Keywords

Details

Category:

Thesis, nostrification

Type:

praca doktorska pracowników zatrudnionych w PG oraz studentów studium doktoranckiego

Language:

Polish

Publication year:

2017

Bibliography: test

1. Wprowadzenie .......................................................................................................... 5
2. Budowa ogniwa DMFC ............................................................................................. 6
3. Klasyczne elektrochemiczne metody diagnostyki ogniw typu PEM ......................... 11
4. Krzywe polaryzacyjne ............................................................................................. 11
5. Pomiar zniekształceń harmonicznych ..................................................................... 15
6. Charakterystyka ogniwa paliwowego ...................................................................... 18 4.1. Charakterystyka anody ogniwa paliwowego zasilanego metanolem ....................... 21
7. Cele badawcze ....................................................................................................... 34
8. Metodyka badawcza ............................................................................................... 36
9. Część eksperymentalna ......................................................................................... 39
10. Metodyka doboru obwodu zastępczego dla panujących warunków pracy ogniwa .. 39 7.2. Wpływ zmian temperatury pracy ogniwa na zachowanie katody ............................. 52 open in new tab
11. Wpływ zmiany stężenia kwasu mrówkowego na wydajność ogniwa paliwowego .... 60 open in new tab
12. Podsumowanie i wnioski końcowe .......................................................................... 72 open in new tab
13. Bibliografia ............................................................................................................. 75 open in new tab
14. Spis dorobku naukowego doktoranta ............................................................................ 85
15. Rys. 36. Zmiany impedancji anody pod wpływem obciążenia dla roztworów o określonym stosunku objętościowym (0.5 M HCOOH : 0.5 M CH3OH): a) 1:0 b) 2:1 c) 1:1 d) 1:2 e) 0:1.
16. A. Vlysidis, M. Binns, C. Webb, C. Theodoropoulos, Glycerol utilisation for the production of chemicals: Conversion to succinic acid, a combined experimental and computational study, Biochem. Eng. J. 58-59 (2011) 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.bej.2011.07.004. open in new tab
17. J. Twidell, T. Weir, No Title, in: Renew. Energy Resour., E&FN SPON. London University Press Cambridge, 1996.
18. L. Carrette, K.A. Friedrich, U. Stimming, Fuel Cells: Principles, Types, Fuels, and Applications , ChemPhysChem. 1 (2000) 162-193. doi:10.1002/1439-7641(20001215)1:4<162::AID- open in new tab
19. M. Winter, R.J. Brodd, What Are Batteries, Fuel Cells, and Supercapacitors?, Chem. Rev. 104 (2004) 4245-4270. doi:10.1021/cr020730k. open in new tab
20. F. Barbir, PEM Fuel Cells, in: N. Sammes (Ed.), Fuel Cell Technol. Reach. Towar. Commer., Springer London, London, 2006: pp. 27-51. doi:10.1007/1-84628-207-1_2. open in new tab
21. J. Larminie, A. Dicks, J. Larminie, A. Dicks, Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells, in: Fuel Cell Syst. Explain., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd,., 2003: pp. 67-119. doi:10.1002/9781118878330.ch4. open in new tab
22. M. Paidar, V. Fateev, K. Bouzek, Membrane electrolysis-History, current status and perspective, Electrochim. Acta. 209 (2016) 737-756. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.209. open in new tab
23. S. Gottesfeld, T.A. Zawodzinski, Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells, in: Adv. Electrochem. Sci. Eng., Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, 1997: pp. 195-301. doi:10.1002/9783527616794.ch4. open in new tab
24. A. Havranek, K. Klafki, K. Wippermann, The influence of the catalyst loading and the ionomer content on the performance of DMFC anodes, in: 2001. http://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/27298. open in new tab
25. X. Xue, C. Bock, L. Birry, B.R. MacDougall, The Influence of Pt Loading, Support and Nafion Content on the Performance of Direct Methanol Fuel Cells: Examined on the Example of the Cathode, Fuel Cells. 11 (2011) 286-300. doi:10.1002/fuce.200900204. open in new tab
26. M.C. Denis, M. Lefevre, D. Guay, J.P. Dodelet, Pt-Ru catalysts prepared by high energy ball-milling for PEMFC and DMFC: Influence of the synthesis conditions, Electrochim. Acta. 53 (2008) 5142- 5154. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2008.02.045. open in new tab
27. W. Zheng, A. Suominen, A. Tuominen, Discussion on the Challenges of DMFC Catalyst Loading Process for Mass Production, Energy Procedia. 28 (2012) 78-87. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2012.08.042. open in new tab
28. A.A. Balandin, Modern State of the Multiplet Theor of Heterogeneous Catalysis, in: 1969: pp. 1-210. doi:10.1016/S0360-0564(08)60029-2. open in new tab
29. O.T. Holton, J.W. Stevenson, The Role of Platinum in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells, Platin. Met. Rev. 57 (2013). open in new tab
30. A. El-kharouf, T.J. Mason, D.J.L. Brett, B.G. Pollet, Ex-situ characterisation of gas diffusion layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells, J. Power Sources. 218 (2012) 393-404. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.099. 76 open in new tab
31. M. Bello, S.M.J. Zaidi, A. Al-Ahmed, S. Basu, D.-H. Park, K.S. Lakhi, A. Vinu, Pt-Ru nanoparticles functionalized mesoporous carbon nitride with tunable pore diameters for DMFC applications, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 252 (2017) 50-58. doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.06.021. open in new tab
32. P.A. Garcia-Salaberri, M. Vera, On the effects of assembly compression on the performance of liquid-feed DMFCs under methanol-limiting conditions: A 2D numerical study, J. Power Sources. 285 (2015) 543-558. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.112. open in new tab
33. R.K. Mallick, S.B. Thombre, Performance of passive DMFC with expanded metal mesh current collectors, Electrochim. Acta. 243 (2017) 299-309. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2017.04.113. open in new tab
34. R. Baronia, J. Goel, S. Tiwari, P. Singh, D. Singh, S.P. Singh, S.K. Singhal, Efficient electro-oxidation of methanol using PtCo nanocatalysts supported reduced graphene oxide matrix as anode for DMFC, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 42 (2017) 10238-10247. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.011. open in new tab
35. B.C. Ong, S.K. Kamarudin, M.S. Masdar, U.A. Hasran, Applications of graphene nano-sheets as anode diffusion layers in passive direct methanol fuel cells (DMFC), Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 42 (2017) 9252-9261. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.094. open in new tab
36. A. Ozden, M. Ercelik, D. Ouellette, C.O. Colpan, H. Ganjehsarabi, F. Hamdullahpur, Designing, modeling and performance investigation of bio-inspired flow field based DMFCs, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. (2017). doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.007. open in new tab
37. N.S. Vasile, A.H.A. Monteverde Videla, S. Specchia, Effects of the current density distribution on a single-cell DMFC by tuning the anode catalyst in layers of gradual loadings: Modelling and experimental approach, Chem. Eng. J. 322 (2017) 722-741. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.04.060. open in new tab
38. J. Ko, K. Kang, S. Park, W.-G. Kim, S.-H. Lee, H. Ju, Effect of design of multilayer electrodes in direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs), Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 39 (2014) 1571-1579. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.069. open in new tab
39. T. Mennola, Measurement of ohmic voltage losses in individual cells of a PEMFC stack, J. Power Sources. 112 (2002) 261-272. doi:10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00391-9. open in new tab
40. P. Hartmann, D. Gerteisen, Local degradation analysis of a real long-term operated DMFC stack MEA, J. Power Sources. 219 (2012) 147-154. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.048. open in new tab
41. D. Gerteisen, Transient and steady-state analysis of catalyst poisoning and mixed potential formation in direct methanol fuel cells, J. Power Sources. 195 (2010) 6719-6731. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.04.004. open in new tab
42. M. LIU, J. WANG, S. WANG, X. XIE, T. ZHOU, V.K. Mathur, On-line Measurement for Ohmic Resistance in Direct Methanol Fuel Cell by Current Interruption Method, Chinese J. Chem. Eng. 18 (2010) 843-847. doi:10.1016/S1004-9541(09)60137-3. open in new tab
43. D. Chakraborty, I. Chorkendorff, T. Johannessen, Metamorphosis of the mixed phase PtRu anode catalyst for direct methanol fuel cells after exposure of methanol: In situ and ex situ characterizations, J. Power Sources. 173 (2007) 110-120. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.057. open in new tab
44. R. Escudero-Cid, P. Hernandez-Fernandez, J.C. Perez-Flores, S. Rojas, S. Garcia-Rodriguez, E. open in new tab
45. Fatis, P. Ocin, Analysis of performance losses of direct methanol fuel cell with methanol tolerant open in new tab
46. PtCoRu/C cathode electrode, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 37 (2012) 7119-7130. 77 doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.12.158. open in new tab
47. G. Xu, J.M. LaManna, J.T. Clement, M.M. Mench, Direct measurement of through-plane thermal conductivity of partially saturated fuel cell diffusion media, J. Power Sources. 256 (2014) 212-219. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.015. open in new tab
48. A. Santasalo-Aarnio, S. Hietala, T. Rauhala, T. Kallio, In and ex situ characterization of an anion- exchange membrane for alkaline direct methanol fuel cell (ADMFC), J. Power Sources. 196 (2011) 6153-6159. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.03.028. open in new tab
49. G. Liu, Z. Pan, W. Li, K. Yu, G. Xia, Q. Zhao, S. Shi, G. Hu, C. Xiao, Z. Wei, The effect of titanium nickel nitride decorated carbon nanotubes-reduced graphene oxide hybrid support for methanol oxidation, Appl. Surf. Sci. 410 (2017) 70-78. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.075. open in new tab
50. X. Mu, Z. Xu, Y. Xie, H. Mi, J. Ma, Pt nanoparticles supported on Co embedded coal-based carbon nanofiber for enhanced electrocatalytic activity towards methanol electro-oxidation, J. Alloys Compd. 711 (2017) 374-380. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.008. open in new tab
51. F. Alcaide, G. Álvarez, P.L. Cabot, R. Genova-Koleva, H.-J. Grande, O. Miguel, Effect of the solvent in the catalyst ink preparation on the properties and performance of unsupported PtRu catalyst layers in direct methanol fuel cells, Electrochim. Acta. 231 (2017) 529-538. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.127. open in new tab
52. C.Y. Du, T.S. Zhao, W.W. Yang, Effect of methanol crossover on the cathode behavior of a DMFC: doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2012.02.018. open in new tab
53. Q. Mao, U. Krewer, R. Hanke-Rauschenbach, Total harmonic distortion analysis for direct methanol fuel cell anode, Electrochem. Commun. 12 (2010) 1517-1519. doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.022. open in new tab
54. E. Ramschak, V. Peinecke, P. Prenninger, T. Schaffer, V. Hacker, Detection of fuel cell critical status by stack voltage analysis, J. Power Sources. 157 (2006) 837-840. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.01.009. open in new tab
55. S. Thomas, S.C. Lee, A.K. Sahu, S. Park, Online health monitoring of a fuel cell using total harmonic distortion analysis, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 39 (2014) 4558-4565. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.180. open in new tab
56. M. Boinet, D. Marlot, J.C. Lenain, S. Maximovitch, F. Dalard, R.P. Nogueira, First results from coupled acousto-ultrasonics and electrochemical noise techniques applied to gas evolving electrodes, Electrochem. Commun. 9 (2007) 2174-2178. doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2007.05.026. open in new tab
57. F. Huet, R.P. Nogueira, P. Lailler, L. Torcheux, Investigation of the high-frequency resistance of a lead-acid battery, J. Power Sources. 158 (2006) 1012-1018. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.11.026. open in new tab
58. B. Legros, P.-X. Thivel, Y. Bultel, R.P. Nogueira, First results on PEMFC diagnosis by electrochemical noise, Electrochem. Commun. 13 (2011) 1514-1516. doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2011.10.007. open in new tab
59. E.S. Denisov, Y.K. Evdokimov, S. Martemianov, A. Thomas, N. Adiutantov, Electrochemical Noise as a Diagnostic Tool for PEMFC, Fuel Cells. 17 (2017) 225-237. doi:10.1002/fuce.201600077. open in new tab
60. K.T. Koshekov, Y.N. Klikushin, V.Y. Kobenko, Y.K. Evdokimov, A. V Demyanenko, Fuel Cell Diagnostics Using Identification Measurement Theory, J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 11 (2014) 51003- 51009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4027395. open in new tab
61. T. V Nguyen, R.E. White, A Water and Heat Management Model for Proton-Exchange-Membrane Fuel Cells, J. Electrochem. Soc. . 140 (1993) 2178-2186. doi:10.1149/1.2220792. open in new tab
62. T.E. Springer, T.A. Zawodzinski, S. Gottesfeld, Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Model, J. Electrochem. open in new tab
63. Soc. . 138 (1991) 2334-2342. doi:10.1149/1.2085971. open in new tab
64. A. Hamnett, Mechanism and electrocatalysis in the direct methanol fuel cell, Catal. Today. 38 (1997) 445-457. doi:10.1016/S0920-5861(97)00054-0. open in new tab
65. T. Iwasita, W. Vielstich, On-line mass spectroscopy of volatile products during methanol oxidation at platinum in acid solutions, J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 201 (1986) 403-408. doi:10.1016/0022-0728(86)80064-X. open in new tab
66. C.L. Childers, H. Huang, C. Korzeniewski, Formaldehyde Yields from Methanol Electrochemical Oxidation on Carbon-Supported Platinum Catalysts, Langmuir. 15 (1999) 786-789. doi:10.1021/la980798o. open in new tab
67. S. Sriramulu, T.D. Jarvi, E.M. Stuve, A kinetic analysis of distinct reaction pathways in methanol electrocatalysis on Pt(111), Electrochim. Acta. 44 (1998) 1127-1134. doi:10.1016/S0013- open in new tab
68. T.D. Jarvi, S. Sriramulu, E.M. Stuve, Potential Dependence of the Yield of Carbon Dioxide from Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Methanol on Platinum(100), J. Phys. Chem. B. 101 (1997) 3649-3652. doi:10.1021/jp9629248. open in new tab
69. J.B. Goodenough, A. Hamnett, B.J. Kennedy, R. Manoharan, S.A. Weeks, Methanol oxidation on unsupported and carbon supported Pt + Ru anodes, J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 240 (1988) 133-145. doi:10.1016/0022-0728(88)80318-8. open in new tab
70. W. Chrzanowski, Badania mechanizmu reakcji elektroutleniania metanolu na elektrodach platynowych i platynowo-rutenowych z uwzględnieniem krystalograficznej orientacji powierzchni elektrody, Wydaw. PG, 2000. https://books.google.pl/books?id=txgtGwAACAAJ.
71. J.N. Tiwari, R.N. Tiwari, G. Singh, K.S. Kim, Recent progress in the development of anode and cathode catalysts for direct methanol fuel cells, Nano Energy. 2 (2013) 553-578. doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2013.06.009. open in new tab
72. N.M. Marković, H.A. Gasteiger, P.N. Ross, X. Jiang, I. Villegas, M.J. Weaver, Electro-oxidation mechanisms of methanol and formic acid on Pt-Ru alloy surfaces, Electrochim. Acta. 40 (1995) 91- 98. doi:10.1016/0013-4686(94)00241-R. open in new tab
73. P. Kolla, A. Smirnova, Methanol oxidation on hybrid catalysts: PtRu/C nanostructures promoted with cerium and titanium oxides, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 38 (2013) 15152-15159. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.096. open in new tab
74. J. Jiang, A. Kucernak, Nanostructured platinum as an electrocatalyst for the electrooxidation of formic acid, J. Electroanal. Chem. 520 (2002) 64-70. doi:10.1016/S0022-0728(01)00739-2. open in new tab
75. Z. WANG, K. QIU, Electrocatalytic oxidation of formic acid on platinum nanoparticle electrode deposited on the nichrome substrate, Electrochem. Commun. 8 (2006) 1075-1081. doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2006.04.014. open in new tab
76. M. Jing, L. Jiang, B. Yi, G. Sun, Comparative study of methanol adsorption and electro-oxidation on carbon-supported platinum in acidic and alkaline electrolytes, J. Electroanal. Chem. 688 (2013) 172- 179. doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2012.10.028. open in new tab
77. Z.-B. Wang, Y.-Y. Chu, A.-F. Shao, P.-J. Zuo, G.-P. Yin, Electrochemical impedance studies of electrooxidation of methanol and formic acid on Pt/C catalyst in acid medium, J. Power Sources. 190 (2009) 336-340. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.01.008. open in new tab
78. J. Jiang, A. Kucernak, Solid polymer electrolyte membrane composite microelectrode investigations of fuel cell reactions. II: voltammetric study of methanol oxidation at the nanostructured platinum microelectrode|Nafion® membrane interface, J. Electroanal. Chem. 576 (2005) 223-236. doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2004.10.019. open in new tab
79. N. Nakagawa, Y. Xiu, Performance of a direct methanol fuel cell operated at atmospheric pressure, J. Power Sources. 118 (2003) 248-255. doi:10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00090-9. open in new tab
80. J.C. Amphlett, B.A. Peppley, E. Halliop, A. Sadiq, The effect of anode flow characteristics and temperature on the performance of a direct methanol fuel cell, J. Power Sources. 96 (2001) 204- 213. doi:10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00490-6. open in new tab
81. J.-P. Diard, N. Glandut, P. Landaud, B. Le Gorrec, C. Montella, A method for determining anode and cathode impedances of a direct methanol fuel cell running on a load, Electrochim. Acta. 48 (2003) 555-562. doi:10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00722-3. open in new tab
82. S. Uhm, S.T. Chung, J. Lee, Characterization of direct formic acid fuel cells by Impedance Studies: In comparison of direct methanol fuel cells, J. Power Sources. 178 (2008) 34-43. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.12.016. open in new tab
83. A.M. Castro Luna, A. Bonesi, W.E. Triaca, V. Baglio, V. Antonucci, A.S. Aricò, Pt-Fe cathode catalysts to improve the oxygen reduction reaction and methanol tolerance in direct methanol fuel cells, J. Solid State Electrochem. 12 (2008) 643-649. doi:10.1007/s10008-007-0334-0. open in new tab
84. N. Markovic, P.. Ross, Surface science studies of model fuel cell electrocatalysts, Surf. Sci. Rep. 45 (2002) 117-229. doi:10.1016/S0167-5729(01)00022-X. open in new tab
85. R. Borup, J. Meyers, B. Pivovar, Y.S. Kim, R. Mukundan, N. Garland, D. Myers, M. Wilson, F. open in new tab
86. Garzon, D. Wood, P. Zelenay, K. More, K. Stroh, T. Zawodzinski, J. Boncella, J.E. McGrath, M. Inaba, K. Miyatake, M. Hori, K. Ota, Z. Ogumi, S. Miyata, A. Nishikata, Z. Siroma, Y. Uchimoto, K.
87. Yasuda, K. Kimijima, N. Iwashita, Scientific Aspects of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Durability and Degradation, Chem. Rev. 107 (2007) 3904-3951. doi:10.1021/cr050182l. open in new tab
88. C. Lo Vecchio, C. Alegre, D. Sebastián, A. Stassi, S.A. Aricò, V. Baglio, Investigation of Supported Pd-Based Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction: Performance, Durability and Methanol Tolerance, Mater. . 8 (2015). doi:10.3390/ma8125438. open in new tab
89. K. Prater, The renaissance of the solid polymer fuel cell, J. Power Sources. 29 (1990) 239-250. doi:10.1016/0378-7753(90)80023-7. open in new tab
90. I.D. Raistrick, Impedance studies of porous electrodes, Electrochim. Acta. 35 (1990) 1579-1586. doi:10.1016/0013-4686(90)80013-E. open in new tab
91. T.E. Springer, I.D. Raistrick, Electrical Impedance of a Pore Wall for the Flooded-Agglomerate Model of Porous Gas-Diffusion Electrodes, J. Electrochem. Soc. 136 (1989) 1594-1603. doi:10.1149/1.2096975. open in new tab
92. M. Ciureanu, R. Roberge, Electrochemical Impedance Study of PEM Fuel Cells. Experimental Diagnostics and Modeling of Air Cathodes, J. Phys. Chem. B. 105 (2001) 3531-3539. doi:10.1021/jp003273p. open in new tab
93. A.A. Kulikovsky, Analysis of Damjanović kinetics of the oxygen reduction reaction: Stability, polarization curve and impedance spectra, J. Electroanal. Chem. 738 (2015) 130-137. doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2014.11.014. open in new tab
94. T.E. Springer, T.A. Zawodzinski, M.S. Wilson, S. Gottesfeld, Characterization of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells Using AC Impedance Spectroscopy, J. Electrochem. Soc. 143 (1996) 587-599. doi:10.1149/1.1836485. open in new tab
95. V..
96. Paganin, C.L.. Oliveira, E.. Ticianelli, T.. open in new tab
97. Springer, E.. Gonzalez, Modelisticinterpretation of the impedance response of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell, Electrochim. Acta. 43 (1998) 3761-3766. doi:10.1016/S0013-4686(98)00135-2. open in new tab
98. N. Wagner, W. Schnurnberger, B. Müller, M. Lang, Electrochemical impedance spectra of solid- oxide fuel cells and polymer membrane fuel cells, Electrochim. Acta. 43 (1998) 3785-3793. doi:10.1016/S0013-4686(98)00138-8. open in new tab
99. M.S. Wilson, S. Gottesfeld, Thin-film catalyst layers for polymer electrolyte fuel cell electrodes, J. open in new tab
100. Appl. Electrochem. 22 (1992) 1-7. doi:10.1007/BF01093004. open in new tab
101. C. Marr, X. Li, Composition and performance modelling of catalyst layer in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell, J. Power Sources. 77 (1999) 17-27. doi:10.1016/S0378-7753(98)00161-X. open in new tab
102. M.S. Kondratenko, M.O. Gallyamov, A.R. Khokhlov, Performance of high temperature fuel cells with different types of PBI membranes as analysed by impedance spectroscopy, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 37 (2012) 2596-2602. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.087. open in new tab
103. M. Markiewicz, C. Zalitis, A. Kucernak, Performance measurements and modelling of the ORR on fuel cell electrocatalysts -the modified double trap model, Electrochim. Acta. 179 (2015) 126-136. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2015.04.066. open in new tab
104. T. Schulz, C. Weinmuller, M. Nabavi, D. Poulikakos, Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy analysis of a thin polymer film-based micro-direct methanol fuel cell, J. Power Sources. 195 (2010) 7548-7558. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.008. open in new tab
105. S. Cruz-Manzo, R. Chen, A generic electrical circuit for performance analysis of the fuel cell cathode catalyst layer through electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, J. Electroanal. Chem. 694 (2013) 45-55. doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2013.01.037. open in new tab
106. M. Javaheri, Investigating the influence of Pd situation (as core or shell) in synthesized catalyst for ORR in PEMFC, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 40 (2015) 6661-6671. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.030. open in new tab
107. A. Seifitokaldani, O. Savadogo, M. Perrier, Stability and catalytic activity of titanium oxy-nitride catalyst prepared by in-situ urea-based sol-gel method for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in acid medium, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 40 (2015) 10427-10438. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.002. open in new tab
108. N. Fouquet, C. Doulet, C. Nouillant, G. Dauphin-Tanguy, B. Ould-Bouamama, Model based PEM fuel cell state-of-health monitoring via ac impedance measurements, J. Power Sources. 159 (2006) 905-913. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.11.035. open in new tab
109. M. Boillot, C. Bonnet, N. Jatroudakis, P. Carre, S. Didierjean, F. Lapicque, Effect of Gas Dilution on PEM Fuel Cell Performance and Impedance Response, Fuel Cells. 6 (2006) 31-37. doi:10.1002/fuce.200500101. open in new tab
110. M.G. Hosseini, P. Zardari, Electrocatalytical study of carbon supported Pt, Ru and bimetallic Pt/Ru nanoparticles for oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline media, Appl. Surf. Sci. 345 (2015) 223-231. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.03.146. open in new tab
111. S.M. Rezaei Niya, M. Hoorfar, Process modeling of electrodes in proton exchange membrane fuel cells, J. Electroanal. Chem. 747 (2015) 112-122. doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2015.04.015. open in new tab
112. M. Mamlouk, K. Scott, Analysis of high temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell electrodes using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, Electrochim. Acta. 56 (2011) 5493- 5512. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2011.03.056. open in new tab
113. P. Piela, R. Fields, P. Zelenay, Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy for Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Diagnostics, J. Electrochem. Soc. . 153 (2006) A1902-A1913. doi:10.1149/1.2266623. open in new tab
114. W. Zhang, T. Maruta, S. Shironita, M. Umeda, Anode and cathode degradation in a PEFC single cell investigated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, Electrochim. Acta. 131 (2014) 245- 249. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2014.02.054. open in new tab
115. Y. Fu, S. Poizeau, A. Bertei, C. Qi, A. Mohanram, J.D. Pietras, M.Z. Bazant, Heterogeneous electrocatalysis in porous cathodes of solid oxide fuel cells, Electrochim. Acta. 159 (2015) 71-80. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.120. open in new tab
116. Y. Zhu, W.H. Zhu, B.J. Tatarchuk, Performance comparison between high temperature and traditional proton exchange membrane fuel cell stacks using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, J. Power Sources. 256 (2014) 250-257. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.049. open in new tab
117. Y. Wang, G.G. Liu, M. Wang, G.G. Liu, J. Li, X. Wang, Study on stability of self-breathing DFMC with EIS method and three-electrode system, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 38 (2013) 9000-9007. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.05.033. open in new tab
118. D. Qu, Investigation of oxygen reduction on activated carbon electrodes in alkaline solution, Carbon N. Y. 45 (2007) 1296-1301. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2007.01.013. open in new tab
119. J. Han, H. Liu, Real time measurements of methanol crossover in a DMFC, J. Power Sources. 164 (2007) 166-173. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.105. open in new tab
120. K. Scott, W.. Taama, P. Argyropoulos, K. Sundmacher, The impact of mass transport and methanol crossover on the direct methanol fuel cell, J. Power Sources. 83 (1999) 204-216. doi:10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00303-1. open in new tab
121. H. Dohle, J. Divisek, J. Mergel, H.. Oetjen, C. Zingler, D. Stolten, Recent developments of the measurement of the methanol permeation in a direct methanol fuel cell, J. Power Sources. 105 (2002) 274-282. doi:10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00953-3. open in new tab
122. P.R. Resnick, W.G. Grot, No Title, 4, 1978.
123. X. Ren, P. Zelenay, S. Thomas, J. Davey, S. Gottesfeld, Recent advances in direct methanol fuel cells at Los Alamos National Laboratory, J. Power Sources. 86 (2000) 111-116. doi:10.1016/S0378- 7753(99)00407-3. open in new tab
124. C.Y. Du, T.S. Zhao, C. Xu, Simultaneous oxygen-reduction and methanol-oxidation reactions at the cathode of a DMFC: A model-based electrochemical impedance spectroscopy study, J. Power Sources. 167 (2007) 265-271. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.02.048. open in new tab
125. K.-J. Jeong, C.M. Miesse, J.-H. Choi, J. Lee, J. Han, S.P. Yoon, S.W. Nam, T.-H. Lim, T.G. Lee, Fuel crossover in direct formic acid fuel cells, J. Power Sources. 168 (2007) 119-125. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.02.062. open in new tab
126. T. Tsujiguchi, T. Iwakami, S. Hirano, N. Nakagawa, Water transport characteristics of the passive direct formic acid fuel cell, J. Power Sources. 250 (2014) 266-273. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.094. open in new tab
127. X. Ren, S. Gottesfeld, Electro-osmotic Drag of Water in Poly(perfluorosulfonic acid) Membranes, J. Electrochem. Soc. . 148 (2001) A87-A93. doi:10.1149/1.1344521. open in new tab
128. T.A. Zawodzinski, C. Derouin, S. Radzinski, R.J. Sherman, V.T. Smith, T.E. Springer, S. Gottesfeld, Water Uptake by and Transport Through Nafion® 117 Membranes, J. Electrochem. Soc. . 140 (1993) 1041-1047. doi:10.1149/1.2056194. open in new tab
129. K. Darowicki, E. Janicka, P. Slepski, Study of Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Process Dynamics Using Dynamic Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy, 7 (2012) 12090-12097.
130. P. Slepski, K. Darowicki, E. Janicka, G. Lentka, A complete impedance analysis of electrochemical cells used as energy sources, J. Solid State Electrochem. 16 (2012) 3539-3549. doi:10.1007/s10008-012-1825-1. open in new tab
131. L. Gawel, L. Nieuzyla, G. Nawrat, K. Darowicki, P. Slepski, Impedance monitoring of corrosion degradation of plasma electrolytic oxidation coatings (PEO) on magnesium alloy, J. Alloys Compd. (2017). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.120. open in new tab
132. J. Ryl, L. Gawel, M. Cieslik, H. Gerengi, G. Lentka, P. Slepski, Instantaneous Impedance Analysis of Non-Stationary Corrosion Process: a Case Study of Carbon Steel in 1M HCl, Int. J. Electrochem. open in new tab
133. Sci. 12 (2017) 6908-6919. doi:10.20964/2017.07.15. open in new tab
134. K. Darowicki, P. Ślepski, M. Szociński, Application of the dynamic EIS to investigation of transport within organic coatings, Prog. Org. Coatings. 52 (2005) 306-310. doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.06.007. open in new tab
135. J. Ryl, A. Zielinski, L. Burczyk, R. Bogdanowicz, T. Ossowski, K. Darowicki, Chemical-Assisted Mechanical Lapping of Thin Boron-Doped Diamond Films: A Fast Route Toward High Electrochemical Performance for Sensing Devices, Electrochim. Acta. 242 (2017) 268-279. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.027. open in new tab
136. B. BOUKAMP, A Nonlinear Least Squares Fit procedure for analysis of immittance data of electrochemical systems, Solid State Ionics. 20 (1986) 31-44. doi:10.1016/0167-2738(86)90031-7. open in new tab
137. K. Darowicki, L. Gawel, Impedance Measurement and Selection of Electrochemical Equivalent Circuit of a Working PEM Fuel Cell Cathode, Electrocatalysis. 8 (2017). doi:10.1007/s12678-017- 0363-0. open in new tab
138. R. de Levie, Advances in electrochemistry and electrochemical engineering Volume 6, Interscience Publishers, New York; London;
139. Sydney, 1967. open in new tab
140. E. Janicka, Kompleksowa impedancyjna charakterystyka pracy ogniw paliwowych : rozprawa doktorska, Politechnika Gdańska, 2014. oai:pbc.gda.pl:50482.
141. SPIS DOROBKU NAUKOWEGO DOKTORANTA Publikacje:
142.  K. Darowicki, L. Gawel, Impedance Measurement and Selection of Electrochemical Equivalent Circuit of a Working PEM Fuel Cell Cathode, Electrocatalysis. 8 (2017). doi:10.1007/s12678-017-0363-0. open in new tab
143.  L. Gawel, L. Nieuzyla, G. Nawrat, K. Darowicki, P. Slepski, Impedance monitoring of corrosion degradation of plasma electrolytic oxidation coatings (PEO) on magnesium alloy, J. Alloys Compd. (2017). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.120. open in new tab
144.  J. Ryl, L. Gawel, M. Cieslik, H. Gerengi, G. Lentka, P. Slepski, Instantaneous Impedance Analysis of Non-Stationary Corrosion Process: a Case Study of Carbon Steel in 1M HCl, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 12 (2017) 6908-6919. doi:10.20964/2017.07.15. Wystąpienia naukowe: open in new tab
145. Zjazd Naukowy PTCHem w Gdańsku-wystąpienie ustne "Impedancyjna charakterystyka katody ogniwa paliwowego typu PEM" open in new tab
146.  7th. Kurt Schwabe Symposium, Mittweida-poster "Impedance diagnostic for cathode in working fuel cell" Prace badawcze realizowane z przemysłem:
147.  Ocena techniczna określająca stan i efektywność zabezpieczenia antykorozyjnego w postaci ochrony katodowej obiektów PPPP "NAFTOPORT" sp. z o.o. open in new tab
148.  Pomiary skuteczności ochrony katodowej stanowiska przeładunkowego T1 w Bazie Przeładunku Paliw Płynnych w Porcie Północnym w Gdańsku open in new tab

show (148) hide

Verified by:

Gdańsk University of Technology