Mitigating the Energy Consumption and the Carbon Emission in the Building Structures by Optimization of the Construction Processes - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Search

Mitigating the Energy Consumption and the Carbon Emission in the Building Structures by Optimization of the Construction Processes

Abstract

For decades, among other industries, the construction sector has accounted for high energy consumption and emissions. As the energy crisis and climate change have become a growing concern, mitigating energy usage is a significant issue. The operational and end of life phases are all included in the building life cycle stages. Although the operation stage accounts for more energy consumption with higher carbon emissions, the embodied stage occurs in a time-intensive manner. In this paper, an attempt has been made to review the existing methods, aiming to lower the consumption of energy and carbon emission in the construction buildings through optimizing the construction processes, especially with the lean construction approach. First, the energy consumption and emissions for primary construction materials and processes are introduced. It is followed by a review of the structural optimization and lean techniques that seek to improve the construction processes. Then, the influence of these methods on the reduction of energy consumption is discussed. Based on these methods, a general algorithm is proposed with the purpose of improving the construction processes’ performance. It includes structural optimization and lean and life cycle assessments, which are expected to influence the possible reduction of energy consumption and carbon emissions during the execution of construction works. 

Citations

  • 2 0

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 2 0

    Scopus

Authors (2)

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 33 times
Publication version
Accepted or Published Version
License
Creative Commons: CC-BY open in new tab

Keywords

Details

Category:
Magazine publication
Type:
Magazine publication
Published in:
ENERGIES no. 14, edition 11,
ISSN: 1996-1073
Publication year:
2021
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.3390/en14113287
Bibliography: test
  1. Giorgi, F. Climate Change: Key Conclusions from the IPCC Fourth assessment report (IPCC-AR4). In International Seminar on Nuclear War and Planetary Emergencies-38th Session; World Scientific: Singapore, 2008; p. 101. open in new tab
  2. Sieminski, A. Annual Energy Outlook 2015; US Energy Information Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. open in new tab
  3. Erickson, L.E. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving air quality: Two global challenges. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2017, 36, 982-988. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  4. Quiros, D.C.; Smith, J.; Thiruvengadam, A.; Huai, T.; Hu, S. Greenhouse gas emissions from heavy-duty natural gas, hybrid, and conventional diesel on-road trucks during freight transport. Atmos. Environ. 2017, 168, 36-45. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  5. Schaltegger, S.; Burritt, R.; Martinov-Bennie, N. Greenhouse gas emissions reporting and assurance: Reflections on the current state. Sustain. Account. Manag. Policy J. 2012. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  6. Global Construction. A Global Forecast for the Construction Industry to 2030; Oxford Economics and Global Construction Perspectives: Londong, UK, 2015. open in new tab
  7. United Nations Environment Programme. Buildings and Climate Change: Summary for Decision Makers; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2009. open in new tab
  8. Lu, W.; Yuan, H. A framework for understanding waste management studies in construction. Waste Manag. 2011, 31, 1252-1260. [CrossRef] [PubMed] open in new tab
  9. Du, Q.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Bai, L.; Li, J.; Han, X. Rebound effect of energy efficiency in China's construction industry: A general equilibrium analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 12217-12226. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  10. IEA. 2019 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction; United Nations Environment Programme:Nairobi, Kenya, 2019. open in new tab
  11. IEA. Key World Energy Statistics 2020. Int. Energy Agency 2020, 33, 4649. open in new tab
  12. Peng, C. Calculation of a building's life cycle carbon emissions based on Ecotect and building information modeling. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 453-465. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  13. Pérez-Lombard, L.; Ortiz, J.; Pout, C. A review on buildings energy consumption information. Energy Build. 2008, 40, 394-398. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  14. Hajdukiewicz, M.; Byrne, D.; Keane, M.M.; Goggins, J. Real-time monitoring framework to investigate the environmental and structural performance of buildings. Build. Environ. 2015, 86, 1-16. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  15. Shiftehfar, R.; Golparvar-Fard, M.; Peña-Mora, F.; Karahalios, K.G.; Aziz, Z. The Application of Visualization for Construction Emission Monitoring. In Construction Research Congress 2010; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2010; pp. 1396-1405. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  16. Dixit, M.K.; Culp, C.H.; Fernández-Solís, J.L. System boundary for embodied energy in buildings: A conceptual model for definition. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 21, 153-164. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  17. Moncaster, A.; Symons, K. A method and tool for 'cradle to grave' embodied carbon and energy impacts of UK buildings in compliance with the new TC350 standards. Energy Build. 2013, 66, 514-523. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  18. Ürge-Vorsatz, D.; Danny Harvey, L.D.; Mirasgedis, S.; Levine, M.D. Mitigating CO 2 emissions from energy use in the world's buildings. Build. Res. Inf. 2007, 35, 379-398. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  19. Sandanayake, M.; Zhang, G.; Setunge, S. Environmental emissions at foundation construction stage of buildings-Two case studies. Build. Environ. 2016, 95, 189-198. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  20. Bilal, M.; Khan, K.I.A.; Thaheem, M.J.; Nasir, A.R. Current state and barriers to the circular economy in the building sector: Towards a mitigation framework. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 276, 123250. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  21. Cang, Y.; Yang, L.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, N. Prediction of embodied carbon emissions from residential buildings with different structural forms. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 54, 101946. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  22. Plank, R. The principles of sustainable construction. IES J. Part A Civ. Struct. Eng. 2008, 1, 301-307. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  23. Perez Fernandez, N. The Influence of Construction Materials on Life-Cycle Energy Use and Carbon Dioxide Emissions of Medium Size Commercial Buildings. Master's Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand, 2008. open in new tab
  24. Frey, P.; Anderson, P.; Andrews, M.; Wolf, C. Building Reuse: Finding a Place on American Climate Policy Agendas. 2008. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Building-Reuse%3A-Finding-a-Place-on-American-Climate-Frey- Anderson/9c4847cfe21652cc13d1d74b6b80311274fcd2a5 (accessed on 3 June 2021).
  25. González, M.J.; García Navarro, J. Assessment of the decrease of CO 2 emissions in the construction field through the selection of materials: Practical case study of three houses of low environmental impact. Build. Environ. 2006, 41, 902-909. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  26. Chastas, P.; Theodosiou, T.; Kontoleon, K.J.; Bikas, D. Normalising and assessing carbon emissions in the building sector: A review on the embodied CO 2 emissions of residential buildings. Build. Environ. 2018, 130, 212-226. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  27. Kumanayake, R.; Luo, H.; Paulusz, N. Assessment of material related embodied carbon of an office building in Sri Lanka. Energy Build. 2018, 166, 250-257. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  28. Robati, M.; Daly, D.; Kokogiannakis, G. A method of uncertainty analysis for whole-life embodied carbon emissions (CO 2 -e) of building materials of a net-zero energy building in Australia. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 225, 541-553. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  29. Shang, C.J.; Zhang, Z.H. Assessment of life-cycle carbon emission for buildings. J. Eng. Manag. 2010, 1, 24-38. open in new tab
  30. Venkatarama Reddy, B.; Jagadish, K. Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies. Energy Build. 2003, 35, 129-137. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  31. Kaewunruen, S.; Sresakoolchai, J.; Yu, S. Global Warming Potentials Due to Railway Tunnel Construction and Maintenance. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6459. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  32. Faccio, M.; Persona, A.; Sgarbossa, F.; Zanin, G. Industrial maintenance policy development: A quantitative framework. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2014, 147, 85-93. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  33. Kaewunruen, S.; Sresakoolchai, J.; Peng, J. Life Cycle Cost, Energy and Carbon Assessments of Beijing-Shanghai High-Speed Railway. Sustainability 2019, 12, 206. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  34. Carrasqueira, M.; Machado, V.C. Strategic logistics: Re-designing companies in accordance with Lean Principles. Int. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. Manag. 2008, 3, 294-302. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  35. Shah, R.; Ward, P.T. Defining and developing measures of lean production. J. Oper. Manag. 2007, 25, 785-805. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  36. Elkington, J. Partnerships fromcannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environ. Qual. Manag. 1998, 8, 37-51. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  37. Belleri, A.; Marini, A. Does seismic risk affect the environmental impact of existing buildings? Energy Build. 2016, 110, 149-158. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  38. Mergos, P.E. Seismic design of reinforced concrete frames for minimum embodied CO 2 emissions. Energy Build. 2018, 162, 177-186. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  39. Moussavi Nadoushani, Z.S.; Akbarnezhad, A. Effects of structural system on the life cycle carbon footprint of buildings. Energy Build. 2015, 102, 337-346. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  40. Yeo, D.; Gabbai, R.D. Sustainable design of reinforced concrete structures through embodied energy optimization. Energy Build. 2011, 43, 2028-2033. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  41. Heravi, G.; Firoozi, M. Production process improvement of buildings' prefabricated steel frames using value stream mapping. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 89, 3307-3321. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  42. Li, L.; Chen, K. Quantitative assessment of carbon dioxide emissions in construction projects: A case study in Shenzhen. J. Clean. Prod. 2017. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  43. Rother, M.; Shook, J. Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Add Value and Eliminate Muda; Lean Enterprise Institute: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003. open in new tab
  44. Rosenbaum, S.; Toledo, M.; Gonzalez, V. Green-lean approach for assessing environmental and production waste in construction. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the IGLC, San Diego, CA, USA, 18-22 July 2012.
  45. Heravi, G.; Rostami, M.; Kebria, M.F. Energy consumption and carbon emissions assessment of integrated production and erection of buildings' pre-fabricated steel frames using lean techniques. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 253, 120045. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  46. You, F.; Hu, D.; Zhang, H.; Guo, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, B.; Yuan, Y. Carbon emissions in the life cycle of urban building system in China-A case study of residential buildings. Ecol. Complex. 2011, 8, 201-212. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  47. Heravi, G.; Nafisi, T.; Mousavi, R. Evaluation of energy consumption during production and construction of concrete and steel frames of residential buildings. Energy Build. 2016, 130, 244-252. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  48. Chae, C.U. Comparative study on the amount of CO 2 emission of building matereals between reinforced concrete and steel strycture buildings using the input-output analysys. In Proceedings of the World Sustainable Building Conterence, Tokyo, Japan, 27-29 September 2005; Volume 9.
  49. Acquaye, A.; Duffy, A.; Basu, B. Embodied emissions abatement-A policy assessment using stochastic analysis. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 429-441. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  50. Li, X.; Shen, G.Q.; Wu, P.; Yue, T. Integrating Building Information Modeling and Prefabrication Housing Production. Autom. Con- str. 2019, 100, 46-60. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  51. Intini, F.; Kühtz, S. Recycling in buildings: an LCA case study of a thermal insulation panel made of polyester fiber, recycled from post-consumer PET bottles. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2011, 16, 306-315. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  52. Chen, T.; Burnett, J.; Chau, C. Analysis of embodied energy use in the residential building of Hong Kong. Energy 2001, 26, 323-340. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  53. Gao, W.; Ariyama, T.; Ojima, T.; Meier, A. Energy impacts of recycling disassembly material in residential buildings. Energy Build. 2001, 33, 553-562. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  54. Crishna, N.; Banfill, P.; Goodsir, S. Embodied energy and CO 2 in UK dimension stone. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2011, 55, 1265-1273. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  55. Gursel, A.P.; Ostertag, C. Comparative life-cycle impact assessment of concrete manufacturing in Singapore. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2017, 22, 237-255. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  56. Morel, J.; Mesbah, A.; Oggero, M.; Walker, P. Building houses with local materials: means to drastically reduce the environmental impact of construction. Build. Environ. 2001, 36, 1119-1126. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  57. Akadiri, P.O.; Chinyio, E.A.; Olomolaiye, P.O. Design of A Sustainable Building: A Conceptual Framework for Implementing Sustainability in the Building Sector. Buildings 2012, 2, 126-152. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  58. Mao, C.; Shen, Q.; Shen, L.; Tang, L. Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between off-site prefabrication and conventional construction methods: Two case studies of residential projects. Energy Build. 2013, 66, 165-176. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  59. Abey, S.T.; Anand, K.B. Embodied Energy Comparison of Prefabricated and Conventional Building Construction. J. Inst. Eng. Ser. A 2019, 100, 777-790. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  60. Lim, J.; Kim, S. Evaluation of CO 2 emission reduction effect using in-situ production of precast concrete components. J. Asian Arch. Build. Eng. 2020, 19, 176-186. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  61. Dong, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, H.; Jiang, B.; Al-Hussein, M. Carbon Reduction Measures-Based LCA of Prefabricated Temporary Housing with Renewable Energy Systems. Sustainability 2018, 10, 718. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  62. Kong, A.; Kang, H.; He, S.; Li, N.; Wang, W. Study on the Carbon Emissions in the Whole Construction Process of Prefabricated Floor Slab. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2326. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  63. Qaemi, M.; Heravi, G. Sustainable Energy Performance Indicators of Green Building in Developing Countries. In Construction Research Congress 2012; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2012; pp. 1961-1970. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  64. Nowotarski, P.; Pasławski, J.; Dallasega, P. Multi-Criteria Assessment of Lean Management Tools Selection in Construction. Arch. Civ. Eng. 2021, 67, 711-726. open in new tab
  65. Ohno, T. Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production; CRC Press: Boca Ration, FL, USA, 1988. open in new tab
  66. Rosenbaum, S.; Toledo, M.; González, V. Improving Environmental and Production Performance in Construction Projects Using Value-Stream Mapping: Case Study. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2014, 140, 04013045. [CrossRef] open in new tab
  67. ISO. 14040: Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006. open in new tab
Verified by:
No verification

seen 85 times

Recommended for you

Meta Tags