AutoCAD: Examination of Factors Influencing User Adoption - Publikacja - MOST Wiedzy


AutoCAD: Examination of Factors Influencing User Adoption


The primary purpose of the research is to examine and validate determinants of user intention to use AutoCAD software, utilising the constructs from prior studies in a more integrated model. The paper proposes a revised Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) for measuring the adoption of AutoCAD. In the study, a latent construct PPA (perceived physical accessibility) was added to the proposed research model as a new determinant of AutoCAD adoption. An online survey of AutoCAD users was conducted to collect data. This data was empirically used to test the proposed research model. The Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) technique was used to evaluate the causal model, and the confirmatory factor analysis was performed to examine the reliability and validity of the measurement model. The study results show that user behavioural intention to use AutoCAD is significantly affected by three determinants: perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and perceived physical accessibility of the software. This finding contributes to an expanded understanding of the factors that promote acceptance of AutoCAD software. Moreover, the main contribution of this study is to verify the impact of the added PPA variable on the behavioural intention to use and the actual use of AutoCAD, and also to create measurement scales for this new latent variable in TAM.


  • 2


  • 0

    Web of Science

  • 1


Cytuj jako

Słowa kluczowe

Informacje szczegółowe

Publikacja w czasopiśmie
artykuły w czasopismach
Opublikowano w:
Engineering Management in Production and Services nr 12, strony 45 - 56,
ISSN: 2543-6597
Rok wydania:
Opis bibliograficzny:
Baj-Rogowska A.: AutoCAD: Examination of Factors Influencing User Adoption// Engineering Management in Production and Services -Vol. 12,iss. 1 (2020), s.45-56
Cyfrowy identyfikator dokumentu elektronicznego (otwiera się w nowej karcie) 10.2478/emj-2020-0004
Bibliografia: test
  1. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and opera- tional definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Sys- tems Research, 9(2), 204-215. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  2. Ahmad, S. Z., & Khalid, K. (2017). The adoption of M- government services from the user's perspectives: Empirical evidence from the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Information Management, 37(5), 367-379. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, United States: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Akkucuk, U. (Ed.) (2014). Handbook of Research on Devel- oping Sustainable Value in Economics. Finance and Marketing. United States: IGI Global. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  5. Bazelais, P., Doleck, T., & Lemay, D. J. (2017). Investigating the predictive power of TAM: A case study of CEGEP students' intentions to use online learning technolo- gies. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 93-111. doi: 10.1007/s10639-017-9587-0 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  6. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, United States: Sage Publications. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  7. Changchit, C., & Chuchuen, C. (2018). Cloud computing: An examination of factors impacting users' adoption. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 58(1), 1-9. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  8. Charles, V., & Kumar, M. (2014). Performance Measure- ment and Management. Cambridge, United King- dom: Scholars Publishing.
  9. Chintalapati, N., & Daruri, V. S. K. (2016). Examining the Use of YouTube as a Learning resource in higher ed- ucation: Scale development and Validation of TAM model. Telematics and Informatics, 34(6), 853-860. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2016.08.008 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  10. Culnan, M. J. (1985). The Dimensions of Perceived Acces- sibility to Information: Implications for the Delivery of Information Systems and Services. Journal of the American Society of Information Sciences, 36, 302-308. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  11. Davis, F. D. (1986). A Technology Acceptance Model for Em- pirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Cambridge, United States: MIT Sloan School of Management.
  12. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, And User Acceptance Of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. doi: 10.2307/249008 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  13. Davis, F. D. (1993). User Acceptance of Information Tech- nology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475-487. doi: 10.1006/ imms.1993.1022 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  14. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User ac- ceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  15. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Re- search. Reading, United States: Addison-Wesley.
  16. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  17. Groß, M. (2018). Heterogeneity in consumers' mobile shopping acceptance: A finite mixture partial least squares modelling approach for exploring and char- acterising different shopper segments. Journal of Re- tailing and Consumer Services, 40, 8-18. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  18. Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall International.
  19. Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A. L. M. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quar- terly, 21(3), 279-305. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  20. Karahanna, E., Agarwal, R., & Angst, C. M. (2006). Recon- ceptualizing compatibility beliefs in technology ac- ceptance research. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 781-804. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  21. King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the tech- nology acceptance model. Information and Manage- ment, 43(6), 740-755. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  22. Lai, V. S., & Li, H. (2000). Technology acceptance model for internet banking: An invariance analysis. Informa- tion and Management, 42(2), 373-386. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  23. Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Ramos de Luna, I., & Montoro-Ríos, F. J. (2015). User behaviour in QR mobile payment sys- tem: the QR Payment Acceptance Model. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(9), 1031-1049. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2015.1047757 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  24. Lim, W. M. (2018). Dialectic Antidotes to Critics of the Technology Acceptance Model: Conceptual, Meth- odological, and Replication Treatments for Behav- ioural Modelling in Technology-Mediated Environ- ments. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 22, 1-11. doi: 10.3127/ajis.v22i0.1651 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  25. Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information and Manage- ment, 38, 217-230. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  26. Park, E., Cho, Y., Han J., & Kwon, S. J. (2017). Comprehensive Approaches to User Acceptance of Internet of Things in a Smart Home Environment. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4(6), 2342-2350. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  27. Park, S. Y. (2009). An Analysis of the Technology Accep- tance Model in Understanding University Students' Behavioral Intention to Use e-Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150-162. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  28. Przechlewski, T. (2012). Modelowanie satysfakcji, użyteczności i wykorzystania oprogramowania Open Source [Mod- eling the satisfaction, usability and use of Open Source software]. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  29. Gdańsk, Poland: Wydawnictwo Uniwersy- tetu Gdańskiego.
  30. Rice, R. E., & Shook, D. (1988). Access to, Usage of, and Outcomes from an Electronic Message System. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 6(3), 255-276. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  31. Sangi, N., Shuguang, L., & Sangi, A. R. (2018). Robustness of factors influencing social media usage/adoption amongst SMEs in developing countries: A case of Pakistan. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 103-109. doi: 10.1145/3183586.3183600 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  32. Sobh, T. (ed.), (2010). Innovations and Advances in Computer Sciences and Engineering. Switzerland: Springer Science & Business Media. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  33. Teo, T. S. H., Lim, V. K. G., & Lai, R. Y. C. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in internet usage. Omega, 27(1), 25-37. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  34. Thong, J. Y. L., Hong, W., & Tam, K. (2002). Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 215-242. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  35. Ul Hassan, M., Iqbal, A., & Iqbal, Z. (2018). Factors affect- ing the adoption of internet banking in Pakistan: An integration of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behaviour. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 28(3), 342-370.
  36. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. De- cision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  37. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A Model of the Ante- cedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481. doi: 10.1111/ j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x otwiera się w nowej karcie
  38. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical exten- sion of the technology acceptance model: four lon- gitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  39. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis G. B., & Davis F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  40. Wai I. S. H., Ng S. S. Y., Chiu D. K. W., Ho K. K. W., & Lo P. (2018). Exploring undergraduate students' usage pattern of mobile apps for education. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 50(1), 34-47. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  41. Wu, J. H., & Wang, S. C. (2005). What drives mobile com- merce? An empirical evaluation of the revised tech- nology acceptance model. Information and Manage- ment, 42, 719-729. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  42. Zarantonello, L., & Pauwels-Delassus, V. (2015). The Handbook of Brand Management Scales. New York, United State: Taylor & Francis Group. otwiera się w nowej karcie
Politechnika Gdańska

wyświetlono 49 razy

Publikacje, które mogą cię zainteresować

Meta Tagi