Effectiveness of pollutants removal in hybrid constructed wetlands – different configurations case study - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Search

Effectiveness of pollutants removal in hybrid constructed wetlands – different configurations case study

Abstract

In recent years, an increase in interest in hybrid constructed wetland systems (HCWs) has been observed. The aim of the paper is to compare different HCW configurations in terms of mass removal rates and efficiency of pollutants removal. Analysed data have been collected at multistage constructed wetlands in Poland, which are composed by at least two beds: horizontal subsurface flow (SSHF) and vertical subsurface flow (SSVF). The evaluation was focused on hybrid constructed wetlands performance with HF+VF vs. VF+HF configuration, where influent wastewater of the same composition was treated. In analysed HCWs, the effective removal of organic matter from 75.2 to 91.6% COD was confirmed. Efficiency of total nitrogen removal varied from 47.3 to 91.7%. The most effective removal of TN (8.3 g m−2 d−1) occurred in the system with VF+VF+HF configuration.

Citations

  • 1

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 4

    Scopus

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 38 times
Publication version
Accepted or Published Version
License
Creative Commons: CC-BY open in new tab

Keywords

Details

Category:
Conference activity
Type:
materiały konferencyjne indeksowane w Web of Science
Title of issue:
9th Conference on Interdisciplinary Problems in Environmental Protection and Engineering EKO-DOK 2017 strony 1 - 8
Language:
English
Publication year:
2017
Bibliographic description:
Gajewska M., Jóźwiakowski K., Skrzypiec K..: Effectiveness of pollutants removal in hybrid constructed wetlands – different configurations case study, W: 9th Conference on Interdisciplinary Problems in Environmental Protection and Engineering EKO-DOK 2017, 2017, ,.
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.1051/e3sconf/20171700023
Bibliography: test
  1. C. Pelissari, C. Ávila, C. M. Trein, J. García, R. Dultra de Armas, P. H. Sezerino, Sci. Total Environ. 574 (2017) open in new tab
  2. M. Gajewska, H. Obarska-Pempkowiak, Environ. Prot. Eng. 37 (2011)
  3. M. Gajewska, A. Tuszyńska, H. Obarska-Pempkowiak, Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 13, 3 (2004)
  4. R. H. Kadlec, S. Wallace, Treatment wetlands, second edition (CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, London, New York, 2009)
  5. F. Masi, S. Caffaz, A. Ghrabi, Water Sci. Technol. 67, 7 (2013) open in new tab
  6. P. Molle, S. Prost-Boucle, A. Lienard, Ecol. Eng. 34 (2008) open in new tab
  7. F. Masi, N. Martinuzzi, R. Bresciani, L. Giovanelli, G. Conte, Water Sci. Technol., 3 (2007) open in new tab
  8. American Public Health Association (APHA), Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (21st Ed. Washington, DC, 2005) open in new tab
  9. Polish standards according limits for discharged sewage and environmental protection from July, 24 2006 (No. 137, item 984) and January, 28 2009 (No. 27, item 169). open in new tab
  10. M. Gajewska, K. Jóźwiakowski, A. Ghrabi, F. Masi, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22 (2015) open in new tab
  11. K. Miksch, J. Sikora, Biotechnologia ścieków (Biotechnology of wastewater) (Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN Warszawa, 2010)
  12. J. Vymazal, Ecol. Eng. 25 (2005) open in new tab
  13. J. Zhai, Md. H. Rahaman, X. Chen, H. Xiao, K. Liao, X. Li, C. Duan, B. Zhang, G. Tao, Y. John, J. Vymazal, Ecol. Eng. 97 (2016) open in new tab
  14. Y. Millot, S. Troesch, D. Esser, P. Molle, A. Morvannou, R. Gourdon, D. P. L. Rousseau, Ecol. Eng. 97 (2016) open in new tab
  15. A. Morvannou, N. Forquet, S. Michel, S. Troesch, P. Molle, Water Sci. Technol. 71, 9 (2015) open in new tab
  16. J. Paing, A. Guilbert, V. Gagnon, F. Chazarenc, Ecol. Eng. 80 (2015) open in new tab
Verified by:
Gdańsk University of Technology

seen 150 times

Recommended for you

Meta Tags