Search
Abstract
The architectural criticism is not invited to the common analysis of the architecture together with the aesthetics. The aesthetics judges entireties whereas criticism describes the architecture from the aesthetic point of view without using common scientific language. Research areas are not located in the joint research space! The result is the ambiguity of critical judgments, the ambiguous estimation of an architectural work. It does not favour creators' orientation for real opinions about the created architecture. The subject of architects' work, the inhabitant of our Planet, is lost, the scientific discourse is hermetic, architects philosophize amateurishly and create mutated author's theories. In response, the aesthetes themselves redefine definitions behind the screen of their science.There should be continually revived trials of building the program of aesthetes' support for theoreticians and the architecture's practitioners, for the sake of the credibility of the two fields of modern knowledge...
Authors (2)
Cite as
Full text
full text is not available in portal
Keywords
Details
- Category:
- Conference activity
- Type:
- publikacja w wydawnictwie zbiorowym recenzowanym (także w materiałach konferencyjnych)
- Title of issue:
- International Virtual Conference ARSA 2012:ARSA 2012 Proceedings in Advanced Research in Scientific Areas : The 1st Virtual International Conference strony 1873 - 1875
- Language:
- English
- Publication year:
- 2012
- Bibliographic description:
- Pokrzywnicka K., Juchnevic K.: Long way to awareness. Architecture and Aesthetic at the crossroads// International Virtual Conference ARSA 2012:ARSA 2012 Proceedings in Advanced Research in Scientific Areas : The 1st Virtual International Conference/ : , 2012, s.1873-1875
- Verified by:
- Gdańsk University of Technology
seen 56 times