Cooperation of mono- and bi-articular muscles: human lower limb - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Search

Cooperation of mono- and bi-articular muscles: human lower limb

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to create and analyze a Pareto-optimal problem that would describe cooperation between mono- and bi-articulate lower limb muscles in sagittal plane. Methods: Equations describing the problem were derived and analyzed, additional constrains were introduced and experimental verification based on gait video analysis was performed. Results: Uncertainty of Pareto-optimal solution is shown for the muscular-skeletal system. An explanation of this situation is presented and discussed. Moreover, this theoretical observation is compared with a lack of gait reproducibility. Small but noticeable differences in gait cycles are shown and explained. Conclusions: A muscular system redundancy is shown and explained by the meaning of Pareto problem. Theoretical considerations were confirmed through a gait analysis. This leads to the conclusion, that during muscle cooperation each movement cycle can be different from the previous one, however due to physiological restrictions only a narrow equivalence class of the possible solutions exists.

Authors (5)

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 74 times
Publication version
Accepted or Published Version
License
Creative Commons: CC-BY-NC-SA open in new tab

Keywords

Details

Category:
Articles
Type:
artykuł w czasopiśmie wyróżnionym w JCR
Published in:
JOURNAL OF MUSCULOSKELETAL & NEURONAL INTERACTIONS no. 18, pages 176 - 182,
ISSN: 1108-7161
Language:
English
Publication year:
2018
Bibliographic description:
Zagrodny B., Ludwicki M., Wojnicz W., Mrozowski J., Awrejcewicz J.: Cooperation of mono- and bi-articular muscles: human lower limb// JOURNAL OF MUSCULOSKELETAL & NEURONAL INTERACTIONS. -Vol. 18, nr. 2 (2018), s.176-182
Bibliography: test
  1. Fick R. Handbuch der Anatomie des Menschen, vol. 2. Jena: Gustav Fisher; 1910.
  2. Sokołowska-Pituchowa J. ed. Human anatomy (in Polish). Warsaw: Medical Publisher PZWL; 1989.
  3. Agur A, Dalley A. Grant's Atlas of Anatomy. Philadelphia: Lippincot, William and Wilkins; 2009.
  4. Ivancevic V, Sharma S. Complexity in Human and Humanoid Biomechanics. Int. J. of Human. Robot. 2008;5(4):679-98. open in new tab
  5. Kuo A.D. The six determinants of gait and the inverted pendulum analogy: A dynamic walking perspective. Human Mov Sci 2007;26(4):617-656. open in new tab
  6. Harderscheit B.C. Movement variability As a Clinical Measure for Locomotion. J of Appl Biomech 2000; 16:419-27. open in new tab
  7. Andrysiak T, Awrejcewicz J, Ludwicki M, Zagrodny B. On the human arm motion camera tracking system. Vibr in Phys Syst 2012, XXV:41-46.
  8. Reicher M. Human anatomy. General anatomy, bones, joints and ligaments, muscles (in Polish). Warsaw: Medical Publisher PZWL; 1976.
  9. Gribble PL, Ostry DJ. Compensation for Interaction Torques During Single-and Multijoint Limb Movement. J of Neurophysiol 1999;82:2310-26. open in new tab
  10. Prilutsky BI, Zatziorsky VM. Optimization-based models of muscle coordination. Exercise and Sport Sci Rev 2002;30:32-38. open in new tab
  11. Latash M. Fundamentals of Motor Control. Amsterdam: Elsevier, Academic Press; 2012. open in new tab
  12. Hirashima M, Oya T. How does the brain solve muscle redundancy? Filling the gap between optimization and muscle synergy hypotheses. Neurosci Res 2016; 104:80-87. open in new tab
  13. Siemieński A. Inverse optimization problem of interacting skeletal muscles (in Polish). Wrocław: Studies and Monographs of the Academy of Physical Education in Wrocław nr 87; 2007. open in new tab
  14. Wojnicz W, Witbrott E. Analysis of Muscles behaviour. Part II. The Computational model of muscles group acting on the elbow joint. Act of Bioeng and Biomech 2010;12(1):3-10. open in new tab
  15. Wang X. Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of influence of hand orientation and joint limits on the control of arm postures and movements. Biol Cyb 1999; 80:449-63. open in new tab
  16. Okadome T, Honda M. Kinematic construction of the trajectory of sequential arm movements. Biol Cy. 1999; 80:157-69. open in new tab
  17. Loss J, Candotti C. Comparative study between two elbow flexion exercises using the estimated resultant muscle force. Brazilian J for Phys Therapy 2008;12(6):502-10. open in new tab
  18. Hollister A, Jatana S, Sing A et al. The axes of rotation of the knee. Clin Orthop and Rel Res 1993;290:259-68. open in new tab
  19. Botasso CL, Prilutsky BI, Croe A, Imberti E, Sartirana S. A numerical procedure for inferring from experimental data optimisation cost functions using multibody model of the neuro-musculoskeletal system. Multibody Syst Dyn 2006;16:123-54. open in new tab
  20. Zagrodny B. Modeling, numerical simulation and designing of the arm-forearm artificial muscle system prototype, Ph.D. Thesis. Łódź: Łódź University of Technology; 2012.
  21. Awrejcewicz J, Kudra G, Zagrodny B. Nonlinearity of muscle stiffness. Theoret and Appl Mech Lett 2012; open in new tab
  22. Frederick A, Matsen MD, Chebli C. Principles for the Evaluation and Management of Shoulder Instability. The J of Bone and Joint Surg 2006;8(3):647-59.
  23. Zagrodny B, Awrejcewicz J. Cooperation of one and multi-joint muscles. Nonl Dyn. and Syst Theory 2015; 15(1):99-106.
Verified by:
Gdańsk University of Technology

seen 135 times

Recommended for you

Meta Tags