Application of Game Theory to Conflict Management in a Construction Contract - Publication - MOST Wiedzy

Search

Application of Game Theory to Conflict Management in a Construction Contract

Abstract

Interest has recently grown in the application of game theory (GT) to solve a number of diverse problems in the field of construction. The use of GT by a general contractor (GC) of construction works to indicate the best strategy leading to winning court proceedings in a situation of conflict with investor (IN), has not been investigated until now. Thus the aim of this paper is to indicate the optimal strategy from the GC viewpoint in a conflict situation with the IN. The article presents a list of the most common causes of conflict between parties of a construction work contract, defines the background of the problem and the cause of the dispute, and subsequently the authors generate a theoretical model of the game. Based on the analyzed game model, the expected payoffs for players were calculated and the probability boundary value determined in making the GC apply the indicated strategy. The study results show that while the probability of issuing a judgment favorable for the GC is at least equal to 0.69 it is justified to use an aggressive strategy. The analysis also confirms that from the financial perspective, litigation in most cases of conflicts in the area of construction should be the ultimate choice.

Citations

  • 1

    CrossRef

  • 1

    Web of Science

  • 1

    Scopus

Details

Category:
Articles
Type:
artykuł w czasopiśmie wyróżnionym w JCR
Published in:
Sustainability no. 7, pages 1 - 12,
ISSN:
Publication year:
2019
Bibliographic description:
Grzyl B., Apollo M., Kristowski A.: Application of Game Theory to Conflict Management in a Construction Contract// Sustainability. -Vol. 7, (2019), s.1-12
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.3390/su11071983
Bibliography: test
  1. Zavadskas, E.K.; Turskis, Z.; Tamošaitienė, J. Contractor selection of construction in a competitive environment. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2008, 9, 181-187. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  2. Tamošaitiene, J.; Turskis, Z.; Zavadskas, E.K. Modeling of Contractor Selection Taking into Account Different Risk Level. In Proceedings of the 25th ISARC, Vilnius, Lituania, 26-29 June 2008; pp. 676-681. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  3. Osborne, M.J. An Introduction to Game Theory, 1st ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003; ISBN 978-0-19-512895-6.
  4. Osborne, M.J.; Rubinstein, A. A Course in Game Theory, 1st ed.; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1994; ISBN 978-0-262-65040-3. open in new tab
  5. Halac, M. Relationship Building: Conflict and Project Choice over Time. J. Law Econ. Organ. 2014, 30, 683-708. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  6. Yang, Y.; Wang, M. Analysis on the interests of construction parties in project management model based on the game theory. In Proceedings of the 2009 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, Shanghai, China, 16-18 December 2009; pp. 4512-4516. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  7. Anderson, L.L., Jr.; Polkinghorn, B. Managing conflict in construction megaprojects: Leadership and third-party principles. Confl. Resolut. Q. 2008, 26, 167-198. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  8. Zavadskas, E.K. Game Theory in Building Technology and Management; Vilnius: Technika, Lithuanian, 2004.
  9. Ibadov, N. Determination of the Risk Factors Impact on the Construction Projects Implementation Using Fuzzy Sets Theory. Acta Phys. Pol. A 2016, 130, 107-111. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  10. Barough, A.S.; Shoubi, M.V.; Skardi, M.J.E. Application of Game Theory Approach in Solving the Construction Project Conflicts. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 58, 1586-1593. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  11. Wu, G.; Wang, H.; Chang, R. A Decision Model Assessing the Owner and Contractor's Conflict Behaviors in Construction Projects. Available online: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ace/2018/1347914/ (accessed on 2 November 2018). open in new tab
  12. Wu, G.; Liu, C.; Zhao, X.; Zuo, J. Investigating the relationship between communication-conflict interaction and project success among construction project teams. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2017, 35, 1466-1482. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  13. Puck, J.; Pregernig, U. The effect of task conflict and cooperation on performance of teams: Are the results similar for different task types? Eur. Manag. J. 2014, 32, 870-878. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  14. Mateo, S.C.; Ramón, J. The use of Game Theory to solve conflicts in the project management and construction industry. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Proj. 2015, 3, 43-58. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  15. Yiu, T.W.; Cheung, S.O. Behavioral Transition: A Framework for the Construction Conflict-Tension Relationship. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2007, 54, 498-505. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  16. Yuan, H.; Ma, H. Game Analysis in the Construction Claim Negotiations. Procedia Eng. 2012, 28, 586-593. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  17. Sacks, R.; Harel, M. An economic game theory model of subcontractor resource allocation behavior. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2006, 24, 869-881. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  18. Motchenkova, E. Determination of optimal penalties for antitrust violations in a dynamic setting. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 189, 269-291. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  19. Brockman, J.L. Interpersonal Conflict in Construction: Cost, Cause, and Consequence. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2014, 140, 4013050. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  20. Zavadskas, E.K.; Peldschus, F. Application of Games Theory in Preparation for Building Production; Vilnius Engineering Civil Institute: Vilnius, Lithuania, 1986.
  21. Hwang, B.-G.; Zhao, X.; Yu, G.S. Risk identification and allocation in underground rail construction joint ventures: contractors' perspective. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2016, 22, 758-767. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  22. Reneke, J.A. A game theory formulation of decision making under conditions of uncertainty and risk. Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl. 2009, 71, e1239-e1246. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  23. Tomczak, M.; Jaśkowski, P. Application of type-2 interval fuzzy sets to contractor qualification process. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2018, 22, 2702-2713. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  24. Apollo, M.; Kembłowski, M.W. Modelowanie ryzyka inwestycyjnego przy użyciu OOBN. Mater. Bud. 2016, 48-49. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  25. Kapliński, O.; Tamošaitiene, J. Game theory applications in construction engineering and management. Ukio Technologinis ir Ekonominis Vystymas 2010, 16, 348-363. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  26. Peldschus, F.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Turskis, Z.; Tamosaitiene, J. Sustainable assessment of construction site by applying game theory. Inzinerine Ekon. Eng. Econ. 2010, 3, 223-236.
  27. Peldschus, F. Multi-attribute decisions in construction. Transform. Bus. Econ. 2008, 7, 163-165.
  28. Peldschus, F. Experience of the game theory application in construction management. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2008, 14, 531-545. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  29. Podvezko, V. Book review: Game theory in building technology and management. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2008, 9, 237-239. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  30. Homburg, C.; Scherpereel, P. How should the cost of joint risk capital be allocated for performance measurement? Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 187, 208-227. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  31. Su, B.B.; Chang, H.; Chen, Y.-Z.; He, D.R. A game theory model of urban public traffic networks. Phys. Stat. Mech. Appl. 2007, 379, 291-297. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  32. Sun, L.-J.; Gao, Z.-Y. An equilibrium model for urban transit assignment based on game theory. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007, 1, 305-314. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  33. Meszek, W. The analysis of property value increase as a result of infrastructural investment projects. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 35, 345. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  34. Grzyl, B.; Miszewska-Urbańska, E.; Siemaszko, A. Safety of investment process parties in the aspect of construction work contract. Zesz. Nauk. Wyższa Szk. Oficer. Wojsk Lądowych Im Gen T Kościuszki 2017, Nr 4. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  35. Grzyl, B.; Apollo, M. Umowa o roboty budowlane w aspekcie podziału ryzyka stron. Inżynieria Morska i Geotechnika 2015, 838-843. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  36. Kembłowski, M.W.; Grzyl, B.; Siemaszko, A. Game Theory Analysis of Bidding for a Construction Contract. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 245. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  37. Anysz, H.; Ibadov, N. Neuro-fuzzy predictions of construction site completion dates. Tech. Trans. 2017, 6. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  38. Juszczyk, M.; Kozik, R.; Leśniak, A.; Plebankiewicz, E.; Zima, K. Errors in the Preparation of Design Documentation in Public Procurement in Poland. Procedia Eng. 2014, 85, 283-292. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  39. Leśniak, A.; Plebankiewicz, E. Modeling the Decision-Making Process Concerning Participation in Construction Bidding. J. Manag. Eng. 2015, 31, 4014032. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  40. Antoniou, F.; Aretoulis, G.N.; Konstantinidis, D.; Kalfakakou, G.P. Engineers' Perception of Contract Types' Performance for Highway Construction Projects. Int. J. Appl. Behav. Econ. IJABE 2013, 2, 1-24. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  41. Ianole, R. Applied Behavioral Economics Research and Trends; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2001; ISBN 978-1-5225-1826-6.
  42. Shi, Q.; Zhu, J.; Li, Q. Cooperative Evolutionary Game and Applications in Construction Supplier Tendency. Available online: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/complexity/2018/8401813/ (accessed on 8 March 2019). open in new tab
  43. Jide, S.; Xincheng, W.; Liangfa, S. Research on the mobility behavior of Chinese construction workers based on evolutionary game theory. Econ. Res.-Ekon. Istraživanja 2018, 31, 1-14. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  44. Kembłowski, M.W.; Grzyl, B.; Siemaszko, A. Game Theory Analysis of Bidding for a Construction Contract. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, England, 2017; Volume 245, p. 062047. open in new tab
  45. Hargreaves-Heap, S.; Varoufakis, Y. Game Theory: A Critical Introduction, 2nd ed.; Routledge: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2004; ISBN 978-0-415-25095-5. open in new tab
Verified by:
Gdańsk University of Technology

seen 79 times

Recommended for you

Meta Tags