Detection of debonding in adhesive joints using Lamb wave propagation - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Search

Detection of debonding in adhesive joints using Lamb wave propagation

Abstract

Adhesively bonded joints are widely used in many branches of industry. Mechanical degradation of this type of connections does not have significant symptoms that can be noticed during visual assessment, so non-destructive testing becomes a very important issue. The paper deals with experimental investigations of adhesively bonded steel plates with different defects. Five samples (an intact one and four with damages in the form of partial debonding) were prepared. The inspection was conducted with the use of guided wave propagation method. Lamb waves were excited at one point of the sample, whereas the out-of-plane velocity signals were recorded in a number of points spread over the area of overlap. The processing of signals consisted of calculations of weighted root mean square (WRMS). The results of the analysis showed that the WRMS maps allow for identification and determination of size and shape of debonding areas.

Citations

  • 1

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 0

    Scopus

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 41 times
Publication version
Accepted or Published Version
License
Creative Commons: CC-BY open in new tab

Keywords

Details

Category:
Articles
Type:
artykuły w czasopismach
Published in:
MATEC Web of Conferences no. 262, pages 1 - 6,
ISSN: 2261-236X
Language:
English
Publication year:
2019
Bibliographic description:
Rucka M., Wojtczak E., Lachowicz J.: Detection of debonding in adhesive joints using Lamb wave propagation// MATEC Web of Conferences -Vol. 262, (2019), s.1-6
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.1051/matecconf/201926210012
Bibliography: test
  1. R.D. Adams and W.C. Wake, Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, (1986) open in new tab
  2. M. Piekarczyk and R. Grec, Arch. Civ. Eng., 58, 309-329 (2012) open in new tab
  3. F. Heidarpour, M. Farahani, and P. Ghabezi, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., 80, 128-132 (2018) open in new tab
  4. R.C. Tighe, J.M. Dulieu-Barton, and S. Quinn, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., 64, 168-178 (2016) open in new tab
  5. M. Korzeniowski, T. Piwowarczyk, and R.G. Maev, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., 14, 661-670 (2014) open in new tab
  6. R.L. Vijayakumar, M.R. Bhat, and C.R.L. Murthy, AIP Conf. Proc., 1430, 1276-1283 (2012) open in new tab
  7. M. Rucka, E. Wojtczak, and J. Lachowicz, Appl. Sci., 8, 522 (2018) open in new tab
  8. R.L. Vijaya Kumar, M.R. Bhat, and C.R.L. Murthy, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., 42, 60-68 (2013) open in new tab
  9. R.L. Vijaya kumar, M.R. Bhat, and C.R.L. Murthy, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 28, 893-914 (2014) open in new tab
  10. W. Roth and V. Giurgiutiu, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., 73, 109-117 (2017) open in new tab
  11. C. Jeenjitkaew and F.J. Guild, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., 75, 101-107 (2017) open in new tab
  12. J.L. Rose, Cambridge University Press, New York (2014)
  13. M.J.S. Lowe, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 42, 525-542 (1995) open in new tab
  14. A. Żak, M. Radzieński, M. Krawczuk, and W. Ostachowicz, Smart Mater. Struct., 21, 35024 (2012) open in new tab
  15. C. Lee and S. Park, Shock Vib., 725030 (2014)
  16. T. Jothi Saravanan, N. Gopalakrishnan, and N. Prasad Rao, Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., 73, 520- 538 (2015)
  17. G.K. Geetha, D. Roy Mahapatra, S. Gopalakrishnan, and S. Hanagud, Compos. Struct., 147, 197-210 (2016) open in new tab
  18. R. Marks, A. Clarke, C. Featherston, C. Paget, and R. Pullin, Appl. Sci., 6, 12 (2016) open in new tab
  19. C. Lee, A. Zhang, B. Yu, and S. Park, Sensors (Switzerland), 17, 1224, (2017) open in new tab
  20. Ł. Pieczonka, Ł. Ambroziński, W.J. Staszewski, D. Barnoncel, and P. Pérès, Opt. Lasers Eng., 99, 80- 87 (2017) open in new tab
  21. M.D. Abràmoff, P.J. Magalhães, and S.J. Ram, Biophotonics Int., 11, 36-41 (2004)
Sources of funding:
Verified by:
Gdańsk University of Technology

seen 179 times

Recommended for you

Meta Tags