Analysis of the impact of socio-economic development on road safety based on the example of Baltic Sea Region countries - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Search

Analysis of the impact of socio-economic development on road safety based on the example of Baltic Sea Region countries

Abstract

Baltic Sea Region (BSR) is a specific region of Europe, bringing together countries with different levels of socio-economic development. The main common point is territorial access to the Baltic Sea and the importance of maritime transport in the transportation of goods. The region consists of 9 countries, including Germany, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Russia (more specifically, Kaliningrad and Leningrad Oblast), of which all, except Russia, are members of the European Union. BSR is an extremely important European region. With the most competitive economies of the world (Scandinavian countries, Germany, Finland), the region (excluding Russia) generates 30% of European GDP. The specificity of BSR is, however, very diverse. The countries differ in almost every way, economic, political, social or cultural. For many years Eastern Europe countries (EEC) versus Western Europe and Scandinavian countries (WEC) have been shared by a large economic and social distance. These differences, although diminishing in result of political transformations, are not without impact on other areas of life. Although Europe is the continent with the lowest level of danger regarding fatal road crashes, when analysing road safety data of the BSR countries we can observe the impact that the socio-economic situation has on road safety. Against the backdrop of other countries, highly developed WEC countries can be clearly distinguished having the lowest road fatality rates. Sweden, in result of implementing Vision Zero, achieved one of the world lowest road fatality rates. On the other hand, Russia can be distinguished with more than twice higher road fatality rate than in other EEC and with the same indicator 5-8 times higher than in WEC countries. Base on the data collected for BSR countries, attempts were made to analyze and assess the impact of the level of socio-economic development on road safety in the road network of analyzed countries. The results are discussed in the paper.

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 29 times
Publication version
Accepted or Published Version
License
Copyright (Statens väg- och transportforskningsinstitut)

Keywords

Details

Category:
Conference activity
Type:
publikacja w wydawnictwie zbiorowym recenzowanym (także w materiałach konferencyjnych)
Title of issue:
18th International Conference Road Safety on Five Continents (RS5C 2018) strony 1 - 12
Language:
English
Publication year:
2018
Bibliographic description:
Jamroz K., Romanowska A., Budzyński M.: Analysis of the impact of socio-economic development on road safety based on the example of Baltic Sea Region countries// 18th International Conference Road Safety on Five Continents (RS5C 2018)/ Linköping: Statens väg- och transportforskningsinstitut, 2018, s.1-12
Bibliography: test
  1. Akaateba, M. A. (2012). Comparing road safety performance of selected EU and African countries using a Composite Road Safety Performance Index. J. Nat. Sci. Res., Vol. 2(8), pp. 31-46. open in new tab
  2. Arranz, J. M., & Gil, A. I. (2009). Traffic accidents, deaths and alcohol consumption. Appl. Econ., Vol. 41(20), pp. 2583-2595. open in new tab
  3. Bishai, D., Quresh, A., James, P., & Ghaffar, A. (2006). National road casualties and economic development. Health Econ., Vol. 15(1), pp. 65-81. open in new tab
  4. BITRE. (2014). Road safety: Modelling a global phenomenon. Report 141, Canberra, Australia. BITRE. (2016). International road safety comparisons 2014. Canberra, Australia. open in new tab
  5. Brüde, U., & Elvik, R. (2015). The turning point in the number of traffic fatalities: Two hypotheses about changes in underlying trends. Accid. Anal. Prev., Vol. 74, pp. 60-68. open in new tab
  6. Cohen, A., & Einav, L. (2003). The effect of mandatory seat belt laws on driving behaviour and traffic fatalities. Rev. Econ. Stat., Vol. 85(4), pp. 828-843.
  7. D'elia, A., & Newstead, S. (2013). The relationship between socio-economic factors and road safety in Western Australia. Curtin-Monash Accident Research Centre.
  8. Ghee, C., Astrop, A., Silcock, D., & Jacobs, G. (1997). Socio-economic aspects of road accidents in developing countries. TRL Report 247, England.
  9. Hermans, E., Brijs, T., Wets, G., & Vanhoof, K. (2009). Benchmarking road safety: Lessons to learn from a data envelopment analysis. Accid. Anal. Prev., 41(1), 174-182. open in new tab
  10. Jamroz, K. (2010). Strategic risk measures in road traffic. J. Konbin, Vol. 13(1). open in new tab
  11. Jamroz, K. (2011). Metoda zarządzania ryzykiem w inżynierii drogowej. Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland.
  12. Jamroz, K. (2012). The impact of road network structure and mobility on the national traffic fatality rate. Procedia -Soc. Behav. Sci., Vol. 54, pp. 1370-1377. open in new tab
  13. Jamroz, K. (2013). Macro model of seat belt use by car occupants. Transp. Probl., 8(4), pp. 103-114. open in new tab
  14. Jamroz, K. (2015). Country Safety Performance Function and the factors affecting it. Proc. Eur. Saf. Reliab. Conf. (ESREL), pp. 101-108. open in new tab
  15. Jamroz, K., & Smolarek, L. (2013). Road safety management tools for country strategic level. 16th Road Saf. Four Cont. Conf., China.
  16. Johansson, R. (2009). Vision Zero -Implementing a policy for traffic safety. Saf. Sci., Vol. 47(6), 826-831. open in new tab
  17. Koornstra, M. J. (2007). Prediction of traffic fatalities and prospects for mobility becoming sustainable-safe. Sadhana -Acad. Proc. Eng. Sci., Vol. 32(4), pp. 365-395. open in new tab
  18. Kopits, E., & Cropper, M. (2005). Traffic fatalities and economic growth. Accid. Anal. Prev., Vol. 37(1), pp. 169-178. open in new tab
  19. La Torre, F., Domenichini, L., Corsi, F., & Fanfani, F. (2014). Transferability of the Highway Safety Manual freeway model to the Italian motorway network. Transp. Res. Rec., Vol. 2435, pp. 61-71.
  20. McMichael, A. J. (1997). Transport and Health: Assessing the Risks. London Sch. Hyg. Trop. Med. 5th Annu. Public Heal. Forum, pp. 9-26.
  21. Oleinik, A. (2016). Corruption on the road: A case study of Russian traffic police. IATSS Res., Vol. 40(1), pp. 19-25. open in new tab
  22. Page, Y. (2001). A statistical model to compare road mortality in OECD countries. Accid. Anal. Prev., Vol. 33(3), pp. 371-385. open in new tab
  23. Pihlak, I., & Antov, D. (2004). A comparison of road safety in the Baltic Sea Region. Proc.17th ICTCT.
  24. Rumar, K. (1988). Collective risk but individual safety. Ergonomics, Vol. 31(4), pp. 507-518. open in new tab
  25. Teik Hua, P., Noland, R. B., & Evans, A. W. (2010). The direct and indirect effects of corruption on motor vehicle crash deaths. Accid. Anal. Prev., Vol. 42(6), pp. 1934-1942.
  26. UNDP. (1990). Human Development Report 1990. New York, Oxford. UNDP. (2012). Human Development Report 2012. open in new tab
  27. WHO. (2015). Global Status Report on Road Safety 2015. open in new tab
  28. Yannis, G., Papadimitriou, E., & Folla, K. (2014). Effect of GDP changes on road traffic fatalities. Saf. Sci., Vol. 63, pp. 42-49. open in new tab
  29. Zambon, F., Fedeli, U., Visentin, C. et al. (2007). Evidence-based policy on road safety: the effect of the demerit points system on seat belt use and health outcomes. J. Epidemiol. Community Health, Vol. 61, pp. 877-81. open in new tab
  30. Żukowska, J. (2012). Road safety analysis in Poland using time-series modelling techniques. J. Polish Saf. Reliab. Assoc., Vol. 3(1), pp. 109-112. open in new tab
Verified by:
Gdańsk University of Technology

seen 100 times

Recommended for you

Meta Tags