To meet or to connect? Face-to-face contacts vs ICT in cluster organisations - Publikacja - MOST Wiedzy

Wyszukiwarka

To meet or to connect? Face-to-face contacts vs ICT in cluster organisations

Abstrakt

The main purpose of the paper is to explore how cluster organisations (COs) take advantage of direct (F2F) and indirect (ICT) contacts in fulfilling their main roles. The paper addresses the research question: “How important are Information and Communication Technologies at each level of advancement of cluster cooperation?” The research was conducted in 2016 in four purposefully selected cluster organisations representing metal and ICT industry. The basic method of data collection was an in-depth individual interview. The authors applied the qualitative content analysis as the procedure to analyse the interviews. The research sample comprised of 30 cluster members. The research was based on an original theoretical concept referring to the trajectory of the development of cooperative relationships in cluster organisations. Four levels of development of cluster cooperation as well as three main roles of cluster organisation were distinguished. At each level, COs play one of three identified roles: a direct resource supplier (providing access to resources), a broker (facilitating resource exchanges) and an integrator (integrating into different dimensions), which gives a total of 12 specific roles. The research has shown that both direct and indirect contacts were significant both in fulfilling the roles assigned to the cluster organisations as well as in developing the cluster cooperation. It has been also observed that ICT importance was slightly different at each level of a CO’s development. Only in one identified role (at level II: Process integrator) the importance of ICT tools was at least as great as F2F contacts. The research study contributes to the literature which refers to the question of face-to-face contacts established in geographical proximity versus the ones set up by using Information and Communication Technologies in cluster organisations. It was noticed that even though ICT plays a significant role in the functioning of COs, they cannot replace face-to-face contacts. They can only be their important complement at every level of CO development. There are also some limitations connected with the qualitative approach, which does not allow the author to generalise the findings. The first limitation is the small research sample. The second limitation is the subjectivity characterising qualitative research, mainly due to the applied techniques of data collection and analysis.

Cytowania

  • 0

    CrossRef

  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 0

    Scopus

Autorzy (2)

Cytuj jako

Słowa kluczowe

Informacje szczegółowe

Kategoria:
Publikacja w czasopiśmie
Typ:
artykuły w czasopismach
Opublikowano w:
Engineering Management in Production and Services nr 11, strony 103 - 117,
ISSN: 2543-6597
Język:
angielski
Rok wydania:
2019
Opis bibliograficzny:
Lis A., Lis A.: To meet or to connect? Face-to-face contacts vs ICT in cluster organisations// Engineering Management in Production and Services -Vol. 11,iss. 4 (2019), s.103-117
DOI:
Cyfrowy identyfikator dokumentu elektronicznego (otwiera się w nowej karcie) 10.2478/emj-2019-0037
Bibliografia: test
  1. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle. Review of In- dustrial Organisation, 11(2), 253-273. doi: 10.1007/ BF00157670 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  2. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  3. Beaudry, C., Breschi, S., & Swann, P. (2000). Clusters, Inno- vation and Growth: A Comparative Study of European Countries. Manchester, Great Britain: Manchester Business School Working Paper.
  4. Carbonara, N. (2005). Information and communication technology and geographical clusters: Opportuni- ties and spread. Technovation, 25(3), 213-222. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00095-6 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  5. Cheba, K. (2015). The influence of clusters on economic de- velopment. A comparative analysis of cluster policy in the European Union and Japan. Oeconomia Coper- nicana, 6(3), 73-88. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  6. Christopher, M. (2005). Logistics and supply chain manage- ment: Creating value-adding networks. Harlow, Great Britain: Pearson Education. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  7. Ciarli, T., & Rabellotti, R. (2007). ICT in industrial dis- tricts: An empirical analysis on adoption, use and impact. Industry and Innovation, 14(3), 277-303. doi: 10.1080/13662710701369239 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  8. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of hu- man capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95- S120. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  9. Cooke, P., & Morgan, K. (1993). The network paradigm: new departures in corporate and regional develop- ment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 11(5), 543-564. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  10. Czakon, W. (2011). Paradygmat sieciowy w naukach o zarządzaniu [Network paradigm in management sciences]. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  11. Przegląd Organizacji, 11, 3-6.
  12. Czakon, W. (2012). Sieci w zarządzaniu strategicznym. War- szawa, Poland: Wolters Kluwer.
  13. Elexa, Ľ., Lesáková, Ľ., Klementová, V., & Klement, L. (2019). Identification of prospective industrial clus- ters in Slovakia. Engineering Management in Produc- tion and Services, 11(2), 31-42. doi: 10.2478/emj- 2019-0009 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  14. Feldman, M.P. (1994). The geography of innovation. Dor- drecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  15. Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1999), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Hawthorne, United States: Aldine De Gruyter. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  16. Goodman L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1), 148-170. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  17. Handfield, R. B., & Nichols, E. L. (2002). Supply chain rede- sign: Transforming supply chains into integrated value systems. Upper Saddler River, United States: Finan- cial Times Prentice Hall.
  18. Haviernikova, K., Okręglicka, M., & Lemańska-Majdzik, A. (2016). Cluster Cooperation And Risk Level In Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 14(2), 82-92. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  19. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Re- search, 15(9), 1277-1288. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  20. Johanson, J., & Mattsson, L. G. (1993). Internationalization of Industrial Systems -A Network Approach. In P. J. Buckley & P. Ghauri (Eds.), The Internationalization of the Firm. A Reader. London, Great Britain: Aca- demic Press. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  21. Krugman, P. (1998). What's new about the new economic geography? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14(2), 7-17. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/14.2.7 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  22. Krugman, P. (1999). The role of geography in development. International Regional Science Review, 22(2), 142- 161. doi: 10.1177/016001799761012307 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  23. Lawson, C., & Lorenz, E. (1999). Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative capacity. Region- al Studies, 33(4), 305-317. doi: 10.1080/713693555 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  24. Leamer, E. E., & Storper, M. (2014). Internet Age, 32(4). doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.84909988 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  25. Leamer, M., & Storper, M. (2001). The economic geography of the Internet age. NBER Working Paper 8450. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  26. Lindqvist, G., Ketels, C., & Sölvell, Ö. (2013). The Cluster Initiative Greenbook. Stockholm, Sweden: Ivory Tow- er Publishers.
  27. Lis, A. M. (2018). Współpraca w inicjatywach klastrowych. Rola bliskości w rozwoju powiązań kooperacyjnych [Cooperation in cluster initiatives: the role of proxim- ity in the development of cooperative relationships]. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  28. Gdańsk, Poland: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Gdań- skiej.
  29. Lis, A. M. (2019). The significance of proximity in cluster initiatives. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 29(3), 287-310. doi: 10.1108/CR- 08-2018-0050 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  30. Lis, A. M., & Lis, A. (2014). Zarządzanie kapitałami w kla- strach. Kapitał społeczny, kulturowy, ekonomiczny i symboliczny w strukturach klastrowych [Capital ma- nagement in clusters. Social, cultural, economic and symbolic capital in cluster structures].
  31. Warszawa, Po- land: Difin.
  32. Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic manage- ment. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363-380. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250130505 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  33. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. London, Great Britain: Macmillan. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  34. Nalebuff, B., & Brandenburger, A. (1996). Coopetition. Lon- don, Great Britain: HarperCollins. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  35. Engineering Management in Production and Services otwiera się w nowej karcie
  36. Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York, United States: John Wiley and Sons.
  37. Perroux, F. (1950). Economic space: theory and applica- tions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(1), 89- 104. doi: 10.2307/1881960 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  38. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organisations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, United States: Harper & Row.
  39. Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York, United States: Basic Books.
  40. Porter, M. E. (1985). The competitive advantage: Creat- ing and sustaining superior performance. New York, United States: Free Press.
  41. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York, United States: Free Press.
  42. Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Boston, United States: Harvard Business Review. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  43. Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition and economic development: Local clusters in the global economy, Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15-31. doi: 10.1177/089124240001400105 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  44. Sabel, C. (1989). Flexible specialization and the re-emer- gence of regional economies. In P. Hirst & J. Zeitlin (Eds.), Reversing industrial decline? Industrial struc- ture and policy in Britain and her competitors (pp. 17- 70). Oxford, Great Britain: Berg.
  45. Scitovsky, T. (1954). Two concepts of external economies. Journal of Political Economy, 62(2), 143-151. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  46. Smith, A. (1954). Bogactwo narodów [Wealth of nations]. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  47. Warszawa, Poland: PWN.
  48. Sölvell, Ö., Lindqvist, G., & Ketels, C. (2003). The Cluster Initiative Greenbook. Stockholm, Sweden: Ivory Tow- er. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  49. Steinfield, C., & Scupola, A. (2008). Understanding the role of ICT networks in a biotechnology cluster: An ex- ploratory study of medicon valley. Information Soci- ety, 24(5), 319-333. doi: 10.1080/01972240802356091 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  50. Steinfield, C., LaRose, R., Chew, H. E., & Tong, S. T. (2012). Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Rural Business Clusters: The Relation Between ICT Adoption and Benefits Derived From Cluster Mem- bership. Information Society, 28(2), 110-120. doi: 10.1080/01972243.2012.651004 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  51. Steinfield, C., Scupola, A., & López-Nicolás, C. (2010). Social capital, ICT use and company performance: Findings from the Medicon Valley Biotech Cluster. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(7), 1156-1166. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.03.004 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  52. Storper, M., & Venables, A. J. (2004). Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(4), 351-370. doi: 10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  53. Štverková, H., & Mynarzová, M. (2017). Cluster Initiatives in the Context of the BEE Model. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 5(3), 59-69.
  54. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250050207 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  55. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Cap- italism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. Lon- don, Great Britain: Free Press, Collier Macmillan. otwiera się w nowej karcie
Weryfikacja:
Politechnika Gdańska

wyświetlono 41 razy

Publikacje, które mogą cię zainteresować

Meta Tagi