Cluster donation: How medical students bound certain types of tissues and biomedical research and how it affects their willingness to donate. - Publikacja - MOST Wiedzy

Twoje konto

zaloguj

Wyszukiwarka

Cluster donation: How medical students bound certain types of tissues and biomedical research and how it affects their willingness to donate.

Abstrakt

Although biomedical research requires cooperation with a large number of donors, its success also depends on the input of healthcare professionals who play a crucial role in promoting biomedical research and influencing an individual’s decision to donate one’s biospecimens that are left over after a medical procedure. This work was aimed at investigating the correlation between medical and healthcare students’ willingness to donate a biospecimen, the type of tissues to be donated, and the type of biomedical research to be conducted. A population survey among medical and healthcare students enrolled at the Poznan University of Medical Sciences was conducted on their attitudes toward the donation of human biological material for research purposes. A total of 1500 students responded and completed the survey. The questionnaire used multiple-choice closed-ended questions designed to explore medical and healthcare students’ preferences for sharing particular types of tissues and donating to a particular type of biomedical research. It asked three questions: 1. Which type of tissue would people be willing to donate for research purposes? 2. Which organs would they be willing to donate after death? 3. What type of research would they be willing to donate to? While future healthcare professionals’ beliefs regarding certain types of tissues and research can influence their willingness to donate for research purposes, many students tend to think about the body and biomedical research in terms of clusters. Consequently, their willingness to donate certain tissues for a particular type of research can affect their decision to donate other tissues. Our data suggest that cluster thinking with regard to donation can be a predictor of people’s readiness to participate in the collection and management of biospecimens.

Cytowania

Autorzy (3)

Cytuj jako

Pełna treść

pobierz publikację
pobrano 39 razy
Wersja publikacji
Submitted Version
Licencja
Creative Commons: CC-BY-NC-ND otwiera się w nowej karcie

Słowa kluczowe

Informacje szczegółowe

Kategoria:
Publikacja w czasopiśmie
Typ:
Publikacja w czasopiśmie
Opublikowano w:
Healthcare nr 11, wydanie 19,
ISSN: 2227-9032
Rok wydania:
2023
Opis bibliograficzny:
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/19/2636
DOI:
Cyfrowy identyfikator dokumentu elektronicznego (otwiera się w nowej karcie) https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11192636
Bibliografia: test
  1. Coppola, L.; Cianflone, A.; Grimaldi, A.M.; Incoronato, M.; Bevilacqua, P.; Messina, F.; Baselice, S.; Soricelli, A.; Mirabelli, P.; Salvatore, M. Biobanking in health care: Evolution and future directions. J. Transl. Med. 2019, 17, 172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1922-3. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  2. Lattanzi, W.; Ripoli, C.; Greco, V.; Barba, M.; Iavarone, F.; Minucci, A.; Urbani, A.; Grassi, C.; Parolini, O. Basic and preclinical research for personalized medicine. J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11, 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11050354. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  3. Goodson, M.L.; Vernon, B.G. A study of public opinion on the use of tissue samples from living subjects for clinical research. J. Clin. Pathol. 2004, 57, 135-138. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2003.9886. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  4. Lewis, C.; Clotworthy, M.; Hilton, S.; Magee, C.; Robertson, M.J.; Stubbins, L.J.; Corfield, J. Public views on the donation and use of human biological samples in biomedical research: A mixed methods study. BMJ Open 2013, 3, e003056. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003056. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  5. Tomlinson, T. Respecting donors to biobank research. Hastings Cent. Rep. 2013, 43, 41-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.115. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  6. Domaradzki, J.; Pawlikowski, J. Public attitudes toward biobanking of human biological material for research purposes. A lit- erature review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2209. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16122209. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  7. Richter, G.; Borzikowsky, C.; Hoyer, B.F.; Laudes, M.; Krawczak, M. Secondary research use of personal medical data: Patient attitudes towards data donation. BMC Med. Ethics 2021, 22, 164. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00728-x. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  8. Caixeiro, N.; Byun, H.; Descallar, J.; Levesque, J.; de Souza, P.; Lee, C.S. Health professionals' opinions on supporting a cancer biobank: Identification of barriers to combat biobanking pitfalls. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2016, 24, 626-632. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2015.191. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  9. Persaud, A.; Bonham, V.L. The role of the health care provider in building trust between patients and precision medicine re- search programs. Am. J. Bioeth. 2018, 18, 26-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2018.1431327. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  10. Miller, L.; Rosenzweig, M. Biobanking: How oncology nurses can contribute to its use. Clin. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2021, 25, 637-639. https://doi.org/10.1188/21.CJON.637-639. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  11. Chróścicka, A.; Paluch, A.; Kalaszczyńska, I.; Szabłowska-Gadomska, I. Biobank personnel-The key to its success. Alternat. Lab. Anim. 2022, 50, 275-281. https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929221113976. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  12. Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej. Postawy Wobec Transplantacji Narządów. 2016. Available online: https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2016/K_119_16.PDF (accessed on 20 May 2023).
  13. Pawlikowski, J. Biobankowanie Ludzkiego Materiału Biologicznego dla Celów Badań Naukowych-Aspekty Organizacyjne, Etyczne, Prawne i Społeczne;
  14. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Lublinie: Lublin, Poland, 2013.
  15. Pawlikowski, J.; Wiechetek, M.; Majchrowska, A. Associations between the willingness to donate samples to biobanks and se- lected psychological variables. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2552. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052552. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  16. Majchrowska, A.; Wiechetek, M.; Domaradzki, J.; Pawlikowski, J. Social differentiation of the perception and human tissues donation for research purposes. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 989252. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.989252. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  17. Kraft, S.A.; Cho, M.K.; Gillespie, K.; Halley, M.; Varsava, N.; Ormond, K.E.; Luft, H.S.; Wilfond, B.S.; Soo-Jin Lee, S. Beyond consent: Building trusting relationships with diverse populations in precision medicine research. Am. J. Bioeth. 2018, 18, 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2018.1431322. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  18. Eisenhauer, E.R.; Arslanian-Engoren, C. Religious values and biobanking decisions: An integrative review. Res. Theory Nurs. Prac. 2016, 30, 104-123. https://doi.org/10.1891/1541-6577.30.2.104. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  19. Leiman, D.A.; Lorenzi, N.M.; Wyatt, J.C.; Doney, A.S.; Rosenbloom, S.T. US and Scottish health professionals' attitudes toward DNA biobanking. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007, 15, 357-362. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2571. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  20. Kintossou, A.K.; N'dri, M.K.; Money, M.; Cissé, S.; Doumbia, S.; Soumahoro, M.K.; Coulibaly, A.F.; Djman, J.A.; Dosso, M. Study of laboratory staff' knowledge of biobanking in Côte d'Ivoire. BMC Med. Ethics 2020, 21, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020- 00533-y. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  21. Abdelhafiz, A.S.; Sultan, E.A.; Ziady, H.H.; Sayed, D.M.; Khairy, W.A. Knowledge, perceptions and attitude of Egyptian physi- cians towards biobanking issues. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0248401. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248401. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  22. Krajewska-Kułak, E.; Kułak, W.; Van Damme-Ostapowicz, K.; Rozwadowska, E.; Lewko, J. Students opinions on DNA banking. Preliminary report. Prog. Health Sci. 2011, 1, 102-105. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  23. Tozzo, P.; Fassina, A.; Caenazzo, L. Young people's awareness on biobanking and DNA profiling: Results of a questionnaire administered to Italian university students. Life Sci. Soc. Policy 2017, 13, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-017-0055-9. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  24. Merdad, L.; Aldakhil, L.; Gadi, R.; Assidi, M.; Saddick, S.Y.; Abuzenadah, A.; Vaught, J.; Buhmeida, A.; Al-Qahtani, M.H. As- sessment of knowledge about biobanking among healthcare students and their willingness to donate biospecimens. BMC Med. Ethics 2017, 18, 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0195-8. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  25. Khatib, F.; Jibrin, D.; Al-Majali, J.; Elhussieni, M.; Almasaid, S.; Ahram, M. Views of university students in Jordan towards bi- obanking. BMC Med. Ethics 2021, 22, 152. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00719-y. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  26. Machin, L.L.; Williams, R.A.; Frith, L. Proposing a sociology of donation: The donation of body parts and products for art, education, research, or treatment. Sociol. Compass 2020, 14, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12826. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  27. Brancato, G.; Macchia, S.; Murgia, M.; Signore, M.; Simeoni, G.; Blanke, K.; Körner, T.; Nimmergut, A.; Lima, P.; Paulino, R.; et al. The Handbook of Recommended Practices for Questionnaire Development and Testing in the European Statistical System. 2005. Available online: https://www.istat.it/en/files/2013/12/Handbook_questionnaire_development_2006.pdf (accessed on 20 May 2023). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  28. Sawicka-Gutaj, N.; Gruszczyński, D.; Guzik, P.; Mostowska, A.; Walkowiak, J. Publication ethics of human studies in the light of the Declaration of Helsinki-A mini-review. J. Med. Sci. 2022, 91, e700. https://doi.org/10.20883/medical.e700. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  29. Gaskell, G.; Gottweis, H.; Starkbaum, J.; Berber, M.M.; Broerse, J.E.W.; Gottweis, U.; Hobbs, A.; Helen, I.; Pashou, M.; Shell, K.; et al. Publics and biobanks: Pan European diversity and the challenge of responsible innovation. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2013, 21, 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2012.104. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  30. Igbe, M.A.; Adebamowo, C.A. Qualitative study of knowledge and attitudes to biobanking among lay persons in Nigeria. BMC Med. Ethics 2012, 13, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-13-27. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  31. Heredia, N.I.; Krasny, S.; Strong, L.L.; Von Hatten, L.; Nguyen, L.; Reininger, B.M.; McNeill, L.H.; Fernández, M.E. Community perceptions of biobanking participation: A qualitative study among Mexican-Americans in three Texas cities. Public Health Ge- nom. 2017, 20, 46-57. https://doi.org/10.1159/000452093. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  32. Yeary, K.H.K.; Alcaraz, K.I.; Ashing, K.T.; Chiu, C.; Christy, S.M.; Felsted, K.F.; Lu, Q.; Lumpkins, C.Y.; Masters, K.S.; Newton, R.L.; et al. Considering religion and spirituality in precision medicine. Transl. Behav. Med. 2020, 10, 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz105. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  33. Sedlár, M.; Grežo, M. Willingness to participate in biobanking: The roles of Big Five personality traits and interpersonal trusting beliefs. Pers. Individ. Diff. 2022, 197, 111770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111770. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  34. Goddard, K.A.; Smith, K.S.; Chen, C.; McMullen, C.; Johnson, C. Biobank recruitment: Motivations for nonparticipation. Bio- preserv. Biobank. 2009, 7, 119-121. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2009.0006. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  35. Sanderson, S.C.; Brothers, K.B.; Mercaldo, N.D.; Clayton, E.W.; Matheny, A.A.H.; Aufox, S.A.; Brilliant, M.H.; Campos, D.; Car- rell, D.S.; Connolly, J.; et al. Public attitudes toward consent and data sharing in biobank research: A large multi-site experi- mental survey in the US. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2017, 100, 414-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.01.021. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  36. Nobile, H.; Vermeulen, E.; Thys, K.; Bergmann, M.M.; Borry, P. Why do participants enroll in population biobank studies? A systematic literature review. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2013, 13, 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1586/erm.12.116. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  37. Kaufman, D.J.; Murphy-Bollinger, J.; Scott, J.; Hudson, K.L. Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 85, 643-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.002. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  38. Meulenkamp, T.M.; Gevers, S.K.; Bovenberg, J.A.; Koppelman, G.H.; van Hylckama Vlieg, A.; Smets, E.M. Communication of biobanks' research results: What do (potential) participants want? Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2010, 152, 2482-2492. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.33617. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  39. Hoeyer, K.L. Size matters: The ethical, legal and social issues surrounding large-scale genetic biobank initiatives. Nor. Epidemiol. 2012, 21, 211-220. https://doi.org/10.5324/nje.v21i2.1496. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  40. Bledsoe, M.J. Ethical, legal and social issues of biobanking: Past, present, and future. Biopreserv. Biobank. 2017, 15, 142-147. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2017.0030. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  41. Caulfield, T.; Murdoch, B. Genes, cells, and biobanks: Yes, there's still a consent problem. PLoS Biol. 2017, 15, e2002654. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2002654. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  42. Domaradzki, J. Geneticization and biobanking. Pol. Soc. Rev. 2019, 1, 103-117. https://doi.org/10.26412/psr205.07. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  43. Lipworth, W.; Morrell, B.; Irvine, R.; Kerridge, I. An empirical reappraisal of public trust in biobanking research: Rethinking restrictive consent requirements. J. Law Med. Ethics 2009, 17, 119-132.
  44. Schwartz, M.D.; Rothenberg, K.; Joseph, L.; Benkendorf, J.; Lerman, C. Consent to the use of stored DNA for genetics research: A survey of attitudes in the Jewish population. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2001, 98, 336-342. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096- 8628(20010201)98:4<336::AID-AJMG1100>3.0.CO;2-7. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  45. Lemke, A.A.; Wolf, W.A.; Hebert-Beirne, J.; Smith, M.E.; Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research par- ticipation and data sharing. Public Health Genom. 2010, 13, 368-377. https://doi.org/10.1159/000276767. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  46. Barnes, R.; Votova, K.; Rahimzadeh, V.; Osman, N.; Penn, A.M.; Zawati, M.H.; Knoppers, B.M. Biobanking for genomic and personalized health research: Participant perceptions and preferences. Biopreserv. Biobank. 2020, 18, 204-212. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2019.0090. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  47. Gaonkar, D.; Taylor, C. Block thinking and internal criticism. Public Cult. 2006, 18, 453-455. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363- 2006-014. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  48. Boise, L.; Hinton, L.; Rosen, H.J.; Ruhl, M.C.; Dodge, H.; Mattek, N.; Albert, M.; Denny, A.; Grill, J.D.; Hughes, T.; et al. Willing- ness to be a brain donor: A survey of research volunteers from 4 racial/ethnic groups. Alzheimer. Dis. Assoc. Disord. 2017, 31, 135- 140. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000174. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  49. Aramoana, J.; Koea, J.; CommNETS Collaboration. An integrative review of the barriers to indigenous peoples participation in biobanking and genomic research. JCO Glob. Oncol. 2020, 6, 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1200/JGO.18.00156. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  50. Hussen, M.S.; Gebreselassie, K.L.; Woredekal, A.T.; Adimassu, N.F. Willingness to donate eyes and its associated factors among adults in Gondar town, North West Ethiopia. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017, 17, 178. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0577-1. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  51. Marmamula, S.; Priya, R.; Varada, R.; Keeffe, J.E. Awareness on Eye Donation in the North-eastern State of Tripura, India-The Tripura Eye Survey. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2022, 29, 460-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2021.1953537. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  52. Kowal, E.; Greenwood, A.; McWhirter, R.E. All in the blood: A review of Aboriginal Australians' cultural beliefs about blood and implications for biospecimen research. J. Empir. Res. Hum. Res. Ethics 2015, 10, 347-359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264615604521. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  53. Simon, M.A.; Tom, L.S.; Dong, X. Knowledge and beliefs about biospecimen research among Chinese older women in Chicago's Chinatown. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2017, 72 (Suppl. S1), S41-S49. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glw333. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  54. European Commission. 2010. Europeans and Biotechnology in 2010. Available online: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/sur- veys/detail/755 (accessed on 20 May 2023). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  55. Disclaimer/Publisher's Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual au- thor(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Weryfikacja:
Brak weryfikacji

wyświetlono 31 razy

Publikacje, które mogą cię zainteresować

When Biobanks Meet Religion: Association Between Religiosity and Attitudes of Polish Medical Students Toward Biobanking of Human Biological Material for Research Purposes

2023

To donate or not to donate? Future healthcare professionals’ opinions on biobanking of human biological material for research purposes

2023

Attitudes of Polish physicians, nurses and pharmacists towards the ethical and legal aspects of the conscience clause

2022

Attitudes of oncology patients’ towards biospecimen donation for biobank research

2024
Meta Tagi