Search
Effectiveness of pollutants removal in hybrid constructed wetlands – different configurations case study
Abstract
In recent years, an increase in interest in hybrid constructed wetland systems (HCWs) has been observed. The aim of the paper is to compare different HCW configurations in terms of mass removal rates and efficiency of pollutants removal. Analysed data have been collected at multistage constructed wetlands in Poland, which are composed by at least two beds: horizontal subsurface flow (SSHF) and vertical subsurface flow (SSVF). The evaluation was focused on hybrid constructed wetlands performance with HF+VF vs. VF+HF configuration, where influent wastewater of the same composition was treated. In analysed HCWs, the effective removal of organic matter from 75.2 to 91.6% COD was confirmed. Efficiency of total nitrogen removal varied from 47.3 to 91.7%. The most effective removal of TN (8.3 g m−2 d−1) occurred in the system with VF+VF+HF configuration.
Citations
-
2
CrossRef
-
0
Web of Science
-
4
Scopus
Authors (3)
-
Krzysztof Jóźwiakowski dr hab
- Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie
Cite as
Full text
- Publication version
- Accepted or Published Version
- License
-
open in new tab
Keywords
Details
- Category:
- Conference activity
- Type:
- materiały konferencyjne indeksowane w Web of Science
- Title of issue:
- 9th Conference on Interdisciplinary Problems in Environmental Protection and Engineering EKO-DOK 2017 strony 1 - 8
- Language:
- English
- Publication year:
- 2017
- Bibliographic description:
- Gajewska M., Jóźwiakowski K., Skrzypiec K..: Effectiveness of pollutants removal in hybrid constructed wetlands – different configurations case study, W: 9th Conference on Interdisciplinary Problems in Environmental Protection and Engineering EKO-DOK 2017, 2017, ,.
- DOI:
- Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.1051/e3sconf/20171700023
- Verified by:
- Gdańsk University of Technology
seen 173 times
Recommended for you
Kinetics of pollutants removal in hybrid treatment wetlands – Case study comparison
- M. Gajewska,
- K. Skrzypiec,
- K. Jóźwiakowski
- + 1 authors