Accuracy of Trajectory Tracking Based on Nonlinear Guidance Logic for Hydrographic Unmanned Surface Vessels - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Search

Accuracy of Trajectory Tracking Based on Nonlinear Guidance Logic for Hydrographic Unmanned Surface Vessels

Abstract

A new trend in recent years for hydrographic measurement in water bodies is the use of unmanned surface vehicles (USVs). In the process of navigation by USVs, it is particularly important to control position precisely on the measuring profile. Precise navigation with respect to the measuring profile avoids registration of redundant data and thus saves time and survey costs. This article addresses the issue of precise navigation of the hydrographic unit on the measuring profile with the use of a nonlinear adaptive autopilot. The results of experiments concerning hydrographic measurements performed in real conditions using an USV are discussed.

Citations

  • 3 1

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 3 2

    Scopus

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 62 times
Publication version
Accepted or Published Version
License
Creative Commons: CC-BY open in new tab

Keywords

Details

Category:
Articles
Type:
artykuły w czasopismach
Published in:
SENSORS no. 20,
ISSN: 1424-8220
Language:
English
Publication year:
2020
Bibliographic description:
Stateczny A., Burdziakowski P., Najdecka K., Domagalska-Stateczna B.: Accuracy of Trajectory Tracking Based on Nonlinear Guidance Logic for Hydrographic Unmanned Surface Vessels// SENSORS -Vol. 20,iss. 3 (2020), s.832-
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.3390/s20030832
Bibliography: test
  1. Specht, M. Method of Evaluating the Positioning System Capability for Complying with the Minimum Accuracy Requirements for the International Hydrographic Organization Orders. Sensors 2019, 19, 3860. [CrossRef] [PubMed] open in new tab
  2. Wang, N.; Er, M.J. Direct Adaptive Fuzzy Tracking Control of Marine Vehicles with Fully Unknown Parametric Dynamics and Uncertainties. IEEE Trans. Contr. Syst. Technol. 2016, 24, 1845-1852. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  3. Wang, N.; Er, M.J.; Sun, J.; Liu, Y. Adaptive Robust Online Constructive Fuzzy Control of a Complex Surface Vehicle System. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 2016, 46, 1511-1523. [CrossRef] [PubMed] open in new tab
  4. Liu, T.; Dong, Z.; Du, H.; Song, L.; Mao, Y. Path following control of the underactuated USV based on the improved line-of-sight guidance algorithm. Pol. Marit. Res. 2017, 24, 3-11. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  5. Liao, Y.; Wan, L.; Zhuang, J. Back stepping dynamical sliding mode control method for the path following of the underactuated surface vessel. Procedia Eng. 2011, 15, 256-263. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  6. Dong, Z.; Wan, L.; Li, Y.; Liu, T.; Zhang, G. Trajectory tracking control of underactuated USV based on modified backstepping approach. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. 2015, 7, 817-832. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  7. Fan, Y.; Mu, D.; Zhang, X.; Wang, G.; Guo, C. Course keeping control based on integrated nonlinear feedback for a USV with pod-like propulsion. J. Navig. 2018, 71, 878-898. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  8. Huang, Q.; Li, T.; Li, Z.; Hang, Y.; Yang, S. Research on PID control technique for chaotic ship steering based on dynamic chaos particle swarm optimization algorithm. In Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Beijing, China, 6-8 July 2012; pp. 1639-1643. open in new tab
  9. Li, Y.; Yang, S.; Yu, Y.; Liu, M. Study on optimization and simulation of hydrofoil USV propulsion intelligent control based on chaos algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2017 2nd International Conference on Materials Science, Machinery and Energy Engineering (MSMEE 2017), Dalian, China, 13-14 May 2017. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  10. Huang, Q.; Liu, X.; Li, T.; Wang, K.; Wang, S. On impulsive parametric perturbation control techniques for chaotic ship steering. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of 2014 IEEE Chinese Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, Yantai, China, 8-10 August 2014; pp. 428-433. open in new tab
  11. Wang, N.; Sun, J.; Er, M.J. Tracking-Error-Based Universal Adaptive Fuzzy Control for Output Tracking of Nonlinear Systems with Completely Unknown Dynamics. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 2018, 26, 869-883. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  12. Wang, N.; Su, S.; Yin, J.; Zheng, Z.; Er, M.J. Global Asymptotic Model-Free Trajectory-Independent Tracking Control of an Uncertain Marine Vehicle: An Adaptive Universe-Based Fuzzy Control Approach. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 2018, 26, 1613-1625. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  13. Patino, H.D.; Liu, D. Neural network-based model reference adaptive control system. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B (Cybern.) 2000, 30, 198-204. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  14. Dai, S.-L.; Wang, C.; Luo, F. Identification and learning control of ocean surface ship using neural networks. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2012, 8, 801-810. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  15. Zhang, Y.; Hearn, G.E.; Sen, P. A neural network approach to ship track-keeping control. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 1996, 21, 513-527. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  16. Brown, M.; Harris, C.J. Neurofuzzy Adaptive Modelling and Control; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1994.
  17. Wang, N.; Joo Er, M. Self-Constructing Adaptive Robust Fuzzy Neural Tracking Control of Surface Vehicles with Uncertainties and Unknown Disturbances. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 2015, 23, 991-1002. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  18. Wang, N.; Sun, J.; Er, M.J.; Liu, Y. A Novel Extreme Learning Control Framework of Unmanned Surface Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 2016, 46, 1106-1117. [CrossRef] [PubMed] open in new tab
  19. Wang, N.; Karimi, H.R.; Li, H.; Su, S. Accurate Trajectory Tracking of Disturbed Surface Vehicles: A Finite-Time Control Approach. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 2019, 24, 1064-1074. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  20. Wang, N.; Qian, C.; Sun, J.; Liu, Y. Adaptive Robust Finite-Time Trajectory Tracking Control of Fully Actuated Marine Surface Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 2016, 24, 1454-1462. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  21. Wang, N.; Pan, X. Path Following of Autonomous Underactuated Ships: A Translation-Rotation Cascade Control Approach. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 2019, 24, 2583-2593. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  22. Stateczny, A.; Burdziakowski, P. Universal autonomous control and management system for multipurpose unmanned surface vessel. Polish Marit. Res. 2019, 1, 30-39. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  23. Stateczny, A.; Kazimierski, W.; Gronska-Sledz, D.; Motyl, W. The Empirical Application of Automotive 3D Radar Sensor for Target Detection for an Autonomous Surface Vehicle's Navigation. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1156. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  24. Park, S.; Deyst, J.; How, J. A new nonlinear guidance logic for trajectory tracking. AIAA Guid. Navig. Control Conf. Exhib. 2004. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  25. Guo, W.; Wang, S.; Dun, W. The Design of a Control System for an Unmanned Surface Vehicle. Open Autom. Control Syst. J. 2015, 7, 50-156. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  26. Moreno, D.; Chaos, D.; Aranda, J.; Muñoz, R.; Díaz, J.M.; Dormido-Canto, S. Application of an aeronautic control for ship path following. J. Marit. Res. 2009, 6, 71-82.
  27. Specht, C.; Specht, M.; Cywinski, P.; Skóra, M.; Marchel, Ł.; Szychowski, P. A New Method for Determining the Territorial Sea Baseline Using an Unmanned Hydrographic Surface Vessel. J. Coast. Res. 2019, 35, 925-936. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  28. Specht, M.; Specht, C.; Lasota, H.; Cywinski, P. Assessment of the Steering Precision of a Hydrographic Unmanned Surface Vessel (USV) along Sounding Profiles Using a Low-Cost Multi-Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Receiver Supported Autopilot. Sensors 2019, 19, 3939. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  29. Seto, M.L.; Crawford, A. Autonomous shallow water bathymetric measurements for environmental assessment and safe navigation using USVs. In Proceedings of the OCEANS 2015-MTS/IEEE Washington, Washington, DC, USA, 19-22 October 2015. open in new tab
  30. Alessandri, A.; Donnarumma, S.; Martelli, M.; Vignolo, S. Motion Control for Autonomous Navigation in Blue and Narrow Waters Using Switched Controllers. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2019, 7, 196. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  31. Munoz-Banon, M.; del Pino, I.; Candelas, F.; Torres, F. Framework for Fast Experimental Testing of Autonomous Navigation Algorithms. Appl. Sci. Basel 2019, 9, 1997. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  32. Kunicka, M.; Litwin, W. Energy Demand of Short-Range Inland Ferry with Series Hybrid Propulsion Depending on the Navigation Strategy. Energies 2019, 12, 3499. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  33. Borkowski, P. Adaptive System for Steering a Ship along the Desired Route. Mathematics 2018, 6, 196. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  34. Borkowski, P. Inference Engine in an Intelligent Ship Course-Keeping System. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2017. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  35. Li, C.; Jiang, J.; Duan, F.; Liu, W.; Wang, X.; Bu, L.; Sun, Z.; Yang, G. Modeling and Experimental Testing of an Unmanned Surface Vehicle with Rudderless Double Thrusters. Sensors 2019, 19, 2051. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  36. Zhan, W.; Xiao, C.; Wen, Y.; Zhou, C.; Yuan, H.; Xiu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zou, X.; Liu, X.; Li, Q. Autonomous Visual Perception for Unmanned Surface Vehicle Navigation in an Unknown Environment. Sensors 2019, 19, 2216. [CrossRef] [PubMed] open in new tab
  37. Lisowski, J. The sensitivity of state differential game vessel traffic model. Polish Marit. Res. 2016, 23, 14-18. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  38. Dudojc, B.; Mindykowski, J. New Approach to Analysis of Selected Measurement and Monitoring Systems Solutions in Ship Technology. Sensors 2019, 19, 1775. [CrossRef] [PubMed] open in new tab
  39. Li, J.; Du, J.; Sun, Y.; Lewis, F.L. Robust adaptive trajectory tracking control of underactuated autonomous underwater vehicles with prescribed performance. Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control 2019, 29, 4629-4643. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  40. Paliotta, C.; Lefeber, E.; Pettersen, K.; Pinto, J.; Costa, M.I.C.; de Sousa, J.T.D.B. Trajectory Tracking and Path Following for Underactuated Marine Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 2019, 27, 1423-1437. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  41. GITHUB. Available online: https://github.com/ArduPilot/ardupilot/commit/a3c2851120f3572893bdf29ddc0e e24dac67cbe1 (accessed on 12 December 2019). open in new tab
  42. Jang, T.; Han, S. Analysis for VTOL Flight Software of PX4. In Proceedings of the 2018 18th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), Daegwallyeong, South Korea, 17-20 October 2018; pp. 872-875.
  43. Siauw, T.; Bayen, A. An Introduction to MATLAB ® Programming and Numerical Methods for Engineers; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  44. Specht, C.; Dabrowski, P.S.; Pawelski, J.; Specht, M.; Szot, T. Comparative analysis of positioning accuracy of GNSS receivers of Samsung Galaxy smartphones in marine dynamic measurements. Adv. Space Res. 2019, 63, 3018-3028. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  45. NovAtel Positioning Leadership. GPS Position Accuracy Measures. APN-029 Revision 1. 2003. Available online: https://www.novatel.com/assets/Documents/Bulletins/apn029.pdf (accessed on 12 December 2019). open in new tab
  46. © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). open in new tab
Verified by:
Gdańsk University of Technology

seen 189 times

Recommended for you

Meta Tags