Doing Well by Doing Good- CSR in a Global Context - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Search

Doing Well by Doing Good- CSR in a Global Context

Abstract

Nowadays, there is a general understanding that stakeholders are crucial for the successful enterprise. There is also a need to think about Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in a global context. Never before corporations enjoyed so much power and authority. Corporations need to evolve, re-think their strategies and change their processes accordingly. However, as of now, there is no agreed way of measuring overall sustainability of actions of each company. There is a great need for holistic studies of CSR, analyzing in details the value created, from stakeholders point of view. This paper is an attempt to propose a way of looking at corporate social responsibility in line with current methodologies and frameworks focusing on value creation. Currently there is no one definition of global CSR to be used, nor there is one comprehensive methodology to describe it. Instead there is abundance of theories and frameworks. This paper proposes one definition and presents a method of analysis of the global corporate commitment to CSR approach. The main concern of this paper is to offer an insight into different ways companies can create value for various stakeholders groups. To narrow the scope of the conducted analysis, the authors identified 13 companies, potential sustainability winners, from products industry Analyzed were both, CSR execution capacity and CSR value creation assessed on basis of compliance with identified CSR basic actions catalogue. Conducted analysis indicated that products companies are aware of needs and expectations of various stakeholders and are good at meeting them. Although assessed companies managed to link sustainability with their strategies, they did not achieve transforming sustainability into core of their business.

Citations

  • 0

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 0

    Scopus

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 607 times
Publication version
Accepted or Published Version
License
Creative Commons: CC-BY open in new tab

Keywords

Details

Category:
Conference activity
Type:
publikacja w wydawnictwie zbiorowym recenzowanym (także w materiałach konferencyjnych)
Title of issue:
Institute of Economic Research Working Papers. No. 94 strony 1 - 7
Language:
English
Publication year:
2017
Bibliographic description:
Popowska M., Ratkowska B.: Doing Well by Doing Good- CSR in a Global Context// Institute of Economic Research Working Papers. No. 94/ Toruń: , 2017, s.1-7
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.13140/rg.2.2.32100.17282
Bibliography: test
  1. Accenture (2014). Organizing for Success on Corporate Responsibility -The Path to High Performance. Retrieved from: https://www.accenture.com/t20150527T205445__w__/in-en/_acnmedia/Accenture/Conversion- Assets/DotCom/Documents/Global/PDF/Dualpub_8/Accenture-Organizing-Success-Corporate-Responsibility- Path-High-Performance.pdf open in new tab
  2. Bowen, H.R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper and Row. open in new tab
  3. Brockett, A. M., Rezaee, Z. (2012). Corporate sustainability: integrating performance and reporting. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119202899. open in new tab
  4. Carroll, Archie B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility. Evolution of a definitional construct, Business and Socie- ty, 38, 3: 268-295. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000765039903800303. Corporate Watch's report (2013). What's wrong with CSR?. Retrieved from: http://www.corporatewatch.org.uk/sites/default/files/CSRreport.pdf. open in new tab
  5. Crane A., Matten D., Spence L. J. (2014). Corporate social responsibility. Reading and cases in a global context, London & New York, Routledge, 2d edition. open in new tab
  6. GRI (2014). Sustainability Disclosure Database. Retrieved from: http://database.globalreporting.org/ Kotler, Ph., Hessekiel, D. & Lee, N. R. (2012). Good works!: Marketing and corporate initiatives that build a better world...and the bottom line. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119205210. open in new tab
  7. KPMG (2014). Corporate Responsibility at KPMG -Community Investment web page. Retrieved from: http://www.kpmg.com/uk/en/about/whatmakesusdifferent/ourapproachtocorporateresponsibility/ kpmginthecommunity/pages/default.aspx open in new tab
  8. Lévy, M., Eskew, M., Bernotat, W. H. & Barner, M. (2007). Who owns the long term?: Perspectives from Global Business Leaders. Harvard Business Review, July-August.
  9. Lubin, D.A., Esty D.C. (2010). The sustainability imperative. Harvard Business Review. May. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2010/05/the-sustainability-imperative. open in new tab
  10. McKinsey & Company (2007). Shaping the new rules of competition -UN Global Compact. Retrieved from: https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/summit2007/mckinsey_embargoed_until020707.pdf
  11. Mermod, A. Y., Idowu, S. O. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in the global business world. Springer. Procter & Gamble (2014). Sustainability Report. Retrieved from: http://www.pg.com/en_US/downloads/sustainability/reports/PG_2014_Sustainability_Report.pdf
  12. Schwartz, M. and Carroll, A. B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: A three-domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 503-530. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq200313435. open in new tab
  13. Simpson, J.& Taylor, J. (2013). Corporate Governance, Ethics and CSR. KoganPage. open in new tab
  14. Smith, N. C., Bhattacharya, C.B., Vogel, D. & Levine, D. I. (2010). Global challenges in responsible business. Cambridge University Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511777660. The Body Shop website. Retrieved from: http://www.thebodyshop.co.uk/values/index.aspx The Magazine for Clean Capitalism, (2015). 2015 Global 100 results. Winter issue. Retrieved from: http://www.corporateknights.com/reports/global-100/2015-global-100-results-14218559/ The United Nations Global Compact (2014). Guide to corporate sustainability. Retrieved from: https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/publications/UN_Global_Compact_Guide_to_Corporate_Sustainability.p df Van der Laan Smith, J., Adhikari, A. & Tondkar, R.H. (2005). Exploring differences in social disclosures interna- tionally: A stakeholder perspective, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, vol. 24, issue 2, 123-151. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2004.12.007. open in new tab
  15. Zadek, S. (2004). The path to corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review, December. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2004/12/the-path-to-corporate-responsibility open in new tab
  16. Zadek, S. (2008). Global collaborative governance: there is no alternative. Corporate governance: The international journal of business in society, 8:4, 374-388. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14720700810899121. open in new tab
  17. Zadek, S. (2007). Collaborative governance: The new multilateralism for the 21st century. Published in Global De- velopment 2.0, Brookings Institute, Washington DC.
  18. Zadek, S., McGillivray, A. (2008). Responsible competitiveness: making sustainability count in global markets. Harvard International Review, summer. open in new tab
Verified by:
Gdańsk University of Technology

seen 102 times

Recommended for you

Meta Tags