Integration of a Multilevel Transport System Model into Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning - Publikacja - MOST Wiedzy

Wyszukiwarka

Integration of a Multilevel Transport System Model into Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning

Abstrakt

When planning their transport policy, cities usually focus on developing sustainable transport systems and reducing the negative consequences of transport. One way to deliver transport policies is to use the Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP), a strategic document designed to meet the demand for mobility whilst ensuring adequate quality of life for the residents. The process of Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning (SUMP process) can be supported by using a transport model. The objective of this article is to analyse the efficacy of the Multilevel Model of Transport Systems—referred to by its acronym, MST—for the SUMP process. With its ability to represent the transport system’s behaviour depending on the level of detail, the MST can significantly benefit the SUMP process. The proposed concept of integration of the MST into the SUMP process has already been tested and applied in delivering Gdynia’s (Poland) SUMP. The paper suggests ways to use the MST at different levels of planning and modelling and describes the outcomes. Using the multilevel structure helps to fully realise the transport model’s potential to improve the effectiveness of urban mobility planning. The conclusions show that the methods proposed in the article are worthwhile and cities should consider them when planning the SUMP process.

Cytowania

  • 3 0

    CrossRef

  • 2 1

    Web of Science

  • 2 7

    Scopus

Pełna treść

Informacje szczegółowe

Kategoria:
Publikacja w czasopiśmie
Typ:
artykuł w czasopiśmie wyróżnionym w JCR
Opublikowano w:
Sustainability nr 10, wydanie 2, strony 1 - 20,
ISSN:
Język:
angielski
Rok wydania:
2018
Opis bibliograficzny:
Okraszewska R., Romanowska A., Wołek M., Oskarbski J., Birr K., Jamroz K.: Integration of a Multilevel Transport System Model into Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning// Sustainability. -Vol. 10, iss. 2 (2018), s.1-20
DOI:
Cyfrowy identyfikator dokumentu elektronicznego (otwiera się w nowej karcie) 10.3390/su10020479
Bibliografia: test
  1. Jacek Oskarbski and Krystian Birr both contributed to Section 2.2, Section 4.2, Section 4.3; Kazimierz Jamroz provided supervision and contributed to Section 5. All authors were directly involved in the SUMP process conducted with the use of the MST in Gdynia: Aleksandra Romanowska-SUMP process leader, Marcin Wołek-SUMP main author and CIVITAS DYN@MO project manager representing the University of Gdansk, Romanika Okraszewska-member of SUMP working team, Jacek Oskarbski-main author of the idea of MST in Gdynia, responsible for its development (CIVITAS DYN@MO measure leader representing the Gdansk University of Technology), Jacek Oskarbski and Krystian Birr-built the MST and used it for SUMP-related analyses, Kazimierz Jamroz-CIVITAS DYN@MO project manager representing the Gdansk University of Technology. References 1. Berry, B.J.L. Urbanization. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226167135_ Urbanization (accessed on 7 February 2018).
  2. Lerner, W. The Future of Urban Mobility: Towards Networked, Multimodal Cities of 2050. Available online: https://robertoigarza.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/rep-the-future-of-urban-mobility-2050-little- 2011.pdf (accessed on 7 February 2018).
  3. Eurostat. Passenger Cars, by Type of Motor Energy. 2015. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ data/database (accessed on 7 February 2018). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  4. Van Wee, B.; Ettema, D. Travel behaviour and health: A conceptual model and research agenda. J. Transp. Health 2016, 3, 240-248. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  5. European Commission DG MOVE. Study to Support an Impact Assessment of the Urban Mobility Package; otwiera się w nowej karcie
  6. Activity 31 Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans Final Report; European Commission DG MOVE: Brussels, Belgium, 2013. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  7. Banister, D. The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transp. Policy 2008, 15, 73-80. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  8. Commission of the European Communities. Green Paper. Towards a New Culture for Urban Mobility; Commission of the European Communities: Brussels, Belgium, 2007. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  9. Litman, T. Measuring transportation traffic, mobility and accessibility. ITE J. 2003, 73, 28-32.
  10. Hickman, R.; Hall, P.; Banister, D. Planning more for sustainable mobility. J. Transp. Geogr. 2013, 33, 210-219. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  11. Reisi, M.; Aye, L.; Rajabifard, A.; Ngo, T. Land-use planning: Implications for transport sustainability. Land Use Policy 2016, 50, 252-261. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  12. Cervero, R. Mixed land-uses and commuting: Evidence from the American housing survey. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 1996, 30, 361-377. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  13. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). Compact City Policies: A Comparative Assessment; OECD: Paris, France, 2012. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  14. Holden, E.; Høyer, K.G. The ecological footprints of fuels. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2005, 10, 395-403. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  15. Moriarty, P.; Honnery, D. Low-mobility: The future of transport. Futures 2008, 40, 865-872. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  16. Mallus, M.; Colistra, G.; Atzori, L.; Murroni, M.; Pilloni, V. Dynamic carpooling in urban areas: Design and experimentation with a multi-objective route matching algorithm. Sustainability 2017, 9, 254. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  17. Bruun, E.; Givoni, M. Sustainable mobility: Six research routes to steer transport policy. Nature 2015, 523, 29-31. [CrossRef] [PubMed] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  18. Wefering, F.; Rupprecht, S.; Bührmann, S.; Böhler-Baedeker, S.; Granberg, M.; Vilkuna, J.; Saarinen, S.; Backhaus, W.; Laubenheimer, M.; Lindenau, M.; et al. Developing and Implementing a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan Guidelines-Developing and Implementing a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan Title: Guidelines. Developing and Implementing a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2014.
  19. Gavanas, N.; Pozoukidou, G.; Verani, E. Integration of LUTI models into sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMPs). Eur. J. Environ. Sci. 2016, 6, 11-17. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  20. Alonso, A.; Monzón, A.; Wang, Y. Modelling Land Use and Transport Policies to Measure Their Contribution to Urban Challenges: The Case of Madrid. Sustainability 2017, 9, 378. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  21. European Commission. A Concept for Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2013. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  22. Wallington, T.J.; Lambert, C.K.; Ruona, W.C. Diesel vehicles and sustainable mobility in the US. Energy Policy 2013, 54, 47-53. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  23. Sosa López, O.; Montero, S. Expert-citizens: Producing and contesting sustainable mobility policy in Mexican cities. J. Transp. Geogr. 2017. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  24. Schippl, J.; Gudmundsson, H.; Hedegaard Sørensen, C.; Anderton, K.; Brand, R.; Dotterud Leiren, M.; Reichenbach, M. Different pathways for achieving cleaner urban areas: A roadmap towards the white paper goal for urban transport. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 14, 2604-2613. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  25. Le Pira, M.; Marcucci, E.; Gatta, V.; Ignaccolo, M.; Inturri, G.; Pluchino, A. Towards a decision-support procedure to foster stakeholder involvement and acceptability of urban freight transport policies. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2017, 9, 54. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  26. Piantanakulchai, M.; Saengkhao, N. Evaluation of alternatives in transportation planning using multi-stakeholders multi-objectives AHP modelling. Proc. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 2003, 4, 1613-1628. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  27. Tang, K.X.; Waters, N.M. The internet, GIS and public participation in transportation planning. Prog. Plan. 2005, 64, 7-62. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  28. Zhong, T.; Young, R.K.; Lowry, M.; Rutherford, G.S. A model for public involvement in transportation improvement programming using participatory Geographic Information Systems, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2008, 32, 123-133. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  29. Banister, D. Cities, mobility and climate change. J. Transp. Geogr. 2011, 19, 1538-1546. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  30. Givoni, M.; Beyazit, E.; Shiftan, Y. The use of state-of-the-art transport models by policymakers-Beauty in simplicity? Plan. Theory Pract. 2016, 17, 385-404. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  31. Joint Assistance to Support Projects in European Regions (JASPERS). The Use of Transport Models in Transport Planning and Project Appraisal, JASPERS Appraisal Guidance (Transport). Available online: http://kc-sump.eu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Upotreba-Modela-u-prometnom- planiranju_JASPERS_kolovoz-2014.pdf (accessed on 7 February 2018). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  32. May, A.D.; Shepherd, S.P.; Timms, P.M. Optimal transport strategies for European cities. Transportation 2000, 27, 285-315. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  33. Kaparias, I.; Zavitsas, K.; Bell, M.G.H. State-of-the-Art of Urban Traffic Management Policies and Technologies; Imperial College London: London, UK, 2010.
  34. Boile, M.P.; Ozbay, K. The Future of Transportation Modeling; New Jersey Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration: West Trenton, NJ, USA, 2005. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  35. WSP Parsons Brinckerhoff, "Planning Techniques" Transport modelling for SUMP-Why, What, When and How Much? Available online: http://www.eltis.org/sites/default/files/16-06-2015_b_jordanou_brasov_ sump.pdf (accessed on 7 February 2018). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  36. Sivakumar, A. Modelling transport: A Synthesis of Transport Modelling Methodologies; Imperial College London: London, UK, 2007. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  37. Travel Model Improvement Program (U.S.); otwiera się w nowej karcie
  38. Barton-Aschman Associates; otwiera się w nowej karcie
  39. Cambridge Systematics, Model validation and reasonableness checking manual (U.S. Depertment of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy, 2001). Available online: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=ien.35556030756969;view=1up;seq=3 (accessed on 7 February 2018).
  40. Singh, R.; Dowling, R. Improved speed-flow relationships: Application to transportation planning models. In Proceedings of the Seventh TRB Conference on the Application of Transportation Planning Methods, Boston, MA, USA, 7-11 March 1999; pp. 340-349.
  41. Macioszek, E.; Sierpiński, G.; Czapkowski, L. Methods of Modeling the Bicycle Traffic Flows on the Roundabouts. In International Conference on Transport Systems Telematics; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2010; pp. 115-124. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  42. Smith, J.; Blewitt, R. Traffic Modelling Guidelines. Traffic Manager and Network Performance Best Practice. Version 3 (Transport for London, 2010). Available online: http://content.tfl.gov.uk/traffic-modelling- guidelines.pdf (accessed on 7 February 2018).
  43. Dimitriou, H.T.; Thompson, R. Strategic Planning for Regional Development in UK; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2008. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  44. Bliemer, M.C.J.; Mulley, C.; Moutou, C.J. Handbook on Transport and Urban Planning in the Developed World. Transp. Rev. 2016, 36, 816-817. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  45. Oskarbski, J.; Zawisza, M.; Miszewski, M. Information system for drivers within the integrated traffic management system-TRISTAR. In International Conference on Transport Systems Telematics; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2015; pp. 131-140. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  46. Kumar, P.; Merzouki, R.; Conrard, B.; Coelen, V.; Ould Bouamama, B. Multilevel Modeling of the Traffic Dynamic. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2014, 15, 1066-1082. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  47. Williams, H.C.W.L. On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit. Environ. Plan. A 1977, 9, 285-344. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  48. ZKM Gdynia. Transport Preferences and Behaviour of Residents of Gdynia;
  49. Marketing Survey Report 2015; ZKM Gdynia: Gdynia, Poland, 2015. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  50. Czapnik, M.; Czermański, E.; Franek, Ł.; Furkal, J.; Hebel, K.; Jagiełło, A.; Kaszubowski, D.; Kuropatwiński, P.; Lewandowski, K.; et al. Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan for Gdynia;
  51. Wołek, M., Ed.; Civitas Dyn@mo: Gdynia, Poland, 2016.
  52. CIVITAS DYN@MO Webpage. Available online: http://civitas.eu/content/dynmo (accessed on 7 February 2018). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  53. Ortúzar, J.D.D.; Willumsen, L.G. Modelling Transport, 4th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  54. Gdynia's, S.U.M.P.; Oskarbski, J.; Jamroz, K.; Budziszewski, T.; Birr, K.; Oskarbski, G.; Gumińska, L.; Oskarbska, I.; Michalski, L.; Smolarek, L.; et al. Report on the Traffic Model Development for SUMP;
  55. Implementation Status Report G3.1, Civitas Dyn@mo Project; Gdansk University of Technology: Gdańsk, Poland, 2016. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  56. Annema, J.A.; De Jong, M. The History of the Transport Future-Evaluating Dutch Transport Scenarios of the Past. Transp. Rev. 2011, 31, 341-356. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  57. Wilkinson, A.; Kupers, R. Living in the futures: How scenario planning changed corporate strategy. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2013, 91, 3-11.
  58. Gunnarson-Östling, U.; Höjer, M. Scenario planning for sustainability in Stockholm, Sweden: Environmental justice considerations. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 2011, 35, 1048-1067. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  59. Grzelec, K.; Hebel, K.; Wyszomisrki, O. A Guide to Developing Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans;
  60. Wołek, M., Ed.; University of Gdansk Development Foundation: Gdańsk, Poland, 2016.
  61. Wołek, M.; Oskarbski, J.; Polakowski, R.; Birr, K. Report on HOV/Bus Lanes in Gdynia Implementation Status Report G3.5; Civitas Dyn@mo: Gdynia, Poland, 2016.
  62. Lindenau, M.; Böhler-Baedeker, S. Citizen and Stakeholder Involvement: A Precondition for Sustainable Urban Mobility. Transp. Res. Procedia 2014, 4, 347-360. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  63. Arsenio, E.; Martens, K.; Di Ciommo, F. Sustainable urban mobility plans: Bridging climate change and equity targets? Res. Transp. Econ. 2016, 55, 30-39. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  64. Salonen, M.; Broberg, A.; Kyttä, M.; Toivonen, T. Do suburban residents prefer the fastest or low-carbon travel modes? Combining public participation GIS and multimodal travel time analysis for daily mobility research. Appl. Geogr. 2014, 53, 438-448. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  65. Banister, D.; Hickman, R. Transport futures: Thinking the unthinkable. Transp. Policy. 2013, 29, 283-293. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
  66. Gudmundsson, H. Analysing Models as a Knowledge Technology in Transport Planning. Transp. Rev. 2011, 31, 145-159. [CrossRef] otwiera się w nowej karcie
Weryfikacja:
Politechnika Gdańska

wyświetlono 60 razy

Publikacje, które mogą cię zainteresować

Meta Tagi