Analysis and interpretation of radiometric signals in a liquid-gas bubble flow - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Search

Analysis and interpretation of radiometric signals in a liquid-gas bubble flow

Abstract

The article presents the analysis of signals from a radiometric system consisting of two scintillation probes and two gamma radiation sealed sources. Calculations and interpretation were carried out for the bubble flow of the water-air mixture in the horizontal pipeline. The analysis of the obtained signals was done in time and frequency domain. In the frequency domain, a range of usable frequencies was identified, which were associated with changes in gamma-ray intensity recorded in the time domain. The gas phase velocity, void fraction and statistical parameters of the signal were also calculated.

Citations

  • 1

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 0

    Scopus

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 20 times
Publication version
Accepted or Published Version
License
Creative Commons: CC-BY open in new tab

Keywords

Details

Category:
Articles
Type:
artykuły w czasopismach
Published in:
EPJ Web of Conferences no. 213, pages 1 - 4,
ISSN: 2100-014X
Language:
English
Publication year:
2019
Bibliographic description:
Zych M., Hanus R., Jaszczur M., Golijanek-Jędrzejczyk A., Świsulski D., Roshani G.: Analysis and interpretation of radiometric signals in a liquid-gas bubble flow// EPJ Web of Conferences -Vol. 213, (2019), s.1-4
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.1051/epjconf/201921302105
Bibliography: test
  1. K. Strąk, M. Piasecka, . Maciejewska, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 117, 375 (2018) open in new tab
  2. B. Maciejewska, M. Piasecka, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 107, 925 (2017) open in new tab
  3. R. Pastuszko, T.M. Wójcik, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 63, 34 (2015) open in new tab
  4. R. Pastuszko, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 125, 197 (2018) open in new tab
  5. T. Ogasawara, H. Takahira, Nucl. Eng. Des. 337, 141 (2018) open in new tab
  6. J. Du, Ch. Zhao, H. Bo, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 127, 796 (2018) open in new tab
  7. P. Cifani, J.G.M. Kuerten, B.J. Geurts, Comput. Fluids. 172, 67 (2018) open in new tab
  8. M. Jaszczur, Arch. of Mech. 63, 77 (2011)
  9. M. Zych, R. Hanus, M. Jaszczur, V. Mosorov, D. Świsulski, EPJ WoC 180, 02124 (2018) open in new tab
  10. M. Zych, Acta Geophys. (to be published) open in new tab
  11. M. Zych, R. Hanus, B. Wilk, L. Petryka, D. Świsulski, Measurement 129, 288 (2018) open in new tab
  12. M. Zych, R. Hanus, M. Jaszczur, . Strzȩpowicz, L. Petryka, W. Mastej, JPCS 745, 032124 (2016) open in new tab
  13. C.M. Salgado, L.E. . randão, C.C. Conti, W.L. Salgado, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 116, 143 (2016) open in new tab
  14. G.H. Roshani, S. Roshani, E. Nazemi, S. Roshani, Measurement 129, 296 (2018) open in new tab
  15. O. Morgado, J.M. Miranda, J.D.P. raújo, J.B.L.M., Int. J. Multiphas. Flow 85, 348 (2016) open in new tab
  16. J.T. García, . Vigueras-Rodriguez, L.G. Castillo, J.M. Carrillo, Sustainability 9, 402 (2017) open in new tab
  17. Guide to the expression of uncertainly in measurement (International Organization for Standardization 1995) open in new tab
  18. V. Mosorov, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 128, 1 (2017) open in new tab
  19. E. Benachour, B. Draoui, B. Imine, M. Hasnat, L. Rahmani, EPJ Web Conf. 114, 02003 (2016) open in new tab
  20. E. Benachour, B. Draoui, B. Imine, L. Rahmani, B. Mebarki, K. Asnoune, M. Hasnat, Int. Rev. Mech. Eng. 9, 55 (2015) open in new tab
  21. V. Mosorov, Electron. Lett. 42, 630 (2006) open in new tab
  22. V. Mosorov, Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 25, 259 (2008) open in new tab
  23. P. Psota, R. Doleček, V. Lédl, T. Vit, P. Mokrý, P. Dančová, EPJ WoC 143, 02097 (2017) open in new tab
  24. J. Dolanský, Z. Chára, P. Vlasák, . Kysela, J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 65, 105 (2017) open in new tab
  25. V. Matoušek, Š. Zrostlík, J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 66, 330 (2018) open in new tab
Verified by:
Gdańsk University of Technology

seen 170 times

Recommended for you

Meta Tags