Polyurethane porous scaffolds (PPS) for soft tissue regenerative medicine applications - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Your account

login

Search

Polyurethane porous scaffolds (PPS) for soft tissue regenerative medicine applications

Abstract

Tissue engineering requires suitable polymeric scaffolds, which act as a physical support for regenerated tissue. A promising candidate might be polyurethane (PUR) scaffold, due to the ease of the PUR properties design, which can be adjusted directly to the intended purpose. In this study, we report a successful fabrication of porous polyurethane scaffolds (PPS) using solvent casting/particulate leaching technique combined with thermally induced phase separation. The obtained PPS had comparable chemical structure to native PUR, which was con- firmed by FTIR and HNMR analyses. The performed DSC study determined a similar Tg of the obtained PPS to native PUR (-38 C). The analysis of TEM micrographs revealed that PPS had a homogenous structure. The studied PPS interactions with canola oil, distilled water, saline solution and phosphate-buffered saline after 3 months of incubation revealed that these materials have stable character in these media. The significant decrease of contact angle from 68 for native PUR to 54 for PPS was noted, as well as the decrease of mechanical properties (TSb * 1 MPa and eb * 95% of PPS were comparable to the native aorta tissue of TSb * 0.3–0.8 MPa and eb * 50–100%). Through SEM analysis, the morphology of the PPS was determined: the porosity was 87% and the pore sizes in the range of 98–492 lm. The biological studies revealed that the obtained PPS are sensitive to microorganisms such as Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli and that they are biocompatible with the 3T3 NIH cell line. In summary, the obtained PPS scaffolds may be a suitable material for soft tissue engineering like blood vessels.

Citations

  • 1 1

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 9

    Scopus

Authors (7)

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 330 times
Publication version
Accepted or Published Version
License
Copyright (Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017)

Keywords

Details

Category:
Articles
Type:
artykuł w czasopiśmie wyróżnionym w JCR
Published in:
POLYMER BULLETIN pages 1 - 23,
ISSN: 0170-0839
Language:
English
Publication year:
2017
Bibliographic description:
Kucińska-Lipka J., Gubańska I., Pokrywczyńska M., Cieśliński H., Filipowicz N., Drewa T., Janik H.: Polyurethane porous scaffolds (PPS) for soft tissue regenerative medicine applications// POLYMER BULLETIN. -, (2017), s.1-23
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.1007/s00289-017-2124-x
Bibliography: test
  1. Dhandayuthapani B, Yoshida Y, Maekawa T, Kumar DS (2011) Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: a review. Int J Polym Sci Article ID 290602, p 19 open in new tab
  2. Langer R, Vacanti JP (1993) Tissue engineering. Science 260(5110):920-926 open in new tab
  3. Langer R, Tirell DA (2004) Designing materials for biology and medicine. Nature 428(6982):487-492 open in new tab
  4. Fuchs JR, Nasseri BA, Vacanti JP (2001) Tissue engineering: a 21st century solution to surgical reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 72(2):577-591 open in new tab
  5. Ramakrishna S, Mayer J, Wintermantel E, Leong KW (2001) Biomedical applications of polymer- composite materials: a review. Compos Sci Technol 61(9):1189-1224 open in new tab
  6. Vert M (2005) Aliphatic polyesters: great degradable polymers that cannot do everything. Biomacromol 6(2):538-546 open in new tab
  7. Piskin E (1994) Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 6:775-795 open in new tab
  8. Ji Y, Ghosh K, Shu XZ, Li B, Sokolov JC, Prestwich GD et al (2006) Electrospun three-dimensional hyaluronic acid nanofibrous scaffolds. Biomaterials 27(20):3782-3792 open in new tab
  9. Guntaillake P, Mayadunne R, Adhikari R (2006) Recent developments in biodegradable synthetic polymers. Biotechnol Ann Rev 12:301-347 open in new tab
  10. Ma PX (2004) Scaffolds for tissue fabrication. Mater Today 7(5):30-40 open in new tab
  11. Kucinska-Lipka J, Gubanska I, Janik H (2013) Polyurethanes modified with natural polymers for medical application. Part I. Polyurethane/chitosan and polyurethane/collagen. Polim (Polym) 58(9):678 open in new tab
  12. Kucinska-Lipka J, Gubanska I, Janik H (2014) Polyurethanes modified with natural polymers for medical application. Part II. Polyurethane/gelatin, polyurethane/starch, polyurethane/cellulose. Polim (Polym) 3:195 open in new tab
  13. Kucinska-Lipka J, Gubanska I, Janik H (2013) Gelatin-modified polyurethanes for soft tissue scaf- fold. Sci World J Article ID 450132, p 12 open in new tab
  14. Guelcher SA (2008) Biodegradable polyurethanes: synthesis and applications in regenerative med- icine. Tissue Eng Part B 14(1):3-17 open in new tab
  15. Kucinska-Lipka J, Gubanska I, Janik H, Sienkiewicz M (2015) Fabrication of polyurethane and polyurethane based composite fibers by the electrospinning technique for soft tissue engineering of cardiovascular system. Mater Sci Eng C 46:166-176 open in new tab
  16. Ma PX, Zhang R (2001) Microtubular architecture of biodegradable polymer scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res 56(4):169-477 open in new tab
  17. Hutmacher DW (2001) Scaffold design and fabrication technologies for engineering tissues-state of the art and future perspectives. J Biomater Sci 12(1):107 open in new tab
  18. Freed LE, Vunjak-Novakovic G (1998) Culture of organized cell communities. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 33(1-2):15-30 open in new tab
  19. Janik H, Marzec M (2015) A review: fabrication of porous polyurethane scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 48:586-591 open in new tab
  20. Vasita R, Katti DS (2006) Nanofibers and their applications in tissue engineering. Int J Nanomed 1(1):15-30 open in new tab
  21. Sokolsky-Papkov M, Aghashi K, Olaye A, Shakesheff K, Domb AJ (2007) Polymer carriers for drug delivery in tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59(4-5):187-206 open in new tab
  22. Seneker SD, Born L, Schmelzer HG, Eisenbach CD, Foscher K (1992) Diisocyanato dicyclohexyl- methane: structure/property relationships of its geometrical isomers in polyurethane elastomers. Colloid Polym Sci 270(6):553 open in new tab
  23. Kucinska-Lipka J, Gubanska I, Janik H, Pokrywczynska M, Drewa T (2015) L-ascorbic acid mod- ified poly(ester urethane)s as a suitable candidates for soft tissue engineering applications. React Funct Polym 97:105-115 open in new tab
  24. Silvestri A, Boffito M, Sartori S, Ciardelli G (2013) Biomimetic materials and scaffolds for myocardial tissue regeneration. Macromol Biosci 13:984-1019 open in new tab
  25. Boffito M, Sartori S, Ciardelli G (2014) Polymeric scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering: requirements and fabrication technologies. Polym Int Forthcom 63:2-11 open in new tab
  26. Janik H, Marzec M (2015) A review: fabrication of porous polyurethane scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C 48:586-591 open in new tab
  27. Janik H (2005) Struktury nadcząsteczkowe i wybrane właściwości rozgałęzionych i usieciowanych poli(estro-uretanów), poli(etero-uretanów) i poli(uretano-biuretanów) formowanych reaktywnie. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Gdańskiej
  28. Szelest-Lewandowska A (2003) Novel polyurethanes for medical applications. PhD Thesis, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk
  29. Brzeska J, Heimowska A, Sikorska W, Jasińska-Walc L, Kowalczuk M, Rutkowska M (2015) Chemical and enzymatic hydrolysis of polyurethane/polylactide blends. Int J Polym Sci 2015:795985 open in new tab
  30. Roeder RK (2013) Mechanical characterization of biomaterials. In: Bandyopadhyay A, Bose S (eds) Characterization of biomaterials, chap 3. Elsevier, p 94 open in new tab
  31. Wei L, Li G, Yan YD, Pradhan R, Kim JO, Quan Q (2012) Lipid emulsions as a drug delivery system for breviscapine: formulation development and optimization. Arch Pharm Res 35(6):1037-1043 open in new tab
  32. Guelcher SA, Srinivasan A, Dumas JE, Didier JE, McBride S, Hollinger JO (2008) Synthesis, mechanical properties, biocompatibility and degradation of polyurethane networks from lysine polyisocyanates. Biomaterials 29:1762-1775 open in new tab
  33. Cetina-Diaz SM, Chan-Chan LH, Vargas-Coronado RF, Cervantes-Uc JM, Quintana-Owen P (2014) Physicochemical characterization of segmented polyurethanes prepared with glutamine or ascorbic acid as chain extenders and their hydroxyapatite composites. J Mater Chem B 2:1966 open in new tab
  34. Punnakitikashem P, Truong D, Menon JU, Nguyen KT, Hong Y (2014) Electrospun biodegradable elastic polyurethane scaffolds with dipyridamole release for small diameter vascular grafts. Acta Biomater 10:4618-4628 open in new tab
  35. Nair PA, Ramesh P (2013) Electrospun biodegradable calcium containing poly(ester urethane) urea: synthesis, fabrication, in vitro degradation and biocompatybility evaluation. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 101:1876-1887 open in new tab
  36. Yilgor I, Yilgor E, Guler IG, Ward TC, Wilkies GL (2006) FTIR investigation of the influence of diisocyanate symmetry on the morphology development in model segmented polyurethanes. Polymer 47:4105-4114 open in new tab
  37. Guan J, Stankus JJ, Wagner WR (2006) Soft tissue scaffolds. Wiley Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering. Wiley-Interscience, US open in new tab
  38. Pokrywczynska M, Gubanska I, Drewa G, Drewa T (2015) Application of bladder acellular matrix in urinary bladder regeneration: the state of the art and future directions. Biomed Res Int 2015:613439 open in new tab
  39. Lee DK, Tsai HB (2000) Properties of segmented polyurethanes derived from different diisocyanates. J Appl Polym Sci 75:167-174 open in new tab
  40. Kanapitsas A, Pissis P, Ribelles G, Pradas M, Privalko EG, Privalko VP (1999) Molecular mobility and hydration properties of segmented polyurethanes with varying structure of soft and hard-chain segments. J Appl Polym Sci 71:1209-1221 open in new tab
  41. Janik H (2010) Progress in the studies of the supermolecular structure of segmented polyurethanes. Polim (Polym) 6:419 open in new tab
  42. Hutmacher DW (2008) Scaffold-based bone engineering by using rapid prototyping technologies in Virtual and Rapid manufacturing. In: Bartolo JB (ed) Advanced research in virtual and rapid pro- totyping. Taylor & Francis Group, New York, p 65 open in new tab
  43. Middleton JC, Tipton AJ (2000) Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices. Bioma- terials 21(23):2335-2346 open in new tab
  44. Bose S, Roy M, Bandyopadhyay A (2012) Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trend Biotechnol 30(10):546-554 open in new tab
  45. Liu X, Chen W, Gustafson CT, Miller AL, Waletzki BE (2015) Tunable tissue scaffolds fabricated by in situ crosslink phase separation system. RSC Adv 5:100824 open in new tab
  46. Leon CA, Leon Y (1998) New perspectives in mercury porosimetry. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 76-77:341-372
  47. Brauker JH, Carr-Brendel VE, Martinson LA, Crudele J, Johnston WD, Johnson RC (1995) Neo- vascularization of synthetic membranes directed by membrane micro architecture. J Biomed Mater Res 29:1517-1524 open in new tab
  48. Klawitter JJ, Hulbert SF (1971) application of porous ceramics for the attachment of load-bearing internal orthopedic applications. J Biomed Mater Res A Symp 2:161-168 open in new tab
  49. Yang S, Leong KF, Du Z, Chua CK (2001) The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering- part I: traditional factors. Tissue Eng 7(6):679-689 open in new tab
  50. Whang K, Healy KE, Elenz DR, Nam EK, Tsai DC, Thomas CH et al (1999) Engineering bone regeneration with bioabsorbable scaffolds with novel microarchitecture. Tissue Eng 5(1):35-51 open in new tab
  51. Yannas IV, Lee E, Orgill DP, Skrabut EM, Murphy GF (1989) Synthesis and characterization of a model extracellular matrix that induces partial regeneration of adult mammalian skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86(3):933-937 open in new tab
  52. Salgado AJ, Coutinho OP, Reis RL (2004) Bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future trends. Macromol Biosci 4(8):743-765 open in new tab
  53. Nair LS, Laurencin CT (2007) Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials. Progr Polym Sci 32(8-9):762-798 open in new tab
  54. Anseth KS, Bowman CN, Brannon-Peppas L (1996) Mechanical properties of hydrogels and their experimental determination. Biomaterials 17(17):1647-1657 open in new tab
  55. Moghe PV, Berthiaume F, Ezzel RM, Toner M, Tompkins RG, Yarmush ML (1996) Culture matrix configuration and composition in the maintenance of hepatocyte polarity and function. Biomaterials 17(3):373-385 open in new tab
  56. Rayan PL, Foty RA, Kohn J, Steinberg MS (2001) Tissue spreading on implantable substrates is a competitive outcome of cell-cell vs cell-substrate adhesivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(8):4323-4327 open in new tab
  57. Ingber DE (2002) Mechanical signalling and the cellular response to extracellular matrix in angio- genesis and cardiovascular physiology. Circ Res 91(10):877-887 open in new tab
  58. Wagenseil JE, Mecham RP (2009) Vascular extracellular matrix and arterial mechanics. Physiol Rev 89(3):957-989 open in new tab
  59. Holzapfel GA (2000) Biomechanics of soft tissue. Comput Biomech 7 open in new tab
  60. Akhtar R, Sherratt MJ, Cruickshank JK, Derby B (2011) Characterizing the elastic properties of tissues. Mater Today 14(3):96-105 open in new tab
  61. Han DK, Park KD, Ryu GH, Kim UY, Min BG, Kim YH (1996) Plasma protein adsorption to sulfonated poly(ethylene oxide)-grafted polyurethane surface. J Biomed Mater Res 30:23-30 open in new tab
  62. Desai NP, Hubbel JA (1991) Biological responses to polyethylene oxide modified polyethylene terephthalate surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 25:829-843 open in new tab
  63. Morton LHG, Surman SB (1994) Biofilms in biodeterioration-a review. Int Biodeter Biodegr 32:203-221 open in new tab
  64. Hoskins C, Cheng WP (2013) Hydrophobic drug solubilisation in Fundamentals of pharmaceutical nanoscience. In: Uchegbu I, Schatzlein AG, Cheng WP, Lalotsa A (eds) 14 edn, Springer, NY, p 386 open in new tab
  65. Karchin A, Simonovsky FI, Ratner BD, Sanders JE (2011) Melt electrospinning of biodegradable polyurethane scaffolds. Acta Biomater 7(9):3277-3284 open in new tab
Verified by:
Gdańsk University of Technology

seen 167 times

Recommended for you

Microporous Polyurethane Thin Layer as a Promising Scaffold for Tissue Engineering

2017

Polyurethanes Crosslinked with Poly(vinyl alcohol) as a Slowly-Degradable and Hydrophilic Materials of Potential Use in Regenerative Medicine

2018

Porosity and swelling properties of novel polyurethane–ascorbic acid scaffolds prepared by different procedures for potential use in bone tissue engineering

2017

A review: Fabrication of porous polyurethane scaffolds

2015
Meta Tags