Abstract
We respond to David Steigmann's discussion of our paper "A general theory for anisotropic Kirchhoff-Love shells with in-plane bending of embedded fibers, Math. Mech. Solids, 28(5):1274-1317" (arXiv:2101.03122). His discussion allows us to clarify two misleading statements in our original paper, and confirm that its formulation is fully consistent with the formulation of Steigmann. We also demonstrate that some of our original statements criticized by Steigmann are not wrong.
Citations
-
0
CrossRef
-
0
Web of Science
-
0
Scopus
Authors (3)
Cite as
Full text
download paper
downloaded 24 times
- Publication version
- Accepted or Published Version
- DOI:
- Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.1177/10812865231224106
- License
- Copyright (2024 SAGE Publications)
Keywords
Details
- Category:
- Articles
- Type:
- artykuły w czasopismach
- Published in:
-
MATHEMATICS AND MECHANICS OF SOLIDS
no. 29,
pages 1038 - 1044,
ISSN: 1081-2865 - Language:
- English
- Publication year:
- 2024
- Bibliographic description:
- Duong T. X., Itskov M., Sauer R.: Response to David Steigmann’s discussion of our paper// MATHEMATICS AND MECHANICS OF SOLIDS -,iss. 5 (2024), s.1038-1044
- DOI:
- Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.1177/10812865231224106
- Sources of funding:
-
- Free publication
- Verified by:
- Gdańsk University of Technology
seen 53 times
Recommended for you
Chapter 13 : The influence of dispersion phase on composite coating properties after cold working
- R. Skoblik,
- R. Starosta,
- T. Dyl
2008