Does pandemic denial help or harm? Belief in COVID-19 and experience of it affect psychological consequences of using neurotic defence mechanisms - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Your account

login

Search

Does pandemic denial help or harm? Belief in COVID-19 and experience of it affect psychological consequences of using neurotic defence mechanisms

Abstract

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic may activate thoughts of death, leading to aversive psychological states. In such situations, defence mechanisms emerge; however, their adaptability depends on many factors. The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between neurotic defence style and depressive symptoms. We assumed that the sense of coherence underlies this correlation and investigated how both believing (or not) in COVID-19 and having (or not) experience of this disease differentiate this mechanism. Methods: This cross-sectional study (N = 720) was conducted through an online panel. Results: For COVID-19 believers who had no experience of the disease, the higher their neurotic defence style, the lower their sense of coherence, which was negatively correlated with depressive symptoms. The same pattern was found for non-believers who have experienced COVID-19. In the group of individuals who believed and experienced COVID-19, the relationship between neurotic defence style and sense of coherence was non-significant. In turn, respondents who neither believed in nor have experienced COVID-19 displayed a positive relationship between neurotic defence style and sense of coherence. Discussion: Although self-deception strategies might be adaptive, they contribute to increased distress, if continued to be used once an individual confronts reality.

Citations

  • 0

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 0

    Scopus

Authors (7)

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 26 times
Publication version
Accepted or Published Version
License
Creative Commons: CC-BY-NC-ND open in new tab

Keywords

Details

Category:
Magazine publication
Type:
Magazine publication
Published in:
Psychiatria i Psychologia Kliniczna no. 22, edition 3, pages 151 - 157,
ISSN: 1644-6313
Publication year:
2022
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.15557/pipk.2022.0020
Bibliography: test
  1. Albuquerque SC, Carvalho ER, Lopes RS et al.: Ego defense mecha- nisms in COPD: impact on health-related quality of life and dysp- noea severity. Qual Life Res 2011; 20: 1401-1410. open in new tab
  2. Altwaijri N, Abualait T, Aljumaan M et al.: Defense mechanism responses to COVID-19. PeerJ 2022; 10: e12811. open in new tab
  3. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV-TR. American Psychiatric Associa- tion, Washington, DC 2000. open in new tab
  4. Andrews G, Singh M, Bond M: The Defense Style Questionnaire. J Nerv Ment Dis 1993; 181: 246-256. open in new tab
  5. Antonovsky A: The structure and properties of the Sense of Coher- ence scale. Soc Sci Med 1993; 36: 725-733. open in new tab
  6. Antonovsky A: Unraveling the Mystery of Health. How People Manage Stress and Stay Well. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco 1987.
  7. Baumeister RF, Dale K, Sommer KL: Freudian defense mechanisms and empirical findings in modern social psychology: reaction for- mation, projection, displacement, undoing, isolation, sublimation, and denial. J Pers 1998; 66: 1081-1124. open in new tab
  8. Beck AT: Cognitive Therapy of Depression. The Guilford Press, New York 1979.
  9. Blaya C, Dornelles M, Blaya R et al.: Do defense mechanisms vary according to the psychiatric disorder? Braz J Psychiatry 2006; 28: 179-183. open in new tab
  10. Bodecka M, Nowakowska I, Zajenkowska A et al.: Gender as a mod- erator between Present-Hedonistic time perspective and depres- sive symptoms or stress during COVID-19 lock-down. Pers Indi- vid Dif 2021; 168: 110395. open in new tab
  11. Bond M: Defense style questionnaire. In: Vaillant GE (ed.): Empirical Studies of Ego Mechanisms of Defense. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC 1986: 146-152. open in new tab
  12. Bond M: Empirical studies of defense style: relationships with psycho- pathology and change. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2004; 12: 263-278. open in new tab
  13. Bowins B: Psychological defense mechanisms: a new perspective. Am J Psychoanal 2004; 64: 1-26. open in new tab
  14. Breslin FC, Hepburn CG, Ibrahim S et al.: Understanding stability and change in psychological distress and sense of coherence: a four- year prospective study. J Appl Soc Psychol 2006; 36: 1-21. open in new tab
  15. Calati R, Oasi O, De Ronchi D et al.: The use of the defence style ques- tionnaire in major depressive and panic disorders: a comprehen- sive meta-analysis. Psychol Psychother 2010; 83: 1-13. open in new tab
  16. Carstens JA, Spangenberg JJ: Major depression: a breakdown in sense of coherence? Psychol Rep 1997; 80: 1211-1220. open in new tab
  17. Ciocca G, Tuziak B, Limoncin E et al.: Psychoticism, immature defense mechanisms and a fearful attachment style are associated with a higher homophobic attitude. J Sex Med 2015; 12: 1953-1960. open in new tab
  18. Cloninger CR, Svrakic DM, Przybeck TR: A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993; 50: 975-990. open in new tab
  19. Cramer P: Protecting the Self: Defense Mechanisms in Action. Guil- ford Press, 2006. open in new tab
  20. Cramer P: Seven pillars of defense mechanism theory. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 2008; 2: 1963-1981. open in new tab
  21. De-Nour AK, Shaltiel J, Czaczkes JW: Emotional reactions of patients on chronic hemodialysis. Psychosom Med 1968; 30: 521-533. open in new tab
  22. Ellenbogen MA, Schwartzman AE, Stewart J et al.: Stress and selective attention: the interplay of mood, cortisol levels, and emotional information processing. Psychophysiology 2002; 39: 723-732. open in new tab
  23. Ettman CK, Abdalla SM, Cohen GH et al.: Prevalence of depression symptoms in US adults before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3: e2019686. open in new tab
  24. Evren C, Ozcetinkaya S, Ulku M et al.: Relationship of defense styles with history of childhood trauma and personality in heroin dependent inpatients. Psychiatry Res 2012; 200: 728-733. open in new tab
  25. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A et al.: Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 2009; 41: 1149-1160. open in new tab
  26. Gambin M, Sękowski M, Woźniak-Prus M et al.: Generalized anxiety and depressive symptoms in various age groups during the COVID-19 lockdown in Poland. Specific predictors and differenc- es in symptoms severity. Compr Psychiatry 2021; 105: 152222. open in new tab
  27. Généreux M, Schluter PJ, Hung KK et al.: One virus, four continents, eight countries: an interdisciplinary and international study on the psychosocial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic among adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 8390. open in new tab
  28. Greenberg J, Pyszczynski T, Solomon S: The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: a terror management theory. In: Baumeister RF (ed.): Public Self and Private Self. Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, New York 1986: 189-212. open in new tab
  29. Hartt M: COVID-19: a lonely pandemic. Cities Health 2021; 5 Suppl 1: S80-S82. open in new tab
  30. Hayes AF: An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivar- iate Behav Res 2015; 50: 1-22. open in new tab
  31. Hayes AF: Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: quantification, inference, and interpretation. Commun Monogr 2018; 85: 4-40. open in new tab
  32. Adams JD, Hayes J, Hopson B: Transition: Understanding and Man- aging Personal Change. Martin Robertson, London 1976.
  33. Josephs L: Neurotic self-deception as a reproductive strategy. In: Piers C (ed.): Personality and Psychopathology. Springer, New York 2011: 201-220. open in new tab
  34. Jutzi CA, Willardt R, Schmid PC et al.: Between conspiracy beliefs, ingroup bias, and system justification: how people use defense strat- egies to cope with the threat of COVID-19. Front Psychol 2020; 11: 578586. open in new tab
  35. Kanekar A, Sharma M: COVID-19 and mental well-being: guidance on the application of behavioral and positive well-being strategies. Healthcare (Basel) 2020; 8: 336. open in new tab
  36. Khademi M, Hajiahmadi M, Faramarzi M: The role of long-term psy- chodynamic psychotherapy in improving attachment patterns, defense styles, and alexithymia in patients with depressive/anxie- ty disorders. Trends Psychiatry Psychother 2019; 41: 43-50. open in new tab
  37. Lehdonvirta V, Oksanen A, Räsänen P et al.: Social media, web, and panel surveys: using non-probability samples in social and policy research. Policy Internet 2021; 13: 134-155. open in new tab
  38. Lingiardi V, McWilliams N: The psychodynamic diagnostic manual - 2nd edition (PDM-2). World Psychiatry 2015; 14: 237-239. open in new tab
  39. Majkowicz M, Chojnacka-Szawłowska G: Metodologiczne problemy badania jakości życia [Methodological issues of studying the quali- ty of life]. In: de Walden-Gałuszko K, Majkowicz M (eds.): Jakość życia w chorobie nowotworowej [Quality of Life in Cancer].
  40. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk 1994: 65-81.
  41. McWilliams N: Psychoanalytic Diagnosis: Understanding Personality Structure in the Clinical Process. Guilford Press, New York 2011.
  42. Mrozowicz-Wrońska M: A psychometric analysis of the Polish version of the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ-40) in a nonclinical sam- ple of young adults. Psychiatr Psychol Klin 2019; 19: 13-18. open in new tab
  43. Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF: Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav Res 2007; 42: 185-227. open in new tab
  44. Pyszczynski T, Lockett M, Greenberg J et al.: Terror management the- ory and the COVID-19 pandemic. J Humanist Psychol 2021; 61: 173-189. open in new tab
  45. Sahdra B, Thagard P: Self-deception and emotional coherence. Minds Mach (Dordr) 2003; 13: 213-231. open in new tab
  46. Sairenchi T, Haruyama Y, Ishikawa Y et al.: Sense of coherence as a predictor of onset of depression among Japanese workers: a cohort study. BMC Public Health 2011; 11: 205. open in new tab
  47. Sammallahti PR, Holi MJ, Komulainen EJ et al.: Comparing two self- report measures of coping -the Sense of Coherence Scale and the Defense Style Questionnaire. J Clin Psychol 1996; 52: 517-524. open in new tab
  48. Schäfer SK, Sopp MR, Schanz CG et al.: Impact of COVID-19 on pub- lic mental health and the buffering effect of a sense of coherence. Psychother Psychosom 2020; 89: 386-392. open in new tab
  49. Sękowski M: Postawa wobec śmierci w cyklu życia człowieka [Attitude Toward Death and the Life Cycle].
  50. Skärsäter I, Rayens MK, Peden A et al.: Sense of coherence and recov- ery from major depression: a 4-year follow-up. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2009; 23: 119-127. open in new tab
  51. Snekkevik H, Anke AGW, Stanghelle JK et al.: Is sense of coherence stable after multiple trauma? Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 443-453. open in new tab
  52. Szymona K: [Changes of sense of coherence (SOC) after psychother- apy in neurotic patients].
  53. Psychiatr Pol 2005; 39: 659-668. open in new tab
  54. Thompson RF, Spencer WA: Habituation: a model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. Psychol Rev 1966; 73: 16-43. open in new tab
  55. Vaillant GE: Involuntary coping mechanisms: a psychodynamic per- spective. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2011; 13: 366-370. open in new tab
  56. Vaillant GE, Bond M, Vaillant CO: An empirically validated hierarchy of defense mechanisms. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1986; 43: 786-794. open in new tab
  57. Waqas A, Naveed S, Aedma KK et al.: Exploring clusters of defense styles, psychiatric symptoms and academic achievements among medical students: a cross-sectional study in Pakistan. BMC Res Notes 2018; 11: 782. open in new tab
  58. Watrowski R, Rohde A: Validation of the Polish version of the Hospi- tal Anxiety and Depression Scale in three populations of gyneco- logic patients. Arch Med Sci 2014; 10: 517-524. open in new tab
  59. Wiley SD: Deception and detection in psychiatric diagnosis. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1998; 21: 869-893. open in new tab
  60. Wu G, Feder A, Cohen H et al.: Understanding resilience. Front Behav Neurosci 2013; 7: 10. open in new tab
  61. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361-370. open in new tab
Verified by:
No verification

seen 79 times

Recommended for you

Gender as a moderator between Present-Hedonistic time perspective and depressive symptoms or stress during COVID-19 lock-down

2021

Defense mechanisms and borderline personality organization among COVID-19 believers and non-believers during complete lock-down

2021

The interplay between Disinhibition and Present-Hedonistic time perspective in the relation between Borderline Personality Organization and depressive symptoms

2022

The importance of trust and altruistic social orientation for COVID-19 distress

2023
Meta Tags