Individual Characteristics and Cognitions of Students with Different Levels of Entrepreneurial Intensity - Publikacja - MOST Wiedzy

Twoje konto

zaloguj

Wyszukiwarka

Individual Characteristics and Cognitions of Students with Different Levels of Entrepreneurial Intensity

Abstrakt

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The objective of the current paper is to verify in what way university students who declare high individual level of entrepreneurial intensity differ from those who are characterized by its intensity level. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: A statistical analysis of obtained survey results was conducted. The group of research participants included 413 business students. Following statistical methods were used to analyze the data: internal reliability test, chi-square test of independence, independent samples t-test. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The line of reasoning presented in the current paper starts with the analysis of entrepreneurial intensity which, when measured on an individual level, is distinctive to people who declare a strong commitment to following an entrepreneurial career. Later the theoretical background including individual characteristics and cognitions that can potentially be prevalent among entrepreneurs is presented. RESEARCH RESULTS: It was found that groups of students who display high and low levels of entrepreneurial intensity differ significantly. These differences pertain to individual characteristics (i.e. gender), the perception of business success indicators and the perception of entrepreneurs’ environment favorability. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Obtained results allow to formulate conclusions about ways in which the development of entrepreneurial attitudes can be facilitated. Several recommendations are proposed for educators and policy makers including adopting a more fine-grained approach to supporting the emergence of entrepreneurial culture in Poland.

Cytowania

  • 0

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 0

    Scopus

Autor (1)

Cytuj jako

Pełna treść

pobierz publikację
pobrano 31 razy
Wersja publikacji
Accepted albo Published Version
Licencja
Creative Commons: CC-BY-ND otwiera się w nowej karcie

Słowa kluczowe

Informacje szczegółowe

Kategoria:
Publikacja w czasopiśmie
Typ:
artykuły w czasopismach recenzowanych i innych wydawnictwach ciągłych
Opublikowano w:
HORYZONTY WYCHOWANIA nr 17, strony 231 - 240,
ISSN: 1643-9171
Język:
angielski
Rok wydania:
2018
Opis bibliograficzny:
Ziemiański P.: Individual Characteristics and Cognitions of Students with Different Levels of Entrepreneurial Intensity// HORYZONTY WYCHOWANIA. -Vol. 17., nr. 43 (2018), s.231-240
DOI:
Cyfrowy identyfikator dokumentu elektronicznego (otwiera się w nowej karcie) 10.17399/hw.2018.174320
Bibliografia: test
  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  2. Caliendo, M., Fossen, F.M., Kritikos, A., & Wetter, M. (2015). The gender gap in entrepreneurship: Not just a matter of personality. CESifo Economic Studies, 61(1), 202-238. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifu023. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  3. Carter, N.C., Gartner, W.B., Shaver, K.G., & Gatewood, E.J. (2003). The career reasons of na- scent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0883-9026(02)00078-2. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  4. Cressy, R. (2006). Why do most firms die young? Small Business Economics, 26(2), 103-116. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-004-7813-9. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  5. Dey, P. (2016). Probing the power of entrepreneurship discourse : an immanent critique. A Guide to Discursive Organizational Psychology, 9780857939(2004), 123-145. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  6. Douglas, E.J. & Shepherd, D.A. (2002). Self-employment as a Career Choice: Attitudes, Entre- preneurial Intentions, and Utility Maximization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(3), 81-90. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783479801.00025. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  7. Fayolle, A. (2013). Personal views on the future of entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 25(7-8), 692-701. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985 626.2013.821318. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  8. Greblikaite, J., Sroka, W., & Gerulaitiene, N. (2016). Involving Young People in Polish and Lithu- anian Social Enterprises by Fostering Entrepreneurial Skills and Abilities as Entrepreneurial Opportunity at University. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(3), 131-152. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040310. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  9. Hamilton, B.H. (2000). Does Entrepreneurship Pay? An Empirical Analysis of the Returns to Self- -Employment. Journal of Political Economy, 108(3), 604-631. Retrieved from: https://doi. org/10.1086/262131. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  10. Kelley, D., Brush, C., Greene, P., Herrington, M., Ali, A., & Kew, P. (2015). GEM Special Report: Women's Entrepreneurship 2015. Gem, 159.
  11. Liao, J., Murphy, P.J., & Welsch, H. (2005). Developing and Validating a Construct of Entrepreneurial Intensity. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 8(2), 31-38. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  12. Liao, J. & Welsch, H. (2005). Roles of social capital in venture creation: Key dimensions and re- search implications. Journal of Small Business Management, 43(4), 345-362. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2005.00141.x. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  13. Liñán, F. (2004). Intention-based models of entrepreneurship education. Piccolla Impresa/Small Business, 3 (January 2004), 1-30.
  14. Łuczka, T. & Rembiasz, M. (2016). Badanie postaw przedsiębiorczych studentów -wybrane aspekty teoretyczne i empiryczne. Horyzonty Wychowania, 15(34), 27-47. Retrieved from: https://doi. org/10.17399/HW.2016.153402. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  15. Morris, M.H., Kuratko, D.F., & Cornwall, J.R. (2013). Entrepreneurship Programs and the Modern University. Edward Elgar Pubslishing. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  16. Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982). The Social Dimensions of Entrepreneurship, in The Encyclopaedia of Entrepreneurship. In: Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, 72-90. Retrieved from: https://doi. org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199546992.003.0019. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  17. Shinnar, R.S., Giacomin, O., & Janssen, F. (2012). Entrepreneurial Perceptions and Intentions: The Role of Gender and Culture. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(3), 465-493. Retrieved form: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00509.x. van Gelderen, M. & Jansen, P. (2006). Autonomy as a start-up motive. Journal of Small Business and En- terprise Development, 13(1), 23-32. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000610645289. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  18. Wach, K., & Wojciechowski, L. (2016). Entrepreneurial Intentions of Students in Poland in the View of Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behaviour. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(1), 83-94. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040106. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  19. Zaleśkiewicz, T. (2004). Przedsiębiorczość i podejmowanie ryzyka. In: T. Tyszka (ed.), Psychologia ekonomiczna. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, 304-333. Copyright and License This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution -NoDerivs (CC BY-ND 4.0) License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by -nd/4.0/ otwiera się w nowej karcie
Weryfikacja:
Politechnika Gdańska

wyświetlono 93 razy

Publikacje, które mogą cię zainteresować

Skłonność do rywalizacji a intencje przedsiębiorcze – o różnicach międzypłciowych

2017

Effective Collaboration of Entrepreneurial Teams—Implications for Entrepreneurial Education

2020

Including the Dark Side of Entrepreneurship in the Entrepreneurship Education

2020

Entrepreneurial competencies and intentions among students of technical universities

2021
Meta Tagi