A Ship Domain-Based Method of Determining Action Distances for Evasive Manoeuvres in Stand-On Situations - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Search

A Ship Domain-Based Method of Determining Action Distances for Evasive Manoeuvres in Stand-On Situations

Abstract

A ship encounter can be considered safe if neither of ships’ domains (defined areas around ships) is intruded by other ships. Published research on this includes optimising collision avoidancemanoeuvres fulfilling domain-based safety conditions.However, until recently there was no method, using ship’s domain to determine exact moment when a particular collision avoidance manoeuvre can still be successfully performed. The authors have already proposed such method for give-way encounters. In the paper, documenting continuation of the research, another kind of scenarios is considered.This paper is focused on situations where the own ship is the stand-on one and the target is supposed to manoeuvre. The presented method uses a ship’s dynamics model to compute distance necessary for a manoeuvre successful in terms of avoiding domain violations. Additionally, stability-related phenomena and their impact on possible manoeuvres in heavy weather are taken into account. The method and applied models are illustrated in a series of simulation results.The simulations cover various examples of stand-on situations, including encounters in heavy weather conditions. Discussed manoeuvres may be limited to course alteration or may combine turns with speed reduction.

Citations

  • 1 8

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 2 2

    Scopus

Authors (3)

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 41 times
Publication version
Accepted or Published Version
License
Creative Commons: CC-BY open in new tab

Keywords

Details

Category:
Articles
Type:
artykuł w czasopiśmie wyróżnionym w JCR
Published in:
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION no. 2018, pages 1 - 19,
ISSN: 0197-6729
Language:
English
Publication year:
2018
Bibliographic description:
Szłapczyński R., Krata P., Szłapczyńska J.: A Ship Domain-Based Method of Determining Action Distances for Evasive Manoeuvres in Stand-On Situations// JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION. -Vol. 2018, nr. ID 3984962 (2018), s.1-19
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.1155/2018/3984962
Bibliography: test
  1. Y. Fujii and K. Tanaka, "Traffic Capacity, " Journal of Navigation, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 543-552, 1971. open in new tab
  2. E. M. Goodwin, "A Statistical Study of Ship Domains, " Journal of Navigation, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 328-344, 1975. open in new tab
  3. T. G. Coldwell, "Marine Traffic Behaviour in Restricted Waters, " Journal of Navigation, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 430-444, 1983. open in new tab
  4. Z. Xu, J. Mou, and Y. Ji, "A Study of 3D Model of Ship Domain for Inland Waterway, " Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science & Engineering), vol. 3, pp. 380-383, 2004.
  5. N. Wang, "An intelligent spatial collision risk based on the quaternion ship domain, " Journal of Navigation, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 733-749, 2010. open in new tab
  6. Z. Pietrzykowski, "Ship's Fuzzy Domain -a Criterion for Navigational Safety in Narrow Fairways, " Journal of Navigation, vol. 61, no. 03, 2008. open in new tab
  7. Z. Pietrzykowski and J. Uriasz, "The ship domain -A criterion of navigational safety assessment in an open sea area, " Journal of Navigation, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 93-108, 2009. open in new tab
  8. M. G. Hansen, T. K. Jensen, T. Lehn-Schioler, K. Melchild, F. M. Rasmussen, and F. Ennemark, "Empirical ship domain based on AIS data, " Journal of Navigation, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 931-940, 2013. open in new tab
  9. Y. Wang and H.-C. Chin, "An Empirically-Calibrated Ship Domain as a Safety Criterion for Navigation in Confined Waters, " Journal of Navigation, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 257-276, 2015. open in new tab
  10. R. Szlapczynski and J. Szlapczynska, "Review of ship safety domains: Models and applications, " Ocean Engineering, vol. 145, pp. 277-289, 2017. open in new tab
  11. R. Szlapczynski, "A new method of planning collision avoidance manoeuvres for multi-target encounter situations, " The Journal of Navigation, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 307-321, 2008. Journal of Advanced Transportation open in new tab
  12. A. Lazarowska, "A new deterministic approach in a decision support system for ship's, " Expert Systems with Applications, pp. 1-10, 2016. open in new tab
  13. J. Liu, F. Zhou, Z. Li, M. Wang, and R. W. Liu, "Dynamic Ship Domain Models for Capacity Analysis of Restricted Water Channels, " Journal of Navigation, vol. 69, no. 03, pp. 481-503, 2015. open in new tab
  14. E. van Iperen, "Classifying Ship Encounters to Monitor Traf- fic Safety on the North Sea from AIS Data, " TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 51-58, 2015. open in new tab
  15. X. Wu, A. L. Mehta, V. A. Zaloom, and B. N. Craig, "Analysis of waterway transportation in Southeast Texas waterway based on AIS data, " Ocean Engineering, vol. 121, pp. 196-209, 2016. open in new tab
  16. W. Zhang, F. Goerlandt, P. Kujala, and Y. Wang, "An advanced method for detecting possible near miss ship collisions from AIS data, " Ocean Engineering, vol. 124, pp. 141-156, 2016. open in new tab
  17. F. Van Westrenen and J. Ellerbroek, "The Effect of Traffic Complexity on the Development of Near Misses on the North Sea, " IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 432-440, 2017. open in new tab
  18. F. Goerlandt and P. Kujala, "On the reliability and validity of ship-ship collision risk analysis in light of different perspectives on risk, " Safety Science, vol. 62, pp. 348-365, 2014. open in new tab
  19. F. Goerlandt and J. Montewka, "Maritime transportation risk analysis: Review and analysis in light of some foundational issues, " Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 138, pp. 115- 134, 2015. open in new tab
  20. X. Qu, Q. Meng, and L. Suyi, "Ship collision risk assessment for the Singapore Strait, " Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 2030-2036, 2011. open in new tab
  21. J. Weng, Q. Meng, and X. Qu, "Vessel collision frequency estimation in the Singapore Strait, " Journal of Navigation, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 207-221, 2012. open in new tab
  22. K. Benedict, M. Kirchhoff, S. Fischer, M. Gluch, S. Klaes, and M. Baldauf, "Application of Fast Time Simulation Technologies for enhanced Ship Manoeuvring Operation, " IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 43, no. 20, pp. 79-84, 2010. open in new tab
  23. K. Benedict, S. Fischer, M. Gluch et al., "Innovative fast time simulation tools for briefing / debriefing in advanced ship handling simulator training and ship operation, " Transactions on Maritime Science, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 24-38, 2017. open in new tab
  24. G. H. Dinh and N. Im, "The combination of analytical and statistical method to define polygonal ship domain and reflect human experiences in estimating dangerous area, " International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, vol. 4, pp. 97- 108, 2016. open in new tab
  25. P. Krata and J. Montewka, "Assessment of a critical area for a give-way ship in a collision encounter, " Archives of Transport, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 51-60, 2015. open in new tab
  26. P. Krata, J. Montewka, and T. Hinz, "Towards the Assessment of Critical Area in a Collision Encounter Accounting for Stability Conditions of a Ship, " Pr. Nauk. Politech. Warsz. XX, p. 10, 2016. open in new tab
  27. C. G. Soares and A. P. Teixeira, "Risk assessment in maritime transportation, " Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 299-309, 2001. open in new tab
  28. J. Wang, "Maritime Risk Assessment and its Current Status, " Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 3-19, 2006. open in new tab
  29. J.-F. Balmat, F. Lafont, R. Maifret, and N. Pessel, "A decision- making system to maritime risk assessment, " Ocean Engineer- ing, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 171-176, 2011. open in new tab
  30. IMO, Resolution MSC/Circ.1023/MEPC/Circ.392. Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process, 2002b. open in new tab
  31. S. Hu, Q. Fang, H. Xia, and Y. Xi, "Formal safety assessment based on relative risks model in ship navigation, " Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 369-377, 2007. open in new tab
  32. J. Montewka, F. Goerlandt, and P. Kujala, "On a systematic per- spective on risk for formal safety assessment (FSA), " Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 127, pp. 77-85, 2014. open in new tab
  33. IMO, Resolution MSC-MEPC.2/Circ.12. Revised guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process, 2015. open in new tab
  34. S.-L. Kao, K.-T. Lee, K.-Y. Chang, and M.-D. Ko, "A fuzzy logic method for collision avoidance in vessel traffic service, " Journal of Navigation, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 17-31, 2007. open in new tab
  35. M. Hänninen and P. Kujala, "Influences of variables on ship collision probability in a Bayesian belief network model, " Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 102, pp. 27-40, 2012. open in new tab
  36. P. V. Davis, M. J. Dove, and C. T. Stockel, "A Computer Simulation of Marine Traffic Using Domains and Arenas, " Journal of Navigation, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 215-222, 1980. open in new tab
  37. B. A. Colley, R. G. Curtis, and C. T. Stockel, "Manoeuvring times, domains and arenas, " Journal of Navigation, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 324-328, 1983. open in new tab
  38. H. Hilgert, "Defining the Close-Quarters Situation at Sea, " Journal of Navigation, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 454-461, 1983. open in new tab
  39. IMO, Resolution MSC.137(76), Standards for ship manoeuvrabil- ity, 2002a.
  40. A. N. Cockcroft, N. Alfred, and J. N. F. Lameijer, A guide to the collision avoidance rules: international regulations for preventing collisions at sea, Elsevier, 2012. open in new tab
  41. H. Hilgert and M. Baldauf, "A common risk model for the assessment of encounter situations on board ships, " Deutsche Hydrographische Zeitschrift, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 531-542, 1997. open in new tab
  42. C. Denker, M. Baldauf, S. Fischer et al., "E-Navigation based cooperative collision avoidance at sea: The MTCAS approach, " in Proceedings of the 24th European Navigation Conference, ENC 2016, Finland, June 2016. open in new tab
  43. M. Baldauf, R. Mehdi, S. Fischer, and M. Gluch, "A perfect warning to avoid collisions at sea?" Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin, vol. 49, pp. 53-64, 2017.
  44. J. Zhang, X. Yan, X. Chen, L. Sang, and D. Zhang, "A novel approach for assistance with anti-collision decision making based on the International Regulations for Preventing Col- lisions at Sea, " Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, vol. 226, no. 3, pp. 250-259, 2012. open in new tab
  45. PRS, Explanatory notes to the standards for ship manoeuvrabil- ity, Informative publication No 25/I, 2008. open in new tab
  46. DNV-GL, "Guidelines for Sea Trials of Motor Vessels, Rules for Classification and Construction, " Additional Rules and Guidelines, 2012. open in new tab
  47. ITTC, Recommended Procedures and Guidelines: Full Scale Measurements Manoeuvrability, Full Scale Manoeuvring Trials, 2002. open in new tab
  48. ABS, Guide for vessel maneuverability, 2006, Guide for vessel maneuverability. open in new tab
  49. K. Benedict, M. Kirchhoff, M. Gluch, S. Fischer, and M. Baldauf, "Manoeuvring simulation on the bridge for predicting motion of real ships and as training tool in ship handling simulators, " in Proceedings of the 8th International Navigational Symposium on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Trans-Nav 2009, pp. 53-58, Poland, June 2009.
  50. J. Artyszuk, L. Gucma, and M. Gucma, "Manoeuvring Simula- tion Methods Applied to Determine the Shape and Operational Condition of New Ports -Mielno Port Case Study, " Scientific Journals Maritime University of Szczecin, vol. 37, no. 109, pp. 10- 15, 2014.
  51. X. Wang, Z. Zou, and F. Xu, "Modeling of ship manoeuvring motion in 4 degrees of freedom based on support vector machines, " in Proceedings of the ASME 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE '13, France, June 2013. open in new tab
  52. T. I. Fossen, "A nonlinear unified state-space model for ship maneuvering and control in a seaway, " International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 2717-2746, 2005. open in new tab
  53. O. El Moctar, U. Lantermann, P. Mucha, J. Höpken, and T. E. Schellin, "RANS-based simulated ship maneuvering account- ing for hull-propulsor-engine interaction, " Ship Technology Research, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 142-161, 2014. open in new tab
  54. R. Szlapczynski and P. Krata, "Determining and visualizing safe motion parameters of a ship navigating in severe weather conditions, " Ocean Engineering, vol. 158, pp. 263-274, 2018. open in new tab
  55. R. Szlapczynski and J. Szlapczynska, "An analysis of domain- based ship collision risk parameters, " Ocean Engineering, vol. 126, pp. 47-56, 2016. open in new tab
  56. R. Szlapczynski and J. Szlapczynska, "A Target Information Display for Visualising Collision Avoidance Manoeuvres in Various Visibility Conditions, " Journal of Navigation, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1041-1055, 2015. open in new tab
  57. ITTC, "Final Report and Recommendations to the 24th ITTC, " in Proceedings of the 24th International Towing Tank Conference, 2005. open in new tab
  58. D. Spanos and M. Palmquist, "Benchmark Study on Numerical Simulation Methods for the Prediction of Parametric Roll of Ships in Waves, " in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Stability of Ships and Ocean Vehicles, pp. 1-9, 2009.
  59. J. Matusiak, "Dynamics of a rigid ship, " Appplied Mechanics, 2013.
  60. J. Matusiak and C. Stigler, "Ship motion in irregular waves during a turning circle manoeuvre, " in In Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Hydrodynamics in Ship Design. 4th International Symposium on Ship Manoeuvring, Ilawa, Poland, 2012.
  61. P. Krata and J. Szlapczynska, "Ship weather routing optimization with dynamic constraints based on reliable synchronous roll prediction, " Ocean Engineering, vol. 150, pp. 124-137, 2018. open in new tab
Sources of funding:
  • Statutory activity/subsidy
Verified by:
Gdańsk University of Technology

seen 117 times

Recommended for you

Meta Tags