Complementary use of GCxGC–TOF–MS and statistics for differentiation of variety in biosolid samples - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Your account

login

Search

Complementary use of GCxGC–TOF–MS and statistics for differentiation of variety in biosolid samples

Abstract

Formation of biosolid cakes, which are one of the main wastes generated in wastewater treatment plants, is connected with emission of many hazardous chemical compounds, including odoriferous ones. To optimize particular processes of biosolid cake processing, it is necessary to assess chemical composition of the gas mixtures containing the compounds released from the cakes. The paper proposes application of two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GCxGC–TOF–MS) to identification of the compounds released from four main types of biosolid cakes and to quantitative determination of the markers characteristic for particular types of cake. Based on the analysis of variance, the following compounds, which could be potential markers of the investigated biosolid cakes, were selected: 1-propanol, 2-hexanone, toluene, o-xylene, p-xylene, and organosulfur compounds (methanethiol, ethanethiol, dimethyl sulfide, dimethyl disulfide, and diethyl disulfide). Theoretical odour concentrations of four investigated types of biosolid cakes were determined, based on measured concentrations and olfactory thresholds of the aforementioned compounds. The highest concentration was revealed for a primary cake (634 ou/m3 ), whereas the lowest concentration was found for an excess cake (136 ou/m3 ) (ou/m3 —odour unit per m3 ; one odour unit is equivalent to collective odour threshold of odorants mixture present in 1 m3 ). The proposed methodology allows preliminary evaluation of the odour nuisance markers connected with formation of the biosolid cakes, without a need for quantitative analysis of all determined compounds.

Citations

  • 1 2

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 1 2

    Scopus

Authors (4)

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 27 times
Publication version
Accepted or Published Version
License
Creative Commons: CC-BY open in new tab

Keywords

Details

Category:
Articles
Type:
artykuł w czasopiśmie wyróżnionym w JCR
Published in:
MONATSHEFTE FUR CHEMIE no. 149, edition 9, pages 1587 - 1594,
ISSN: 0026-9247
Language:
English
Publication year:
2018
Bibliographic description:
Byliński H., Dymerski T., Gębicki J., Namieśnik J.: Complementary use of GCxGC–TOF–MS and statistics for differentiation of variety in biosolid samples// MONATSHEFTE FUR CHEMIE. -Vol. 149, iss. 9 (2018), s.1587-1594
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.1007/s00706-018-2221-z
Bibliography: test
  1. Cieślik BM, Namieśnik J, Konieczka P (2015) J Clean Prod 90:1 open in new tab
  2. Wu C, Liu J, Zhao P, Li W, Yan L, Piringer M, Schauberger G (2017) Atmos Environ 164:337 open in new tab
  3. Yan L, Liu J, Jiang S, Wu C, Gao K (2017) Sensors 17:1624 open in new tab
  4. Garrido-Baserba M, Molinos-Senante M, Abelleira-Pereira JM, Fdez-Güelfo LA, Poch M, Hernández-Sancho F (2015) J Clean Prod 107:410 open in new tab
  5. Beghia SP, Rodriguesa AC, de Sa LM, Santosa JM (2012) Chem Eng Trans 30:91
  6. Gębicki J, Byliński H, Namieśnik J (2016) Environ Monit Assess 188:32 open in new tab
  7. Cieślik B, Konieczka P (2016) Arch Waste Manag Environ Prot 18:15
  8. Chen WH, Lin SJ, Lee FC, Chen MH, Yeh TY, Kao CM (2017) Proc Saf Environ Prot 109:410 open in new tab
  9. González-Cebrino F, García-Parra J, Ramírez R (2016) Innov Food Sci Emerg Techn 33:108
  10. Siti HN, Kamisah Y, Nur Iliyani MI, Mohamed S, Jaarin K (2017) Biomed Pharm 87:451 open in new tab
  11. Marsol-Vall A, Balcells M, Eras J, Canela-Garayoa R (2018) Food Chem 239:119 open in new tab
  12. Błaszczak W, Amarowicz R, Górecki AR (2017) Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 39:141 open in new tab
  13. Hudson N, Gies A, Duperouzel D (2006) Biores Techn 97:2015 open in new tab
  14. Klenbusch MR (1986) User's guide EPA-600/8-86/008. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC open in new tab
  15. Hudson N, Ayoko GA, Dunlop M, Duperouzel D, Burrell D, Bell K, Gallagher E, Nicholas P, Heinrich N (2009) Biores Technol 100:118 open in new tab
  16. Wiergowski M, Woźniak MK, Kata M, Biziuk M (2016) Monatsh Chem 147:1415 open in new tab
  17. Kosek K, Kozak K, Kozioł K, Jankowska K, Chmiel S, Polk- owska _ Z (2018) Sci Total Environ 622-623:913 open in new tab
  18. Complementary use of GCxGC-TOF-MS and statistics for differentiation of variety in biosolids… 1593 open in new tab
  19. Brasseur C, Dekeirsschieter J, Schotsmans EMJ, de Koning S, Wilson AS, Haubruge E, Focant JF (2012) J Chrom A 1255:163 open in new tab
  20. Perrault KA, Rai T, Stuart BH, Forbes SL (2015) Anal Methods 7:690
  21. Almstetter MF, Oefner PJ, Dettmer K (2012) Anal Bioanal Chem 402:1993 open in new tab
  22. Marriott PJ, Chin ST, Maikhunthod B, Schmarr HG, Bieri S (2012) Trends Anal Chem 34:1 open in new tab
  23. Byliński H, Kolasińska P, Dymerski T, Gębicki J, Namieśnik J (2017) Monatsh Chem 148:1651 open in new tab
  24. Rosenfeld PE, Henry CL, Dills RL, Harrison RB (2001) Water Air Soil Pol 127:173 open in new tab
  25. Fisher RM, Le-Minh N, Sivret EC, Alvarez-Gaitan JP, Moore SJ, Stuetz RM (2017) Sci Total Environ 599-600:663 open in new tab
  26. Lehtinen J, Veijanen A (2011) Water Air Soil Pol 218:185 26. Fatone F, Di Fabio S, Bolzonella D, Cecchi F (2011) Water Res 45:93
  27. Fisher RM, Alvarez-Gaitan JP, Stuetz RM, Moore SJ (2017) J Environ Manag 198:153 open in new tab
  28. Novak JT, Sadler ME, Murthy SN (2003) Water Res 37:3136 open in new tab
  29. Kacker R, Novak JT, Higgins MJ (2011) Proc Water Environ Fed 9:6409 open in new tab
  30. Chen YC, Higgins MJ, Beightol SM, Murthy SN, Toffey WE (2011) Water Res 45:2616 open in new tab
  31. Nagata Y (2003) Odor Measur Rev:118
  32. Fisher RM, Le-Minh N, Alvarez-Gaitan JP, Moore SJ, Stuetz RM (2018) Sci Total Environ 616-617:622 open in new tab
Verified by:
Gdańsk University of Technology

seen 128 times

Recommended for you

Differences between selected volatile aromatic compound concentrations in sludge samples in various steps of wastewater treatment plant operations

2019

Determination of odour concentration by TD-GC×GC–TOF-MS and field olfactometry techniques

2017

Monitoring of odors emitted from stabilized dewatered sludge subjected to aging using proton transfer reaction–mass spectrometry

2019

Evaluation of Health Hazard Due to Emission of Volatile Organic Compounds from Various Processing Units of Wastewater Treatment Plant

2019
Meta Tags