Effect of the Road Environment on Road Safety in Poland - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Search

Effect of the Road Environment on Road Safety in Poland

Abstract

Run-off-road accidents tend to be very severe because when a vehicle leaves the road, it will often crash into a solid obstacle (tree, pole, supports, front wall of a culvert, barrier). A statistical analysis of the data shows that Poland's main roadside hazard is trees and the severity of vehicles striking a tree in a run-off-road crash. The risks are particularly high in north-west Poland with many of the roads lined up with trees. Because of the existing rural road cross-sections, i.e. having trees directly on road edge followed immediately by drainage ditches, vulnerable road users are prevented from using shoulders and made to use the roadway. With no legal definition of the road safety zone in Polish regulations, attempts to remove roadside trees lead to major conflicts with environmental stakeholders. This is why a compromise should be sought between the safety of road users and protection of the natural environment and the aesthetics of the road experience. Rather than just cut the trees, other road safety measures should be used where possible to treat the hazardous spots by securing trees and obstacles and through speed management. Accidents that are directly related to the road environment fall into the following categories: hitting a tree, hitting a barrier, hitting a utility pole or sign, vehicle rollover on the shoulder, vehicle rollover on slopes or in ditch. The main consequence of a roadside hazard is not the likelihood of an accident itself but of its severity. Poland's roadside accident severity is primarily the result of poor design or operation of road infrastructure. This comes as a consequence of a lack of regulations or poorly defined regulations and failure to comply with road safety standards. The new analytical model was designed as a combination of the different factors and one that will serve as a comprehensive model. It was assumed that it will describe the effect of the roadside on the number of accidents and their consequences. The design of the model was based on recommendations from analysing other models. The assumptions were the following: the model will be used to calculate risk factors and accident severity, the indicators will depend on number of vehicle kilometres travelled or traffic volumes, analyses will be based on accident data: striking a tree, hitting a barrier, hitting a utility pole or sign. Additional data will include roadside information and casualty density measures will be used - killed and injured.

Citations

  • 8

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 1 0

    Scopus

Keywords

Details

Category:
Articles
Type:
publikacja w in. zagranicznym czasopiśmie naukowym (tylko język obcy)
Published in:
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering no. 245, pages 1 - 10,
ISSN: 1757-8981
Title of issue:
World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering-Architecture-Urban Planning Symposium (WMCAUS) strony 1 - 10
ISSN:
1757-8981
Language:
English
Publication year:
2017
Bibliographic description:
Budzyński M., Jamroz K., Marcin A.. Effect of the Road Environment on Road Safety in Poland. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2017, Vol. 245, iss. 4, s.1-10
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.1088/1757-899x/245/4/042065
Bibliography: test
  1. Jamroz, K., 2011. Risk management methods in engineering road. Gdansk University of Technology.
  2. WHO (World Human Organization), 2011. Global Plan for the Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011-2020. Washington. open in new tab
  3. EC (European Commission), 2010. Road Safety Programme 2011 -2020. Brussels. open in new tab
  4. MIR (The Ministry of Infrastructure and Development), 2013. National Road Safety Programme. The Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Warsaw 2013. open in new tab
  5. Jamroz, K., Gaca, S., Dabrowska, M., Budzyński, M., 2005. GAMBIT 2005 -National Road Safety Programme, Gdansk and Cracow University of Technology, Motor Transport Institute. open in new tab
  6. Budzynski, M., Kustra,W., 2012. Hazard analysis on homogeneous road sections. "Drogownictwo" 4/2012, Warsaw.
  7. Jamroz, K., Antoniuk, M., Jelinski, L., & Gronowska, K., 2015. Run off road and its consequences -recognize the problem sections of national roads Pomeranian province. "Drogownictwo" 4- 5/2015.
  8. Budzynski, M., Jamroz, K., 2009. The strategy to reduce the number and effects of run-off-road "Drogownictwo", R. 64 (4-5) pp 134-142. open in new tab
  9. WMCAUS IOP Publishing IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 245 (2017) 042065 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/245/4/042065 open in new tab
  10. AASHTO, 2010. Highway Safety Manual.Washington, D.C. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials AASHTO.
  11. Lee, J., Mannering, F., 1999. Analysis of roadside accident frequency and severity and roadside safety management, Research Project T9903, Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC), Washington open in new tab
  12. Viner, J. G., 1995. Rollovers on side slopes and ditches , Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 27, No. 4, 483-491. open in new tab
  13. Zegeer, C. V., Forrest, M., 1995. Council Safety relationships associated with cross-sectional roadway elements , Transportation Research Record 1512, 29-36.
  14. RSI, 2012. Road Safety Inspection Guideline For Safety Checks of Existing Roads, World Road Association (PIARC), France open in new tab
  15. Cafiso, S., La Cava, G., Montella, A., Pappalardo, G., 2006. Operative Procedures for Safety Inspections on Two -Lane Rural Roads, IASP, Catania, Italy. open in new tab
  16. RSI, 2012. Road Safety Inspection RVS 02.02.34 Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie, Österreichische Forschungsgesellschaft Straße-Schiene -Verkehr.
  17. Directive 2008/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, On road infrastructure safety management, Brussel 2008 open in new tab
  18. Budzyński M., Jamroz K., 2014: Roadside Trees as a Road Safety Hazard in Poland. TRB AFB(20) 2 Meeting on Road Side Safety Design -5 November 2014, Brussels open in new tab
  19. ROSEBUD: Measure against collisions with trees RN134 (landes), WP4 Case Report, 2005 Austria open in new tab
  20. EASTA (Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies), 2005. Development of traffic accident prediction models by traffic and road characteristics in urban areas, Vol.5, pp. 2046-2061 open in new tab
  21. Elvik, R., 1994. The safety value of guardrails and crash cushions: a meta-analysis of evidence from evaluation studies, Institute of Transport Economics, Norway. open in new tab
  22. Karim, H., Magnusson, M., Wiklund, M., 2012. Assessment of Injury Rates Associated with Road Barrier Collision. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, no. 48. open in new tab
  23. RISER, 2006. Roadside Infrastructure for Safer European Roads -Envelope of Vehicle and Driver Response Prior to Collisions, Chalmer University of Technology 2003 -2006.
Verified by:
Gdańsk University of Technology

seen 141 times

Recommended for you

Meta Tags