Finite element method simulations of various cases of crash tests with N2/W4/A steel road barrier - Publication - Bridge of Knowledge

Your account

login

Search

Finite element method simulations of various cases of crash tests with N2/W4/A steel road barrier

Abstract

The subject of this study is performance of N2/W4/A steel road safety barrier investigated in numerical simulations. System was checked under several types of initial conditions, which were assumed basing on the TB11 and TB32 normative crash tests. The main goal of present study is to investigate the relationship between initial conditions (angle and velocity) of the impact and the severity indices (associated to the vehicle occupant) during the collision. Obtained performance parameters and impact severity indexes may be considered reasonable. Results of the simulations facilitates the deep insight into vehicle crash mechanics phenomena.

Citations

  • 3

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 4

    Scopus

Authors (3)

Cite as

Full text

download paper
downloaded 63 times
Publication version
Accepted or Published Version
License
Creative Commons: CC-BY open in new tab

Keywords

Details

Category:
Articles
Type:
artykuły w czasopismach
Published in:
MATEC Web of Conferences no. 231, pages 1 - 9,
ISSN: 2261-236X
Language:
English
Publication year:
2018
Bibliographic description:
Burzyński S., Chróścielewski J., Pachocki Ł.: Finite element method simulations of various cases of crash tests with N2/W4/A steel road barrier// MATEC Web of Conferences -Vol. 231, (2018), s.1-9
DOI:
Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.1051/matecconf/201823101005
Bibliography: test
  1. J.O. Hallquist, LS-DYNA Theory Manual (Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2006)
  2. LS-DYNA Keyword User's Manual (Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2015)
  3. European Standard EN 1317-1-5 (2010) open in new tab
  4. British Standard PD CEN/TR 16303-1-5 (2012) open in new tab
  5. K. Jamroz, S. Burzyński, W. Witkowski, K. Wilde, Numerical methods for the assessment of bridge safety barriers, in: M. Kleiber, T. Burczyński, K. Wilde, J. Gorski, K. Winkelmann, Ł. Smakosz (Eds.), Adv. Mech. Theor. Comput. Interdiscip. Issues, 1st ed., pp. 231-234 (CRC Press, 2016) open in new tab
  6. W. Borkowski, Z. Hryciów, P. Rybak, J. Wysocki, Numerical simulation of the standard TB11 and TB32 tests for a concrete safety barrier, KONES Powetrain Transp. 17 (2010) open in new tab
  7. M. Borovinšek, M. Vesenjak, M. Ulbin, Z. Ren, Simulation of crash tests for high 7 open in new tab
  8. MATEC Web of Conferences 231, 01005 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201823101005 GAMBIT 2018 containment levels of road safety barriers, Eng. Fail. Anal. 14 pp. 1711-1718 (2007). doi:10.1016/J.ENGFAILANAL.2006.11.068 open in new tab
  9. K. Wilde, K. Jamroz, D. Bruski, S. Burzyński, J. Chróścielewski, W. Witkowski, Numerical simulations of bus crash-test with barrier and truss supporting structure (in Polish), J. Civ. Eng. Environ. Archit. 63 pp. 455-467 (2016) open in new tab
  10. M. Klasztorny, D.B. Nycz, P. Szurgott, Modelling and simulation of crash tests of N2- W4-A category safety road barrier in horizontal concave arc, Int. J. Crashworthiness. 21 pp. 644-659 (2016). doi:10.1080/13588265.2016.1212962 open in new tab
  11. K. Wilde, D. Bruski, S. Burzyński, J. Chróścielewski, W. Witkowski, Numerical crash analysis of the cable barrier, in: J. Awrejcewicz, M. Kaźmierczak, J. Mrozowski, P. Olejnik (Eds.), DSTA-2017 Conf. Books, pp. 555-566 (Department of Automation, Biomechanics and Mechatronics, 2017) open in new tab
  12. M. Klasztorny, K. Zielonka, D.B. Nycz, P. Posuniak, R.K. Romanowski, Experimental validation of simulated TB32 crash tests for SP-05/2 barrier on horizontal concave arc without and with composite overlay, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 18 pp. 339-355 (2018). doi:10.1016/J.ACME.2017.07.007 open in new tab
  13. K. Wilde, K. Jamroz, D. Bruski, M. Budzyński, S. Burzyński, J. Chroscielewski, W. Witkowski, Curb-to-Barrier Face Distance Variation an a TB51 Bridge Barrier Crash Test Simulation, Arch. Civ. Eng. 63 pp. 187-199 (2017). doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/ace-2017-0024 open in new tab
  14. M.R. Ferdous, A. Abu-Odeh, R.P. Bligh, H.L. Jones, N.M. Sheikh, Performance limit analysis for common roadside and median barriers using LS-DYNA, Int. J. Crashworthiness. 16 pp. 691-706 (2011). doi:10.1080/13588265.2011.623023 open in new tab
  15. T.-L. Teng, C.-C. Liang, T.-T. Tran, Development and validation of a finite element model for road safety barrier impact tests, Simulation. 92 pp. 565-578 (2016). doi:10.1177/0037549716644507 open in new tab
  16. M. Hadjioannou, D. Stevens, M. Barsotti, Development and Validation of Bolted Connection Modeling in LS-DYNA ® for Large Vehicle Models, in: 14th Int. LS- DYNA Conf., pp. 1-12 (2016)
  17. S. Narkhede, N. Lokhande, B. Gangani, G. Gadekar, Bolted Joint Representation in LS-DYNA to Model Bolt Pre-Stress and Bolt Failure Characteristics in Crash Simulations, in: 11th Int. LS-Dyna Users Conf., pp. 11-20 (2010)
  18. R. Rahbari, A. Tyas, J. Buick Davison, E.P. Stoddart, Web shear failure of angle-cleat connections loaded at high rates, J. Constr. Steel Res. 103 pp. 37-48 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.07.013 open in new tab
  19. J.D. Reid, N.R. Hiser, Detailed modeling of bolted joints with slippage, Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 41 pp. 547-562 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.finel.2004.10.001 open in new tab
  20. D.A.F. Bayton, T.B. Jones, G. Fourlaris, Analysis of a safety barrier connection joint post-testing, Mater. Des. 29 pp. 915-921 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2007.04.010 open in new tab
  21. D.B. Nycz, Modelowanie złączy śrubowych segmentów prowadnicy typu B bariery drogowej SP-05/2, Model. Inżynierskie. pp. 105-112 (2016)
  22. W. Wu, R. Thomson, A study of the interaction between a guardrail post and soil during quasi-static and dynamic loading, Int. J. Impact Eng. 34 pp. 883-898 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.04.004 open in new tab
  23. E.L. Fasanella, K.E. Jackson, S. Kellas, Soft Soil Impact Testing and Simulation of Aerospace Structures, in: 10th Int. LS-DYNA User's Conf., pp. 29-42 (2008)
  24. T. Belytschko, W. Liu, B. Moran, Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures (Wiley, 2000) open in new tab
  25. M.H. Ray, M. Mongiardini, C.A. Plaxio, M. Anghileri, NCHRP Web-Only Document 179: Procedures for Verification and Validation of Computer Simulations Used for Roadside Safety Applications (Transportation Research Board, 2010) open in new tab
  26. W.L. Oberkampf, M.F. Barone, Measures of agreement between computation and experiment: Validation metrics, J. Comput. Phys. 217 pp. 5-36 (2006). doi:10.1016/J.JCP.2006.03.037 open in new tab
  27. M. Mongiardini, M.H. Ray, M. Anghileri, Development of a Software for the Comparison of Curves During the Verification and Validation of Numerical Models, in: 7th Eur. LS-DYNA Conf., (2009) open in new tab
  28. MATEC Web of Conferences 231, 01005 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201823101005 GAMBIT 2018 open in new tab
Sources of funding:
Verified by:
Gdańsk University of Technology

seen 202 times

Recommended for you

Numerical crash analysis of the cable barrier

2017

Experimental and numerical analysis of the modified TB32 crash tests of the cable barrier system

2019

The influence of position of the post or its absence on the performance of the cable barrier system

2018

On the influence of the acceleration recording time on the calculation of impact severity indexes

2018
Meta Tags