Joint Analysis of National Eco-Efficiency, Eco-Innovation and SDGs in Europe: DEA Approach - Publikacja - MOST Wiedzy

Twoje konto

zaloguj

Wyszukiwarka

Joint Analysis of National Eco-Efficiency, Eco-Innovation and SDGs in Europe: DEA Approach

Abstrakt

The growing complexity and intertwining of different socio-economic issues both in individual countries and internationally mean that single-theme analyses do not consider all the relationships and thus have cognitive limitations. Therefore, studies that combine several research areas are increasingly common in the literature to clarify the connections and relationships. In this study, considering the sequential nature of the stages, a combined analysis of eco-efficiency, eco-innovation, and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) was performed. The analysis was carried out for 27 European Union countries in 2017–2019. Dynamic Network SBM and Dynamic Divisional Malmquist Index were used for the study. The research results show that the EU countries achieve relatively higher efficiency results in eco-innovation and SDG than ecoefficiency. The average overall efficiency level for all EU countries was only 0.63. The change in productivity was influenced by both the frontier shift and catch-up effect, but only with regard to eco-efficiency and eco-innovation. At the same time, the frontier-shift effect did not affect the change in SDG productivity.

Cytowania

Autorzy (2)

Cytuj jako

Pełna treść

pobierz publikację
pobrano 21 razy
Wersja publikacji
Accepted albo Published Version
Licencja
Creative Commons: CC-BY-NC-ND otwiera się w nowej karcie

Informacje szczegółowe

Kategoria:
Publikacja w czasopiśmie
Typ:
Publikacja w czasopiśmie
Opublikowano w:
Technological and Economic Development of Economy nr 28, wydanie 6, strony 1739 - 1767,
ISSN: 2029-4913
Rok wydania:
2022
DOI:
Cyfrowy identyfikator dokumentu elektronicznego (otwiera się w nowej karcie) https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2022.17702
Bibliografia: test
  1. Allen, C., Metternicht, G., & Wiedmann, T. (2018). Initial progress in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A review of evidence from countries. Sustainability Science, 13, 1453- 1467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0572-3 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  2. Allen, C., Metternicht, G., & Wiedmann, T. (2019). Prioritising SDG targets: Assessing baselines, gaps and interlinkages. Sustainability Science, 14(2), 421-438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0596-8 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  3. ASEM SMEs Eco-innovation Center. (2018). 2018 ASEM Eco-innovation Index. Annual report. ASEIC. Retrieved September 12, 2021, from http://aseic.org/reference/publishing.php otwiera się w nowej karcie
  4. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  5. Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneur- ship, 1, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  6. Carrillo-Hermosill, J., del Río, P., & Könnölä, T. (2010). Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(10-11), 1073-1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.014 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  7. Chachuli, F. S. M., Ludin, N. A., Mat, S., & Sopian, K. (2020). Renewable energy performance evaluation studies using the data envelopment analysis (DEA): A systematic review. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 12, 062701. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0024750 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  8. Chang, T.-S., Tone, K., & Wu, C.-H. (2021). Nested dynamic network data envelopment analysis models with infinitely many decision making units for portfolio evaluation. European Journal of Opera- tional Research, 291(2), 766-781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.09.044 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  9. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  10. Cheba, K., & Bąk, I. (2021). Environmental production efficiency in the European Union countries as a tool for implementation of goal 7 of the 2030 Agenda. Energies, 14(15), 4593. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154593 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  11. Cleantech Group. (2017). The Global Cleantech Innovation Index 2017. Retrieved September 5, 2021, from https://www.cleantech.com/indexes/the-global-cleantech-innovation-index/ otwiera się w nowej karcie
  12. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver software (2 nd ed.). Springer. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-0-387-45283-8 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  13. Ding, L.-L., Lei, L., Wang, L., & Zang, L.-F. (2020). Assessing industrial circular economy performance and its dynamic evolution: An extended Malmquist index based on cooperative game network DEA. Science of the Total Environment, 731, 139001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139001 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  14. European Commission. (2019). Communication from the Commission. The European Green Deal, COM(2019) 640 final. Brussels. Retrieved September 12, 2021, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0640 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  15. European Commission. (2020). Circular economy indicators. Retrieved September 17, 2021, from https://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecoap/indicators/circular-economy-indicators_en otwiera się w nowej karcie
  16. European Commission. (2021). The eco-innovation scoreboard and the eco-innovation index. Retrieved September 5, 2021, from https://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecoap/indicators/index_en otwiera się w nowej karcie
  17. Eurostat. (2021). Database. Retrieved September 5, 2021, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/ data/database otwiera się w nowej karcie
  18. Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1996). Intertemporal production frontiers: With dynamic DEA. Kluwer Aca- demic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1816-0 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  19. Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2000). Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34(1), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(99)00012-9 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  20. Färe, R., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1978). Measuring the technical efficiency of production. Journal of Eco- nomic Theory, 19(1), 150-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(78)90060-1 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  21. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B., & Roos, P. (1994). Productivity change in Swedish hospitals: A Malmquist output index approach. In A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, A. Y. Lewin, & M. L. Seiford (Eds.), Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology and applications (pp. 253-272). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0637-5_13 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  22. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. A. K., & Pasurka, C. (1989). Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/1928055 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  23. Glavi, P., Lesjak, M., & Hirsbak, S. (2012, May 2-4). European training course on eco-efficiency. In 15 th European Roundtable on Sustainable Consumption and Production. Bregenz, Austria. Retrieved September 12, 2021, from https://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/european-training-course-on-eco- efficiency otwiera się w nowej karcie
  24. Grochová, L. I., & Litzman, M. (2021). The efficiency in meeting measurable sustainable development goals. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(8), 709-719. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2021.1882606 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  25. Guo, X., Lu, C. C., Lee, J. H., & Chiu, Y. H. (2017). Applying the dynamic DEA model to evaluate the energy efficiency of OECD countries and China. Energy, 134, 392-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.040 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  26. Jankiewicz, M., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2020). Assesment of trends in the share of expenditure on services and food in the Visegrad Group member states. International Journal of Business and Society, 21(2), 977-996. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3306.2020 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  27. Kalra, M., Panicker, D., Dixit, A., Jain, R., & Thakur, B. K. (2021). Ensuring access to sustainable and affordable energy to all. In W. Leal Filho, A. Azul, L. Brandli, A. Lange Salvia, & T. Wall (Eds.), Affordable and clean energy, encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (pp. 619-629). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  28. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71057-0_139-1 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  29. Kao, C. (2014). Network data envelopment analysis: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 239(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.039 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  30. Kiani Mavi, R., & Kiani Mavi, N. (2021). National eco-innovation analysis with big data: A common- weights model for dynamic DEA. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120369 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  31. Kiani Mavi, R., Saen, R., & Goh, M. (2019). Joint analysis of eco-efficiency and eco-innovation with common weights in two-stage network DEA: A big data approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 553-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.035 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  32. Kemp, R., Arundel, A., Rammer, C., Miedzinski, M., Tapia, C., Barbieri, N., Tűrkeli, S., Bassi, A. M., Mazzanti, M., Chapman, D., Diaz López, F., & McDowall, W. (2019). Maastricht manual on measur- ing eco-innovation for a green economy. Innovation for Sustainable Development Network. Maas- tricht, Netherlands. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  33. Koronakos, G. (2019). A taxonomy and review of the network data envelopment analysis literature. In G. Tsihrintzis, M. Virvou, E. Sakkopoulos, & L. Jain (Eds.), Machine learning paradigms. Learning and analytics in intelligent systems (pp. 255-311). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15628-2_9 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  34. Kuosmanen, T. (2005). Measurement and analysis of eco-efficiency: An economist's perspective. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4), 15-18. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819805775248025 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  35. Łącka, I., & Brzezicki, Ł. (2021). The efficiency and productivity evaluation of national innovation sys- tems in Europe. European Research Studies Journal, 24(3), 471-496. https://doi.10.35808/ersj/2440 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  36. Leal Filho, W., Fritzen, B., Ruiz Vargas, V., Paço, A., Zhang, Q., Doni, F., Azul, A. M., Vasconcelos, C. R. P., Nikolaou, I. E., Skouloudis, A., Weresa, M. A., Marczewska, M., Price, E., Anholon, R., Rampasso, I., Quelhas, O., Salvia, A. L., Ozuyar, P. G., Moggi, S., & Wu, Y. J. (2021). Social innovation for sus- tainable development: Assessing current trends. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 29(4), 311-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2021.2013974 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  37. Li, H., Pang, S., Cao, Y., & Gao, J. (2021). Research on the evaluation of comprehensive efficiency of technological innovation and eco-environment in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 283, 124603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124603 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  38. Łozowicka, A. (2020). Evaluation of the efficiency of sustainable development policy implementation in selected EU member states using DEA. The ecological dimension. Sustainability, 12(1), 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010435 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  39. Madaleno, M., Moutinho, V., & Robaina, M. (2016). Economic and environmental assessment: EU cross-country. Efficiency ranking analysis. Energy Procedia, 106, 134-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.111 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  40. Mardani, A., Streimikiene, D., Balezentis, T., Saman, M. Z. M., Nor, K. M., & Khoshnava, S. M. (2018). Data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental economics: An overview of the state-of- the-art and recent development trends. Energies, 11(8), 2002. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11082002 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  41. Mariz, F. B., Almeida, M. R., & Aloise, D. (2018). A review of Dynamic Data Envelopment Analysis: state of the art and applications. International Transactions in Operational Research, 25(2), 469-505. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12468 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  42. Miola, A., & Schiltz, F. (2019). Measuring sustainable development goals performance: How to monitor policy action in the 2030 agenda implementation? Ecological Economics, 164, 106373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106373 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  43. Moutinho, V., & Madaleno, M. (2021a). A two-stage DEA model to evaluate the technical eco-efficiency indicator in the EU countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), 3038. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063038 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  44. Moutinho, V., & Madaleno, M. (2021b). Assessing eco-efficiency in Asian and African countries using stochastic frontier analysis. Energies, 14(4), 1168. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14041168 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  45. OECD. (2017). Green growth indicators 2017. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264268586-en OECD. (2021). Data. Retrieved August 12, 2021, from https://data.oecd.org/ otwiera się w nowej karcie
  46. Pais-Magalhães, V., Moutinho, V., & Marques, A. C. (2021). Scoring method of eco-efficiency using the DEA approach: Evidence from European waste sectors. Environment, Development and Sustain- ability, 23(7), 9726-9748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00709-x. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  47. Park, M. S., Bleischewitz, R., Han, K. J., Jang, E. K., & Joo, J. H. (2017). Eco-innovation indices as tool for measuring eco-innovation. Sustainability, 9(12), 2206. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122206 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  48. Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation-Eco-innovation research and contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  49. Sompolska-Rzechula, A., & Kurdyś-Kujawska, A. (2021). Towards understanding interactions between sustainable development goals: The role of climate-well-being linkages. Experience of EU countries. Energies, 14(7), 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14072025 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  50. Stanković, J., Marjanović, I., & Stojković, N. (2021). DEA Assessment of socio-economic development of European countries. Management. Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies, 26(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.7595/management.fon.2020.0012 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  51. Sustainable Development Solutions Network. (2021). Sustainable development report 2021. SDSN. Re- trieved September 2, 2021, from https://www.sdgindex.org/reports/ otwiera się w nowej karcie
  52. Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  53. Tone, K. (2004). Malmquist productivity index: Efficiency change over time. In W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, & J. Zhu (Eds.), International series in operations research & management science: Vol. 71. Handbook on data envelopment analysis (pp. 203-227). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7798-X_8 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  54. Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2009). Network DEA: A slacks-base measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(1), 243-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.027 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  55. Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2010). Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. Omega, 38(3-4), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2009.07.003 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  56. Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2014). Dynamic DEA with network structure: A slacks-based measure ap- proach. Omega, 42(1), 124-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.04.002 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  57. Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2017). The dynamic network DEA model. In K. Tone (Ed.), Advances in DEA theory and applications with extensions to forecasting models (pp. 74-84). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118946688.ch9 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  58. Tsaples, G., & Papathanasiou, J. (2021). Data envelopment analysis and the concept of sustainability: A review and analysis of the literature. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 138, 110664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110664 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  59. United Nations. (1992a). United Nations sustainable development. Agenda 21. Retrieved September 7, 2021, from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/outcomedocuments/agenda21 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  60. United Nations. (1992b). United Nations framework convention on climate change. FCCC/INFOR- MAL/84 GE.05-62220 (E) 200705. Retrieved September 10, 2021, from https://unfccc.int/resource/ docs/convkp/conveng.pdf otwiera się w nowej karcie
  61. United Nations. (2015a). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Geneva. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  62. United Nations. (2015b). Paris Agreement. Retrieved September 12, 2021, from https://unfccc.int/sites/ default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf otwiera się w nowej karcie
  63. United Nations. (2015c). Indicators and a monitoring framework for the sustainable development goals. Launching a data revolution for the SDGs. Retrieved September 17, 2021, from https://resources.un- sdsn.org/indicators-and-a-monitoring-framework-for-sustainable-development-goals-launching-a- data-revolution-for-the-sdgs otwiera się w nowej karcie
  64. Vanhercke, B., Spasova, S., & Fronteddu, B. (2021). Social policy in the European Union: State of play 2020. Facing the pandemic. European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) and European Social Observa- tory (OSE). Retrieved September 20, 2021, from https://www.etui.org/publications/social-policy- european-union-state-play-2020 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  65. World Bank. (2021). Indicators. Retrieved August 10, 2021, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator otwiera się w nowej karcie
  66. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2006). Eco-efficiency learning module. WBCSD. Retrieved September 12, 2021, from https://www.wbcsd.org/Projects/Education/Resources/Eco- efficiency-Learning-Module otwiera się w nowej karcie
  67. Yang, W.-C., Lu, W.-M., & Ramasamy, A. P. (2021). International environmental efficiency trends and the impact of the Paris Agreement. Energies, 14(15), 4503. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154503 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  68. Yu, S., Liu, J., & Li, L. (2020). Evaluating provincial eco-efficiency in China: An improved network data envelopment analysis model with undesirable output. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 6886-6903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06958-2 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  69. Zalasiewicz, J., Waters, C., & Head, M. J. (2017). Anthropocene: Its straigraphic basis. Nature, 541, 289. https://doi.org/10.1038/541289b otwiera się w nowej karcie
  70. Zhang, Y., Mao, Y., Jiao, L., Shuai, C., & Zhang, H. (2021). Eco-efficiency, eco-technology innovation and eco-well-being performance to improve global sustainable development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89, 106580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106580 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  71. Zhou, H., Yang, Y., Chen, Y., Zhu, J., & Shi, Y. (2021). DEA application in sustainability 1996-2019: The origins, development, and future directions. In C. Chen, Y. Chen, & V. Jayaraman (Eds.), Interna- tional series in operations research & management science: Vol. 301. Pursuing sustainability. OR/MS applications in sustainable design, manufacturing, logistics, and resource management (pp. 71-109). otwiera się w nowej karcie
  72. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58023-0_4 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  73. Kiani Mavi et al. (2019), Yang et al. (2021), Moutinho and Madaleno (2021a), Zhang et al. (2021), Li et al. (2021)
  74. Energy consumption Guo et al. (2017), Kiani Mavi et al. (2019), Łozowicka (2020), Yang et al. (2021), Li et al. (2021)
  75. Indicators of Eco-innovation Park et al. (2017), Kiani Mavi and Kiani Mavi (2021) SDG Grochová and Litzman (2021), Miola and Schiltz (2019), Sompolska- Rzechula and Kurdyś-Kujawska (2021), Cheba and Bąk (2021) Czechia 1.18 1.63 0.95 1.62 1.23 1.01 1.24 0.86 0.80 1.23 1.56 0.70 1.04 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.20
  76. G. m. 1.09 1.23 0.97 1.27 1.13 0.97 1.17 0.98 0.88 1.09 1.33 0.91 1.03 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.03 1.10 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  77. Note: MI -Malmquist Index; FS -Frontier-shift effect; CU -Catch-up effect; G. m. -Geometric mean; otwiera się w nowej karcie
  78. > 8 -2017->2018; 8 > 9 -2018->2019. otwiera się w nowej karcie
Weryfikacja:
Brak weryfikacji

wyświetlono 32 razy

Publikacje, które mogą cię zainteresować

The Efficiency and Productivity Evaluation of National Innovation Systems in Europe

2021

Economic growth, structural change and quality upgrading in New Member States

2009

The role of trade in intra industry productivity growth - the case of old and new European Union countries.

2013

Market Size, Competitiveness and Technological Frontier - the Impact of Trade Integration with the UE on Productivity in Polish Manufacturing Sectors

2011
Meta Tagi