Analysis and bioanalysis: an effective tool for data collection of environmental conditions and processes - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Search

Analysis and bioanalysis: an effective tool for data collection of environmental conditions and processes

Abstract

Reliable information that allows us to estimate the state of the environment and to forecast changes in the ecosystem are constantly required. Increasing environmental consciousness and dynamic development of analytical techniques are the main reasons for determining the wide range of pollutants occurring at very low concentrations in complex matrix samples. The presence and concentration of many of those pollutants in the environment are not yet subjected to legal regulations, so development of new methodologies to ensure good quality of results and their control are essential. This paper presents the target and development directions currently observed in environmental monitoring and biomonitoring. A lot of attention has been paid to a wide range of compounds that are endocrine disruptors. The overview of analytical approaches and procedures used to detect and to determine biologically active compounds can be found in this paper as well.

Citations

  • 2

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 9

    Scopus

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 30 times
Publication version
Accepted or Published Version
License
Copyright (Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 2016)

Keywords

Details

Category:
Articles
Type:
artykuł w czasopiśmie wyróżnionym w JCR
Published in:
POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES no. 25, pages 45 - 53,
ISSN: 1230-1485
Publication year:
2016
Bibliographic description:
Szczepańska N., Owczarek K., Kudłak B., Pokrywka A., Mazerska Z., Gałuszka A., Namieśnik J.: Analysis and bioanalysis: an effective tool for data collection of environmental conditions and processes// POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES. -Vol. 25, nr. 1 (2016), s.45-53
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.15244/pjoes/60315
Bibliography: test
  1. KUDŁAK B., NAMIEŚNIK J. Environmental fate of endocrine-disrupting compounds-analytical problems and challenges. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 38, 242, 2008. open in new tab
  2. WENNIG R. Threshold values in toxicology -useful or not? Forensic Sci. Int. 113, 323, 2000. open in new tab
  3. CHELI F., BATTAGLIA D., GALLO R., DELL'ORTO V., EU legislation on cereal safety: An update with a focus on mycotoxins. Food Control 37, 315, 2014. open in new tab
  4. DAUGHTON C.G., Non-regulated water contaminants: emerging research. Environ. Impact Assess. 24, 711, 2004. open in new tab
  5. VETROVA E., ESIMBEKOVA E., REMMEL, KOTOVA S., BEŁOSKOV N., KRATASYUK V., GITELSON G. A bioluminescent signal system: detection N of chemical toxicants in water. Luminescence 22, 206, 2007. open in new tab
  6. VIJAYARAGHAVAN R., ISLAMA S.K., ZHANG M., RIPP S., CAYLOR S., BULL N.D., MOSER S., TERRY S.C., BLALOCK B.J., SAYLER G.S. A bioreporter bioluminescent integrated circuit for very low-level chemical sensing in both gas and liquid environments. Sensors Actuators B 123, 922, 2007. open in new tab
  7. GIROTTI S., Ferri E.N., Fumo M.G., Maiolini E. Monitoring of environmental pollutants by bioluminescent bacteria. Anal. Chim. Acta 608, 2, 2008. open in new tab
  8. NAMIEŚNIK J. Modern trends in monitoring and analysis of environmental pollutants. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 10,127, 2001.
  9. KONIECZKA P., WOLSKA L., NAMIEŚNIK J. Quality problems in determination of organic compounds in environmental samples, such as PAHs and PCBs. TrAC 29, 706, 2010. open in new tab
  10. NAMIEŚNIK J. Trends in environmental analytics and monitoring. New Horizons and Challenges in Environmental Analysis and Monitoring, Chapter 1, Gdańsk: CEEAM, Chem. Fac. Gdań. Univ. Technol.
  11. MARKERT B. Definitions and principles for bioindication and biomonitoring of trace metals in the environment. J. Trace Elem. Med Biol. 21, 77, 2007. open in new tab
  12. KOLKMANA A., SCHRIKS M., BRANDA W., BÄUERLEINA P.S., van der KOOI M.M.E., van DOORNA R.H., EMKE E., REUS A.A., van der LINDENC S.C., de VOOGT P., HERINGA M.B.Sample preparation for combined chemical analysis and in vitro bioassay application in water quality assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Phar. 36, 1291, 2013. open in new tab
  13. METCALFE C.D., KLEYWEGT S., LETCHER R.J., TOPP E., WAGH P., TRUDEAU V.L., MOON T.W. A multi-assay screening approach for assessment of endocrine-active contaminants in wastewater effluent samples. Sci Total Environ. 132, 454, 2013. open in new tab
  14. VOS J.G., DYBING E., GREIM H.A., LADEFOGED O., LAMBRE C., TARAZONA J.V. Health effects of endocrine- disrupting chemicals on wildlife, with special reference to the European situation. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 30, 71, 2000. open in new tab
  15. KUDŁAK B., SZCZEPAŃSKA N., OWCZAREK K., MAZERSKA Z., NAMIEŚNIK J. Revision of biological methods serving the determination of EDC presence and their endocrine potential. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 45, 191, 2015. open in new tab
  16. GILBERT S. G. A Small Dose of ToxicologyThe Health Effects of Common Chemicals. Healthy World Press.
  17. AURIOL M., FILALI-MEKNASSI Y., TYAGI R.D., ADAMS C.D., SURAMPALLI R.Y. Endocrine-disrupting compounds removal from wastewater, a new challenge. Process Biochem. 41, 525, 2006. open in new tab
  18. LEUNG K.M.Y., KWONG R.P.Y., HORIGUCHI T., QIU JW.., YANG R., SONG M., JIANG G., ZHENG G.J., LAM P.K.S. Ecological risk assessments of endocrine disrupting organotin compounds using marine neogastropods in Hong Kong. Chemosphere 65,922, 2006. open in new tab
  19. CAMPBELL C.G.,BORGLIN S.E., GREEN F.B., GRAYSON A., WOZEI E., STRINGFELLOW W.T. Biologically directed environmental monitoring, fate, and transport of estrogenic endocrine disrupting compounds in water: A review. Chemosphere 65, 1265, 2006. open in new tab
  20. VOLDNER E.C., LI Y. Global usage of selected persistent organochlorines. Sci. Total. Environ. 160, 201, 1995. open in new tab
  21. REIERSEN L.O. Local and Transboundary Pollutants, The Arctic: Environment, People, Policy, Harwood, Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, 585,. 2005. open in new tab
  22. BEZCHLEBOVA J., CERNOHLAVKOVA J., LANA J., SOCHOVA I., KOBETICOVA K., HOFMAN J. Effects of toxaphene on soil organisms. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 68, 326, 2007. open in new tab
  23. WOO S., YUM S. Transcriptional response of marine medaka (Oryzias javanicus) on exposure to toxaphene. Comp Biochem Physiol C 153, 355, 2011.
  24. SHABIR G.A., LOUGH W.J., ARAIN S.A., BRADSHAW T.K. Evaluation and application of best practice in analytical method validation. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 30, 311, 2007. open in new tab
  25. CASTRO-PUYANA M., MENDIOLA J.A., IBAÑEZ E.Strategies for a cleaner new scientific discipline of green foodomics. TrAC 52, 23, 2013. open in new tab
  26. ARMENTAS., GARRIGUE S.S, de la GUARDIA M. Green Analytical Chemistry. TrAC 27, 497, 2008.
  27. GAŁUSZKA A., KONIECZKA P., MIGASZEWSKI Z.M., NAMIEŚNIK J. Analytical eco-scale for assessing the greenness of analytical procedures. TrAC, 37, 61, 2012. open in new tab
  28. JAKIMSKA A., KOT-WASIK A., NAMIEŚNIK J. The current state-of-the-art in thedetermination of pharmaceutical residues in environmental matrices using hyphenated techniques. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 44, 277, 2014. open in new tab
  29. VULLIET E., BAUGROS J.B., FLAMENT-WALTON M.M., GRENIER-LOUSTALOT M. F.Analytical methods for the determination of selected steroid sex hormones and corticosteriods in wastewater. Anal. Bioanal.Chem. 387, 2143, 2007. open in new tab
Verified by:
Gdańsk University of Technology

seen 191 times

Recommended for you

Meta Tags