Keywords

Details

Category:

Articles

Type:

publikacja w in. zagranicznym czasopiśmie naukowym (tylko język obcy)

Published in:

Journal of Scientific & Technical Research pages 11708 - 11711,
ISSN: 2574-1241

Title of issue:

Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research. BJSTR strony 11708 - 11711

ISSN:

2574-1241

Language:

English

Publication year:

2019

Bibliographic description:

Szarlej P., Janik H., Kucińska-Lipka J., Gubańska I.. Modifiers for Medical Grade Polymeric Systems used in FDM 3D Printing - Short Review. Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, 2019, , iss. 5, s.11708-11711

DOI:

Digital Object Identifier (open in new tab) 10.26717/bjstr.2019.15.002778

Bibliography: test

1. Tappa K, Jammalamadaka U (2018) Novel biomaterials used in medical 3D printing techniques. J Funct Biomater 7: 9(1). open in new tab
2. Vanderburgh J, Sterling JA, Guelcher SA (2017) 3D Printing of Tissue Engineered Constructs for In Vitro Modeling of Disease Progression and Drug Screening. Ann Biomed Eng 45(1): 164-179. open in new tab
3. Negi S, Dhiman S, Sharma RK (2017) Basics and applications of rapid prototyping medical models. Rapid Prototyp J 20(3): 256-267. open in new tab
4. Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A (2013) Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today 16(12): 496-504. open in new tab
5. Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, Gurr M, Mülhaupt R, et al. (2017) Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing. Chem Rev 117(15): 10212-10290. open in new tab
6. An J, Teoh JEM, Suntornnond R, Chua Ck (2015) Design and 3D Printing of Scaffolds and Tissues. Engineering 1(2): 261-268. open in new tab
7. Korpela J, Kokkari A, Korhonen H, Malin M, Narhi T, et al. (2013) Biodegradable and bioactive porous scaffold structures prepared using fused deposition modeling. J Biomed Mater Res -Part B Appl Biomater 101(4): 610-619. open in new tab
8. Luzuriaga MA, Berry DR, Reagan JC, Smaldone RA, Jeremiah J, et al. (2018) Biodegradable 3D Printed Polymer Microneedles for Transdermal Drug Delivery, p. 1-8. open in new tab
9. Esposito Corcione C, Gervaso F, Scalera F, et al. (2017) 3D printing of hydroxyapatite polymer-based composites for bone tissue engineering. J Polym Eng 37(8): 741-746. open in new tab
10. Chai X, Chai H, Wang X (2017) Fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printed tablets for intragastric floating delivery of domperidone. Sci Rep 7(1): 1-9. open in new tab
11. Melocchi A, Parietti F, Maroni A, Foppoli A, Gazzaniga A, et al. (2016) Hot-melt extruded fi laments based on pharmaceutical grade polymers for 3D printing by fused deposition modeling. Int J Pharm 509(1-2): 255-263. open in new tab
12. Przybytek A, Janik H (2016) Application in 3D printing 4 :32-39.
13. Verstraete G, Samaro A, Grymonpré W (2018) 3D printing of high drug loaded dosage forms using thermoplastic polyurethanes. Int J Pharm 536(1): 318-325. open in new tab
14. Konta A, García Piña M, Serrano D (2017) Personalised 3D Printed Medicines: Which Techniques and Polymers Are More Successful? Bioengineering 4(4): 79. open in new tab
15. Sadia M, Sosnicka A, Arafat B (2016) Adaptation of pharmaceutical excipients to FDM 3D printing for the fabrication of patient-tailored immediate release tablets. Int J Pharm 513(1-2): 659-668. open in new tab
16. Lei Y, Rai B, Ho KH, Teoh SH (2007) In vitro degradation of novel bioactive polycaprolactone-20 % tricalcium phosphate composite scaffolds for bone engineering 27: 293-298. open in new tab
17. Rai B, Teoh SH, Hutmacher DW, Cao T, Ho KH, et al. (2005) Novel PCL- based honeycomb scaffolds as drug delivery systems for rhBMP-2. Biomaterials 26(17): 3739-3748. open in new tab
18. Corcione CE, Gervaso F, Scalera F, Montagna F (2017) 3D printing of hydroxyapatite polymer-based composites for bone tissue engineering, p. 1-6.
19. Gioumouxouzis CI, Katsamenis OL, Bouropoulos N, Fatouros DG (2017) 3D printed oral solid dosage forms containing hydrochlorothiazide for controlled drug delivery. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 40: 164-171. open in new tab
20. Beck RCR, Chaves PS, Goyanes A (2017) 3D printed tablets loaded with polymeric nanocapsules: An innovative approach to produce customized drug delivery systems. Int J Pharm 528(1-2): 268-279. open in new tab
21. Okwuosa TC, Stefaniak D, Arafat B, Isreb A, Wan KW, et al. (2016) A Lower Temperature FDM 3D Printing for the Manufacture of Patient- Specific Immediate Release Tablets. Pharm Res 33(11): 2704-2712. open in new tab
22. Madan S, Madan S (2012) Hot melt extrusion and its pharmaceutical applications. 7(2): 123-133. open in new tab
23. Cunha-Filho M, Araújo MR, Gelfuso GM, Gratieri T (2017) FDM 3D printing of modified drug-delivery systems using hot melt extrusion: A new approach for individualized therapy. Ther Deliv 8(11): 957-966. open in new tab
24. Kotlarz M, Jordan R, Wegener E (2018) One step 3D printing of surface functionalized composite scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Acta Bioeng Biomech 20(2): 35-45.
25. Genina N, Holländer J, Jukarainen H, Mäkilä E, Salonen J, et al. (2016) Ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) as a new drug carrier for 3D printed medical drug delivery devices. Eur J Pharm Sci 90: 53-63. open in new tab
26. Economidou SN, Lamprou DA, Douroumis D (2018) 3D printing applications for transdermal drug delivery. Int J Pharm 544(2): 415-424. open in new tab
27. Systems DD (2018) International Journal of Drug Development and Application of 3D Printing Technology in the Development of Novel 18 776(1): 1-8. open in new tab
28. Vilar G, Tulla puche J, Albericio F (2018) Polymers and Drug Delivery Systems, p. 1-28. open in new tab
29. Liechty WB, Kryscio DR, Slaughter B V, Peppas NA (2010) Polymers for Drug Delivery Systems. open in new tab
30. Id BH, Caetano G, Vyas C, Blaker JJ (2018) Polymer-Ceramic Composite Scaffolds : The Effect of Hydroxyapatite and β-tri-Calcium Phosphate 11: 1-20.
31. Michel J, Penna M, Kochen J, Cheung H (2015) Recent Advances in Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds Containing Mesenchymal Stem Cells. open in new tab
32. Sultana T, Rana M, Akhtar N, Hasan Z, Talukder AH (2017) Preparation and physicochemical characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite based 3d porous scaffold for biomedical application 3(3): 384-389.
33. Endres M, Hutmacher DW, Salgado AJ (2003) Osteogenic Induction of Human Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells in Novel Synthetic Polymer-Hydrogel Matrices. Tissue Eng 9(4): 689-702. open in new tab
34. Corcione CE, Gervaso F, Madaghiele M, Sannino A, Licciulli A (2018) Author's Accepted Manuscript. Ceram Int.
35. Sousa FCG De, Evans JRG (2003) Sintered Hydroxyapatite Latticework for Bone Substitute 19: 517-519. open in new tab
36. Phosphate T, Matrix B, Nyberg E, Rindone A, Dorafshar A (2017) Comparison of 3D-Printed Poly-e -Caprolactone Scaffolds 23(3): 503- 514.
37. Dudek P (2013) Agh university of science and technology, faculty of mechanical engineering and robotics. kraków, Poland, p. 2-5.
38. Wu J, Chen N, Bai F, Wang Q (2017) Preparation of Poly ( vinyl alcohol )/ Poly ( lactic acid )/ Hydroxyapatite Bioactive Nanocomposites for Fused Deposition Modeling, p. 1-11. open in new tab
39. Legeros RZ (2002) Properties of Osteoconductive Biomaterials : Calcium Phosphates 395: 81-98. open in new tab
40. Rai B, Teoh SH, Ho KH (2004) The effect of rhBMP-2 on canine osteoblasts seeded onto 3D bioactive polycaprolactone scaffolds. Biomaterials 25(24): 5499-5506. open in new tab
41. Drummer D, Cifuentes Cuéllar S, Rietzel D (2012) Suitability of PLA/TCP for fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyp J 18(6): 500-507. open in new tab
42. Kalita SJ, Bose S, Hosick HL, Bandyopadhyay A (2003) Development of controlled porosity polymer-ceramic composite scaffolds via fused deposition modeling. Mater Sci Eng C 23(5): 611-620. open in new tab

show (42) hide

Sources of funding:

• Statutory activity/subsidy

Verified by:

Gdańsk University of Technology