Volunteerism in the last year as a moderator between empathy and altruistic social value orientation: An exploratory study - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Your account

login

Search

Volunteerism in the last year as a moderator between empathy and altruistic social value orientation: An exploratory study

Abstract

Volunteerism is a sustained prosocial activity, and young adults are one of the most important targets for organizations recruiting volunteers. Empathy and altruistic social value orientation measured by a decomposed game are dispositional traits that might foster engagement in volunteerism. Using a self-report online-based questionnaire study on two groups of young adults (aged 18-35, N = 224 non-volunteers and N = 178 volunteers in the last year) the relationship between empathy and altruistic social value orientation in both of these groups was explored. The results suggest that volunteers are significantly higher on empathy and altruistic social value orientation than non-volunteers. In non-volunteers, empathy is positively linked to altruistic social value orientation, whereas for volunteers the relationship is inversed. The results provide evidence that volunteers, when high on empathy, might not necessarily be ready to share financial resources with others, as operationalized by a decomposed game.

Citations

  • 6

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 1

    Scopus

Author (1)

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 14 times
Publication version
Accepted or Published Version
License
Creative Commons: CC-BY-NC-SA open in new tab

Keywords

Details

Category:
Magazine publication
Type:
Magazine publication
Published in:
Current Issues in Personality Psychology no. 10, edition 1, pages 10 - 20,
ISSN: 2353-4192
Publication year:
2022
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.5114/cipp.2021.108258
Bibliography: test
  1. Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and com- munion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751-763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751 open in new tab
  2. Barraza, J. A. (2011). Positive emotional expectations predict volunteer outcomes for new volunteers. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 211-219. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11031-011-9210-4 open in new tab
  3. Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Slingsby, J. K., Harrell, K. L., Peekna, H. M., & Todd, R. M. (1991). Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 413-426. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.413 open in new tab
  4. Batson, C. D., Dyck, J. L., Brandt, J. R., Batson, J. G., Powell, A. L., McMaster, M. R., & Griffitt, C. (1988). Five studies testing two new egoistic alterna- tives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 52-77. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.52 open in new tab
  5. Batson, C. D., Lishner, D. A., & Stocks, E. L. (2015). The empathy-altruism hypothesis. In D. A. Schroeder & W. G. Graziano (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 259-268). Oxford University Press.
  6. Boling, A. L. (2005). Volunteer motivations across the lifespan [Doctoral dissertation]. The Claremont Graduate University. open in new tab
  7. Brunell, A. B., Tumblin, L., & Buelow, M. T. (2014). Narcissism and the motivation to engage in volun- teerism. Current Psychology, 33, 365-376. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9216-7 open in new tab
  8. Bussell, H., & Forbes, D. (2002). Understanding the volunteer market: The what, where, who and why of volunteering. Journal of Philanthropy and Mar- keting, 7, 244-257. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.183 open in new tab
  9. Carlo, G. (2006). Care-based and altruistically based morality. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Hand- book of moral development (pp. 551-579). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. open in new tab
  10. Carlo, G., Eisenberg, N., Troyer, D., Switzer, G., & Speer, A. L. (1991). The altruistic personality: In what contexts is it apparent? Journal of Personal- ity and Social Psychology, 61, 450-458. https://doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.450 open in new tab
  11. Davis, M. H. (1996). Empathy: a social psychological approach. Westview. open in new tab
  12. Davis, M. H., Hall, J. A., & Meyer, M. (2003). The first year: Influences on the satisfaction, involvement, and persistence of new community volunteers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 248- 260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202239050 open in new tab
  13. Davis, M. H., Mitchell, K. V., Hall, J. A., Lothert, J., Snapp, T., & Meyer, M. (1999). Empathy, expecta- tions, and situational preferences: Personality in- fluences on the decision to participate in volun- teer helping behaviors. Journal of Personality, 67, 469-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00062 open in new tab
  14. Dovidio, J. F. (1991). The empathy-altruism hypothesis: Paradigm and promise. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 126-128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0202_4 open in new tab
  15. Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Pen- ner, L. A. (2006). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Psychology Press. open in new tab
  16. Dwiggins-Beeler, R., Spitzberg, B., & Roesch, S. (2011). Vectors of volunteerism: Correlates of volunteer retention, recruitment, and job satisfaction. Jour- nal of Psychological Issues in Organizational Cul- ture, 2, 22-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpoc.20074 open in new tab
  17. Dziobek, I., Rogers, K., Fleck, S., Bahnemann, M., Heekeren, H. R., Wolf, O. T., & Convit, A. (2008). Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with Asperger syndrome using the Mul- tifaceted Empathy Test (MET). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 464-473. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0486-x open in new tab
  18. Edele, A., Dziobek, I., & Keller, M. (2013). Explaining altruistic sharing in the dictator game: The role of affective empathy, cognitive empathy, and justice sensitivity. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 96-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.020 open in new tab
  19. Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psy- chological Bulletin, 101, 91-119. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91 open in new tab
  20. Farrelly, D., & Bennett, M. (2018). Empathy leads to increased online charitable behaviour when time is the currency. Journal of Community & Applied So- cial Psychology, 28, 42-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/ casp.2339 open in new tab
  21. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160. https:// doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 open in new tab
  22. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007).
  23. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 open in new tab
  24. Findley, D., & Ojanen, T. (2013). Agentic and com- munal goals in early adulthood: Associations with narcissism, empathy, and perceptions of self and others. Self and Identity, 12, 504-526. https://doi. org/10.1080/15298868.2012.694660 open in new tab
  25. Finkelstein, M. A., Penner, L. A., & Brannick, M. T. (2005). Motive, role identity, and prosocial person- ality as predictors of volunteer activity. Social Be- havior and Personality, 33, 403-418. https://doi.org/ 10.2224/sbp.2005.33.4.403 open in new tab
  26. Francis, J. E. (2011). The functions and norms that drive university student volunteering. Internation- al Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Mar- keting, 16, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.390 open in new tab
  27. Freeman, R. B. (1997). Working for nothing: The sup- ply of volunteer labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 15, S140-S166. https://doi.org/10.1086/209859 open in new tab
  28. Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., Lüdtke, O., & Nebe- rich, W. (2014). Agency-communion and interest in prosocial behavior: Social motives for assimila- tion and contrast explain sociocultural inconsis- tencies. Journal of Personality, 82, 452-466. https:// doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12076 open in new tab
  29. Hartenian, L. S., & Lilly, B. (2009). Egoism and com- mitment: a multidimensional approach to under- volume 10(1),  standing sustained volunteering. Journal of Mana- gerial Issues, 21, 97-118.
  30. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, mod- eration, and conditional process analysis: a regres- sion-based approach. Guilford Publications.
  31. Hustinx, L. (2001). Individualisation and new styles of youth volunteering: an empirical exploration. Voluntary Action, 3, 57-76.
  32. Jankowiak-Siuda, K., Kantor-Martynuska, J., Siwy-Hu- dowska, A., Śmieja, M., Dobrołowicz-Konkol, M., Zaraś-Wieczorek, I., & Siedler, A. (2017). Psycho- metric properties of a Polish adaptation of short form of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-Short). Psychi- atria Polska, 51, 197-734. https://doi.org/10.12740/ pp/64270 open in new tab
  33. Jasielska, D., Prusik, M., & Rajchert, J. (2019). 'I will help but not everybody' -Donating to charity in a deficit vs. growth condition: The importance of well-being. Studia Psychologica, 61, 230-244. https://doi.org/10.21909/sp.2019.04.785 open in new tab
  34. Jasielska, D., & Rajchert, J. (2020). When is happy also prosocial? The relationship between happiness and social orientation depends on trust, agency and communion. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 8, 309-316. https://doi.org/10.5114/ cipp.2020.101494 open in new tab
  35. Janoski, T., Musick, M., & Wilson, J. (1998). Be- ing volunteered? The impact of social participa- tion and pro-social attitudes on volunteering. Sociological Forum, 13, 495-519. https://doi.org/ 10.1023/A:1022131525828 open in new tab
  36. Kee, Y. H., Li, C., Wang, J. C., & Kailani, M. I. B. (2018). Motivations for volunteering and its associations with time perspectives and life satisfaction: a latent profile approach. Psychological Reports, 121, 932- 951. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294117741653 open in new tab
  37. Klimecki, O. M., Mayer, S. V., Jusyte, A., Scheeff, J., & Schönenberg, M. (2016). Empathy promotes al- truistic behavior in economic interactions. Scientif- ic Reports, 6, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31961 open in new tab
  38. Konrath, S., Ho, M. H., & Zarins, S. (2016). The stra- tegic helper: Narcissism and prosocial motives and behaviors. Current Psychology, 35, 182-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9417-3 open in new tab
  39. Laurent, S. M., & Hodges, S. D. (2009). Gender roles and empathic accuracy: The role of communion in reading minds. Sex Roles, 60, 387-398. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11199-008-9544-x Lauterbach, O., & Hosser, D. (2007). Assessing em- pathy in prisoners -a shortened version of the interpersonal reactivity index. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 66, 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421- 0185.66.2.91 open in new tab
  40. Lenhard, W., & Lenhard, A. (2016). Calculation of ef- fect sizes. Retrieved from https://www.psychomet- rica.de/effect_size.html
  41. Lönnqvist, J. E., & Walkowitz, G. (2019). Experimentally induced empathy does not affect monetarily incen- tivized dictator game behavior. Frontiers in Psycholo- gy, 10, 337. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00337 open in new tab
  42. Lönnqvist, J. E., Walkowitz, G., Verkasalo, M., & Wich- ardt, P. C. (2011). Situational power moderates the influence of self-transcendence vs. self-enhance- ment values on behavior in ultimatum bargain- ing. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 336-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.03.003 open in new tab
  43. MacNeela, P. (2008). The give and take of volunteering: Motives, benefits, and personal connections among Irish volunteers. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 19, 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-008-9058-8 open in new tab
  44. Maki, A., Dwyer, P. C., & Snyder, M. (2016). Time perspective and volunteerism: The importance of focusing on the future. The Journal of Social Psy- chology, 156, 334-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022 4545.2015.1090946 open in new tab
  45. Marta, E., Manzi, C., Pozzi, M., & Vignoles, V. L. (2014). Identity and the theory of planned behavior: Pre- dicting maintenance of volunteering after three years. The Journal of Social Psychology, 154, 198- 207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2014.881769 open in new tab
  46. Mateiu-Vescan, R., Ionescu, T., & Opre, A. (2020). Re- considering volunteering: Individual change as a result of doing good for others. Voluntas: Inter- national Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organi- zations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00247-0 open in new tab
  47. McClintock, C. G., & Allison, S. T. (1989). Social value orientation and helping behavior. Journal of Ap- plied Social Psychology, 19, 353-362. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb00060.x open in new tab
  48. Merritt, A. C., Effron, D. A., & Monin, B. (2010). Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 344- 357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00263.x open in new tab
  49. Messick, D. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Moti- vational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(68)90046-2 open in new tab
  50. Mowen, J. C., & Sujan, H. (2005). Volunteer behavior: a hierarchical model approach for investigating its trait and functional motive antecedents. Jour- nal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 170-182. https:// doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1502_9 open in new tab
  51. Murphy, R. O., & Ackermann, K. A. (2014). Social value orientation: Theoretical and measurement issues in the study of social preferences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 13-41. https://doi. org/10.1177/1088868313501745 open in new tab
  52. Murphy, R. O., Ackermann, K. A., & Handgraaf, M. (2011). Measuring social value orientation. Judg- ment and Decision Making, 6, 771-781. http://dx.doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.1804189 open in new tab
  53. Musick, M. A., & Wilson, J. (2007). Volunteers: a social profile. Indiana University Press.
  54. Nowakowska, I. (2020a). Prosociality in relation to developmental tasks of emerging adulthood. Psy- chologia Rozwojowa, 25, 15-25. https://doi.org/ 10.4467/20843879PR.20.024.13432 open in new tab
  55. Nowakowska, I. (2020b). Social Value Orientation Slid- er Measure by Murphy et al. (2011). Instruction in Polish. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/ 10.17605/OSF.IO/BRDQ7 open in new tab
  56. Nowakowska, I. (2021). Age, frequency of volunteer- ing, and present-hedonistic time perspective pre- dict donating items to people in need, but not money to combat COVID-19 during lock-down. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144- 021-01993-0 open in new tab
  57. Omoto, A. M., & Packard, C. D. (2016). The power of connections: Psychological sense of commu- nity as a predictor of volunteerism. The Journal of Social Psychology, 156, 272-290. https://doi.org/10. 1080/00224545.2015.1105777 open in new tab
  58. Omoto, A. M., & Snyder, M. (1995). Sustained helping without obligation: motivation, longevity of ser- vice, and perceived attitude change among AIDS volunteers. Journal of Personality and Social Psy- chology, 68, 671-686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.68.4.671 open in new tab
  59. Pavey, L., Greitemeyer, T., & Sparks, P. (2012). "I help because I want to, not because you tell me to": Em- pathy increases autonomously motivated helping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 681- 689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211435940 open in new tab
  60. Penner, L. A. (2002). Dispositional and organizational influences on sustained volunteerism: an inter- actionist perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 447-467. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00270 open in new tab
  61. Penner, L. A., & Finkelstein, M. A. (1998). Dispositional and structural determinants of volunteerism. Jour- nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 525- 537. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.525 open in new tab
  62. Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schro- eder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365-392. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56. 091103.070141 open in new tab
  63. Persson, B. N., & Kajonius, P. J. (2016). Empathy and universal values explicated by the empathy-altru- ism hypothesis. The Journal of Social Psychology, 156, 610-619. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545. 2016.1152212 open in new tab
  64. Rehberg, W. (2005). Altruistic individualists: Motiva- tions for international volunteering among young adults in Switzerland. Voluntas: International Jour- nal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 16, 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-005-5693-5 open in new tab
  65. Sharabany, R., & Bar-Tal, D. (1982). Theories of the development of altruism: Review, comparison and integration. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 5, 49-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 016502548200500103 open in new tab
  66. Shields, P. O. (2009). Young adult volunteers: Recruit- ment appeals and other marketing considerations. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 21, 139-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495140802528658 open in new tab
  67. Silfver, M., Helkama, K., Lönnqvist, J. E., & Verkasa- lo, M. (2008). The relation between value priori- ties and proneness to guilt, shame, and empathy. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 69-80. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11031-008-9084-2 open in new tab
  68. Snyder, M., & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Hand- book of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 883-947). Random House. open in new tab
  69. Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (2007). Social action. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psy- chology: a handbook of basic principles (pp. 940- 961). Guilford Press.
  70. Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (2008). Volunteerism: Social issues perspectives and social policy im- plications. Social Issues and Policy Review, 2, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2008.00009.x open in new tab
  71. Stolinski, A., Ryan, C., Hausmann, L., & Wernli, M. (2004). Empathy, guilt, volunteer experiences, and intentions to continue volunteering among buddy volunteers in an AIDS organization. Journal of Ap- plied Biobehavioral Research, 9, 1-22. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1751-9861.2004.tb00089.x open in new tab
  72. Udipi, S., Veach, P. M., Kao, J., & LeRoy, B. S. (2008). The psychic costs of empathic engagement: Per- sonal and demographic predictors of genetic counselor compassion fatigue. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17, 459-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10897-008-9162-3 open in new tab
  73. Van Lange, P. A., Bekkers, R., Schuyt, T. N., & Vugt, M. V. (2007). From games to giving: Social value orienta- tion predicts donations to noble causes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 375-384. https://doi. org/10.1080/01973530701665223 open in new tab
  74. Veludo-de-Oliveira, T. M., Pallister, J. G., & Fox- all, G. R. (2015). Unselfish? Understanding the role of altruism, empathy, and beliefs in volunteering commitment. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 27, 373-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10495142.2015.1080504 open in new tab
  75. Wakabayashi, A., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Goldenfeld, N., Delaney, J., Fine, D., Smith, R., & Weil, L. (2006). Development of short forms of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-Short) and the System- izing Quotient (SQ-Short). Personality and Individu- al Differences, 41, 929-940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. paid.2006.03.017 open in new tab
  76. Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Soci- ology, 26, 215-240. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. soc.26.1.215 open in new tab
  77. Yeung, J. W. (2017). Religious involvement and partici- pation in volunteering: Types, domains and aggre- gate. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28, 110-138. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9756-6 open in new tab
Verified by:
No verification

seen 88 times

Recommended for you

Altruists will be altruists, but what about individualists? The role of future time perspective and social value orientation in volunteers’ declarations to continue engagement in three time horizons

2023

Age, frequency of volunteering, and Present-Hedonistic time perspective predict donating items to people in need, but not money to combat COVID-19 during lock-down

2021

Future of nature, our future. A preregistered report on future time perspective, social value orientation, and pro-environmental outcomes based on data from Poland and Sweden

2023

The importance of trust and altruistic social orientation for COVID-19 distress

2023
Meta Tags