Keywords

Details

Category:

Articles

Type:

artykuły w czasopismach recenzowanych i innych wydawnictwach ciągłych

Published in:

Studies & Proceedings of Polish Association for Knowledge Management pages 4 - 15,
ISSN: 1732-324X

Publication year:

2012

Bibliographic description:

Boiński T., Krawczyk H.: Dynamic OWL Ontology matching Using Lexical Wordnet-based Measures// Studies & Proceedings of Polish Association for Knowledge Management. -., nr. 60 (2012), s.4-15

Bibliography: test

1. Boiński, T.: Procedures for merging and alignment of domain ontologies [in Polish], PhD thesis, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdansk University of Technology, 2012.
2. Boiński, T., Budnik, Ł., Jakowski, A., Mroziński, J. and Mazurkiewicz, K.: OCS -domain oriented ontology creation system, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, Vol. 18, No. 3B, pp. 35-38, 2009.
3. Cycorp Inc. (2010), Cyc [Online]. Available at: http://www.cyc.com/cyc
4. De Nicola, A., Missikoff, M. and Navigli, R.: A software engineering approach to ontology building, Information Systems, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 258-275, 2009. open in new tab
5. ENISA (2010), Enisa: a European Union Agency -Glossary of Risk Management [Online]. open in new tab
6. Euzenat, J. (2006): EON Ontology Alignment Contest [Online]. Available at: http://oaei.ontologymatching.org/2006/ open in new tab
7. Euzenat, J. and Valtchev, P.: Similarity-based ontology alignment in OWL-lite, ECAI 2004: 16 th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, August 22-27, 2004, Valencia, Spain: including Prestigious Applicants of Intelligent Systems (PAIS 2004): proceedings, 2004. open in new tab
8. Fellbaum, C.: WordNet: An electronic lexical database, The MIT press, 1998 open in new tab
9. Firesmith, D. G.: A Taxonomy of safety-related requirements, International Workshop on High Assurance Systems (RHAS'05), 2005. open in new tab
10. Firesmith, D.G.: A taxonomy of security-related requirements, International Workshop on High Assurance Systems (RHAS'05), 2005. open in new tab
11. Gennari, J. H., Musen, M. A., Fergerson, R.W., Grosso, W. E., Crubézy, M., Eriksson, H., Noy, N. F. and Tu, S.W.: The evolution of Protégé: an environment for knowledge-based systems development, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 89-123, 2003. open in new tab
12. Gruber, T. R. et al. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications, Knowledge acquisition, Vol. 5, p. 199, 1993. open in new tab
13. Guttman, B. and Roback, E. A.: An introduction to computer security: the NIST handbook, DIANE Publishing, 1995. open in new tab
14. Hovy, E.: Combining and standardizing large-scale, practical ontologies for machine translation and other uses, Proceedings of the 1 st International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 535-542, 1998.
15. Jian, N., Hu, W., Cheng, G. and Qu, Y.: Falcon-AO: Aligning ontologies with Falcon, Integrating Ontologies Workshop Proceedings, 2005.
16. Levenshtein, V. I.: Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals, Soviet Physics Doklady, Vol. 10, pp. 707-710, 1966.
17. Lin, D.: An information-theoretic definition of similarity, Proceedings of the 15 th International Conference on Machine Learning, Vol. 1, pp. 296-304, 1998.
18. McGuinness, D. L., Van Harmelen, F. et al. OWL web ontology language overview, W3C recommendation, Vol. 10, pp. 2004-03, 2004.
19. Miller, G. A. and Charles, W. G.: Contextual correlates of semantic similarity, Language and cognitive processes, Vol. 6, No 1, pages 1-28, 1991 open in new tab
20. Niles, I. and Pease, A.: Towards a standard upper ontology, Proceedings of the international conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, pp. 2-9, 2001. open in new tab
21. Noy, N. F., Fergerson, R. and Musen, M.: The knowledge model of Protege-2000: Combining interoperability and flexibility, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management Methods, Models, and Tools, pp. 69-82, 2000. open in new tab
22. Noy, N. F., McGuinness, D. L. et al. Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology, 2001. open in new tab
23. Princeton University (2010), WordNet Database Statistics [Online]. Available at: http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wordnet/man/wnstats.7WN.html open in new tab
24. Russel, S. and Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice hall. 2003
25. Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering. 8 th , Harlow, UK: Addison-Wesley, 2006
26. Suárez-Figueroa, M. C. et al (2009): D5. 4.2: Revision and extension of the neon methodology for building contextualized ontology networks, NeOn project [Online].
27. ŁĄCZENIE ONTOLOGII OWL Z WYKORZYSTANIEM MIAR BAZUJĄCYCH NA WORDNET STRESZCZENIE Ontologie coraz częściej służą jako mechanizm opisu zarówno zgormadzonej wiedzy, jak i samej domeny, na której operuje aplikacja. Ze względu na mnogość do- stępnych rozwiązań zachodzi konieczność umożliwienia dynamicznego łączenia ta-

show (27) hide

Verified by:

Gdańsk University of Technology