Pronouncement of embedded agency in the field of social entrepreneurship - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Search

Pronouncement of embedded agency in the field of social entrepreneurship

Abstract

The paper provides insights into how social entrepreneurship and the institutional theory framework can be combined. The author situates the social entrepreneurship phenomenon here, and embarks on the traditional structure vs agency debate from social sciences, sociology of organizations in particular. The concept of embedded agency is referred to and employed to explain the phenomenon of social entrepreneurship. In this paper, the author provides key arguments concerning how the institutional theory framework can be useful in the field of social entrepreneurship research and practice. The author also discusses how the embedded agency concept is more pronounced in the social entrepreneurship context.

Citations

  • 0

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 0

    Scopus

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 43 times
Publication version
Accepted or Published Version
License
Creative Commons: CC-BY-NC-ND open in new tab

Keywords

Details

Category:
Articles
Type:
artykuły w czasopismach recenzowanych i innych wydawnictwach ciągłych
Published in:
Problemy Zarządzania no. 16, pages 229 - 239,
ISSN: 1644-9584
Language:
English
Publication year:
2018
Bibliographic description:
Starnawska M.: Pronouncement of embedded agency in the field of social entrepreneurship// Problemy Zarządzania. -Vol. 16., nr. 1(73) (2018), s.229-239
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.7172/1644-9584.73.14
Bibliography: test
  1. Arend, R.J. (2013). A heart-mind opportunity nexus: Distinguishing social entrepreneur- ship for entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 38, 313-315, http://dx.doi. org/10.5465/amr.2012.0251. open in new tab
  2. Batillana, J. (2004). Foundations for a theory of institutional entrepreneurship: Solving the paradox of embedded agency. INSEAD Working Paper Series, 2004/61/OB. Retrieved from: https://flora.insead.edu/fichiersti_wp/inseadwp2004/2004-61.pdf.
  3. Battilana, J. and D'Aunno, T. (2003). Institutional work. Actors and agency in Institu- tional studies of organizations. In: T.B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby and B. Leca (eds), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 31-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. open in new tab
  4. Batillana, J., Leca, B. and Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65-107, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19416520903053598. open in new tab
  5. Batko, R. and Bogacz-Wojtanowska, E. (2015). Przedsiębiorstwa społeczne -poszukiwanie tożsamości pomiędzy celami ekonomicznymi a społecznymi. Problemy Zarządzania, 4(56), 195-206, http://dx.doi.org/10.7172/1644-9584.56.12. open in new tab
  6. Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  7. Berglund, K., Johannisson, B. and Schwartz, B. (eds). (2012). Societal entrepreneurship. Positioning, penetrating, promoting. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. open in new tab
  8. Bruton, G.D., Ahlstrom, D. and Li, H.L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where we are now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421-440, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00390.x. open in new tab
  9. Dacin, P.A., Dacin, M.T. and Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we don't need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37-57, http://www.jstor.org/stable/29764973. open in new tab
  10. Defourny, J. and Nyssens, M. (2016). Fundamentals for international typology of social enterprise models. ICSEM Working Papers, 33, The ICSEM Project, Liege. open in new tab
  11. DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In: L.G. Zucker (ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3-22). Cam- bridge MA: Ballinger.
  12. DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095101. open in new tab
  13. DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W.W. (1991). Constructing an organizational field as profes- sional project: US art museums 1920-1940. In: W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (eds), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 267-292). Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  14. Eisenstadt, S.N. (1980). Cultural orientations, institutional entrepreneurs, and social change: Comparative analysis of traditional civilizations. American Journal of Sociology, 85(4), 840-869, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/227091. DOI 10.7172/1644-9584.73.14 open in new tab
  15. Emirbayer, M. and Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962-1023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/231294. open in new tab
  16. Fligstein, N. (1997). Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 397-405, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764297040004003. open in new tab
  17. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embed- dedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510, http://www.jstor.org/sta- ble/2780199. open in new tab
  18. Grimes, M.G., McMullen, J.S., Vogus, T.J. and Miller, T.L. (2013). Studying the origins of social entrepreneurship: Compassion and the role of embedded agency. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 460-463, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0429. open in new tab
  19. Holm, P. (1995). The dynamics of institutionalization: Transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 398-422, http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/2393791. open in new tab
  20. Karatas-Ozkan, M. and Chell, E. (2010). Nascent entrepreneurship and learning. Chel- tenham, UK, Northampton MA, USA: Edward Elgar. open in new tab
  21. Karatas-Ozkan, M., Yavuz, C. and Howells, J. (2014). Theorising entrepreneurship: Insti- tutional theory perspective. In: E.Chell and M. Karatas-Ozkan (eds), Handbook of research on small business and entrepreneurship (pp. 70-82). Cheltenham UK, Northampton MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
  22. Kerlin, J.A. (ed.). (2009). Social enterprise. Global comparison. Hanover and London: Tufts University Press.
  23. Korsgaard, S. and Anderson, A.R. (2011). Enacting entrepreneurship as social value creation. International Small Business Journal, 29(2), 135-151, http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/026624261039193. open in new tab
  24. Lawrence, T. B. and Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In: S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T.B. Lawrence and W.R. Nord (eds), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 215-254). London: Sage. open in new tab
  25. Maguire, S., Hardy, C. and Lawrence, T.B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657-679, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20159610. open in new tab
  26. McMullen, J.S., Plummer, L.A. and Acs, Z.J. (2007). What is an entrepreneurial oppor- tunity? Small Business Economics, 28(4), 273-28, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11187- 006-9040-z. open in new tab
  27. Meyer, J. and Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363, http://dx.doi. org/10.1086/226550. open in new tab
  28. Miller, T.L., Grimes, M.G., McMullen, J.S. and Vogus, T. (2012).Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 37, 616-640, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.10.0456. open in new tab
  29. Nicholls, A. (2010). The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a pre-paradigmatic fields. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 611-633, http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00397.x. open in new tab
  30. Oliver, Ch. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Manage- ment Review, 16(1), 145-179, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/258610. open in new tab
  31. Pache, A.-C. and Chowdhury, I. (2012). Social entrepreneurs as institutionally embedded entrepreneurs: Toward a new model of social entrepreneurship education. Acad- emy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 494-510, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ amle.2011.0019. open in new tab
  32. Reay, T., Golden-Biddle, K. and Germann, K. (2006). Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and microprocesses of change. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 977-998, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20159812. open in new tab
  33. Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots. Berkeley: University of California Press. Pronouncement of Embedded Agency in the Field of Social Entrepreneurship
  34. Seo, M. and Creed, W. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27, 222-247, http://dx.doi. org/10.5465/AMR.2002.6588004. open in new tab
  35. Starnawska, M. (2015). Przedsiębiorczość społeczna w społeczeństwie obywatelskim w Polsce. Studia BAS, 4(44), 167-203.
  36. Starnawska, M. (2016a). Social entrepreneurship -Avenues for the field development through research paradigm intersection -Discussion. Humanities and Social Sciences, 23(4), 241-251, http://dx.doi.org/10.7862/rz.2016.hss.74. open in new tab
  37. Starnawska, M. (2016b). Social entrepreneurship research -Challenges, explanations and suggestions for the field development. Problemy Zarządzania, 3(61), 13-31, http:// dx.doi.org/10.7172/1644-9584.61.1. open in new tab
  38. Starnawska, M. (2017). Przedsiębiorczość społeczna w świetle teorii instytucjonalnej -próba przyczynku teoretycznego. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, XVIII(I), 150-161.
  39. Starnawska M. and Brzozowska, A. (2018). Social entrepreneurship and social enter- prise phenomenon: Antecedents, processes, impact across cultures and contexts. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 14(2), 3-18, http://dx.doi. org/10.7341/20181421. open in new tab
  40. Stephan, U. and Drencheva, A. (2017). The person in social entrepreneurship: A system- atic review of research on the social entrepreneurial personality. In: G. Ahmetoglu, T. Chamorro-Premuzic, B. Klinger and T. Karcisky (eds), The Wiley handbook of entrepreneurship (pp. 205-229). Hoboken USA, Chichester UK: Wiley and Sons. open in new tab
  41. Suddaby, R. (2011). Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(1), 14-20, https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1056492609347564. open in new tab
  42. Thornton, P.H., Ocasio, W. and Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  43. Townsend, D.M. and Hart, T.A. (2008). Perceived institutional ambiguity and the choice of organizational form in social entrepreneurial ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 685-700, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00248.x. open in new tab
  44. Welter, F. and W.B. Gartner (eds). (2016). A research agenda for entrepreneurship and context. Cheltenham UK, Northampton MA USA: Edward Elgar. open in new tab
  45. Young, D.R. and Brewer C.V. (2016). Introduction. In: D.R. Young, E.A.M. Searing and C.V. Brewer (eds), The social enterprise zoo (pp. 3-14). Cheltenham UK and Northampton MS, USA: Edward Elgar. open in new tab
  46. Young, D.R., Searing, E.A.M. and Brewer, C.V. (eds). (2016). The social enterprise zoo. Cheltenham UK and Northampton MS, USA: Edward Elgar. open in new tab
  47. Zbierowski, P. (2015). Milowy krok w rozwoju badań przedsiębiorczości? GEM i PSED -porównanie, dorobek, aspiracje i perspektywy na przyszłość. Problemy Zarządzania, 1(51) part 2, http://dx.doi.org/10.7172/1644-9584. open in new tab
Verified by:
Gdańsk University of Technology

seen 105 times

Recommended for you

Meta Tags