Enhanced uniform data sampling for constrained data‐driven modeling of antenna input characteristics - Publikacja - MOST Wiedzy

Twoje konto

zaloguj

Wyszukiwarka

Enhanced uniform data sampling for constrained data‐driven modeling of antenna input characteristics

Abstrakt

Data-driven surrogates are the most popular replacement models utilized in many fields of engineering and science, including design of microwave and antenna structures. The primary practical issue is a curse of dimensionality which limits the number of independent parameters that can be accounted for in the modelling process. Recently, a performance-driven modelling technique has been proposed where the constrained domain of the model is spanned by a set of reference designs optimized with respect to selected figures of interest. This approach allows for significant improvement of prediction power of the surrogates without the necessity of reducing the parameter ranges. Yet, uniform allocation of the training data samples in the constrained domain remains a problem. Here, a novel design of experiments technique ensuring better sample uniformity is proposed. Our approach involves uniform sampling on the domain-spanning manifold and linear transformation of the remaining sample vector components onto orthogonal directions with respect to the manifold. Two antenna examples are provided to demonstrate the advantages of the technique, including application case studies (antenna optimization).

Cytowania

  • 3

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 2

    Scopus

Autorzy (4)

Cytuj jako

Pełna treść

pobierz publikację
pobrano 682 razy
Wersja publikacji
Accepted albo Published Version
Licencja
Copyright (2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Słowa kluczowe

Informacje szczegółowe

Kategoria:
Publikacja w czasopiśmie
Typ:
artykuły w czasopismach
Opublikowano w:
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL MODELLING-ELECTRONIC NETWORKS DEVICES AND FIELDS nr 32, strony 1 - 11,
ISSN: 0894-3370
Język:
angielski
Rok wydania:
2019
Opis bibliograficzny:
Kozieł S., Sigurdsson A., Pietrenko-Dąbrowska A., Szczepański S.: Enhanced uniform data sampling for constrained data‐driven modeling of antenna input characteristics// INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL MODELLING-ELECTRONIC NETWORKS DEVICES AND FIELDS -Vol. 32,iss. 5 (2019), s.1-11
DOI:
Cyfrowy identyfikator dokumentu elektronicznego (otwiera się w nowej karcie) 10.1002/jnm.2584
Bibliografia: test
  1. Nocedal J, Wright S. Numerical Optimization. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2006. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  2. Fernandez Pantoja M, Rubio Bretones A, Gomez Martin R. Benchmark antenna problems for evolutionary optimization algorithms. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2007;55(4):1111-1121. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  3. Lalbakhsh A, Afzal MU, Esselle KP. Multiobjective particle swarm optimization to design a time-delay equalizer metasurface for an electromagnetic band-gap resonator antenna. IEEE Antennad Wirel Propag Lett. 2017;16:915-915. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  4. Darvish A, Ebrahimzadeh A. Improved fruit-fly optimization algorithm and its applications in antenna array synthesis. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2018;66(4):1756-1766. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  5. Wang J, Yang XS, Wang BZ. Efficient gradient-based optimization of pixel antenna with large-scale connections. IET Microwaves Antennas Propag. 2018;12(3):385-389. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  6. Ochoa JS, Cangellaris AC. Random-space dimensionality reduction for expedient yield estimation of passive microwave structures. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech. 2013;61(12):4313-4321. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  7. Kouassi A, Nguyen-Trong N, Kaufmann T, Lalléchère S, Bonnet P, Fumeaux C. Reliability-aware optimization of a wideband antenna. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2016;64(2):450-460. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  8. Abdel-Malek HL, Hassan ASO, Soliman EA, Dakroury SA. The ellipsoidal technique for design centering of microwave circuits exploiting space-mapping interpolating surrogates. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech. 2006;54(10):3731-3738.
  9. Simpson TW, Pelplinski JD, Koch PN, Allen JK. Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: survey and recommendations. Eng Comput. 2001;17(2):129-150. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  10. Bandler JW, Georgieva N, Ismail MA, Rayas-Sánchez JE, Zhang QJ. A generalized space mapping tableau approach to device modeling. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech. 2001;49(1):67-79. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  11. Baratta IA, de Andrade CB, de Assis RR, Silva EJ. Infinitesimal dipole model using space mapping optimization for antenna placement. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2018;17(1):17-20. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  12. Xu J, Li M, Chen R. Space mapping optimisation of 2D array elements arrangement to reduce the radar cross-scattering. IET Microwaves Antennas Propag. 2017;11(11):1578-1582. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  13. Su Y, Lin J, Fan Z, Chen R. Shaping optimization of double reflector antenna based on manifold mapping, Int Applied Computational Electromagnetic Society Symp. (ACES), pp. 1-2, 2017.
  14. Chavez-Hurtado JL, Rayas-Sanchez JE. Polynomial-based surrogate modeling of RF and microwave circuits in frequency domain exploiting the multinomial theorem. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech. 2016;64(12):4371-4381. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  15. Couckuyt I. Forward and inverse surrogate modeling of computationally expensive problems, Ph.D. Thesis, Ghent University, 2013.
  16. Kabir H, Wang Y, Yu M, Zhang QJ. Neural network inverse modeling and applications to microwave filter design. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech. 2008;56(4):867-879. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  17. Jacobs JP, Koziel S. Reduced-cost microwave filter modeling using a two-stage Gaussian process regression approach. Int J RF Microwave Comput Aided Eng. 2014;25(5):453-462. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  18. Zhang J, Zhang C, Feng F, Zhang W, Ma J, Zhang QJ. Polynomial chaos-based approach to yield-driven EM optimization. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech. 2018;66(7):3186-3199. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  19. Koziel S, Bekasiewicz A. Rapid dimension scaling of triple-band antennas by means of inverse surrogate modeling, IEEE Antennas Prop Symp, 2017. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  20. Taskin G, Kaya H, Bruzzone L. Feature selection based on high dimensional model representation for hyperspectral images. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2017;26(6):2918-2928. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  21. Ma S, Aybat NS. Efficient optimization algorithms for robust principal component analysis and its variants. Proc IEEE. 2018;106(8):1411-1426. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  22. Koziel S, Bekasiewicz A. Computationally feasible narrow-band antenna modeling using response features. Int J RF Microwave Comput Aided Eng. 2017;27(4). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  23. Echeverria D, Lahaye D, Encica L, Lomonova EA, Hemker PW, Vandenput AJA. Manifold-mapping optimization applied to linear actu- ator design. IEEE Trans Magn. 2006;42(4):1183-1186. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  24. Koziel S, Bekasiewicz A. On reduced-cost design-oriented constrained surrogate modeling of antenna structures. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2017;16:1618-1621. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  25. Koziel S. Low-cost data-driven surrogate modeling of antenna structures by constrained sampling. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2017;16:461-464. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  26. Santner TJ, Williams BJ, Notz WI. Space-filling designs for computer experiments. In: The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. Springer Series in Statistics. New York: Springer; 2003:121-161. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  27. Steponavice I, Shirazi-Manesh M, Hyndman RJ, Smith-Miles K, Villanova L. On sampling methods for costly multi-objective black-box optimization. In: Advances in Stochastic and Deterministic Global Optimization. New York: Springer; 2016:273-296. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  28. Leary S, Bhaskar A, Keane A. Optimal orthogonal-array-based Latin hypercubes. J Appl Stat. 2003;30(5):585-598. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  29. Giunta AA, Wojtkiewicz SF, Eldred MS. Overview of modern design of experiments methods for computational simulations, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Paper AIAA 2003-0649, 2003. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  30. Borouchaki H, George PL, Lo SH. Optimal Delaunay point insertion. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1996;39(20):3407-3437. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  31. Koziel S, Sigurdsson AT, Szczepanski S. Uniform sampling in constrained domains for low-cost surrogate modeling of antenna input characteristics. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2018;17(1):164-167. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  32. Chen Y-C, Chen S-Y, Hsu P. Dual-band slot dipole antenna fed by a coplanar waveguide, IEEE Int Symp Ant Prop., pp. 3589-3592, 2006.
  33. Koziel S, Bekasiewicz A, Leifsson L. Rapid EM-driven antenna dimension scaling through inverse modeling. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2016;15:714-717. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  34. Koziel S. Fast simulation-driven antenna design using response-feature surrogates. Int J RF Microwave Comput Aided Eng. 2015;25(5):394-402. otwiera się w nowej karcie
Weryfikacja:
Politechnika Gdańska

wyświetlono 71 razy

Publikacje, które mogą cię zainteresować

Improved Uniform Sampling in Constrained Domains for Data-Driven Modelling of Antennas

2018

Uniform sampling in constrained domains for low-cost surrogate modeling of antenna input characteristics

2018

Multi-fidelity EM simulations and constrained surrogate modelling for low-cost multi-objective design optimisation of antennas

2018

Variable‐fidelity modeling of antenna input characteristics using domain confinement and two‐stage Gaussian process regression surrogates

2020
Meta Tagi