Safeguarding democracy during pandemics. Social distancing, postal, or internet voting—the good, the bad, or the ugly?

Robert Krimmer; David Duenas Cid; Iuliia Krivonosova

doi:10.1080/09540962.2020.1766222

Safeguarding democracy during pandemics. Social distancing, postal, or internet voting—the good, the bad, or the ugly?

Abstract

During a pandemic, many countries and organizations must decide whether to postpone upcoming elections or to hold them (Krimmer et al., 2020a). If the decision is made to hold the election, three main scenarios come to mind: continue using the existing system but include measures to ensure the health of participants; or look for alternatives among remote voting channels which could ensure social distancing is guaranteed either by postal voting, or internet voting.

Citations

2 1

CrossRef
0

Web of Science
2 2

Scopus

Authors (3)

Robert Krimmer dr
David Duenas Cid dr hab.
- Kozminski University
Iuliia Krivonosova

Cite as

Full text

download paper

downloaded 48 times

Publication version: Accepted or Published Version
DOI:: Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.1080/09540962.2020.1766222
License: open in new tab

full content of the article see on external site open in new tab

Keywords

Details

Category:

Articles

Type:

artykuły w czasopismach

Published in:

PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT no. 41, pages 8 - 10,
ISSN: 0954-0962

Language:

English

Publication year:

2021

Bibliographic description:

Duenas Cid D., Krimmer R., Krivonosova I.: Safeguarding democracy during pandemics. Social distancing, postal, or internet voting—the good, the bad, or the ugly?// PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT -,iss. 41/1 (2021),

DOI: