Flavones in cocoa defence against Phytophthora megakarya - Publikacja - MOST Wiedzy

Wyszukiwarka

Flavones in cocoa defence against Phytophthora megakarya

Abstrakt

Cross-pollination of suitable genotypes and earlier selection of elite offspring using adequate plants-associated defence markers in plantlets leaves are decisive for development of T. cacao genotypes tolerant to black pods disease (BPD). T. cacao plantlets from manual cross-pollination of ♀SNK64 × ♂UPA143 were analyzed for their susceptibility to BPD using leaf disc test. Subsequently, leaves (healthy, wounded and wound+infected) of selected E9 (tolerant), E13 (moderate susceptible) and E32 (most susceptible) young hybrid genotypes from ♀SNK64 × ♂UPA143 were used for flavones analysis using a HPLC/LC/MS system. Leaf disc test showed 62.5% of the progeny with disease score rates lower than the mean value of both parents. About 79.17% and 20.83% of the progeny were lesser susceptible than the most susceptible parent (UPA143) and the tolerant parent (SNK64) respectively. Total flavones contents were abiotic and biotic stresses dependant. Under infection, tolerant hybrid genotype (E9) displayed the highest flavones contents, which might control tolerance to BPD. Individual flavones analysis revealed differential patterns depending on flavones, treatment and hybrid genotype. Luteolin rutinoside isomer (tR=12.5), isoorientin (tR=12.0) and apigenin-pentosyl-hexoside (tR=10.9) appeared to be characteristic of tolerant hybrid genotype (E9) during infection. Reversely, high content of Apigenin-hexoside (tR=10.1) and apigenin-hexoside (tR=11.6) might be associated to the susceptible hybrid genotypes (E13) and(E32). Hence, ♀SNK64 × ♂UPA143 could be used to develop hybrid genotypes tolerant to BPD. Pools of above flavones, reported here for the first time in T. cacao defence, might be useful markers to develop T. cacao hybrid genotypes tolerant to BPD.

Autorzy (7)

  • Zdjęcie użytkownika  Emile Minyaka

    Emile Minyaka

    • University of Douala, Cameroon Department of Biochemistry
  • Zdjęcie użytkownika  Claude Simo

    Claude Simo

    • University of Douala, Cameroon Department of Plant Biology
  • Zdjęcie użytkownika  Banen Madina

    Banen Madina

    • University of Douala, Cameroon Department of Biochemistry
  • Zdjęcie użytkownika  Piau Mouen

    Piau Mouen

    • University of Douala, Cameroon Department of Biochemistry
  • Zdjęcie użytkownika  Nicolas Niemenak

    Nicolas Niemenak

    • University of Yaounde I, Cameroon Department of Biological Sciences Higher Teacher’s Training
  • Zdjęcie użytkownika  Ndoumou Omokolo

    Ndoumou Omokolo

    • University of Yaounde I, Cameroon Department of Biological Sciences Higher Teacher’s Training

Cytuj jako

Pełna treść

pobierz publikację
pobrano 33 razy
Wersja publikacji
Accepted albo Published Version
Licencja
Creative Commons: CC-BY otwiera się w nowej karcie

Słowa kluczowe

Informacje szczegółowe

Kategoria:
Publikacja w czasopiśmie
Typ:
publikacja w in. zagranicznym czasopiśmie naukowym (tylko język obcy)
Opublikowano w:
Research & Reviews: Journal of Botanical Sciences nr 6, wydanie 3, strony 50 - 63,
ISSN: 2320-0189
Język:
angielski
Rok wydania:
2017
Opis bibliograficzny:
Minyaka E., Simo C., Kusznierewicz B., Madina B., Mouen P., Niemenak N., Omokolo N.. Flavones in cocoa defence against Phytophthora megakarya. Research & Reviews: Journal of Botanical Sciences, 2017, Vol. 6, iss. 3, s.50-63
Bibliografia: test
  1. Research & Reviews: Journal of Botanical Sciences e-ISSN:2320-0189 p-ISSN:2347-2308 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  2. by adjusting its physiology to buffer the effects of diseases [18]. In one hand, these resistance strategies, may include physical and/ or chemical barriers, mechanisms that rapidly clear infection and processes that limit the spread of damage within T. cacao (such as localized cell death). In other hand, tolerance often involves some degree of compensation for disease damage. Therefore, T. cacao might tolerate infection due BPD by increasing the chlorophyll concentration in leaves, delaying the senescence of infected tissues, and increasing the nutrient uptake [24]. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  3. This might indicate that, the above mention flavones could be considered as markers of tolerance to BPD in T. cacao. The stimulation of these flavones group can be due to the activation of jasmonic acid pathway during the development of different reactions of cocoa against P. megakarya [25]. In fact, in sorghum anthracnose resistance, Nicholson and Hammerschmidt [21] identified luteolin and apigenin as flavonoid phytoalexins. Additionally, in infection condition, luteolin rutinoside isomer (t R =12.5), isoorientin (t R =12.0) and apigenin-pentosyl-hexoside (t R =10.9) appeared to be present in tolerant hybrid genotype (E9) but, completely absent in moderate (E13) and high (E32) susceptible hybrid genotypes. Protective effect of isoorientin against pathogen in Linum usitatissimum was reported [26]. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  4. Antipathogenic properties of luteolin rutinoside isomer (t R =12.5), isoorientin (t R =12.0) and apigenin-pentosyl-hexoside (t R =10.9) may result, in part, from antioxidative properties of flavonoids. They may quench ROS (reactive oxygen species) generated both by the pathogens and the plant as a result of the infection [26]. They may also be directly involved in the inhibition of the pathogen's enzymes, especially those digesting the plant cell wall, by chelating metals required for their activity. These small secondary metabolites may also inhibit spore development and mycelium hyphae elongation [26]. Makoi and Ndakidemi [27] showed that, flavonoids inhibit root pathogens, especially fungal ones. In general, isoflavones, flavanes and flavanones were acknowledged as efficient anti-microbial agents [27]. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  5. Antipathogenic properties of luteolin rutinoside isomer (t R =12.5), isoorientin (t R =12.0) and apigenin-pentosyl-hexoside (t R =10.9) could be characteristic of tolerant T. cacao hybrid genotype during infection. Reversely high content in apigenin-hexoside (t R =10.1) and apigenin-hexoside (t R =11.6) appeared to be characteristic of susceptibility to BPD. Their contents increase from E9, E13 and E32 in untreated, wounded and wounded+infected leaves from young T. cacao hybrid genotypes plantlets. REFERENCES otwiera się w nowej karcie
  6. Tondje PR, et al. Bioassay of Geniculosporium species for Phytophthora megakarya biological control on cocoa pod husk pieces. African J Biotech. 2006;8:648-652.
  7. Pokou ND, et al. Levels of resistance to Phytophthora pod rot in cocoa accessions selected onfarm in Cote d'Ivoire. Crop Prot. 2008;27:302-309. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  8. Efombagn MIB, et al. Selection for resistance to Phytophthora pod rot of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) in Cameroon: Repeatability and reliability of screening tests and field observations. Crop Prot J. 2011;30:105-110. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  9. Nyadanu DR, et al. Host plant resistance to Phytophthora pod rot in cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.): the role of epicuticular wax on pod and leaf surfaces. Inter J Botany. 2012;8:13-21. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  10. Bowers JH, et al. The impact of plant disease on world chocolate production. Plant Health Prog. 2001. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  11. Akrofi AY, et al. Management of Phytophthora pod rot disease on cocoa farms in Ghana. Crop Prot. 2003;22:469-477. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  12. Hooks RRC and Johnson WM. Impact of agricultural diversification on the insect community of cruciferous crops. Crop Prot. 2003;22:223-238. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  13. Iwaro AD, et al. Usefulness of the detached pod test for assessment of cacao resistance to Phytophthora pod rot. Eur J Plant Path. 2005;113:173-182. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  14. Bohinc T and Trdan S. Trap crops for reducing damage caused by cabbage stink bugs (Eurydema spp.) amd flea beetles (Phyllotreta spp.) on white cabbage: Fact or fantasy. J Food Agri Envir. 2012;10(2):1365-1370. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  15. Tahi M, et al. Rapid screening of cocoa genotypes for field resistance to Phytophthora palmivora using leaves, twigs and roots. Eur J Plant Path. 2000;106:87-94. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  16. Nyassé S, et al. Early selection for resistance to Phytophthora megakarya in local and introduced cocoa varieties in Cameroon. Tropical Sci. 2003;43:96-102. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  17. Research & Reviews: Journal of Botanical Sciences e-ISSN:2320-0189 p-ISSN:2347-2308 otwiera się w nowej karcie
  18. Nyassé S, et al. Leaf inoculation as an early screening test for cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) resistance to Phytophthora black pod disease. Crop Prot. 1995;14:657-663. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  19. Tsukasa I and Goro K. Flavone and flavonol glycosides from the leaves of Triumfetta procumbens in Ryukyu Islands. Bull Natl Mus Nat Sci. 2012;38(2):63-67.
  20. Winkel-Shirley B. Biosynthesis of flavonoids and effects of stress. Cur Opin Plant Biol. 2002;5:218-223. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  21. Bradshaw HD Jr and Schemske DW. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc Nat Acad Sci. (USA). 2003;96:11910-11915.
  22. Martens S and Mithöfer A. Flavones and flavone synthases. Phytochem. 2005;66:2399 -2407. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  23. Blaha G and Lotodk R. A primary criterion for the selection of cocoa in Cameroon: Resistance to brown rot in pods. Variations in reactions to the disease in relation to ecological data and the physiological state of the fruits. Coffee Cocoa Tea. 1976;20(2):97-116. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  24. Efombagn MIB, et al. Phenotypic variation of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) on farms and in the gene bank in Cameroon. J Plant Breed Crop Sci. 2009;1:258-264. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  25. Yegang D, et al. Identification of flavone phytoalexins and a pathogen inducible flavone synthase II gene (SbFNSII) in sorghum. J Exp Bot. 2010;61(4):983-994.
  26. Lattanzio V, et al. Role of phenolics in the resistance mechanisms of plants against fungal pathogens and insects. Phytochemistry: Advances in Research. 2006;661:23-67.
  27. Nicholson RL and Hammerschmidt R. Phenolic compounds and their role in disease resistance. Ann Rev Phytopath. 1992;30:369-389. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  28. Liu B, et al. Preparing apigenin from leaves of Adinandranitida. Food Technol Biotechn. 2008;46(1):111-115.
  29. Nayaka HB, et al. Antibacterial attributes of Apigenin, isolated from Portulaca oleracea L. Int J Bacteriol. 2014;2014:1-8. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  30. Ueda M, et al. Molecular approach to the nyctinastic movement of the plant controlled by a biological clock. Int J Mol Sci. 2001;2:156-164. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  31. Boudjeko T, et al. Luteolin derivatives and heritability of resistance in the Theobroma cacao L. (Cacao)/Phytophthora megakarya Bra and Griff interaction. Aust Plant Path. 2007;36:56-61. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  32. Mierziak J, et al. Flavonoids as important molecules of plant interactions with the environment. Molecules. 2014;19:16240- 16265. otwiera się w nowej karcie
  33. Makoi HJR and Ndakidemi PA. Biological, ecological and agronomic significance of plant phenolic compounds in rhizosphere of the symbiotic legumes. Afr J Biotechnol. 2007;6:1358-1368.
Weryfikacja:
Politechnika Gdańska

wyświetlono 99 razy

Publikacje, które mogą cię zainteresować

Meta Tagi