Transcriptomic responses to wounding: meta-analysis of gene expression microarray data - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Your account

login

Search

Transcriptomic responses to wounding: meta-analysis of gene expression microarray data

Abstract

Background A vast amount of microarray data on transcriptomic response to injury has been collected so far. We designed the analysis in order to identify the genes displaying significant changes in expression after wounding in different organisms and tissues. This meta-analysis is the first study to compare gene expression profiles in response to wounding in as different tissues as heart, liver, skin, bones, and spinal cord, and species, including rat, mouse and human. Results We collected available microarray transcriptomic profiles obtained from different tissue injury experiments and selected the genes showing a minimum twofold change in expression in response to wounding in prevailing number of experiments for each of five wound healing stages we distinguished: haemostasis & early inflammation, inflammation, early repair, late repair and remodelling. During the initial phases after wounding, haemostasis & early inflammation and inflammation, the transcriptomic responses showed little consistency between different tissues and experiments. For the later phases, wound repair and remodelling, we identified a number of genes displaying similar transcriptional responses in all examined tissues. As revealed by ontological analyses, activation of certain pathways was rather specific for selected phases of wound healing, such as e.g. responses to vitamin D pronounced during inflammation. Conversely, we observed induction of genes encoding inflammatory agents and extracellular matrix proteins in all wound healing phases. Further, we selected several genes differentially upregulated throughout different stages of wound response, including established factors of wound healing in addition to those previously unreported in this context such as PTPRC and AQP4. Conclusions We found that transcriptomic responses to wounding showed similar traits in a diverse selection of tissues including skin, muscles, internal organs and nervous system. Notably, we distinguished transcriptional induction of inflammatory genes not only in the initial response to wounding, but also later, during wound repair and tissue remodelling.

Citations

  • 1 5

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 1 3

    Scopus

Authors (4)

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 21 times
Publication version
Accepted or Published Version
License
Creative Commons: CC-BY open in new tab

Keywords

Details

Category:
Articles
Type:
artykuł w czasopiśmie wyróżnionym w JCR
Published in:
BMC GENOMICS no. 18, pages 850 - 861,
ISSN: 1471-2164
Language:
English
Publication year:
2017
Bibliographic description:
Sass P., Dąbrowski M., Charzyńska A., Sachadyn P.: Transcriptomic responses to wounding: meta-analysis of gene expression microarray data// BMC GENOMICS. -Vol. 18, (2017), s.850-861
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.1186/s12864-017-4202-8
Bibliography: test
  1. Stroncek JD, Reichert WM. Overview of wound healing in different tissue types. In: Reichert WM, editor. Indwelling neural implants: strategies for contending with the in vivo environment. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2008. open in new tab
  2. Weyrich AS, Schwertz H, Kraiss LW, Zimmerman GA. Protein synthesis by platelets: historical and new perspectives. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7(2):241-6. open in new tab
  3. Kumar A, Brockes JP. Nerve dependence in tissue, organ, and appendage regeneration. Trends Neurosci. 2012;35(11):691-9. open in new tab
  4. Palatinus JA, Rhett JM, Gourdie RG. Translational lessons from scarless healing of cutaneous wounds and regenerative repair of the myocardium. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2010;48(3):550-7. open in new tab
  5. Taub R. Liver regeneration: from myth to mechanism. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004;5(10):836-47. open in new tab
  6. Lorenz HP, Longaker MT, Perkocha LA, Jennings RW, Harrison MR, Adzick NS. Scarless wound repair: a human fetal skin model. Development. 1992; 114(1):253-9.
  7. Ferguson MW, O'Kane S. Scar-free healing: from embryonic mechanisms to adult therapeutic intervention. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004; 359(1445):839-50. open in new tab
  8. Podolak-Popinigis J, Ronowicz A, Dmochowska M, Jakubiak A, Sachadyn P. The methylome and transcriptome of fetal skin: implications for scarless healing. Epigenomics. 2016;8(10):1331-45. open in new tab
  9. Fraser JF, Cuttle L, Kempf M, Phillips GE, O'Rourke PK, Choo K, Hayes MT, Kimble RM. Deep dermal burn injury results in scarless wound healing in the ovine fetus. Wound Repair Regen. 2005;13(2):189-97. open in new tab
  10. Rolfe KJ, Grobbelaar AO. A review of fetal scarless healing. ISRN Dermatol. 2012;2012:698034. open in new tab
  11. Porrello ER, Mahmoud AI, Simpson E, Hill JA, Richardson JA, Olson EN, Sadek HA. Transient regenerative potential of the neonatal mouse heart. Science. 2011;331(6020):1078-80. open in new tab
  12. Gornikiewicz B, Ronowicz A, Krzeminski M, Sachadyn P. Changes in gene methylation patterns in neonatal murine hearts: implications for the regenerative potential. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:231. open in new tab
  13. Seifert AW, Kiama SG, Seifert MG, Goheen JR, Palmer TM, Maden M. Skin shedding and tissue regeneration in African spiny mice (Acomys). Nature. 2012;489(7417):561-5. open in new tab
  14. Gawronska-Kozak B, Bogacki M, Rim JS, Monroe WT, Manuel JA. Scarless skin repair in immunodeficient mice. Wound Repair Regen. 2006;14(3):265-76. open in new tab
  15. Da Wei Huang BTS, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2008;4(1):44-57.
  16. Hoffmann DC, Textoris C, Oehme F, Klaassen T, Goppelt A, Romer A, Fugmann B, Davidson JM, Werner S, Krieg T, et al. Pivotal role for alpha1- antichymotrypsin in skin repair. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(33):28889-901. open in new tab
  17. Low QE, Drugea IA, Duffner LA, Quinn DG, Cook DN, Rollins BJ, Kovacs EJ, DiPietro LA. Wound healing in MIP-1alpha(−/−) and MCP-1(−/−) mice. Am J Pathol. 2001;159(2):457-63. open in new tab
  18. Walker JT, Elliott CG, Forbes TL, Hamilton DW. Genetic deletion of Galectin-3 does not impair full-thickness Excisional skin healing. J Investig Dermatol. 2016;136(5):1042-50. open in new tab
  19. Ansorge HL, Beredjiklian PK, Soslowsky LJ. CD44 deficiency improves healing tendon mechanics and increases matrix and cytokine expression in a mouse patellar tendon injury model. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(10):1386-91. open in new tab
  20. Madala SK, Pesce JT, Ramalingam TR, Wilson MS, Minnicozzi S, Cheever AW, Thompson RW, Mentink-Kane MM, Wynn TA. Matrix metalloproteinase 12- deficiency augments extracellular matrix degrading metalloproteinases and attenuates IL-13-dependent fibrosis. J Immunol. 2010;184(7):3955-63. open in new tab
  21. Owings RA, Boerma M, Wang J, Berbee M, Laderoute KR, Soderberg LS, Vural E, Jensen MH. Selective deficiency of HIF-1α in myeloid cells influences secondary intention wound healing in mouse skin. In Vivo. 2009;23(6):879-84.
  22. Mack JA, Abramson SR, Ben Y, Coffin JC, Rothrock JK, Maytin EV, Hascall VC, Largman C, Stelnicki EJ. Hoxb13 knockout adult skin exhibits high levels of hyaluronan and enhanced wound healing. FASEB J. 2003;17(10):1352-4. open in new tab
  23. Ishida Y, Kondo T, Takayasu T, Iwakura Y, Mukaida N. The essential involvement of cross-talk between IFN-γ and TGF-β in the skin wound- healing process. J Immunol. 2004;172(3):1848-55. open in new tab
  24. Eming SA, Werner S, Bugnon P, Wickenhauser C, Siewe L, Utermöhlen O, Davidson JM, Krieg T, Roers A. Accelerated wound closure in mice deficient for interleukin-10. Am J Pathol. 2007;170(1):188-202. open in new tab
  25. Bradshaw AD, Reed MJ, Sage EH. SPARC-null mice exhibit accelerated cutaneous wound closure. J Histochem Cytochem. 2002;50(1):1-10. open in new tab
  26. Martinez-Ferrer M, Afshar-Sherif A-R, Uwamariya C, de Crombrugghe B, Davidson JM, Bhowmick NA. Dermal transforming growth factor-β responsiveness mediates wound contraction and epithelial closure. Am J Pathol. 2010;176(1):98-107. open in new tab
  27. Thomay AA, Daley JM, Sabo E, Worth PJ, Shelton LJ, Harty MW, Reichner JS, Albina JE. Disruption of interleukin-1 signaling improves the quality of wound healing. Am J Pathol. 2009;174(6):2129-36. open in new tab
  28. Mori R, Kondo T, Ohshima T, Ishida Y, Mukaida N. Accelerated wound healing in tumor necrosis factor receptor p55-deficient mice with reduced leukocyte infiltration. FASEB J. 2002;16(9):963-74. open in new tab
  29. Schwanhausser B, Busse D, Li N, Dittmar G, Schuchhardt J, Wolf J, Chen W, Selbach M. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature. 2011;473(7347):337-3z42. open in new tab
Verified by:
Gdańsk University of Technology

seen 104 times

Recommended for you

Activation of endogenous regenerative potential in mammals using epigenetic inhibitor zebularine

2021

Imunofan—RDKVYR Peptide—Stimulates Skin Cell Proliferation and Promotes Tissue Repair

  • J. Sawicka,
  • M. Dzierżyńska,
  • A. Wardowska
  • + 26 authors
2020

Transcriptomic Effects of Estrogen Starvation and Induction in the MCF7 Cells. The Meta-analysis of Microarray Results

2015

Imunofan - RDKVYR peptide - stimulates skin cell proliferation and promotes tissue repair

2020
Meta Tags