Exploring COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories: Education, Religiosity, Trust in Scientists, and Political Orientation in 26 European countries - Publikacja - MOST Wiedzy

Twoje konto

zaloguj

Wyszukiwarka

Exploring COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories: Education, Religiosity, Trust in Scientists, and Political Orientation in 26 European countries

Abstrakt

The COVID-19 virus disseminated globally at an accelerated pace, culminating in a worldwide pandemic; it engendered a proliferation of spurious information and a plethora of misinformation and conspiracy theories (CTs). While many factors contributing to the propensity for embracing conspiracy ideation have been delineated, the foremost determinant influencing individuals’ proclivity towards CT endorsement appears to be their level of educational attainment. This research aimed to assess the moderating effect of religiosity, trust in scientists, and political orientation on the impact of education level on people’s belief in COVID-19-related CTs in Europe by considering both individual-level and country-level contextual covariates of CT. We analysed data from the newest European Social Survey (ESS10) round conducted between September 2020 and September 2022 in 26 countries. We found religiosity weakens, and trust in scientists strengthens the effect of education, while the impact of political orientation is not straightforward. The result also demonstrates a significant negative correlation between the aggregate country-level data of the respondents supporting CTs and the level of vaccination and cumulative excess deaths in Europe. We concluded with a recommendation that planning effective public health strategies and campaigns are insufficient when based solely on
people’s education, as individuals’ beliefs moderate the effect of education.

Cytowania

Autorzy (3)

Cytuj jako

Pełna treść

pobierz publikację
pobrano 17 razy
Wersja publikacji
Submitted Version
Licencja
Creative Commons: CC-BY-NC-ND otwiera się w nowej karcie

Słowa kluczowe

Informacje szczegółowe

Kategoria:
Publikacja w czasopiśmie
Typ:
Publikacja w czasopiśmie
Opublikowano w:
Scientific Reports nr 13,
ISSN: 2045-2322
Rok wydania:
2023
Opis bibliograficzny:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-44752-w
DOI:
Cyfrowy identyfikator dokumentu elektronicznego (otwiera się w nowej karcie) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44752-w
Bibliografia: test
  1. Douglas, K. M. et al. Understanding conspiracy theories. Polit. Psychol. 40, 3-35. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ pops. 12568 (2019). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  2. Uscinski, J. E. & Enders, A. M. Conspiracy theories: A primer. (Rowman & Littlefield, 2023).
  3. Oliver, J. E. & Wood, T. J. Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 58, 952-966. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ ajps. 12084 (2014). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  4. Swami, V. et al. Putting the stress on conspiracy theories: Examining associations between psychological stress, anxiety, and belief in conspiracy theories. Personal. Individ. Differ. 99, 72-76. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. paid. 2016. 04. 084 (2016). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  5. van Prooijen, J.-W. & Douglas, K. M. Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Stud. 10, 323-333. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 17506 98017 701615 (2017). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  6. Imhoff, R. & Lamberty, P. A Bioweapon or a Hoax? The link between distinct conspiracy beliefs about the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and pandemic behavior. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 11, 1110-1118. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 19485 50620 934692 (2020). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  7. Morelock, J. & Narita, F. Z. The nexus of QAnon and COVID-19: legitimation crisis and epistemic crisis. Critic. Sociol. 48, 1005-1024. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 08969 20521 10696 14 (2022). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  8. Depoux, A. et al. The pandemic of social media panic travels faster than the COVID-19 outbreak. J. Travel Med. 27, taaa031. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ jtm/ taaa0 31 (2020). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  9. The_Lancet_Infectious_Diseases. The COVID-19 infodemic. Lancet Infect. Dis. 20, 875 (2020). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S1473- 3099(20) 30565-X otwiera się w nowej karcie
  10. Hughes, J. P. et al. The impact of risk perceptions and belief in conspiracy theories on COVID-19 pandemic-related behaviours. PLOS ONE 17, e0263716. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. pone. 02637 16 (2022). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  11. Lin, T., Heemskerk, A., Harris, E. A. & Ebner, N. C. Risk perception and conspiracy theory endorsement predict compliance with COVID-19 public health measures. British J. Psychol. 114, 282-293. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ bjop. 12613 (2023). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  12. Bierwiaczonek, K., Gundersen, A. B. & Kunst, J. R. The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 46, 101346. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. copsyc. 2022. 101346 (2022). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  13. Bruder, M. & Kunert, L. The conspiracy hoax? Testing key hypotheses about the correlates of generic beliefs in conspiracy theories during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Psychol. 57, 43-48. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ ijop. 12769 (2022). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  14. Earnshaw, V. A. et al. COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, health behaviors, and policy support. Transl. Behav. Med. 10, 850-856. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ tbm/ ibaa0 90 (2020). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  15. Simões, J. et al. Organisation of the State, model of health system and COVID-19 health outcomes in six European countries, during the first months of the COVID-19 epidemic in 2020. Int. J. Health Plann. Manage. 36, 1874-1886. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ hpm. 3271 (2021). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  16. Waitzberg, R. et al. Early health system responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Mediterranean countries: A tale of successes and challenges. Health Policy 126, 465-475. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. healt hpol. 2021. 10. 007 (2022). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  17. Jolley, D. & Douglas, K. M. The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLOS ONE 9, e89177. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. pone. 00891 77 (2014). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  18. Allington, D., McAndrew, S., Moxham-Hall, V. & Duffy, B. Coronavirus conspiracy suspicions, general vaccine attitudes, trust and coronavirus information source as predictors of vaccine hesitancy among UK residents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychol. Med. 53, 236-247. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/ S0033 29172 10014 34 (2023). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  19. Mousoulidou, M., Christodoulou, A., Siakalli, M. & Argyrides, M. The role of conspiracy theories, perceived risk, and trust in science on COVID-19 vaccination decisiveness: evidence from Cyprus. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20(4), 2898 (2023). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  20. Jach, Ł. The scientistic worldview and its relationships with fear of COVID, conspiracy beliefs, preventive behaviors, and attitudes towards vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Polish sample. Curr. Issues Personal. Psychol. 11, 11-28. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5114/ cipp. 2021. 111633 (2023). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  21. Juanchich, M., Sirota, M., Jolles, D. & Whiley, L. A. Are COVID-19 conspiracies a threat to public health? Psychological charac- teristics and health protective behaviours of believers. European J. Soc. Psychol. 51, 969-989. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ ejsp. 2796 (2021). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  22. van Prooijen, J.-W. & van Vugt, M. Conspiracy theories: Evolved functions and psychological mechanisms. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 13, 770-788. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 17456 91618 774270 (2018). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  23. Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., Callan, M. J., Dawtry, R. J. & Harvey, A. J. Someone is pulling the strings: hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories. Think. Reason. 22, 57-77. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 13546 783. 2015. 10515 86 (2016). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  24. Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S. & Furnham, A. Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition 133, 572-585. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cogni tion. 2014. 08. 006 (2014). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  25. Frenken, M., Bilewicz, M. & Imhoff, R. On the relation between religiosity and the endorsement of conspiracy theories: The role of political orientation. Polit. Psychol. 44, 139-156. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ pops. 12822 (2023). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  26. Lahrach, Y. & Furnham, A. Are modern health worries associated with medical conspiracy theories?. J. Psychosomat. Res. 99, 89-94. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jpsyc hores. 2017. 06. 004 (2017). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  27. Beyer, H. & Herrberg, N. The revelations of Q. Dissemination and resonance of the QAnon conspiracy theory among US Evangelical Christians and the role of the Covid-19 crisis. Zeitschrift für Religion Gesellschaft und Politik. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s41682-023- 00147-2 (2023). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  28. Beller, J. Religion and militarism: The effects of religiosity, religious fundamentalism, religious conspiracy belief, and demographics on support for military action. Peace Conflict J. Peace Psychol. 23, 179-182. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ pac00 00250 (2017). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  29. Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. & Jetten, J. Unpacking the relationship between religiosity and conspiracy beliefs in Australia. British J. Soc. Psychol. 58, 938-954. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ bjso. 12314 (2019). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  30. van Prooijen, J.-W., Krouwel, A. P. M. & Pollet, T. V. Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 6, 570-578. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 19485 50614 567356 (2015). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  31. Imhoff, R. et al. Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries. Nat. Hum. Behav. 6, 392-403. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41562-021-01258-7 (2022). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  32. Soveri, A., Karlsson, L. C., Antfolk, J., Lindfelt, M. & Lewandowsky, S. Unwillingness to engage in behaviors that protect against COVID-19: The role of conspiracy beliefs, trust, and endorsement of complementary and alternative medicine. BMC Public Health 21, 684. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s12889-021-10643-w (2021). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  33. Roozenbeek, J. et al. Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. R. Soc. Open Sci. 7, 201199. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1098/ rsos. 201199 (2020). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  34. Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E. & Oberauer, K. The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Sci- ence. PLOS ONE 8, e75637. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. pone. 00756 37 (2013). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  35. Vranic, A., Hromatko, I. & Tonković, M. "I Did My Own Research": overconfidence, (dis)trust in science, and endorsement of conspiracy theories. Front. Psychol. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3389/ fpsyg. 2022. 931865 (2022). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  36. van Prooijen, J.-W. Why education predicts decreased belief in conspiracy theories. Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 31, 50-58. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ acp. 3301 (2017). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  37. Mishler, W. & Rose, R. Trust, distrust and skepticism: Popular evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-communist societies. J. Polit. 59, 418-451. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/ S0022 38160 00535 12 (1997). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  38. Horáková, N. A mistrustful society?: The lack of trust in government institutions in the Czech republic. Int. J. Soc. Qual. 10, 52-71. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3167/ IJSQ. 2020. 100206 (2020). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  39. Pytlas, B. & Kossack, O. In Transforming the transformation: The East European radical right in the political process (ed Michael Minkenberg) 105-136 (Routledge, 2015). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  40. Vachudova, M. A. From competition to polarisation in central Europe: How populists change party systems and the European union. Polity 51, 689-706. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1086/ 705704 (2019). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  41. Scientific Reports | (2023) 13:18116 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44752-w otwiera się w nowej karcie
Weryfikacja:
Brak weryfikacji

wyświetlono 41 razy

Publikacje, które mogą cię zainteresować

The importance of trust and altruistic social orientation for COVID-19 distress

2023

Belief in the importance of socially responsible behaviors – the significance of trust and personal experiences with COVID-19

2022

Exploring COVID-19 conspiracy theories: education, religiosity, trust in scientists, and political orientation in 26 European countries

2023

Are We Facing a Tsunami of Vaccine Hesitancy or Outdated Pandemic Policy in Times of Omicron? Analyzing Changes of COVID-19 Vaccination Trends in Poland

2023
Meta Tagi