Usability of mobile applications: a systematic literature study - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Search

Usability of mobile applications: a systematic literature study

Abstract

Since the release of the first mobile devices, the usability of on-board applications has been the concern not only of software vendors but hardware manufacturers as well. The academia community later willingly joined the discussion on usability in terms of theory and empirical measurement, having experience and knowledge in desktop settings. At first sight, such a background should guarantee a solid foundation to conduct research on software usability in a new setting. However, a preliminary study on the subject matter revealed methodological disorder in contemporary literature. As a matter of fact, a need emerged to review existing usability definitions, attributes and measures to recognize all associated aspects. In order to fill this void, we conducted a systematic literature review on usability studies indexed by the Scopus database and devoted to mobile applications. The input volume covers 790 documents from 2001 to 2018. The data analysis shows that the ISO 9241–11 usability definition has been adopted in an unchanged form and popularized as the standard by the HCI community. Secondly, in total, 75 attributes were identified and analysed. The most frequent are efficiency (70%), satisfaction (66%) and effectiveness (58%), which directly originate from the above definition. Subsequently, the less frequent are learnability (45%), memorability (23%), cognitive load (19%) and errors (17%). The last two concern simplicity (13%) and ease of use (9%). Thirdly, in the evaluation of usability, controlled observation and surveys are two major research methods applied, while eye-tracking, thinking aloud and interview are hardly used and serve as complementary to collect additional data. Moreover, usability evaluations are often confused with user experience dimensions, covering not only application quality characteristics, but also user beliefs, emotions and preferences. All these results indicate the need for further research on the usability of mobile applications, aiming to establish a consensus in the theory and practice among all interested parties.

Citations

  • 9 2

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 9 6

    Scopus

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 264 times
Publication version
Accepted or Published Version
License
Creative Commons: CC-BY open in new tab

Keywords

Details

Category:
Articles
Type:
artykuły w czasopismach
Published in:
IEEE Access pages 55563 - 55577,
ISSN: 2169-3536
Language:
English
Publication year:
2020
Bibliographic description:
Weichbroth P.: Usability of mobile applications: a systematic literature study// IEEE Access -,iss. 8 (2020), s.55563-55577
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.1109/access.2020.2981892
Bibliography: test
  1. M. Rouse and I. Wigmore. (2013). Definition. Mobile App. [Online].
  2. Statista. (2019). Global Mobile Device Market Share in 2017 and 2018, by Device Type. [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/ statistics/183530/worldwide-market-share-mobile-device/ open in new tab
  3. Statista. (2019). Smartphone User Penetration as Percentage of Total Global Population From 2014 to 2021. [Online]. Available: https:// www.statista.com/statistics/203734/global-smartphone-penetration-per- capita-since-2005/ open in new tab
  4. H. M. Salman, W. F. Wan Ahmad, and S. Sulaiman, ''Usability evaluation of the smartphone user interface in supporting elderly users from experts' perspective,'' IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 22578-22591, 2018. open in new tab
  5. M. Sikorski, ''Beyond product usability: User satisfaction and quality management,'' in Proc. CHI Extended Abstr. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI). New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2000, pp. 61-62. open in new tab
  6. H. Feng, T. Hoegler, and W. Stucky, ''Exploring the critical success factors for mobile commerce,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Mobile Bus., Jun. 2006, p. 40. open in new tab
  7. E. Garcia-Lopez, A. Garcia-Cabot, C. Manresa-Yee, L. de-Marcos, and C. Pages-Arevalo, ''Validation of navigation guidelines for improving usability in the mobile Web,'' Comput. Standards Interfaces, vol. 52, pp. 51-62, May 2017. open in new tab
  8. N. Tractinsky, ''The usability construct: A dead end?'' Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 131-177, Mar. 2018. open in new tab
  9. B. Shackel, ''Usability-Context, framework, definition, design and eval- uation,'' Interacting Comput., vol. 21, nos. 5-6, pp. 339-346, Dec. 2009. open in new tab
  10. J. Kjeldskov and J. Stage, ''New techniques for usability evaluation of mobile systems,'' Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., vol. 60, nos. 5-6, pp. 599-620, May 2004. open in new tab
  11. K. Gulzar, J. Sang, M. Ramzan, and M. Kashif, ''Fuzzy approach to prioritize usability requirements conflicts: An experimental evaluation,'' IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 13570-13577, 2017. open in new tab
  12. P. Weichbroth, ''Delivering usability in IT products: Empirical lessons from the field,'' Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng., vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1027-1045, Jul. 2018. open in new tab
  13. M. S. Bashir and A. Farooq, ''EUHSA: Extending usability heuristics for smartphone application,'' IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 100838-100859, 2019. open in new tab
  14. R. Parente Da Costa, E. D. Canedo, R. T. De Sousa, R. De Oliveira Albuquerque, and L. J. Garcia Villalba, ''Set of usability heuristics for quality assessment of mobile applications on smartphones,'' IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 116145-116161, 2019.
  15. A. Seffah, M. Donyaee, R. B. Kline, and H. K. Padda, ''Usability mea- surement and metrics: A consolidated model,'' Softw. Qual. J., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 159-178, Jun. 2006. open in new tab
  16. S. Winter, S. Wagner, and F. Deissenboeck, ''A comprehensive model of usability,'' in Proc. IFIP Int. Conf. Eng. Hum.-Comput. Interact. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2007, pp. 106-122. open in new tab
  17. K. Majrashi and M. Hamilton, ''A cross-platform usability measurement model,'' Lect. Notes Softw. Eng., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 132, 2015. open in new tab
  18. P. Weichbroth, ''Usability attributes revisited: A time-framed knowledge map,'' in Proc. Federated Conf. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst., Sep. 2018, pp. 1005-1008. open in new tab
  19. Software Enginnering-Product Quality, Standard ISO/IEC 9126:1991, ISO/IEC, Geneva, Switzerland, 1991. open in new tab
  20. Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work With Visual Display Termi- nals (VDTs)-Part 11: Guidance on Usability, Standard ISO 9241- 11:1998(en), ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1998. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-1:v1:en open in new tab
  21. Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction-Part 11: Usability: Defini- tions and Concepts, ISO 9241-11:2018(en), ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:- 11:ed-2:v1:en open in new tab
  22. J. R. Lewis, ''Usability: Lessons learned. . . and yet to be learned,'' Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 663-684, Sep. 2014. open in new tab
  23. D. Quiñones and C. Rusu, ''How to develop usability heuristics: A systematic literature review,'' Comput. Standards Interfaces, vol. 53, pp. 89-122, Aug. 2017. open in new tab
  24. Systems and Software Engineering-Systems and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE)-System and Software Quality Models, Standard ISO/IEC 25010:2011, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011. open in new tab
  25. Software Engineering-Product Quality-Part 1: Quality Model, Standard ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2001. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/22749.html open in new tab
  26. J. Nielsen, ''Iterative user-interface design,'' Computer, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 32-41, Nov. 1993. open in new tab
  27. N. Bevan, ''Usability is quality of use,'' in Advances in Human Fac- tors/Ergonomics, vol. 20. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 1995, pp. 349-354. open in new tab
  28. J. M. C. Bastien, ''Usability testing: A review of some methodological and technical aspects of the method,'' Int. J. Med. Inform., vol. 79, no. 4, pp. e18-e23, Apr. 2010. open in new tab
  29. T. Boren and J. Ramey, ''Thinking aloud: Reconciling theory and practice,'' IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 261-278, 3rd Quart., 2000. open in new tab
  30. S. Richardson, R. Mishuris, A. O'Connell, D. Feldstein, R. Hess, P. Smith, L. McCullagh, T. McGinn, and D. Mann, '''Think aloud' and 'Near live' usability testing of two complex clinical decision support tools,'' Int. J. Med. Inform., vol. 106, pp. 1-8, Oct. 2017. open in new tab
  31. G. Deniz and P. O. Durdu, ''A comparison of mobile form controls for different tasks,'' Comput. Standards Interfaces, vol. 61, pp. 97-106, Jan. 2019. open in new tab
  32. T. Kato, ''What 'question-asking protocols' can say about the user inter- face,'' Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 659-673, Dec. 1986. open in new tab
  33. T. Obata, T. Daimon, and H. Kawashima, ''A cognitive study of in- vehicle navigation systems: Applying verbal protocol analysis to usability evaluation,'' in Proc. Vehicle Navigat. Inf. Syst. Conf. (VNIS), Oct. 1993, pp. 232-237. open in new tab
  34. R. Nagpal, D. Mehrotra, and P. K. Bhatia, ''The state of art in Website usability evaluation methods,'' in Design Solutions for User- Centric Information Systems. Harrisburg, PA, USA: IGI Global, 2017, pp. 275-296. open in new tab
  35. et. al. R. Nagpal, ''FAHP approach to rank educational Websites on usability,'' Int. J. Comput. Digit. Syst., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 251-260, Oct. 2015.
  36. A. Hinderks, M. Schrepp, F. J. Domínguez Mayo, M. J. Escalona, and J. Thomaschewski, ''Developing a UX KPI based on the user experi- ence questionnaire,'' Comput. Standards Interfaces, vol. 65, pp. 38-44, Jul. 2019. open in new tab
  37. J.-P. Jain and W.-C. Shen, ''A study of the optimization of app design with regards to usability and user experience-a case study of SunlineApp,'' in Proc. Eng. Innov. Design, 7th Int. Conf. Innov., Commun. Eng. (ICICE), Hangzhou, China. CRC Press, May 2019, p. 175. open in new tab
  38. A. Holzinger, ''Usability engineering methods for software developers,'' Commun. ACM, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 71-74, Jan. 2005. open in new tab
  39. L. F. Gonçalves, L. G. Vasconcelos, E. V. Munson, and L. A. Baldochi, ''Supporting adaptation of Web applications to the mobile environment with automated usability evaluation,'' in Proc. 31st Annu. ACM Symp. Appl. Comput. (SAC). New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2016, pp. 787-794. open in new tab
  40. J. Grigera, A. Garrido, J. M. Rivero, and G. Rossi, ''Automatic detection of usability smells in Web applications,'' Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., vol. 97, pp. 129-148, Jan. 2017. open in new tab
  41. J. Falkowska, J. Sobecki, and M. Pietrzak, ''Eye tracking usability testing enhanced with EEG analysis,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Design, User Exper., Usability. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2016, pp. 399-411. open in new tab
  42. P. Weichbroth, K. Redlarski, and I. Garnik, ''Eye-tracking Web usability research,'' in Proc. Federated Conf. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst., Oct. 2016, pp. 1681-1684. open in new tab
  43. P. Realpe-Muñoz, C. A. Collazos, J. Hurtado, T. Granollers, J. Muñoz-Arteaga, and J. Velasco-Medina, ''Eye tracking-based behavioral study of users using e-voting systems,'' Comput. Standards Interfaces, vol. 55, pp. 182-195, Jan. 2018. open in new tab
  44. T. Tullis, S. Fleischman, M. McNulty, C. Cianchette, and M. Bergel, ''An empirical comparison of lab and remote usability testing of Web sites,'' in Proc. Usability Professionals Assoc. Conf., 2002, pp. 1-8.
  45. J. Dong, S. L. Martin, J. M. Mullaly, and A. R. Tannenbaum, ''Method, system and program for performing remote usability testing,'' U.S. Patent 6 526 526, Feb. 25, 2003.
  46. J. Sauer, A. Sonderegger, K. Heyden, J. Biller, J. Klotz, and A. Uebelbacher, ''Extra-laboratorial usability tests: An empirical com- parison of remote and classical field testing with lab testing,'' Appl. Ergonom., vol. 74, pp. 85-96, Jan. 2019. open in new tab
  47. M. J. Scott, F. Spyridonis, and G. Ghinea, ''Designing for design- ers: Towards the development of accessible ICT products and services using the VERITAS framework,'' Comput. Standards Interfaces, vol. 42, pp. 113-124, Nov. 2015. open in new tab
  48. J. Díaz, C. Rusu, and C. A. Collazos, ''Experimental validation of a set of cultural-oriented usability heuristics: E-commerce Websites evaluation,'' Comput. Standards Interfaces, vol. 50, pp. 160-178, Feb. 2017. open in new tab
  49. T. C. Lacerda and C. G. von Wangenheim, ''Systematic literature review of usability capability/maturity models,'' Comput. Standards Interfaces, vol. 55, pp. 95-105, Jan. 2018. open in new tab
  50. D. Quiñones, C. Rusu, and V. Rusu, ''A methodology to develop usabil- ity/user experience heuristics,'' Comput. Standards Interfaces, vol. 59, pp. 109-129, Aug. 2018. open in new tab
  51. I. Connell, A. Blandford, and T. Green, ''CASSM and cognitive walk- through: Usability issues with ticket vending machines,'' Behav. Inf. Technol., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 307-320, Sep. 2004. open in new tab
  52. T. Hollingsed and D. G. Novick, ''Usability inspection methods after 15 years of research and practice,'' in Proc. 25th Annu. ACM Int. Conf. Design Commun. (SIGDOC). New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2007, pp. 249-255. open in new tab
  53. L. Alonso-Virgós, J. P. Espada, and R. G. Crespo, ''Analyzing compli- ance and application of usability guidelines and recommendations by Web developers,'' Comput. Standards Interfaces, vol. 64, pp. 117-132, May 2019. open in new tab
  54. Z. Zhang, V. Basili, and B. Shneiderman, ''Perspective-based usability inspection: An empirical validation of efficacy,'' Empirical Softw. Eng., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 43-69, 1999. open in new tab
  55. M. N. Mahrin, P. Strooper, and D. Carrington, ''Selecting usability evaluation methods for software process descriptions,'' in Proc. 16th open in new tab
  56. Asia-Pacific Softw. Eng. Conf., Dec. 2009, pp. 523-529. open in new tab
  57. C. Wilson, User Interface Inspection Methods: A User-Centered Design Method. London, U.K.: Newnes, 2013. open in new tab
  58. J. Vanderdonckt and A. Beirekdar, ''Automated Web evaluation by guide- line review,'' J. Web Eng., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 102-117, 2005. open in new tab
  59. M. Speicher, A. Both, and M. Gaedke, ''Towards metric-based usability evaluation of online Web interfaces,'' in Proc. Mensch Comput. Work- shopband, 2013, pp. 277-281. open in new tab
  60. T. S. D. Silva, M. S. Silveira, and F. Maurer, ''Usability evaluation practices within agile development,'' in Proc. 48th Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., Jan. 2015, pp. 5133-5142. open in new tab
  61. G. Büyüközkan, ''Determining the mobile commerce user requirements using an analytic approach,'' Comput. Standards Interfaces, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 144-152, Jan. 2009. open in new tab
  62. K. Curcio, A. Malucelli, S. Reinehr, and M. A. Paludo, ''An analysis of the factors determining software product quality: A comparative study,'' Comput. Standards Interfaces, vol. 48, pp. 10-18, Nov. 2016. open in new tab
  63. I. Arroyo, F. Giné, C. Roig, and A. Granollers, ''Performance and usabil- ity tradeoff in a cluster display wall,'' Comput. Standards Interfaces, vol. 62, pp. 53-63, Feb. 2019. open in new tab
  64. A. Darejeh and D. Singh, ''An investigation on ribbon interface design guidelines for people with less computer literacy,'' Comput. Standards Interfaces, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 808-820, Sep. 2014. open in new tab
  65. A. Shrestha, A. Cater-Steel, M. Toleman, and T. Rout, ''Benefits and rel- evance of international standards in a design science research project for process assessments,'' Comput. Standards Interfaces, vol. 60, pp. 48-56, Nov. 2018. open in new tab
  66. P. Efe and O. Demirors, ''A change management model and its applica- tion in software development projects,'' Comput. Standards Interfaces, vol. 66, Oct. 2019, Art. no. 103353. open in new tab
  67. S. Caplan, ''Using focus group methodology for ergonomic design,'' Ergonomics, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 527-533, May 1990. open in new tab
  68. J. Nielsen, ''The use and misuse of focus groups,'' IEEE Softw., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 94-95, 1997. open in new tab
  69. A. Stefani and M. Xenos, ''Weight-modeling of B2C system qual- ity,'' Comput. Standards Interfaces, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 411-421, Jun. 2011. open in new tab
  70. A. Sutcliffe, ''Task analysis, systems analysis and design: Sym- biosis or synthesis?'' Interacting Comput., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 6-12, Apr. 1989. open in new tab
  71. D. Benyon, ''Adaptive systems: A solution to usability problems,'' User Model. User-Adapted Interact., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 65-87, 1993. open in new tab
  72. A. Crystal and B. Ellington, ''Task analysis and human-computer inter- action: Approaches, techniques, and levels of analysis,'' in Proc. 10th open in new tab
  73. Americas Conf. Inf. Syst. (AMCIS), 2004, p. 391. open in new tab
  74. G. de Haan, G. C. van der Veer, and J. C. van Vliet, ''Formal mod- elling techniques in human-computer interaction,'' Acta Psychol., vol. 78, nos. 1-3, pp. 27-67, Dec. 1991. open in new tab
  75. A. Badre, Shaping Web Usability: Interaction Design in Context. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley, 2002.
  76. S. R. Humayoun, Y. Dubinsky, and T. Catarci, ''A three-fold integration framework to incorporate user-centered design into agile software devel- opment,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Hum. Centered Design. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2011, pp. 55-64. open in new tab
  77. S. K. Card, A. Newell, and T. P. Moran, The Psychology of Human- Computer Interaction. Trenton, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., 1983.
  78. S. A. Oyewole and J. M. Haight, ''Determination of optimal paths to task goals using expert system based on GOMS model,'' Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 823-833, Mar. 2011. open in new tab
  79. D. Fernandez-Lanvin, J. D. Andres-Suarez, M. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, and B. Pariente-Martinez, ''The dimension of age and gender as user model demographic factors for automatic personalization in e-commerce sites,'' Comput. Standards Interfaces, vol. 59, pp. 1-9, Aug. 2018. open in new tab
  80. D. Zhang and B. Adipat, ''Challenges, methodologies, and issues in the usability testing of mobile applications,'' Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 293-308, Jul. 2005. open in new tab
  81. A. Hussain and M. Kutar, ''Usability metric framework for mobile phone application,'' in Proc. 10th Annu. PostGraduate Symp. Converg. Telecom- mun., Netw. Broadcast., 2009, pp. 978-982. open in new tab
  82. A. H. Kronbauer, C. A. S. Santos, and V. Vieira, ''Smartphone applica- tions usability evaluation: A hybrid model and its implementation,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Hum.-Centred Softw. Eng. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2012, pp. 146-163. open in new tab
  83. R. Harrison, D. Flood, and D. Duce, ''Usability of mobile applications: Literature review and rationale for a new usability model,'' J. Interact. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 1, 2013. open in new tab
  84. I. do Nascimento Mendes and A. C. Dias-Neto, ''A process-based approach to test usability of multi-platform mobile applications,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Design, User Exper., Usability. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2016, pp. 456-468. open in new tab
  85. A. Saleh, R. B. Isamil, and N. B. Fabil, ''Extension of pacmad model for usability evaluation metrics using goal question metrics (GQM) approach,'' J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 90-100, 2015.
  86. N. Parsazadeh, R. Ali, and M. Rezaei, ''A framework for cooperative and interactive mobile learning to improve online information evaluation skills,'' Comput. Edu., vol. 120, pp. 75-89, May 2018. open in new tab
  87. E. A. Khan and M. K. Y. Shambour, ''An analytical study of mobile applications for Hajj and Umrah services,'' Appl. Comput. Informat., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 37-47, Jan. 2018. open in new tab
  88. P. Lew and L. Olsina, ''Relating user experience with MobileApp quality evaluation and design,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Web Eng. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2013, pp. 253-268. open in new tab
  89. H. I. Abubakar, N. Hashim, and A. Hussain, ''Verification process of usability evaluation model for m-banking application,'' in Proc. Recent Adv. Comput. Sci. 14th Int. Conf. Appl. Comput. Appl. Comput. Sci. (ACA- COS), 2015, pp. 23-25. open in new tab
  90. E. Kaur and P. D. Haghighi, ''A context-aware usability model for mobile health applications,'' in Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Adv. Mobile Comput. Multi Media (MoMM). New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2016, pp. 181-189. open in new tab
  91. B. Kitchenham, ''Procedures for performing systematic reviews,'' Keele, UK, Keele Univ., vol. 33, no. 2004, pp. 1-26, 2004.
  92. B. Kitchenham and S. Charters, ''Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (version 2.3),'' Keele Univ. Durham Univ., Keele, U.K., & Durham, U.K., Tech. Rep., EBSE-2007- 01, 2007.
  93. H. Zhang and M. Ali Babar, ''Systematic reviews in software engineer- ing: An empirical investigation,'' Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1341-1354, Jul. 2013. open in new tab
  94. Scopus. An Eye on Global Research: 5,000 Publishers. Over 71 M Records and 23,700 Titles, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Elsevier, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.elsevier.com/__ data/assets/pdf_file/0017/114533/SC_FS_overview_WEB.pdf open in new tab
  95. C. K. Coursaris and D. Kim, ''A research agenda for mobile usability,'' in Proc. CHI Extended Abstr. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI). New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2007, pp. 2345-2350. open in new tab
  96. IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology, IEEE Standard 610.12-1990, 1990, pp. 1-84. open in new tab
  97. J. Nielsen, ''Durability of usability guidelines,'' Alertbox, Bengaluru, India, Tech. Rep., Jan. 2005.
  98. N. Bevan, ''International standards for HCI and usability,'' Int. J. Hum.- Comput. Stud., vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 533-552, Oct. 2001. open in new tab
  99. L. Barnett, C. Harvey, and C. Gatzidis, ''First time user experiences in mobile games: An evaluation of usability,'' Entertainment Comput., vol. 27, pp. 82-88, Aug. 2018. open in new tab
  100. N. Bessghaier and M. Souii, ''Towards usability evaluation of hybrid mobile user interfaces,'' in Proc. IEEE/ACS 14th Int. Conf. Comput. Syst. Appl. (AICCSA), Oct. 2017, pp. 895-900. open in new tab
  101. R. Duran-Saez, X. Ferre, H. Zhu, and Q. Liu, ''Task analysis-based user event logging for mobile applications,'' in Proc. IEEE 25th Int. Requirements Eng. Conf. Workshops (REW), Sep. 2017, pp. 152-155. open in new tab
  102. S. Caro-Alvaro, E. Garcia-Lopez, A. Garcia-Cabot, L. de-Marcos, and J.-J. Martinez-Herraiz, ''Identifying usability issues in instant messag- ing apps on iOS and Android platforms,'' Mobile Inf. Syst., vol. 2018, pp. 1-19, Oct. 2018. open in new tab
  103. J. Espinoza, P. Loarte, C. Espinoza, F. Paz, and J. Arenas, ''A new software development model: Innovation through mobile application with UCD,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Design, Exper., Usability. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2018, pp. 673-692. open in new tab
  104. F. Z. Ghazizadeh and S. Vafadar, ''A quantitative evaluation of usability in mobile applications: An empirical study,'' in Proc. Int. Symp. Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng. Conf. (CSSE), Oct. 2017, pp. 1-6. open in new tab
  105. Z. Huang and Z. Tian, ''Analysis and design for mobile applications: A user experience approach,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Design, User Exper., Usability. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2018, pp. 91-100. open in new tab
  106. A. Hussain, E. O. Mkpojiogu, S. Mortada, and W. S. Yue, ''Mobile experience evaluation of an e-reader app,'' J. Telecommun., Electron. Comput. Eng. (JTEC), vol. 10, nos. 1-10, pp. 11-15, 2018. open in new tab
  107. J. Krzewińska, A. Indyka-Piasecka, M. Kopel, E. Kukla, Z. Telec, and B. Trawiński, ''Usability testing of a responsive Web system for a school for disabled children,'' in Proc. Asian Conf. Intell. Inf. Database Syst. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2018, pp. 705-716. open in new tab
  108. K. M. Malan, J. H. P. Eloff, and J. A. De Bruin, ''Semi-automated usability analysis through eye tracking,'' South Afr. Comput. J., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 66-84, 2018. open in new tab
  109. S. S. Nathan, A. Hussain, and N. L. Hashim, ''Usability evaluation of deaf mobile application interface: A systematic review,'' J. Eng. Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 291-297, 2018. open in new tab
  110. R. Pakomera, D. van Greunen, and A. Veldsman, ''Usability and use- fulness in designing patient-centric systems in afro-centric setting,'' in Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Rel., Infocom Technol. Optim. (Trends Future Direc- tions) (ICRITO), Sep. 2017, pp. 576-579. open in new tab
  111. S. Shafiq and T. A. Khan, ''Role & value of usability in educational learning via game based apps,'' Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 7, pp. 70-77, Nov. 2018.
  112. V. N. Adama, I. S. Shehu, S. A. Adepoju, and R. G. Jimoh, ''Towards designing mobile banking user interfaces for novice users,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Design, User Exper., Usability. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2017, pp. 181-197. open in new tab
  113. M. Aguilar and C. Zapata, ''Integrating UCD and an agile methodol- ogy in the development of a mobile catalog of plants,'' in Advances in Ergonomics Modeling, Usability & Special Populations. Cham, Switzer- land: Springer, 2017, pp. 75-87. open in new tab
  114. S. Caro-Alvaro, E. Garcia-Lopez, A. Garcia-Cabot, L. de-Marcos, and J.-M. Gutierrez-Martinez, ''A systematic evaluation of mobile applica- tions for instant messaging on iOS devices,'' Mobile Inf. Syst., vol. 2017, pp. 1-17, Oct. 2017. open in new tab
  115. Z. M. C. Cruz, J. J. R. Alpay, J. D. D. Depeno, M. J. C. Altabirano, and R. Bringula, ''Usability of 'Fatchum': A mobile application recipe recom- mender system,'' in Proc. 6th Annu. Conf. Res. Inf. Technol. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2017, pp. 11-16. open in new tab
  116. S. Ibtasam, H. Mehmood, L. Razaq, J. Webster, S. Yu, and R. Anderson, ''An exploration of smartphone based mobile money applications in pakistan,'' in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Inf. Commun. Technol. Develop. (ICTD). New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2017, p. 1. open in new tab
  117. S. Prezenski, D. Bruechner, and N. Russwinkel, ''Predictive cognitive modelling of applications,'' in Proc. 12th Int. Joint Conf. Comput. Vis., Imag. Comput. Graph. Theory Appl., 2017, pp. 165-171. open in new tab
  118. Y. Wang and R. Brennan, ''Building high usability consumer-oriented linked data mobile apps,'' in Proc. Irish Conf. Artif. Intell. Cogn. Sci. (AICS), Dublin, Republic of Ireland, Dec. 2017, pp. 1-12. open in new tab
  119. Q. Ye, S. A. Boren, U. Khan, and M. S. Kim, ''Evaluation of func- tionality and usability on diabetes mobile applications: A systematic literature review,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Digit. Hum. Modeling Appl. Health, Saf., Ergonom. Risk Manage. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2017, pp. 108-116. open in new tab
  120. V. V. S. M. Chintapalli, W. Tao, Z. Meng, K. Zhang, J. Kong, and Y. Ge, ''A comparative study of spreadsheet applications on mobile devices,'' Mobile Inf. Syst., vol. 2016, pp. 1-10, Feb. 2016. open in new tab
  121. H. Hoehle, R. Aljafari, and V. Venkatesh, ''Leveraging Microsoft's mobile usability guidelines: Conceptualizing and developing scales for mobile application usability,'' Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., vol. 89, pp. 35-53, May 2016. open in new tab
  122. R. Liu, J. Cao, K. Zhang, W. Gao, J. Liang, and L. Yang, ''When privacy meets usability: Unobtrusive privacy permission recommendation system for mobile apps based on crowdsourcing,'' IEEE Trans. Services Comput., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 864-878, Sep. /Oct. 2018. open in new tab
  123. I. Nascimento, W. Silva, B. Gadelha, and T. Conte, ''Userbility: A tech- nique for the evaluation of user experience and usability on mobile appli- cations,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Hum.-Comput. Interact. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2016, pp. 372-383. open in new tab
  124. P. Paškevicius and R. Damaševicius, ''Design of usable interface for a mobile e-commerce system,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Young Researchers Inform., Math. Eng., 2016, pp. 31-35.
  125. M. Tenemaza, E. Mena-Maldonado, F. Ledesma, M. Llumiquinga, and S. Luján-Mora, ''Augmented reality in limited environment, analysis of usability,'' in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. ICT, Soc. Hum. Beings (ICT), 2016, pp. 277-279.
  126. A. S. A. Al-Aidaroos and A. Abdul Mutalib, ''Design of the usability measurement tool for multimodal mobile applications,'' J. Teknologi, vol. 77, no. 29, pp. 41-47, 2015. open in new tab
  127. M. Al-khomsan, A. Al-Arjan, A. Al-Amro, and K. Al-Nafjan, ''Usability evaluation of Twitter on Android platform for elderly arab users using morae evaluation tool,'' in Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Internet Technol. Secured Trans. (ICITST), Dec. 2015, pp. 446-447. open in new tab
  128. H. M. Az-Zahra, A. Pinandito, and H. Tolle, ''Usability evaluation of mobile application in culinary recommendation system,'' in Proc. IEEE Asia-Pacific Conf. Wireless Mobile (APWiMob), Aug. 2015, pp. 89-94. open in new tab
  129. Z. Elkheir and A. Abdul Mutalib, ''Mobile learning applications design- ing concepts and challenges: Survey,'' Res. J. Appl. Sci., Eng. Technol., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 438-442, 2015. open in new tab
  130. H. Hoehle and V. Venkatesh, ''Mobile application usability: Concep- tualization and instrument development,'' MIS Quart., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 435-472, Feb. 2015. open in new tab
  131. A. Hussain, H. I. Abubakar, and N. B. Hashim, ''Evaluating mobile banking application: Usability dimensions and measurements,'' in Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Multimedia, Nov. 2014, pp. 136-140. open in new tab
  132. M. S. Kim, A. A. Ben Ramadan, M. A. Clarke, M. K. Markey, K. J. Lage, M. R. Aro, K. L. Ingalls, and V. Sindhwani, ''Usability of mobile applica- tions supporting training in diagnostic decision-making by radiologists,'' in Int. Conf. Digit. Hum. Modeling Appl. Health, Saf., Ergonom. Risk Manage. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2015, pp. 448-454. open in new tab
  133. P. Kortum and M. Sorber, ''Measuring the usability of mobile applications for phones and tablets,'' Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 518-529, Aug. 2015. open in new tab
  134. S. J. Levulis and D. J. Harris, ''Are all tests equal? A comparison of emulator and device testing for mobile usability evaluation,'' in Proc. Hum. Factors Ergonom. Soc. Annu. Meeting, vol. 59, no. 1. Los Angeles, CA, USA: Sage, 2015, pp. 976-980. open in new tab
  135. M. Plachkinova, G. Faddoul, and S. Chatterjee, ''Designing a mobile application for complementary and alternative medicine: A usability approach,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Hum.-Comput. Interact. Cham, Switzer- land: Springer, 2015, pp. 345-349. open in new tab
  136. F. Botella, J. P. Moreno, and A. Peñalver, ''How efficient can be a user with a tablet versus a smartphone?'' in Proc. 15th Int. Conf. Hum. Comput. Interact. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2014, p. 64. open in new tab
  137. W. Y. Chua, M. P.-H. Wan, K. Chang, and W. Yi, ''Improving mobile applications usage experience of novice users through user-acclimatized interaction: A case study,'' in Proc. Americas Conf. Inf. Syst., 2014, pp. 1-10. open in new tab
  138. A. Hussain, N. L. Hashim, and N. Nordin, ''MGQM: Evaluation metric for mobile and human interaction,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Hum.-Comput. Interact. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2014, pp. 42-47. open in new tab
  139. K. Lapin, ''Deriving usability goals for mobile applications,'' in Proc. Mulitmedia, Interact., Design Innov. Int. Conf. Multimedia, Interact., Design Innov. (MIDI). New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2014, pp. 1-6. open in new tab
  140. J.-M. López-Gil, M. Urretavizcaya, B. Losada, and I. Fernández-Castro, ''Integrating field studies in agile development to evaluate usability on context dependant mobile applications,'' in Proc. 15th Int. Conf. Hum. Comput. Interact. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2014, pp. 24:1-24:8. open in new tab
  141. A. S. Tsiaousis and G. M. Giaglis, ''Mobile websites: Usability evaluation and design,'' Int. J. Mobile Commun., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 29-55, 2014. open in new tab
  142. L. Wein, ''Visual recognition in museum guide apps: Do visitors want it?'' in Proc. 32nd Annu. ACM Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI). New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2014, pp. 635-638. open in new tab
  143. B. Aryana and T. Clemmensen, ''Mobile usability: Experiences from Iran and Turkey,'' Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 220-242, Mar. 2013. open in new tab
  144. M. N. Islam, ''A systematic literature review of semiotics perception in user interfaces,'' J. Syst. Inf. Technol., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 45-77, 2013.
  145. P. Chynał, J. M. Szymański, and J. Sobecki, ''Using eyetracking in a mobile applications usability testing,'' in Proc. Asian Conf. Intell. Inf. Database Syst. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2012, pp. 178-186. open in new tab
  146. D. Flood, R. Harrison, C. Iacob, and D. Duce, ''Evaluating mobile appli- cations: A spreadsheet case study,'' Int. J. Mobile Hum. Comput. Interact., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 37-65, Oct. 2012. open in new tab
  147. F. Nayebi, J.-M. Desharnais, and A. Abran, ''The state of the art of mobile application usability evaluation,'' in Proc. 25th IEEE Can. Conf. Electr. Comput. Eng. (CCECE), Apr. 2012, pp. 1-4. open in new tab
  148. M. Nourbakhsh, R. Mohamad Zin, J. Irizarry, S. Zolfagharian, and M. Gheisari, ''Mobile application prototype for on-site information man- agement in construction industry,'' Eng., Construct. Architectural Man- age., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 474-494, Aug. 2012. open in new tab
  149. R. Hegarty and J. Wusteman, ''Evaluating EBSCOhost mobile,'' Library Hi Tech, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 320-333, 2011. open in new tab
  150. B. Biel, T. Grill, and V. Gruhn, ''Exploring the benefits of the combination of a software architecture analysis and a usability evaluation of a mobile application,'' J. Syst. Softw., vol. 83, no. 11, pp. 2031-2044, Nov. 2010. open in new tab
  151. K. Chen, S. Wang, and Y. Pei, ''The adoption and use of mobile com- merce: An information processing perspective,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Man- age. Service Sci., Sep. 2009, pp. 1-4. open in new tab
  152. B. Falchuk, ''Visual and interaction design themes in mobile healthcare,'' in Proc. 6th Annu. Int. Conf. Mobile Ubiquitous Syst., Comput., Netw. Services, Jul. 2009, pp. 1-10. open in new tab
  153. D. Zhang, B. Adipat, and Y. Mowafi, ''User-centered context-aware mobile applications-The next generation of personal mobile comput- ing,'' Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 24, no. 1, p. 3, 2009. open in new tab
  154. K. Liukkunen, M. Eteläperä, M. Oivo, J.-P. Soininen, and M. Pellikka, ''Virtual prototypes in developing mobile software applications and devices,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Product Focused Softw. Process Improve- ment. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2008, pp. 174-188. open in new tab
  155. K. H. Moe, B. Dwolatzky, and R. V. Olst, ''Designing a usable mobile application for field data collection,'' in Proc. IEEE Africon. 7th Africon Conf. Afr., vol. 2, Sep. 2004, pp. 1187-1192. open in new tab
  156. C. D. de Oliveira, R. P. de Mattos Fortes, and E. F. Barbosa, ''An analysis of crossword learning: A mobile application for the elderly,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Hum. Aspects IT Aged Population. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2018, pp. 501-515. open in new tab
  157. O. Korhan and M. Ersoy, ''Usability and functionality factors of the social network site application users from the perspective of uses and gratification theory,'' Qual. Quantity, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1799-1816, Jul. 2016. open in new tab
  158. W.-M. Han, C.-H. Hsu, and C.-Y. Yeh, ''Using dematel to analyze the quality characteristics of mobile applications,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Future Inf. Eng. Manuf. Sci. (FIEMS), vol. 2. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2015, p. 131.
  159. S. Geiger-Prat, B. Marin, S. Espana, and G. Giachetti, ''A GUI modeling language for mobile applications,'' in Proc. IEEE 9th Int. Conf. Res. Challenges Inf. Sci. (RCIS), May 2015, pp. 76-87. open in new tab
  160. R. Capilla, L. Carvajal, and H. Lin, ''Addressing usability requirements in mobile software development,'' in Relating System Quality and Software Architecture. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2014, pp. 303-324. open in new tab
  161. S. P. Osorio, L. M. Aristizabal, and C. A. Zuluaga, ''Development of a command interface based on handheld devices for remotely oper- ated vehicles,'' in Proc. IEEE Colombian Conf. Robot. Autom. (CCRA), Sep. 2016, pp. 1-5. open in new tab
  162. H. I. Abubakar, N. L. Hashim, and A. Hussain, ''Usability evaluation model for mobile banking applications interface: Model evaluation pro- cess using experts' panel,'' J. Telecommun., Electron. Comput. Eng., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 53-57, 2016.
  163. R. Inostroza, C. Rusu, S. Roncagliolo, V. Rusu, and C. A. Collazos, ''Developing SMASH: A set of smartphone's usability heuristics,'' Com- put. Standards Interfaces, vol. 43, pp. 40-52, Jan. 2016. open in new tab
  164. M. A. Kabir, O. A. M. Salem, and M. U. Rehman, ''Discovering knowl- edge from mobile application users for usability improvement: A fuzzy association rule mining approach,'' in Proc. 8th IEEE Int. Conf. Softw. Eng. Service Sci. (ICSESS), Nov. 2017, pp. 126-129. open in new tab
  165. A. Kulpy and G. Bekaroo, ''Fruitify: Nutritionally augmenting fruits through markerless-based augmented reality,'' in Proc. IEEE 4th Int. Conf. Soft Comput. Mach. Intell. (ISCMI), Nov. 2017, pp. 149-153. open in new tab
  166. Y. Man, M. Lützhöft, N. A. Costa, M. Lundh, and S. N. MacKinnon, ''Gaps between users and designers: A usability study about a tablet- based application used on ship bridges,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Appl. Hum. Factors Ergonom. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2017, pp. 213-224. open in new tab
  167. A. Widyanti and S. A. Q. Ainizzamani, ''Usability evaluation of online transportation' user interface,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Syst. Innov. (ICITSI), Oct. 2017, pp. 82-86. open in new tab
  168. A. Hussain, H. A. Razak, and E. O. Mkpojiogu, ''The perceived usability of automated testing tools for mobile applications,'' J. Eng., Sci. Technol., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 89-97, 2017. open in new tab
  169. W. Roh and S.-W. Lee, ''An ontological approach to predict trade- offs between security and usability for mobile application requirements engineering,'' in Proc. IEEE 25th Int. Requirements Eng. Conf. Work- shops (REW), Sep. 2017, pp. 69-75. open in new tab
  170. A. Saleh, R. Ismail, and N. Fabil, ''Evaluating usability for mobile appli- cation: A MAUEM approach,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Softw. e-Bus. (ICSEB). New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2017, pp. 71-77. open in new tab
  171. Z. Zali, ''An initial theoretical usability evaluation model for assessing defence mobile e-based application system,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Inf. Commun. Technol. (ICICTM), May 2016, pp. 198-202. open in new tab
  172. I. Costa, W. Silva, A. Lopes, L. Rivero, B. Gadelha, E. Oliveira, and T. Conte, ''An empirical study to evaluate the feasibility of a UX and usability inspection technique for mobile applications,'' in Proc. 28th Int. Conf. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng., Jul. 2016, pp. 1-5. open in new tab
  173. B. A. Kumar and P. Mohite, ''Usability of mobile learning applications: A systematic literature review,'' J. Comput. Edu., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-17, Mar. 2018. open in new tab
  174. D. F. O. de Paula, B. H. X. M. Menezes, and C. C. Araújo, ''Building a quality mobile application: A user-centered study focusing on design thinking, user experience and usability,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Design, User Exper., Usability. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2014, pp. 313-322. open in new tab
  175. A. Hussain, N. L. Hashim, N. Nordin, and H. M. Tahir, ''A metric-based evaluation model for applications on mobile phone,'' J. Inf. Commun. Technol., vol. 12, pp. 55-71, Dec. 2013.
  176. J. Eustáquio Rangel de Queiroz and D. de Sousa Ferreira, ''A multidimen- sional approach for the evaluation of mobile application user interfaces,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Hum.-Comput. Interact. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2009, pp. 242-251.
  177. M. Kenteris, D. Gavalas, and D. Economou, ''An innovative mobile electronic tourist guide application,'' Pers. Ubiquitous Comput., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 103-118, Feb. 2009. open in new tab
  178. A. Hussain and E. Ferneley, ''Usability metric for mobile application: A goal question metric (GQM) approach,'' in Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Inf. Integr. Web-Based Appl. Services (iiWAS). New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2008, pp. 567-570. open in new tab
  179. J. Häkkilä, P. Korpipää, S. Ronkainen, and U. Tuomela, ''Interaction and end-user programming with a context-aware mobile application,'' in Proc. IFIP Conf. Hum.-Comput. Interact. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2005, pp. 927-937. open in new tab
  180. C. Ryan and A. Gonsalves, ''The effect of context and application type on mobile usability: An empirical study,'' in Proc. 28th Australas. Conf. Comput. Sci., vol. 38. Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia: Australian Com- puter Society, 2005, pp. 115-124.
  181. P. Jarupunphol, W. Buathong, T. Chansaeng, and N. Laosen, ''A descrip- tive design for a smart kitchen management application (SKM),'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Inf. Comput. Technol. (ICICT), Mar. 2018, pp. 61-66. open in new tab
  182. K. McDonald, W. Abell, C. Smith, and S. Gibbs, ''Lessons learned from evaluating a mobile app out in the field,'' in Proc. 4th Int. Conf. User Sci. Eng. (i-USEr), Aug. 2016, pp. 5-10. open in new tab
  183. E. O. Mkpojiogu, N. L. Hashim, and R. Adamu, ''Observed demographic differentials in user perceived satisfaction on the usability of mobile banking applications,'' in Proc. 8th Knowl. Manage. Int. Conf. (KMICe), Chiang Mai, Thailand, 2016, pp. 29-30.
  184. P. Pocatilu, I. Ivan, A. Zamfiroiu, and C. Boja, ''An aggregate indicator for mobile application quality assessment,'' TURKISH J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 23, pp. 956-973, 2015. open in new tab
  185. M. Fetaji, Z. Dika, and B. Fetaji, ''Usability testing and evaluation of a mobile software solution: A case study,'' in Proc. ITI-30th Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Interfaces, Jun. 2008, pp. 501-506. open in new tab
  186. N. K. Chuan, A. Sivaji, F. A. Loo, W. F. W. Ahmad, and S. S. Nathan, ''Evaluating 'gesture interaction' requirements of mobile applications for deaf users: Discovering the needs of the hearing-impiared in using touch- screen gestures,'' in Proc. IEEE Conf. Open Syst. (ICOS), Nov. 2017, pp. 90-95. open in new tab
  187. S. A. A. Shukri, H. Arshad, and R. Z. Abidin, ''Mobile augmented reality system design guidelines based on tourist's emotional state,'' J. Telecom- mun., Electron. Comput. Eng., vol. 9, nos. 2-12, pp. 75-79, 2017. open in new tab
  188. T. Aljaber and N. Gordon, ''A guidance and evaluation approach for mHealth education applications,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Collabo- ration Technol. Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka: Springer, 2017, pp. 330-340.
  189. M. A. Redondo, A. I. Molina, and C. X. Navarro, ''Extending CIAM methodology to support mobile application design and evaluation: A case study in m-learning,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Cooperat. Design, Visualizat. Eng. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2015, pp. 11-18. open in new tab
  190. S. Valdivia, R. Blanco, A. Uribe-Quevedo, L. Penuela, D. Rojas, and B. Kapralos, ''Development and evaluation of two posture-tracking user interfaces for occupational health care,'' Adv. Mech. Eng., vol. 10, no. 6, Jun. 2018, Art. no. 168781401876948. open in new tab
  191. A. Hussain and R. Fitria, ''Mobile flight and hotel booking application: A heuristic and UX test,'' J. Telecommun., Electron. Comput. Eng., vol. 10, nos. 1-11, pp. 93-101, 2018.
Verified by:
Gdańsk University of Technology

seen 488 times

Recommended for you

Meta Tags