Employee Commitment Matters for CSR Practice, Reputation and Corporate Brand Performance—European Model - Publikacja - MOST Wiedzy


Employee Commitment Matters for CSR Practice, Reputation and Corporate Brand Performance—European Model


So far, there have been no studies that explore how employee brand commitment moderates CSR practice outcomes. Employee brand commitment is often claimed as a focal input and output of the CSR. So, it means that it shapes CSR conditions. Then, it is a moderator. This study aims to verify it. Besides, commitment exists in many forms and can be achieved in many ways. Hence the question, if employees are committed to the brand, then how does it affect the outcomes of social responsibility practices such as corporate reputation or brand performance? This study analyzed a sample of 282 cases from the construction industry in Europe, using SPSS Amos and the PROCESS macro, to reveal the strong alignment of an excellent level of all three: CSR practice, corporate brand reputation, employee brand commitment. Still, it also shows that the high level of CSR practice may leverage corporate brand reputation even though employees are not brand committed. It exposes how meaningful the excellent level of CSR practice is. Moreover, the study also reveals that the lack of employee brand commitment may jeopardize reputation. So, the simplest way to achieve sustainability of brand performance is to keep employee brand commitment and CSR practice at the highest possible level to secure corporate brand reputation, which is a strong mediator between CSR practice and brand performance. The people are the company. So, in light of the study findings, it is clear that the future of corporate brands is in employees’ hands. Thus, companies should focus on improving employee commitment to achieve better corporate socialresponsibility practice outcomes. Moreover, the findings in this study present evidence supporting the importance of internal branding. This is the first study that has explored how employee brand commitment moderates CSR outcomes in a national context.


  • 1


  • 2

    Web of Science

  • 1


Cytuj jako

Pełna treść

pobierz publikację
pobrano 48 razy
Wersja publikacji
Accepted albo Published Version
Creative Commons: CC-BY otwiera się w nowej karcie

Słowa kluczowe

Informacje szczegółowe

Publikacja w czasopiśmie
artykuły w czasopismach
Opublikowano w:
Sustainability nr 12, strony 1 - 16,
Rok wydania:
Opis bibliograficzny:
Kucharska W.: Employee Commitment Matters for CSR Practice, Reputation and Corporate Brand Performance—European Model// Sustainability -Vol. 12,iss. 3 (2020), s.1-16
Cyfrowy identyfikator dokumentu elektronicznego (otwiera się w nowej karcie) 10.3390/su12030940
Bibliografia: test
  1. Barwise, P.; Higson, C.; Likierman, A.; Marsh, P. Brands as separable assets. Bus. Strategy Rev. 1990, 1, 43- 59, doi:10.1111/j.1467-8616.1990.tb00010.x. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  2. Kucharska, W.; Flisikowski, K.; Confente, I. Do global brands contribute to the economy of their country of origin? A dynamic spatial approach. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2018, 27, 768-780, doi:10.1108/jpbm-10-2017-1641. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  3. Aon Hewitt. 2017 trends in global employee engagement. 2017. Available online: http://images.respond.aonhewitt.com/Web/AonHewitt/%7Bd9a8975c-f5b1-4105-8dfd- 63a835f3213b%7D_2017-Trends-in-Global-Employee-Engagement.pdf (accessed on 15 December 2019). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  4. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Towards the circular economy: An economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. 2012. Available online: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/ publications/Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation-Towards-the-Circular-Economy-vol.1.pdf (accessed on 15 December 2019).
  5. Clarkson, M.E. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1995, 20, 92-117, doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  6. Venturelli, A.; Cosma, S.; Leopizzi, R. Stakeholder engagement: An evaluation of European banks. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2018, 25, 690-703, doi:10.1002/csr.1486 o.2017.03.177. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  7. Testa, F.; Boiral, O.; Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. Improving CSR performance by hard and soft means: The role of organizational citizenship behaviours and the internalization of CSR standards. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2018, 25, 853-865, doi:10.1002/csr.1502. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  8. Hamadamin, H.H.; Atan, T. The Impact of Strategic Human Resource Management Practices on Competitive Advantage Sustainability: The Mediation of Human Capital Development and Employee Commitment. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5782, doi:10.3390/su11205782. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  9. Bringham, J.B.; Mitchell, B.W.; Bishop, D.G.; Allen, N.J. Working for a higher purpose: A theoretical framework for commitment to organization-sponsored causes. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2013, 23 174-189, doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.07.004. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  10. Johnson, R.E.; Chang, C.-H.; Yang, L.-Q. Commitment and motivation at work: The relevance of employee identity and regulatory focus. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2010, 35, 226-245, doi:10.5465/amr.35.2.zok226. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  11. Dixon-Fowler, H.; O'Leary-Kelly, A.; Johnson, J.; Waite, M. Sustainability and ideology-infused psychological contracts: An organizational-and employee-level perspective. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2019, doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100690. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  12. Meyer, J.P.; Herscovitch, L. Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2001, 11, 299-326, doi:10.1016/S1053-482200053-X. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  13. Becker, H.S. Notes on the concept of commitment. Am. J. Sociol. 1960, 66, 32-40, doi:10.1086/222820. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  14. Becker, T.E.; Billings, R.S.; Eveleth, D.M.; Gilbert, N.L. Foci and bases of employee commitment: Implications for job performance. Acad. Manag. J. 1996, 39, 464-482, doi:10.2307/256788. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  15. Ravens, C. Internal brand management in an international context. In Innovatives Markenmanagement; otwiera się w nowej karcie
  16. Springer Gabler: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2014; Volume 47, pp. 3-10. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  17. Piehler, R. Employees' brand understanding, brand commitment, and brand citizenship behaviour: A closer look at the relationships among construct dimensions. J. Brand Manag. 2018, 25, 217-234, doi:10.1057/s41262-018-0099-z. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  18. da Graça Marques Casimiro Almeida, M.; Fernandes Matos Coelho, A. The antecedents of corporate reputation and image and their impacts on employee commitment and performance: The moderating role of CSR. Corp. Reput. Rev. 2018, 22, doi:10.1057/s41299-018-0053-8. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  19. Hoppe, D. Linking employer branding and internal branding: Establishing perceived employer brand image as an antecedent of favourable employee brand attitudes and behaviours. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2018, 27, 452-467, doi:10.1108/jpbm-12-2016-1374. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  20. Waeraas, A.; Dahle, D.Y. When reputation management is people management: Implications for employee voice. Eur. Manag. J. 2020, doi:10.1016/j.emj.2019.08.010. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  21. de Chernatony, L.; Drury, S.; Segal-Horn, S. Communicating services brands' values internally and externally. Serv. Ind. J. 2006, 26, 819-836. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  22. Brodie, R.J.; Glynn, M.S.; Little, V. The service brand and the service-dominant logic: Missing fundamental premise or the need for stronger theory? Mark. Theory 2006, 6, 363-379, doi:10.1177/1470593106066797. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  23. Gupta, M. Corporate social responsibility, employee-company identification, and organizational commitment: Mediation by employee engagement. Curr. Psychol. 2017, 36, 101-109, doi:10.1007/s12144-015- 9389-8. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  24. Kucharska, W.; Kowalczyk, R. How to achieve sustainability? Employee's point of view on company's culture and CSR practice. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2019, 26, 453-467, doi:10.1002/csr.1696. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  25. Kowalczyk, R.; Kucharska, W. Corporate social responsibility practices incomes and outcomes: Stakeholders' pressure, culture, employee commitment, corporate reputation, and brand performance. A Polish-German cross-country study. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2019, doi:10.1002/csr.1823. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  26. Cheung, C.; Kong, H.; Song, H. How to influence hospitality employee perceptions on hotel brand performance? Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2014, 26, 1162-1178, doi:10.1108/IJCHM-02-2013-0090. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  27. Garas, S.R.R.; Mahran, A.F.A.; Mohamed, H.M.H. Internal corporate branding impact on employees' brand supporting behaviour. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2018, 27, 79-95, doi:10.1108/jpbm-03-2016-1112. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  28. Lepak, D., Smith, K.; Taylor, M.S. Value creation and value capture: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2007, 32, 180-194, doi:10.5465/amr.2007.23464011. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  29. Kamakura, W.A.; Russell, G.J. Measuring brand value with scanner data. Int. J. Res. Mark. 1993, 10, 9-22, doi:10.1016/0167-811690030-3. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  30. Piehler, R.; King, C.; Burmann, C.; Xiong, L. The importance of employee brand understanding, brand identification, and brand commitment in realizing brand citizenship behavior. Eur. J. Mark. 2016, 50, 1575- 1601, doi:10.1108/ejm-11-2014-0725. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  31. Nygaard, A.; Biong, H. The influence of retail management's use of social power on corporate ethical values, employee commitment, and performance. J. Bus. Ethics 2010, 97, 87-108, doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0497-y. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  32. Burmann, C.; Zeplin, S. Building brand commitment: A behavioural approach to internal brand management. J. Brand Manag. 2005, 12, 279-300, doi:10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540223. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  33. Opoku-Dakwa, A.; Chen, C.C.; Rupp, D.E. CSR initiative characteristics and employee engagement: An impact-based perspective. J. Organ. Behav. 2018, 39, 580-593, doi:10.1002/job.2281. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  34. Pedersen, E.R.G. All animals are equal, but…: Management perceptions of stakeholder relationships and societal responsibilities in multinational corporations. Bus. Ethics Eur. Rev. 2011, 20, 177-191, doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2011.01618.x. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  35. Rodrigo, P.; Aqueveque, C.; Duran, I.J. Do employees value strategic CSR? A tale of affective organizational commitment and its underlying mechanisms. Bus. Ethics 2019, 28, 459-475, doi:10.1111/beer.12227. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  36. Rosati, F.; Costa, R.; Calabrese, A.; Pedersen, E.R.G. Employee attitudes towards corporate social responsibility: A study on gender, age and educational level differences. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2018, 25, 1306-1319, doi:10.1002/csr.1640. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  37. Story, J.; Neves, P. When corporate social responsibility (CSR) increases performance: Exploring the role of intrinsic and extrinsic CSR attribution. Bus. Ethics Eur. Rev. 2015, 24, 111-124, doi:10.1111/beer.12084. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  38. McShane, L.; Cunningham, P. To thine own self be true? Employees' judgments of the authenticity of their organization's corporate social responsibility program. J. Bus. Ethics 2012, 108, 81-100, doi:10.1007/s10551- 011-1064-x. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  39. Glavas, A. Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: Enabling employees to employ more of their whole selves at work. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 796, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00796. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  40. Glavas, A.; Godwin, L.N. Is the perception of 'goodness' good enough? Exploring the relationship between perceived corporate social responsibility and employee organizational identification. J. Bus. Ethics 2013, 114, 15-27, doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1323-5. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  41. Glavas, A.; Kelley, K. The effects of perceived corporate social responsibility on employee attitudes. Bus. Ethics Q. 2014, 24, 165e202, doi:10.5840/beq20143206. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  42. Caligiuri, P.; Mencin, A.; Jiang, K. Win-win-win: The influence of company-sponsored volunteerism programs on employees, NGOs, and business units. Pers. Psychol. 2013, 66, 825-860, doi:10.1111/peps.12019. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  43. Gond, J.P.; El Akremi, A.; Swaen, V.; Babu, N. The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person-centric systematic review. J. Organ. Behav. 2017, 38, 225-246, doi:10.1002/job.2170. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  44. Dhanesh, G.S. CSR as organization-employee relationship management strategy: A case study of socially responsible information technology companies in India. Manag. Commun. Q. 2014, 28, 130-149, doi:10.1177/0893318913517238. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  45. Eisingerich, A.B.; Rubera, G. Drivers of brand commitment: A cross-national investigation. J. Int. Mark. 2010, 18, 64-79, doi:10.1509/jimk.18.2.64. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  46. Farooq, O.; Payaud, M.; Merunka, D.; Valette-Florence, P. The impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment: Exploring multiple mediation mechanisms. J. Bus. Ethics 2014, 125, 563-580, doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1928-3. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  47. Hofman, P.S.; Newman, A. The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment and the moderating role of collectivism and masculinity: Evidence from China. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2014, 25, 631-652, doi:10.1080/09585192.2013.792861. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  48. Carmeli, A.; Gilat, G.; Waldman, D.A. The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance. J. Manag. Stud. 2007, 44, 972-992, doi:10.1111/j.1467- 6486.2007.00691.x. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  49. He, H.; Li, Y. CSR and service brand: The mediating effect of brand identification and moderating effect of service quality. J. Bus. Ethics 2011, 100, 673-688, doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0703-y. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  50. Kim, H.R.; Lee, M.; Lee, H.T.; Kim, N.M. Corporate social responsibility and employee-company identification. J. Bus. Ethics 2010, 95, 557-569, doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0440-2. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  51. Thompson, J.A.; Bunderson, J.S. Violations of principle: Ideological currency in the psychological contract. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2003, 28, 571-586, doi:10.5465/amr.2003.10899381. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  52. Allen, N.J.; Meyer, J.P. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. J. Occup. Psychol. 1990, 63, 1-18, doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  53. McWilliams, A.; Siegel, D.S. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2001, 26, 117-127, doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4011987. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  54. Melo, T.; Garrido-Morgado, A. Corporate reputation: A combination of social responsibility and industry. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2012, 19, 11-31, doi:10.1002/csr.260. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  55. Michelon, G. Sustainability disclosure and reputation: A comparative study. Corp. Reput. Rev. 2011, 14, 79- 96, doi:10.1057/crr.2011.10. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  56. Sen, S.; Bhattacharya, C.B. Doing better at doing good: When, why and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2004, 47, 9-24, doi:10.1509/jmkr. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  57. Michelon, G.; Boesso, G.; Kumar, K. Examining the link between strategic corporate social responsibility and company performance: An analysis of the best corporate citizens. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2013, 20, 81-94, doi:10.1002/csr.1278. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  58. Neville, B.; Bell, S.; Mengüç, B. Corporate reputation, stakeholders and the social performance-financial performance relationship. Eur. J. Mark. 2005, 39, 1184-1198, doi:10.1108/03090560510610798. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  59. Lee, K.H.; Herold, D.M.; Yu, A.L. Small and medium enterprises and corporate social responsibility practice: A Swedish perspective. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2016, 23, 88-99, doi:10.1002/csr.1366. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  60. Porter, M.E.; Kramer, M.R. Creating shared value. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2011, 89, 62-77.
  61. Lee, K.H. Linking stakeholders and corporate reputation towards corporate sustainability. Int. J. Innov. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 6, 219-235, doi:10.1504/ijisd.2012.046947. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  62. López-Pérez, M.E.; Merelo-Polo, I.; Vázquez-Carrasco, R.; Cambra-Fierro, J. Sustainability and business outcomes in the context of SMEs: Comparing family firms vs. non-family firms. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4080, doi:10.3390/su10114080. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  63. Lai, C.-S.; Chiu, C.-J.; Yang, C.-F.; Pai, D.-C. The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand performance: The mediating effect of industrial brand equity and corporate reputation. J. Bus. Ethics 2010, 95, 457-469, doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0433-1. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  64. Hayes, A. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 2nd ed.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2018.
  65. Torres, A.; Bijmolt, T.H.A.; Tribo, J.A.; Verhoef, P. Generating global brand equity through corporate social responsibility to key stakeholders. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2012, 29, 13-24, doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.10.002. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  66. Pratihari, S.K.; Uzma, S.H. CSR and corporate branding effect on brand loyalty: A study on Indian banking industry. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2018, 27, 57-78, doi:10.1108/JPBM-05-2016-1194. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  67. Cowan, K.; Guzman, F. How CSR reputation, sustainability signals, and country-of-origin sustainability reputation contribute to corporate brand performance: An exploratory study. J. Bus. Res. 2019, doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.017. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  68. Karazsia, B.; Berlin, K.S. Can a mediator moderate? Considering the role of time and change in the mediator-moderator distinction. Behav. Ther. 2018, 49, 12-20, doi:10.1016/j.beth.2017.10.001. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  69. Hur, W.M.; Moon, T.W.; Lee, H.G. Employee engagement in CSR initiatives and customer-directed counterproductive work behavior (CWB): The mediating roles of organizational civility norms and job calling. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2018, 25, 1087-1098, doi:10.1002/csr.1522. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  70. Verčič, A.T.; Ćorić, D.S. The relationship between reputation, employer branding and corporate social responsibility. Public Relat. Rev. 2018, 44, 444-452.
  71. Halkos, G.; Skouloudis, A. National CSR and institutional conditions: An exploratory study. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 139, 1150-1156, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.047. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  72. Kaiser, H. An index of factor simplicity. Psychometrika 1974, 39, 31-36, doi:10.1007/BF02291575. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  73. Hair, J.F.; Anderson, R.E.; Babin, B.J.; Black, W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective; Pearson: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2010.
  74. Byrne, B.M. Structural Equation Modeling with Amos; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2016. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  75. Podsakoff, P.M.; Organ, D. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Manag. 1986, 12, 531-544, doi:10.1177/014920638601200408. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  76. Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.-Y.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: Acritical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879-903, doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  77. Lindell, M.K.; Whitney, D.J. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psychol. 2001, 86, 114-121, doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  78. Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39-50, doi:10.2307/3151312. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  79. Francis, G. Introduction to SPSS for Windows, 3rd ed.; Pearson Education: Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2001.
  80. Steiger, J.H.; Lind, J.C. Statistically Based Tests for the Number of Common Factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA, USA, May 1980.
  81. Wheaton, D.E.; Muthen, B.; Alwin, D.F.; Summers, G.F. Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociol. Methodol. 1977, 8, 84-136, doi:10.2307/270754. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  82. Bollen, K.A. Structural Equations with Latent Variables; otwiera się w nowej karcie
  83. McDonald, R.P.; Marsh, H.W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychol. Bull. 1990, 107, 247-255, doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.247. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  84. Dw.com. Germanyʹs foreign population reaches record 10.6 million. 2017. Available online: https://www.dw.com/en/germanys-foreign-population-reaches-record-106-million/a-43353320 (accessed on 15 December 2019). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  85. Statista.com. Number of foreigners in Germany in 2018, by region of origin. 2018. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/891324/foreigner-numbers-by-region-of-origin-germany/ (accessed on 15 December 2019).
  86. Nink, M. Engagement index Deutschland. 2015. Available online: http://www.gallup.com/de- de/181871/engagement-index-deutschland.aspx (accessed on 15 December 2019).
  87. Effectory International. The essential guide to driving employee engagement in Europe. 2019. Available online: http://www.efectory.com (accessed on 30 November 2019).
  88. Ghosh, K. How and when do employees identify with their organization? Perceived CSR, first-party (in)justice, and organizational (mis)trust at workplace. Pers. Rev. 2018, 47, 1152-1171, doi:10.1108/PR-08- 2017-0237. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  89. Yu, Y.; Choi, Y. Stakeholder pressure and CSR adoption: The mediating role of organizational culture for Chinese companies. The Social Science Journal. 2016, 53, 226-235, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.07.006 otwiera się w nowej karcie
Politechnika Gdańska

wyświetlono 42 razy

Publikacje, które mogą cię zainteresować

Meta Tagi