting of solid wastes and digestates. Atmos. Environ. 2019, 201, 1-12.
7. Papurello, D.; Soukoulis, C.; Schuhfried, E.; Cappellin, L.; Gasperi, F.; Silvestri, S.; Santarelli, M.; Biasioli, F. Monitoring of volatile compound emissions during dry anaerobic digestion of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste by Proton Transfer Reaction Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 126, 254-265. [CrossRef] [PubMed] open in new tab
8. Salazar Gómez, J.I.; Lohmann, H.; Krassowski, J. Determination of volatile organic compounds from biowaste and co-fermentation biogas plants by single-sorbent adsorption. Chemosphere 2016, 153, 48-57. [CrossRef] open in new tab
9. Boczkaj, G.; Makoś, P.; Fernandes, A.; Przyjazny, A. New procedure for the control of the treatment of industrial effluents to remove volatile organosulfur compounds. J. Sep. Sci. 2016, 39. [CrossRef] open in new tab
10. Makoś, P.; Boczkaj, G. Deep eutectic solvents based highly efficient extractive desulfurization of fuels-Eco-friendly approach. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 111916. [CrossRef] open in new tab
11. Andersson, F.A.T.; Karlsson, A.; Svensson, B.H.; Ejlertsson, J. Occurrence and abatement of volatile sulfur compounds during biogas production. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2004, 54, 855-861. [CrossRef] open in new tab
12. Sarmad, S.; Mikkola, J.-P.; Ji, X. CO 2 capture with Ionic liquids (ILs) and Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs): A new generation of sorbents. ChemSusChem 2016, 10, 324-352. [CrossRef] open in new tab
13. Sevimoglu, O.; Tansel, B. Effect of persistent trace compounds in landfill gas on engine performance during energy recovery: A case study. Waste Manag. 2013, 33, 74-80. [CrossRef] [PubMed] open in new tab
14. Sun, Q.; Li, H.; Yan, J.; Liu, L.; Yu, Z.; Yu, X. Selection of appropriate biogas upgrading technology-a review of biogas cleaning, upgrading and utilisation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 51, 521-532. [CrossRef] open in new tab
15. Allegue, L.B.; Hinge, J. Biogas upgrading Evaluation of methods for H 2 S removal. Dan. Technol. Inst. 2014, 31.
16. Mahmood, Q.; Zheng, P.; Cai, J.; Hayat, Y.; Hassan, M.J.; Wu, D.L.; Hu, B.L. Sources of sulfide in waste streams and current biotechnologies for its removal. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 2007, 8, 1126-1140. [CrossRef] open in new tab
17. Burgess, J.E.; Parsons, S.A.; Stuetz, R.M. Developments in odour control and waste gas treatment biotechnology: A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2001, 19, 35-63. [CrossRef] open in new tab
18. Ryckebosch, E.; Drouillon, M.; Vervaeren, H. Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35, 1633-1645. [CrossRef] open in new tab
19. Nordlander, E.; Holgersson, J.; Thorin, E.; Thomassen, M.; Yan, J. Energy Efficiency Evaluation of two Biogas Plants. Int. Conf. Appl. Energy 2011, 1661-1675.
20. Rossi, F.; Nicolini, A. A cylindrical Small Size Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell: Experimental Investigation on Materials and Improving Performance Solutions. Fuel Cells 2009, 9, 170-177. [CrossRef] open in new tab
21. Rossi, F. A new geometry high performance small power MCFC. J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2004, 1-6. [CrossRef] open in new tab
22. Tippayawong, N.; Thanompongchart, P. Biogas quality upgrade by simultaneous removal of CO 2 and H 2 S in a packed column reactor. Energy 2010, 35, 4531-4535. [CrossRef] open in new tab
23. Noorain, R.; Kindaichi, T.; Ozaki, N.; Aoi, Y.; Ohashi, A. Biogas purification performance of new water scrubber packed with sponge carriers. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 214, 103-111. [CrossRef] open in new tab
24. Farooq, M.; Chaudhry, I.A.; Hussain, S.; Ramzan, N.; Ahmed, M. Biogas Up Gradation for Power Generation Applications in Pakistan. J. Qual. Technol. Manag. Vol. Viiiissue Ii 2012, VIII, 107-118.
25. Wilk, A.; Więcław-Solny, L.; Tatarczuk, A.; Krótki, A.; Spietz, T.; Chwoła, T. Solvent selection for CO 2 capture from gases with high carbon dioxide concentration. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 34, 2275-2283. [CrossRef] open in new tab
26. Xu, H.J.; Zhang, C.F.; Zheng, Z.S. Solubility of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide in a solution of methyldiethanolamine mixed with ethylene glycol. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 6175-6180. [CrossRef] open in new tab
27. Romero, A.; Santos, A.; Tojo, J.; Rodríguez, A. Toxicity and biodegradability of imidazolium ionic liquids. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 151, 268-273. [CrossRef] [PubMed] open in new tab
28. Makoś, P.; Słupek, E.; Gębicki, J. Hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents in microextraction techniques-A review. Microchem. J. 2020, 152, 104384. [CrossRef] open in new tab
29. Zhang, Q.; De Oliveira Vigier, K.; Royer, S.; Jérôme, F. Deep eutectic solvents: Syntheses, properties and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 7108-7146. [CrossRef] open in new tab
30. Smink, D.; Kersten, S.R.A.; Schuur, B. Recovery of lignin from deep eutectic solvents by liquid-liquid extraction. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 235, 116127. [CrossRef] open in new tab
31. Florindo, C.; Branco, L.C.; Marrucho, I.M. Development of hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents for extraction of pesticides from aqueous environments. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2017, 448, 135-142. [CrossRef] open in new tab
32. Zubeir, L.F.; Van Osch, D.J.G.P.; Rocha, M.A.A.; Banat, F.; Kroon, M.C. Carbon Dioxide Solubilities in Decanoic Acid-Based Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Solvents. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2018, 63, 913-919. [CrossRef] open in new tab
33. Pätzold, M.; Siebenhaller, S.; Kara, S.; Liese, A.; Syldatk, C.; Holtmann, D. Deep Eutectic Solvents as Efficient Solvents in Biocatalysis. Trends Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 943-959. [CrossRef] [PubMed] open in new tab
34. Makoś, P.; Fernandes, A.; Przyjazny, A.; Boczkaj, G. Sample preparation procedure using extraction and derivatization of carboxylic acids from aqueous samples by means of deep eutectic solvents for gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric analysis. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1555, 10-19. [CrossRef] [PubMed] open in new tab
35. Makoś, P.; Przyjazny, A.; Boczkaj, G. Hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents as "green" extraction media for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aqueous samples. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1570, 28-37. [CrossRef] [PubMed] open in new tab
36. Sun, S.; Niu, Y.; Xu, Q.; Sun, Z.; Wei, X. Efficient SO 2 absorptions by four kinds of deep eutectic solvents based on choline chloride. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 8019-8024. [CrossRef] open in new tab
37. Yang, D.; Han, Y.; Qi, H.; Wang, Y.; Dai, S. Efficient Absorption of SO 2 by EmimCl-EG Deep Eutectic Solvents. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 6382-6386. [CrossRef] open in new tab
38. Florindo, C.; Lima, F.; Branco, L.C.; Marrucho, I.M. Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Solvents: A Circular Approach to Purify Water Contaminated with Ciprofloxacin. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 14739-14746. [CrossRef] open in new tab
39. Moura, L.; Moufawad, T.; Ferreira, M.; Bricout, H.; Tilloy, S.; Monflier, E.; Costa Gomes, M.F.; Landy, D.; Fourmentin, S. Deep eutectic solvents as green absorbents of volatile organic pollutants. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2017, 15, 747-753. [CrossRef] open in new tab
40. Słupek, E.; Makoś, P.; Gȩbicki, J.; Rogala, A. Purification of model biogas from toluene using deep eutectic solvents. E3s Web Conf. 2019, 116, 00078. open in new tab
41. Ma, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhu, T. Comparison of hydrophilic and hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents for pretreatment determination of sulfonamides from aqueous environments. Anal. Methods 2019, 11, 5901-5909. [CrossRef] open in new tab
42. Florindo, C.; Oliveira, F.S.; Rebelo, L.P.N.; Fernandes, A.M.; Marrucho, I.M. Insights into the synthesis and properties of deep eutectic solvents based on cholinium chloride and carboxylic acids. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 2416-2425. [CrossRef] open in new tab
43. Kalhor, P.; Ghandi, K. Deep eutectic solvents for pretreatment, extraction, and catalysis of biomass and food waste. Molecules 2019, 24, 4012. [CrossRef] [PubMed] open in new tab
44. Simon, S.; Duran, M.; Dannenberg, J.J. How does basis set superposition error change the potential surfaces for hydrogen-bonded dimers? J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 11024-11031. [CrossRef] open in new tab
45. Johnson, E.R.; Keinan, S.; Mori-Sánchez, P.; Contreras-García, J.; Cohen, A.J.; Yang, W. Revealing noncovalent interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 6498-6506. [CrossRef] [PubMed] open in new tab
46. Lu, T.; Chen, F. Quantitative analysis of molecular surface based on improved Marching Tetrahedra algorithm. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2012, 38, 314-323. [CrossRef] [PubMed] open in new tab
47. Lu, T.; Chen, F. Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 2012, 33, 580-592. [CrossRef] [PubMed] open in new tab
48. Noyola, A.; Morgan-sagastume, J.M.; Lo, J.E.; Ingenierı, I.D.; Escolar, C.; Universitaria, C.; Me, D.F. Treatment of biogas produced in anaerobic reactors for domestic wastewater: Odor control and energy/resource recovery. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio. Technol. 2006, 51, 93-114. [CrossRef] open in new tab
49. Ducom, G.; Radu-tirnoveanu, D.; Pascual, C.; Benadda, B.; Germain, P. Biogas-Municipal solid waste incinerator bottom ash interactions: Sulphur compounds removal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 166, 1102-1108. [CrossRef] open in new tab
50. Arespacochaga, N.D.; Valderrama, C.; Mesa, C.; Bouchy, L.; Cortina, J.L. Biogas deep clean-up based on adsorption technologies for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 255, 593-603. [CrossRef] open in new tab
51. Privalova, E.; Rasi, S.; Mäki-Arvela, P.; Eränen, K.; Rintala, J.; Murzin, D.Y.; Mikkola, J.P. CO 2 capture from biogas: Absorbent selection. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 2979-2994. [CrossRef] open in new tab
52. Hsu, C.H.; Chu, H.; Cho, C.M. Absorption and reaction kinetics of amines and ammonia solutions with carbon dioxide in flue gas. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2003, 53, 246-252. [CrossRef] open in new tab
53. Guo, Y.; Niu, Z.; Lin, W. Comparison of removal efficiencies of carbon dioxide between aqueous ammonia and NaOH solution in a fine spray column. Energy Procedia 2011, 4, 512-518.
54. Gonzalez-Garza, D.; Rivera-Tinoco, R.; Bouallou, C. Comparison of ammonia, monoethanolamine, diethanolamine and methyldiethanolamine solvents to reduce CO 2 greenhouse gas emissions. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2009, 18, 279-284.
55. Zhang, K.; Ren, S.; Yang, X.; Hou, Y.; Wu, W.; Bao, Y. Efficient absorption of low-concentration SO 2 in simulated flue gas by functional deep eutectic solvents based on imidazole and its derivatives. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 327, 128-134. [CrossRef] open in new tab
56. Lemus, J.; Bedia, J.; Moya, C.; Alonso-Morales, N.; Gilarranz, M.A.; Palomar, J.; Rodriguez, J.J. Ammonia capture from the gas phase by encapsulated ionic liquids (ENILs). RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 61650-61660. [CrossRef] open in new tab
57. Meyer, M. Infrared, raman, microwave and ab initio study of dimethyl disulfide: Structure and force field. J. Mol. Struct. 1992, 273, 99-121. [CrossRef] open in new tab
58. Biswal, H.S.; Chakraborty, S.; Wategaonkar, S. Experimental evidence of O-H-S hydrogen bonding in supersonic jet. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129. [CrossRef] open in new tab
59. Biswal, H.S.; Wategaonkar, S. Sulfur, not too far behind O, N, and C: SH· · · π hydrogen bond. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 12774-12782. [CrossRef] open in new tab
60. Bhattacharyya, S.; Bhattacherjee, A.; Shirhatti, P.R.; Wategaonkar, S. O-H· · · S hydrogen bonds conform to the acid-base formalism. J. Phys. Chem. A 2013, 117, 8238-8250. [CrossRef] open in new tab
61. Minch, M.J. An Introduction to Hydrogen Bonding (Jeffrey, George A.). J. Chem. Educ. 1999, 76, 759. [CrossRef] open in new tab

show (61) hide

Verified by:

Gdańsk University of Technology