Switching Regulation in the Control of 5-Phase Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Fed by 3×5 Direct Matrix Converter - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Search

Switching Regulation in the Control of 5-Phase Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Fed by 3×5 Direct Matrix Converter

Abstract

Matrix converter is an AC-AC direct power converter comprising of an array of bi- directional switches. It does not require an intermediate DC-link and allows sinusoidal output waveforms with varying amplitudes and frequencies. The configuration of these bi- directional switches decides the number of inputs and outputs of the matrix converter. This research uses a direct matrix converter (DMC) as a phase-changing device that can convert a three-phase AC voltage into a 5-phase AC voltage. The DMC is modulated with the model predictive control algorithm. The output of DMC is fed to a five-phase permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM). The model predictive current control technique for DMC is carried out by developing a mathematical model of an input filter and PM motor used as a load. The predictive control of DMC results in sinusoidal output current, and it also enables the frequency variation in the output current. This frequency variation is useful in controlling the speed of the motor connected to the load. After controlling the 5- phase motor, the switching frequency regulation is done to observe its effect on the motor's stator current waveforms. Switching frequency regulation helps to limit the unnecessary switching of DMC. We developed a MATLAB-based Simulink model to study PMSM, and detailed results are presented. The results show that switching regulation can significantly reduce the switching frequency without compromising the current waveform quality.

Citations

Author (1)

Cite as

Full text

full text is not available in portal

Keywords

Details

Category:
Monographic publication
Type:
Monographic publication
Publication year:
2021
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) https://doi.org/10.18280/ejee.230104
Bibliography: test
  1. Alesina, A., Venturini, M.G.B. (1989). Analysis and design of optimum-amplitude nine-switch direct AC-AC converters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 4(1): 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1109/63.21879 open in new tab
  2. Leubner, M., Remus, N., Haase, J., Hofmann, W. (2018). Collector-emitter voltage-based one-step commutation for direct three-level matrix converter. 20th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE'18 ECCE Europe), Riga, Latvia, pp. 1-9.
  3. Li, G.B., Hu, J.F., Li, Y.D., Zhu, J.G. (2019). An improved model predictive direct torque control strategy for reducing harmonic currents and torque ripples of five- phase permanent magnet synchronous motors. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 66(8): 5820-5829. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2018.2870359 open in new tab
  4. Basri, H.M., Mekhilef, S. (2016). Model predictive torque and flux control of induction motor fed by three level indirect matrix converter with unity power factor strategy. IEEE 8th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference, Hefei, China, pp. 2557- 2563. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPEMC.2016.7512701 open in new tab
  5. Munuswamy, I., Wheeler, P.W. (2017). Third method for regenerative braking in matrix converter drive: More electric aircraft. Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT), Vellore, India, 2017, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPACT.2017.8244884 open in new tab
  6. Dabour, S.M., Abdel-Khalik, A., Ahmed, S., Massoud, A. (2016). Performance of a three-to-five matrix converter fed five-phase induction motor under open- circuit switch faults. IEEE Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics, Penang, Malaysia, pp. 159-164. open in new tab
  7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAIE.2016.7575056 open in new tab
  8. Levi, E. (2015). Advances in converter control and innovative exploitation of additional degrees of freedom for multiphase machines. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 63(1): 433-448. open in new tab
  9. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2015.2434999 open in new tab
  10. Ishaq, M., Afzal, M.H., Waqar, M. (2020). Model predictive control of 3× 5 and 5× 3 bidirectional matrix converter. 17th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON), Phuket, Thailand, pp. 443-446. open in new tab
  11. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTI-CON49241.2020.9158071 open in new tab
  12. Qu, J.G., Xu, J., Wang, L.N., Hui, Y.N. (2018). Research on the modulation and control of multilevel matrix converter. The Journal of Engineering, 2018(13): 614- 621. https://doi.org/10.1049/joe.2018.0058 open in new tab
  13. Hossam, H.H., Youssef, A.R., Mohamed, E.M. (2020). Optimal power extraction control schemes for five-phase PMSG based wind generation systems. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 23(1): 144-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2019.04.004 open in new tab
  14. Rivera, M., Wheeler, P., Olloqui, A., Khaburi, D.A. (2016). A review of predictive control techniques for matrix converters -Part II. 2016 7th Power Electronics and Drive Systems Technologies Conference (PEDSTC), Tehran, Iran, pp. 589-595. open in new tab
  15. https://doi.org/10.1109/PEDSTC.2016.7556926 open in new tab
  16. Kumar, A., Sadhu, P.K., Mohanta, D.K., Reddy, M.J.B. (2018). An effective switching algorithm for single phase matrix converter in induction heating applications. Electronics, 7(8): 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics7080149 open in new tab
  17. Li, G.D., Zhao, Y.X., Li, B. (2020). Open-circuit fault- tolerant control of five-phase permanent-magnet synchronous motor using control variable method. International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM), Gothenburg, Sweden, pp. 2132-2138. open in new tab
  18. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEM49940.2020.9270955 open in new tab
  19. Gulbudak, O., Santi, E. (2015). A predictive control scheme for a dual output indirect matrix converter. IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Charlotte, NC, USA, pp. 2828-2834. https://doi.org/10.1109/APEC.2015.7104751 open in new tab
  20. Pandit, J.K., Aware, M.V., Nemade, R.V., Levi, E. (2016). Direct torque control scheme for a six-phase induction motor with reduced torque ripple. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 32(9): 7118-7129. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2016.2624149 open in new tab
  21. Li, J.Y., Cui, M.T., Du, T.Q., Sun, C.J., Huang, X.J. (2019). Modeling and analyzing an optimal control method for parallel multi-matrix converter systems in intelligent micro-grid. IEEE International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies and Systems (ICSETS), Bhubaneswar, India, pp. 103-108. open in new tab
  22. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSETS.2019.8744799 open in new tab
  23. Wang, R.T., Wang, X., Liu, R.T., Zhang, J.W., Mu, X.J. (2018). Generalized double line voltage synthesis strategy for three-to-five phase matrix converter. IET Power Electronics, 11(5): 895-901. open in new tab
  24. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-pel.2017.0487 open in new tab
  25. Kali, Y., Rodas, J., Gregor, R., Benjielloun, K., Doval- Gandoy, J., Goodwin, G. (2018). Speed control of a five- phase induction motor drive using modified super- twisting algorithm. International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM), Amalfi, Italy, 938-943. open in new tab
  26. https://doi.org/10.1109/SPEEDAM.2018.8445404 open in new tab
  27. Wang, R.T., Wang, X., Liu, C., Gao, X.W. (2018). A duty cycle space vector modulation strategy for a three- to-five phase direct matrix converter. Energies, 11(2): 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11020370 open in new tab
  28. Andraž, R., Mitja, N., Henrik, L., Peter, Z., Danijel, V. (2019). Trendi v razvoju močnostne elektronike za vodenje električnih strojev. Elektrotehniški vestnik, letnik 86, številka 5, str. 237-247. URN:NBN:SI:DOC- 3RV9JNPF from http://www.dlib.si
  29. Lei, J.X., Feng, S., Wheeler, P., Zhou, B., Zhao, J.F. (2020). Steady-state error suppression and simplified implementation of direct source current control for matrix converter with model predictive control. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 35(3): 3183-3194. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2019.2928874 open in new tab
  30. Vargas, R., Rodriguez, J., Rojas, C.A., Rivera, M. (2014). Predictive control of an induction machine fed by a matrix converter with increased efficiency and reduced common-mode voltage. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 29(2): 473-485. open in new tab
  31. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2014.2299594 open in new tab
  32. Rahman, K., Iqbal, A., Al-Hitmi, M.A., Dordevic, O., Ahmad, S. (2019). Performance analysis of a three-to- five phase dual matrix converter based on space vector pulse width modulation. IEEE Access, 7: 12307-12318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2892514 open in new tab
  33. Booin, M.B., Cheraghi, M. (2019). THD minimization in a five-phase five-level VSI using a novel SVPWM technique. 10th International Power Electronics, Drive Systems and Technologies Conference (PEDSTC), Shiraz, Iran, pp. 285-290. open in new tab
  34. https://doi.org/10.1109/PEDSTC.2019.8697810 open in new tab
  35. Siami, M., Khaburi, D.A., Rodriguez, J. (2018). Simplified finite control set-model predictive control for matrix converter-fed PMSM drives. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 33(3): 2438-2446. open in new tab
  36. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2017.2696902 open in new tab
  37. Wu, X.S., Song, W.S., Xue, C. (2018). Low-complexity model predictive torque control method without weighting factor for five-phase PMSM based on hysteresis comparators. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 6(4): 1650-1661. https://doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE.2018.2849320 open in new tab
  38. Tereshkin, V.M., Grishin, D.A., Makulov, I.A. (2018). A comparative analysis of the efficiency of three-and five- phase self-controlled synchronous motors. Russian Electrical Engineering, 89: 343-349. open in new tab
  39. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068371218050103 open in new tab
  40. Debour, S.M., Abdel-Khalik, A.S., Ahmed, S., Massoud A.M., Allam, S.M. (2018). Common-mode voltage reduction for space vector modulated three-to five-phase indirect matrix converter. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 95: 266-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2017.08.020 open in new tab
  41. Siami, M., Khaburi, D.A., Rivera, M., Rodrí guez, J. (2017). An experimental evaluation of predictive current control and predictive torque control for a PMSM fed by a matrix converter. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 64(11): 8459-8471. open in new tab
  42. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2017.2703658 open in new tab
  43. Rajendran, S., Govindarajan, U., Sankar, D.S.P. (2014). Active and reactive power regulation in grid connected wind energy systems with permanent magnet synchronous generator and matrix converter. IET Power Electronics, 7(3): 591-603. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet- pel.2013.0058 open in new tab
  44. Yousefi, B., Soleymani, S., Mozafari, B., Gholamian, S.A. (2017). Speed control of matrix converter-fed five- phase permanent magnet synchronous motors under unbalanced voltages. Energies, 10(10): 1509. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10101509 open in new tab
  45. Saeed, M.S.R., Song, W.S., Yu, B., Wu, X.S. (2020). Low-complexity deadbeat model predictive current control with duty ratio for five-phase PMSM Drives. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 35(11): 12085- 12099. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2020.2983048 open in new tab
  46. Lei, J.X., Feng, S., Zhou, B., Nguyen, H.N., Zhao, J.F., Chen, W. (2020). A simple modulation scheme with zero common-mode voltage and improved efficiency for direct matrix converter-fed PMSM drives. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 8(4): 3712-3722. open in new tab
  47. https://doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE.2019.2934730 open in new tab
Verified by:
No verification

seen 71 times

Recommended for you

Meta Tags