Exchange-traded products in Germany: development and substitution of exchange-traded funds, exchange-traded commodities and exchange-traded notes. - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Search

Exchange-traded products in Germany: development and substitution of exchange-traded funds, exchange-traded commodities and exchange-traded notes.

Abstract

Research background: Exchange-traded products (ETPs) are one of the most rapidly growing categories of financial products. Their fast development has been boosted by innovative features. Three main categories of ETPs are exchange-traded funds (ETFs), exchange-traded commodities (ETCs) and exchange-traded notes (ETNs). ETCs and ETNs remain least known, even though their number on some stock exchanges is high. In Europe, Germany is one of the largest and most active ETPs markets. ETCs and ETNs are debt instruments, in contrast with the most popular ETFs, which are equity securities. Therefore, they offer investors different advantages but also expose them to other types of risks. Purpose of the article: The key aim of the article is to present the features of ETPs and to provide in-depth insight into the issues linked with the development of ETPs market in Germany, with the special emphasis on the ETCs and ETNs. Methodology/methods: In the main empirical part of the article, German ETPs market is analyzed using descriptive statistics and technological substitution framework (employed for the analysis of innovations in order to evaluate the changing market shares of, first, ETFs versus ETCs and ETNs, as well as, second, ETFs versus other types of investment funds). The period of the analysis is 2010-2016 in the former case and 2007-2016 in the latter. Findings: Share of ETPs other than ETFs in the total market in Germany remains low. Even though market position of the leading products, i.e. ETFs, is still very strong, some substitution has been observed, especially after 2015. Predictions indicate that this trend will continue in the upcoming years. Results of the analysis of the investment funds’ market confirm the substitution between ETFs and tradi-tional investment funds over 2007-2017, in particular in the first years of this time period.

Citations

  • 0

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 1

    Scopus

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 75 times
Publication version
Accepted or Published Version
License
Creative Commons: CC-BY open in new tab

Keywords

Details

Category:
Articles
Type:
artykuły w czasopismach recenzowanych i innych wydawnictwach ciągłych
Published in:
EQUILIBRIUM Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy no. 13, edition 4, pages 643 - 665,
ISSN: 1689-765X
Language:
English
Publication year:
2018
Bibliographic description:
Marszk A.: Exchange-traded products in Germany: development and substitution of exchange-traded funds, exchange-traded commodities and exchange-traded notes.// EQUILIBRIUM Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy. -Vol. 13., iss. 4 (2018), s.643-665
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.24136/eq.2018.031
Bibliography: test
  1. Abner, D. (2016). The ETF handbook. How to value and trade exchange-traded funds. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781119 297727. open in new tab
  2. Agapova, A. (2011). Conventional mutual index funds versus exchange-traded funds. Journal of Financial Markets, 14(2). doi: 10.1016/j.finmar.2010.10.005. open in new tab
  3. Aroskar, R., & Ogden, W. A. (2012). An analysis of exchange traded notes track- ing errors with their underlying indexes and indicative values. Applied Finan- cial Economics, 22(24). doi: 10.1080/09603107.2012.684787. open in new tab
  4. Blitz, D., Huij, J., & Swinkels, L. (2012). The performance of European index funds and exchange-traded funds. European Financial Management, 18(4). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-036X.2010.00550.x. open in new tab
  5. Charteris, A., Chau, F., Gavriilidis, K., & Kallinterakis, V. (2014). Premiums, discounts and feedback trading: evidence from emerging markets' ETFs. Inter- national Review of Financial Analysis, 35. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2014.07.010. open in new tab
  6. Chen, J., Chen, Y., & Frijns, B. (2017). Evaluating the tracking performance and tracking error of New Zealand exchange traded funds. Pacific Accounting Re- view, 29(3). doi: 10.1108/PAR-10-2016-0089. open in new tab
  7. Cherry, J. (2004). The limits of arbitrage: evidence from exchange traded funds. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=628061 (12.08.2018). open in new tab
  8. Cserna, B., Levy, A., & Wiener, Z. (2013). Counterparty risk in exchange-traded notes (ETNs). Journal of Fixed Income, 23(1). doi: 10.3905/jfi.2013.23.1.076. Curcio, R. J., Lipka, J. M., & Thornton, Jr., J. H. (2004). Cubes and the individual investor. Financial Services Review, 13. open in new tab
  9. Czuderna, K., Riedel, C., & Wagner, N. (2015). Liquidity and conditional market returns: evidence from German exchange traded funds. Economic Modelling, 51. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.08.028. open in new tab
  10. Dannhauser, C. D. (2017). The impact of innovation: evidence from corporate bond exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Journal of Financial Economics, 125. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.06.002. open in new tab
  11. Deutsche Bank (2010). The race for assets in the European commodity exchange- traded products space. London.
  12. Deutsche Bank (2015). European monthly ETF market review. London. Deutsche Bank (2017). ETF annual review & outlook. London.
  13. Elton, E., Gruber, M., Comer, G., & Li, K. (2002). Spiders: where are the bugs? Journal of Business, 75(3). doi:10.1086/339891. open in new tab
  14. ETFGI (2017). ETFGI global ETF and ETP industry highlights -December 2016. Retrieved from http://www.etfgi.com/publications/reports (22.03.2017). open in new tab
  15. Ferri, R. (2009). The ETF book: the ETF book: all you need to know about ex- change-traded funds. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  16. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (2012). Investor alerts exchange-traded notes -avoid unpleasant surprises. Retrieved from http://www.finra.org/in vestors/alerts/exchange-traded-notes-avoid-surprises (20.03.2017). open in new tab
  17. Fisher, J. C., & Pry, R. H. (1972). A simple substitution model of technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 3. doi: 10.1016/S0040- 1625(71)80005-7. open in new tab
  18. Hill, J. M. (2013). The evolution and success of index strategies in ETFs. Financial Analyst Journal, 72(5). doi: 10.2469/faj.v72.n5.2. open in new tab
  19. Hill, J. M., Nadig, D., Hougan, M., & Fuhr, D. (2015). A comprehensive guide to exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Charlottesville, VA: CFA Institute Research Foundation. open in new tab
  20. Hilliard, J. (2017). Premiums and discounts in ETFs: an analysis of the arbitrage mechanism in domestic and international funds. Global Finance Journal, 25. doi: 10.1016/j.gfj.2014.06.001. open in new tab
  21. Hull, I. (2016). The development and spread of financial innovations. Quantitative Economics, 7. doi:10.3982/QE521. open in new tab
  22. Ivanov, S. I. (2016). Analysis of ETF bid-ask spread components. Quarterly Re- view of Economics and Finance, 61. doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2016.02.004. open in new tab
  23. Krause, T., & Tse, Y. (2013). Volatility and return spillovers in Canadian and U.S. industry ETFs. International Review of Economics and Finance, 25. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2012.07.009. open in new tab
  24. Kucharavy, D., & De Guio, R. (2011). Logistic substitution model and technologi- cal forecasting. Procedia Engineering, 9. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.129. open in new tab
  25. Kwaśnicki, W. (2013). Logistic growth of the global economy and competitiveness of nations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(1). doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.07.007. open in new tab
  26. Lechman, E. (2015). ICT diffusion in developing countries. Towards a new concept of technological takeoff. Springer. doi: 10.1007/ 978-3-319-18254-4. open in new tab
  27. Lechman, E., & Marszk, A. (2015). ICT technologies and financial innovations: the case of Exchange Traded Funds in Brazil, Japan, Mexico, South Korea and the United States. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 99. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.01.006. open in new tab
  28. Lechman, E., & Marszk, A. (2018). Tracing financial innovation diffusion and substitution trajectories. Recent evidence on exchange-traded funds in Japan and South Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.003 open in new tab
  29. Lettau, M., & Madhavan, A. (2018). Exchange-Traded Funds 101 for Economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(1). doi: 10.1257/jep.32.1.135. open in new tab
  30. Leung, T., & Santoli, M. (2016). Leveraged exchange-traded funds: price dynam- ics and options valuation. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-29094-2. open in new tab
  31. Lin, J.-C. (2016). Does the inverse exchange-traded fund trading convey a bearish signal to the market?. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 13(2-2). doi:10.21511/imfi.13(2-2).2016.02. open in new tab
  32. MacManus, C., & Lee, J. (2017). The growth of ETFs in Europe. Performance Magazine, 22.
  33. Madhavan, A. (2012). Exchange-traded funds, market structure, and the flash crash. Financial Analyst Journal, 68(4). doi: 10.2469/faj.v68.n4.6. open in new tab
  34. Marchetti, C., & Nakicenovic, N. (1979). The dynamics of energy systems and the logistic substitution model. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Sys- tems Analysis.
  35. Marshall, B. R., Nguyen, N. H., & Visaltanachoti, N. (2013). ETF arbitrage: intra- day evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin. 2013.05.014. open in new tab
  36. Marshall, B. R., Nguyen, N. H., & Visaltanachoti, N. (2018). Do liquidity proxies measure liquidity accurately in ETFs? Journal of International Financial Mar- kets, Institutions and Money. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin. 2018.02.011. open in new tab
  37. Marszk, A., Lechman, E., & Kaur, H. (2017). Financial markets diffusion patterns. The case of Mexican investment funds. Equilibrium. Quarterly Jour- nal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(1). doi: 10.24136/eq.v12i1.5. open in new tab
  38. Meyer, P. S., Yung, J. W., & Ausubel, J. H. (1999). A primer on logistic growth and substitution: the mathematics of the Loglet Lab software. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 61(3). doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00021-9. open in new tab
  39. Petajisto, A. (2017). Inefficiencies in the pricing of exchange-traded funds. Finan- cial Analyst Journal, 73(1). doi: 10.2469/faj.v73.n1.7. open in new tab
  40. Shank, C. A., & Vianna, A. C. (2016). Are US-Dollar-Hedged-ETF investors ag- gressive on exchange rates? A panel VAR approach. Research in International Business and Finance, 38. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.05.002. open in new tab
  41. Vandermarliere, B., Ryckebusch, J., Schoors, K., Cauwelsc, P., & Sornette, D. (2017). Discrete hierarchy of sizes and performances in the exchange-traded fund universe. Physica A., 469. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.084. open in new tab
  42. Xetra (2017). Monthly statistics Cash Market. Retrieved from http://www.deuts che-boerse-cash-market.com/dbcm-en/instruments-statistics/statistics/cash-mar ket-statistics/monthly-statistics-cash-market (20.03.2017). open in new tab
  43. Yiannaki, S. M. (2015). ETFs performance Europe -a good start or not? Procedia Economics and Finance, 30. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01346-5. 2007.01.01 2007.07.01 2008.01.01 2008.07.01 2009.01.01 2009.07.01 2010.01.01 2010.07.01 2011.01.01 2011.07.01 2012.01.01 2012.07.01 2013.01.01 2013.07.01 2014.01.01 2014.07.01 2015.01.01 2015.07.01 2016.01.01 open in new tab
  44. 90% 100% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 equity fixed income commodity and other
Sources of funding:
Verified by:
Gdańsk University of Technology

seen 114 times

Recommended for you

Meta Tags