From evil demiurge to caring hero: Images of geneticists in the movies - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Your account

login

Search

From evil demiurge to caring hero: Images of geneticists in the movies

Abstract

Although images of science and scientists depicted in popular culture have been criticized as an exaggeration and fear mongering, the cinema is an important resource that influences individuals’ beliefs about science. Because popular depictions of science play a crucial role in constructing the public’s ‘scientific imaginary’ they constitute an inherent dimension of the social understanding of science and are as important for science communication as the “real” science. Fictional filmic representations of geneticists portrayed in 145 films reveal that popular culture reconstructs common images and stereotypes of scientists. While the most prevalent negative stereotypes depicted in films include: the evil demiurge, the egoist without morals, the nerdy geneticist, and the capitalist who betrays the ethos of science, over the last few decades films tend to construct more positive images of geneticists: the objective researcher, the practical expert, the bioethicist, the caring physician and the dedicated idealist. Additionally, although molecular biology depicted in films largely represents a man’s world, especially since the 1990s, the figure of the woman geneticist is on the rise. The coexistence of multiple representations of geneticists in films demonstrate that cinematic images of geneticists constitute an important narrative tool that helps moviemakers in reconstructing the social promises and perils related to biotechnology. Thus, films should be understood as a site for the examination of how popular culture fuels hopes and anxieties related to the scientific revolution that permeate culture and how these hopes and fears change over time from horror to hope and from fiction to reality.

Citations

Author (1)

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 63 times
Publication version
Submitted Version
License
Creative Commons: CC-BY-NC-ND open in new tab

Keywords

Details

Category:
Magazine publication
Type:
Magazine publication
Published in:
Science as Culture
ISSN: 0950-5431
Title of issue:
Science as Culture
Publication year:
2023
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2023.2180627
Bibliography: test
  1. Bull, S. (2019) Television and the Genetic Imaginary. in: Palgrave Studies in Science and Popular Culture. (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
  2. Burri, R. V. (2018) Envisioning futures: imagining technoscientific worlds in film, European Journal of Futures Research, 6, pp. 17. doi:10.1186/s40309-018-0148-6 open in new tab
  3. Calogero, R. M., Boroughs, M. and Thompson, J. K. (2007) The impact of Western beauty ideals on the lives of women and men: A sociocultural perspective, in: V. Swami, and A Furnham (Eds) The Body Beautiful, pp. 259-298 (London: Palgrave Macmillan). open in new tab
  4. Chapman, R., Likhanov, M., Selita, F., Zakharov, I., Smith-Woolley, E. and Kovas, Y. (2019) New literacy challenge for the twenty-first century: genetic knowledge is poor even among well educated, Journal of Community Genetics, 10(1), pp. 73-84. open in new tab
  5. Czarny, M. J., Faden, R. R. and Sugarman, J. (2010) Bioethics and professionalism in popular television medical dramas, Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(4), pp. 203-206. open in new tab
  6. Davin, S. (2003) Healthy viewing: the reception of medical narratives, Sociology of Health and Illness, 25(6), pp. 662-679. open in new tab
  7. De Zoysa, R. and Newman, O. (2002) Globalization, soft power and the challenge of Hollywood, Contemporary Politics, 8(3), pp. 185-202. open in new tab
  8. Dinello, D. (2005) Technophobia!: Science Fiction Visions of Posthuman Technology (Austin: University of Texas Press). open in new tab
  9. Domaradzki, J. (2021) Popular culture and genetics: Genetics and biotechnologies in the movies, Polish Sociological Review, 215(3), pp. 281-310. open in new tab
  10. Domaradzki, J. (2022) Treating rare diseases with the movies: Can popular movies enhance public understanding of rare diseases?, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 17(1), pp. 117. open in new tab
  11. Eberl, J. (2010) I, clone: How cloning is (mis)portrayed in contemporary cinema, Film and History, 40(2), pp. 27-44. open in new tab
  12. Elena, A. (1997) Skirts in the lab: Madame Curie and the image of the woman scientist in the feature film, Public Understanding of Science, 6(3), pp. 269-278. open in new tab
  13. Eurobarometer. 2010. Science and Technology. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/ commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_340_en.pdf (accessed 15 September 2021). open in new tab
  14. Flicker, E. (2003) Between brains and breasts-women scientists in fiction film: On the mar- ginalization and sexualization of scientific competence, Public Understanding of Science, 12(3), pp. 307-318. open in new tab
  15. Flores, G. (2002) Mad scientists, compassionate healers, and greedy egotists: the portrayal of physicians in the movies, Journal of the National Medical Association, 94(7), pp. 635-658.
  16. Franklin, S. (2000) Life itself: Global nature and genetic imaginary, in: S. Franklin, C. Lury, and J Stacey (Eds) Global Nature, Global Culture, pp. 188-227 (London: Sage). open in new tab
  17. Frayling, C. (2005) Mad, Bad and Dangerous? The Scientist and the Cinema (London: Reaktion Books).
  18. Funk, C. (2017) Mixed messages about public trust in science, Issues in Science and Technology, 34(1), pp. 86-88.
  19. Gibbons, E., Stovall, I. and Clayton, J. (2021) Genetics in film and TV, 1912-2020, Journal of Literature and Science, 14(1), pp. 1-22.
  20. Glassy, M. C. (2006) The Biology of Science Fiction Cinema (Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland & Company).
  21. Hall, S. (1997) Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices (London: Sage).
  22. Haynes, R. D. (1994) From Faust to From Faust to Strangelove (Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press).
  23. Haynes, R. D. (2003) From alchemy to artificial intelligence: Stereotypes of the scientist in Western literature, Public Understanding of Science, 12(3), pp. 243-253. open in new tab
  24. Haynes, R. D. (2006) The alchemist in fiction: The master narrative, HYLE, International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 12(1), pp. 5-29. open in new tab
  25. Haynes, R. D. (2016) Whatever happened to the 'mad, bad' scientist? Overturning the stereotype, Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), pp. 31-44. open in new tab
  26. Haynes, R. D. (2017) From Madman to Crime Fighter. The Scientist in Western Culture (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).
  27. Heine, S. J., Dar-Nimrod, I., Cheung, B. Y. and Proulx, T. (2017) Essentially biased: Why people are fatalistic about genes, in: J.M. Olson (Eds) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, pp. 137-192 (Elsevier Academic Press). open in new tab
  28. Jones, R. A. (1997) The boffin: A stereotype of scientists in post-war British films (1945- 1970), Public Understanding of Science, 6(1), pp. 31-48. open in new tab
  29. Jörg, D. (2003) The good, the bad and the ugly -Dr. Moreau goes to Hollywood, Public Understanding of Science, 12(3), pp. 297-305. open in new tab
  30. Kampourakis, K. (2022) Understanding Genes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  31. Kirby, D. A. (2000) The new eugenics in cinema: genetic determinism and gene therapy in "GATTACA", Science Fiction Studies, 27(2), pp. 193-215. open in new tab
  32. Kirby, D. A. (2003a) The threat of materialism in the age of genetics: DNA at the drive-in, in: G.D. Rhodes (Eds) Horror at the Drive-in: Essays in Popular Americana, pp. 241-258 (Jefferson, NC: McFarland).
  33. Kirby, D. A. (2003b) Science advisors, representation, and Hollywood films, Molecular Intervention, 3(2), pp. 54-60. open in new tab
  34. Kirby, D. A. (2007) The devil in our DNA: A brief history of eugenics in science fiction films, Literature and Medicine, 26(1), pp. 83-108. open in new tab
  35. Kirby, D. A. (2011) Lab Coats in Hollywood: Science, Scientists, and Cinema (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press). open in new tab
  36. Kirby, D. A. (2014) Science and technology in film. Themes and representations, in: M. Bucchi, and B Trench (Eds) Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, pp. 97-112 (New York: Routledge). open in new tab
  37. Merzagora, M. (2010) Reflecting imaginaries: science and society in the movies, in: A. Smelik (Eds) The Scientific Imaginary in Visual Culture, pp. 35-48 (Goettingen: Socrates). open in new tab
  38. Meyer, A., Cserer, A. and Schmidt, M. (2013) Frankenstein 2.0.: Identifying and character- ising synthetic biology engineers in science fiction films, Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 2013(9), pp. 9. open in new tab
  39. Muela, G. F. J. and Abril, A. M. (2014) Genetics and cinema: Personal misconceptions that constitute obstacles to learning, International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 4(3), pp. 260-280. open in new tab
  40. Mulvey, L. (1999) Visual pleasure and narrative cinema, in: L. Braudy, and M Cohen (Eds) Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings, pp. 833-844 (New York: Oxford University Press). open in new tab
  41. Nelkin, D. and Lindee, M. S. (1999) The DNA Mystique. The Gene As a Cultural Icon (New York: W. H. Freeman and Company). open in new tab
  42. Ouellette, L., Ritter, H., Shaheen, M., Brown, A., Huynh, V., Fleeger, A., Fleeger, T. and Jones, J. S. (2021) Are television medical dramas bad for our image?, American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 41(1), pp. 235-236. open in new tab
  43. O'Riordan, K. (2008) Human cloning in film: Horror, ambivalence, hope, Science as Culture, 17(2), pp. 145-162. open in new tab
  44. Pew Research Center. 2019. Key Findings About Americans' Confidence in Science and Their Views on Scientists' Role in Society. Available at https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/ 2020/02/12/key-findings-about-americans-confidence-in-science-and-their-views-on- scientists-role-in-society/ (accessed 15 September 2021).
  45. Olivier, B. (2010) AVATAR: ecopolitics, technology, science, art and myth, South African Journal of Art History, 25(3), pp. 1-16.
  46. Quick, B. L. (2009) The effects of viewing Grey's anatomy on perceptions of doctors and patient satisfaction, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 53(1), pp. 38-55. open in new tab
  47. Roberts, J., Archer, L., DeWitt, J. and Middleton, A. (2019) Popular culture and genetics; open in new tab
  48. friend, foe or something more complex?, European Journal of Medical Genetics, 62(5), pp. 368-375. open in new tab
  49. Rose, C. (2007) Biology in the movies: Using the double-edged sword of popular culture to enhance public understanding of science, Evolutionary Biology, 34(1-2), pp. 49-54. open in new tab
  50. Schibeci, R. and Lee, L. (2003) Portrayals of science and scientists, and 'science for citizen- ship, Research in Science and Technological Education, 21, pp. 177-192. open in new tab
  51. Schmidt, M., Meyer, A. and Cserer, A. (2015) The Bio:Fiction film festival: Sensing how a debate about synthetic biology might evolve, Public Understanding of Science, 24(5), pp. 619-635. open in new tab
  52. Stacey, J. (2010) The Cinematic Life of the Gene (London: Duke University Press). open in new tab
  53. Steinke, J. (1997) A portrait of a woman as a scientist: Breaking down barriers created by gender role stereotypes, Public Understanding of Science, 6(4), pp. 409-428. open in new tab
  54. Stern, F. and Kampourakis, K. (2017) Teaching for genetics literacy in the post-genomic era, Studies in Science Education, 53(2), pp. 193-225. open in new tab
  55. Stern, M. (2004) Jurassic park and the moveable feast of science, Science as Culture, 13(3), pp. 347-372. open in new tab
  56. Terzian, S. G. and Grunzke, A. L. (2007) Scrambled eggheads: Ambivalent representations of scientists in six Hollywood film comedies from 1961 to 1965, Public Understanding of Science, 16(4), pp. 407-419. open in new tab
  57. Tian, Y. and Yoo, J. H. (2020) Medical drama viewing and medical trust: A moderated mediation approach, Health Communication, 35(1), pp. 46-55. open in new tab
  58. Tudor, A. (1989) Monsters and Mad Scientists (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
  59. Turney, J. (1998) Frankenstein's Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture (New Haven and London: Yale University Press).
  60. Dijck, J. (1998) Imagenation. Popular Images of Genetics (New Hampshire and London: Palgrave Macmillan).
  61. Wasson, H. and Grieveson, L. (2018) Cinema's Military Industrial Complex (Oakland, CA: University of California Press).
  62. Weingart, P., Muhl, C. and Pansegrau, P. (2003) Of power maniacs and unethical geniuses: Science and scientists in fiction film, Public Understanding of Science, 12(3), pp. 279-287. open in new tab
  63. Weitekamp, M. A. (2017) The image of scientists in The Big Bang Theory, Physics Today, 70 (1), pp. 40-48. open in new tab
Verified by:
No verification

seen 38 times

Recommended for you

Can popular films instil carcinophobia? Images of cancer in popular Polish cinema

2022

From evil demiurge to caring hero: images of geneticists in the movies

2023

Narracje o świeżej traumie. Upamiętnianie ataków terrorystycznych w krajobrazie codziennym miast

2020

Superheroes or Super Spreaders? The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Social Attitudes towards Nurses: A Qualitative Study from Poland

2023
Meta Tags