Criteria for evaluation and selection of the best offer for the Contract Engineer service - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Your account

login

Search

Criteria for evaluation and selection of the best offer for the Contract Engineer service

Abstract

The purpose of the legal regulations regarding public procurement in EU countries is to ensure effective funds' spending. When assessing and selecting the best offer, the contracting entities have at their disposal many different criteria, including non-price criteria. Their proper selection and application is necessary to ensure the high quality of the ordered product, delivery or service. Making an order for intellectual services, including performed by the Contract Engineer (CE), should be based primarily on the criterion of qualifications and experience. The actions and decisions taken by CE are particularly important for the quality and timeliness of the contract. The purpose of the research is to indicate to what scope and extent the awarding entities in Poland use the possibility of a wide selection of different criteria for the evaluation of intellectual services, consisting of performing the CE function. On the basis of selected proceedings, the authors discuss the criteria for evaluation and selection of the best offer applied in practice, classify them, analyze and evaluate them. The results of the conducted research indicate that the price and experience are often used in practice as the CE selection criteria. The authors, however, give numerous examples of other criteria. In many cases, these criteria are difficult to verify at the stage of evaluating offers and enforcing them in practice in course of works, raising doubts as to their effectiveness, sometimes making it impossible to make a reliable assessment and select the most advantageous offer. The authors indicate that despite many possibilities offered by the legal status in force in Poland, in practice, in some cases, criteria that have a large impact on the increase of the proposed service price, but not reflected in its quality, apply. As a consequence, it results in the lack of effective spending of public funds.

Citations

  • 2

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 2

    Scopus

Authors (3)

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 35 times
Publication version
Accepted or Published Version
License
Creative Commons: CC-BY open in new tab

Keywords

Details

Category:
Articles
Type:
artykuły w czasopismach
Published in:
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering no. 603, pages 1 - 10,
ISSN: 1757-8981
Language:
English
Publication year:
2019
Bibliographic description:
Grzyl B., Apollo M., Igor H.: Criteria for evaluation and selection of the best offer for the Contract Engineer service// IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering -Vol. 603,iss. 3 (2019), s.1-10
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.1088/1757-899x/603/3/032076
Bibliography: test
  1. Dyrektywa Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady 2014/24/UE z dnia 26 lutego 2014 r. w sprawie zamówień publicznych, art. 67 ust. 1, uchylająca dyrektywę 004/18/WE, Dz. Urz. UE L 94 z 28.3.2014 r., str. 65, 2014.
  2. A. Kristowski, B. Grzyl, and D. Kowalski, "The analysis of the influence of the corrosion protection method of selected steel elements on the steel structure life cycle costs," in Proceedings of the Proceedings of the CCC 2018; 2018. open in new tab
  3. B. Grzyl, and A. Siemaszko, "The Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost in public works contracts," E3S Web Conf. 44, 47, 2018. open in new tab
  4. D. Wieczorek, E. Plebankiewicz, and K. Zima, "Model estimation of the whole life cost of a building with respect to risk factors," Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ, 25, 20-38, 2019. open in new tab
  5. E. Plebankiewicz, K. Zima, and D. Wieczorek, "Life Cycle Equivalent Annual Cost (LCEAC) as a Comparative Indicator in the Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Buildings with Different Lifetimes," MATEC Web Conf, 196, 2018. open in new tab
  6. H. Anysz, "The profit as in-company evaluation of the construction site effectiveness," MATEC Web Conf. 117, 9, 2017. open in new tab
  7. B. Grzyl, M. Apollo, E. Miszewska-Urbańska, and A. Kristowski, "The criteria for evaluation and selection the best tender applied by the authorities in Poland and selected EU countries," MATEC Web Conf. 219, 2018. open in new tab
  8. I. Heyducki, "Inżynier Kontraktu w świetle obowiązujących w Polsce przepisów -studium przypadków," MSc, Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering: Gdansk, 2018.
  9. M. Kajrukszto, J. Gandziarowski, M. Bańkowska, M. Trynkowska, and K. Wośkało, Raport o sporach budowlanych w Polsce 2018.
  10. M. Lempkowski "Najczęstsze przyczyny powstawania sporów w branży budowlanej," Biul. Konsult. 2018, 51, 10-12, 2018.
  11. Ogłoszenie o zamówieniu na pełnienie funkcji inżyniera kontraktu PN 16, ZP.271.16.2017. open in new tab
  12. Przetarg nieograniczony na pełnienie funkcji Inżyniera Kontraktu, Inspektora Nadzoru Inwestorskiego przy realizacji inwestycji pn. Stworzenie centrum aktywności organizacji pozarządowych przy ul. Zamkowej 6, 2018. open in new tab
  13. Specyfikacja Istotnych Warunków Zamówienia Publicznego (SIWZ), nr sprawy: ZP/ZS/2/2016 open in new tab
Verified by:
Gdańsk University of Technology

seen 118 times

Recommended for you

The criteria for evaluation and selection the best tender applied by the authorities in Poland and selected EU countries

2018

The Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost in public works contracts

2018

Towards evaluation of the Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria - examination of a fishing vessel vulnerability to surf-riding, based on historical capsizing

2022

The 90th Birthday Jubilee of Professor Eugeniusz Bielewicz

2014
Meta Tags